<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c198</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:50:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c198</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright is solely concerned with infringement.  That's what copyright law is all about.  The whole basis of copyright law is to make it illegal for people to copy and distribute certain works under certain circumstances.  Anticircumvention laws are only about making it illegal for people to circumvent technical reasons why they can't copy, but it doesn't take into account that copyright law is only about stopping the copyring/distribution of certain works under certain circumstances.  Not all works and/or under all circumstances.  Anticircumvention stops all works under all circumstances.<br />
<br />
This isn't weakening copyright law; it's restricting copyright law to be just copyright law.  If there were a section of copyright law that dealt with embezzlement and a bill was proposed to remove it from copyright law to it's own section, would you call that a weakening of copyright law as well?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c196</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:50:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c196</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is irrelevant to my point. This would weaken copyright law. Mike's claim to the contrary is totally bogus. Can anyone refute my actual point?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c193</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:49:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c193</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You miss the point. Under the current law, it is illegal to circumvent certain access controls. This is so even if once circumvented, the person does not commit copyright infringement. Under the change that Mike supports, it won't be illegal to circumvent those same measures even if the person does not commit copyright infringement. Thus, the very same act that is currently illegal under copyright law would become legal under the proposed change. This is clearly a WEAKENING of copyright law; the rights held by copyright owners will be weakened. That Mike is pretending that it's not a weakening is priceless. I'm not saying that it's a good idea or a bad idea. I'm merely pointing out the irrefutable fact that this would weaken copyright law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: No more Fox for me...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c332</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[davnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:48:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c332</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's always some idiot who cares more about "being on TV" than the contents of some document they had to sign, didn't understand a single word of, and therefore didn't care. There'll always be fodder for such shows.<br />
.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:48:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AJ, it's obvious to anyone with half a brain that copyright is too restrictive and draconian. Why in the hell should works be tied up in this system for a hundred plus years? Who's benefiting from that arrangement? This is a huge reason why there's so little respect for copyright law.<br />
<br />
And it never should have been change to opt-out. Copyright as an opt-in system is the way was intended.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:45:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Anticircumvention is a different wrong than infringement</i><br />
<br />
Who said it should be wrong? The DRM lobby? Everyone else says it's not wrong. So this new proposal expresses the view of the public. And it should repeal the invalid law of the DRM lobby which was forced on the public previously.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Decentralized power</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c237</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:44:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c237</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Building plants that generate electricity that is then distributed across a power grid is both inefficient and locks people into a centralized system.<br />
<br />
It is better to create more location-based systems (for example, using solar to run individual housing units).<br />
<br />
Now, you could perhaps have nuclear plants in very isolated, safe areas that use that electricity to create hydrogen that would then power fuel cells.<br />
<br />
And perhaps some day there will be very small nuclear units that power homes or blocks.<br />
<br />
But replacing current oil or gas-