<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;laws against unpaid internships are kind of silly&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c979</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:16:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c979</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Spoken like a true failure, one who did try to do something they thought would change the world, only to find out its actually really damn hard and alot of work to do so. <br />
<br />
Or you found out your "idea" wasnt worth what you thought it was in the free market and think its due to the mythical 1% that know your idea would "hurt them" <br />
<br />
I have noticed a tendency for all those that rail against the 1% (and like to sit and talk but not take any action, or wait for others to do the hard work on trying to change) are always some combination of the 2 and will not look back at their ownselves to find the fundimental flaw in their private failure. <br />
<br />
I suggest some self reflection is in order.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c425</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[G Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c425</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually it's better if the court finds against the business since then Leaseweb could (dependent on US qualified immunity rules) counter sue the DOJ. If the DOJ balk and carry on like the idiots they seem to be in this case then that will just show all business's that basically if the DOJ come knocking tell em to politely fuck off unless all warrants and liability structures for third parties at a crime scene are upheld.<br />
<br />
This is a lose-lose for DOJ though LeaseWeb are also culpable too here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c970</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btrussell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c970</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We don't want to block it. We wish to see how long it takes for someone who was caught cheating on his exam to actually get a job.<br />
<br />
Shall we discuss the merits of my assertion that you were caught cheating on your exam?<br />
<br />
*You are here all day everyday, obviously you have nothing better to do.<br />
<br />
*You infringe on copyright yet call everyone else "pirates."<br />
<br />
*You promise to leave the blog for a year if Mike would engage you. Mike did yet you are still here.<br />
<br />
You don't have any merit therefore merits cannot be discussed with you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: That's nice, but WE live in terminally predatory capitalism.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c266</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c266</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> But that era is over for us.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Not by a longshot. In fact, I would assert the exact opposite: this sort of thing is more true now than ever before in my lifetime.<br />
<br />
The revolution continues apace. That's why you see so much fighting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c963</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:11:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c963</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I was just curious as to how pro-content creator Mike took care of those creating content for him to monetize. No need to reveal the embarrassing specifics, I can read between the lines. Thanks for the response."<br />
<br />
Translation: I raised a point questioning paid vs. non-paid writers for this site, with the implication that they are all non-paid thus proving Mansick is a hypocrite in my world, and then when *multiple* of those same writers step up and verify they are, in fact, paid something, I hand-wave it away with a snide remark about "knowing better" than the actual people involved and move the goalposts of the argument to "oh yeah, how MUCH do you get paid?" and focus on that, pretending as if that was what I actually said from the start. Also, I criticize THIS site for the topics it covers, taking them to task for not covering "important" (as I define it) ideas and areas, but of course, I only do that HERE, and not, say, ANY OTHER FUCKING SITE ON THE INTERNET THAT COVERS WHATEVER TOPICS THEY COVER TOO. Needless to say, I am a completely useless lying fucktard shill who has no life and contributes nothing to anything and exist only to whine and cry and attack people who actually are successful with their lives. Since I am a failure, I have to punish everyone else for my lack of talent and ability.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prosecute or destroy?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c412</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[eaving]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:08:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c412</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At this point do we actually think the purpose of things was to prosecute Megaupload, or simply to destroy it?  Saying this all ended tomorrow and Dotcom got everything back it would still be a huge process to get Megaupload back on its feet.  I definitely think in that circumstance he could, but with his new Mega I am not sure he would bother even now.  With them continuing to drag their feet and keeping as much as they can in limbo it look every day more and more like they wish to simply bury something they cannot rightfully legally take down.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c390</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[G Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:07:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c390</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually it being a criminal case the prosecution has absolute control of all of the crime scene evidence.. If they allow it to be destroyed they have a major problem since that evidence could of held exculpatory evidence and therefore any inculpatory evidence they also hold BASED on that destroyed evidence they allowed vicariously to be destroyed is now unavailable to be used.. Well thats in a due process situation....this situation is far from due process]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c961</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:57:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c961</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't believe I provided enough lines to read between, but whatever.  By your tone I can tell you've come to the discussion with your own presuppositions and that nothing will assuage you of them.  It's been said it isn't what you think but how you think that's important.  I fear for you, as a result....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c374</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[madjo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:56:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c374</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, it was the hosting partner Leaseweb that deleted the material.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c371</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[madjo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:54:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c371</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Haven't you heard? You're now guilty until proven guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c940</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:53:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c940</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was just curious as to how pro-content creator Mike took care of those creating content for <i>him</i> to monetize. No need to reveal the embarrassing specifics, I can read between the lines. Thanks for the response.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:53:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[the DOJ does not have jurisdiction in the Netherlands...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c345</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:51:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c345</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You should re-read the article. DOJ destroyed evidence, not Dotcom.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c321</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:51:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c321</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why is it assumed that KDC should be on the hook for maintaing the evidence on the servers?<br />
<br />
Wasn't it "seized" by the DOJ? <br />
<br />
If my car is seized as evidence, how exactly would I be responsible for maintaining the integrity of it, since I don't have possession of it?<br />
<br />
Sounds like a typical fuckup at multiple levels (or par for the course when it comes to the DOJ).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>NSA</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:51:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Doesn't the NSA have a backup copy of the Megaupload servers?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Forget about Dotcom and the case for a moment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c301</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Zen Master]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:50:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c301</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Think about all the idi-I mean, poor souls who uploaded their child's baby pictures/wedding photos/personal files/etc to MegaUpload without backing them up locally! They just lost all of that because of LeaseWeb.<br />
<br />
...Actually, hold on for a second. <br />
<br />
Since LeaseWeb's deleted all the content from the servers, does that mean that the data on Carpathia is gone as well?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:48:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[First police beating up people for looking at them funny, then massive surveillance of the general public, now casual destruction of evidence that incriminates the government.<br />
<br />
When did we end up in a novel about a dystopian future?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Herd of jackasses</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c262</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[SolkeshNaranek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:47:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c262</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From the point of view of the DOJ, this is a God send.<br />
<br />
They (DOJ) currently look like a herd of brain dead jackasses with the way they have handled this case.<br />
<br />
Everything they have touched has gone straight down the tubes.<br />
<br />
If they file to dismiss the charges, it will only make them look even worse (if that is possible).<br />
<br />
By having the hosting provider delete possible exculpatory evidence, the entire proceeding is tainted thus warranting a dismissal.<br />
<br />
The case goes away for reasons beyond the control of the DOJ, letting them trumpet to the press how they would have convicted Kim, if not for the loss of evidence.<br />
<br />
This seems to be a big face saving win for the DOJ.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c320</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny L]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:45:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c320</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, the photo may not have been innocuous but still be justified. Let's say for example (I just made this one up) that a public figure denies knowing a particular organized crime boss. Then some investigative reporter photographs them both in bed together using a telephoto lens from across the street. That act would normally be a violation of the new law (and here intent matters - if your intention was to capture the building because you're interested in architecture it's not a violation but if your sole purpose was to catch them in the act you are), but since it can be deemed of public interest the photographer is not in violation of the law (but the publisher faces the risk of a libel law suit if he publishes, but that's another matter of course).<br />
<br />
It is still troublesome that it is the very ACT of photographing that is criminalised, not what they are later used for, which means that the photographer must be more aware when shooting - perhaps with little time to consider - rather than being able to contemplate the picture afterwards.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c247</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Zen Master]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:44:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c247</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And as I recall, the only reason that the DOJ was able to identify several infringing files (39ish? Can't remember for certain) and claim "HEY! MegaUpload's hosting infringing content! Send in ze marines!" was because those files were movies that had been submitted by the NinjaVideo group, which the DOJ was using as evidence. <br />
<br />
MU would've deleted the infringing files if the DOJ gave them the go-ahead (they were told all this through Carpathia), because the DOJ said "Don't do this or we'll charge you with tampering of evidence." So they kept them active and untouched, even after the NinjaVideo case ended, waiting for the green light from the DOJ to delete them. Instead, Megaupload gets taken down using those exact same files.<br />
<br />
Go figure.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>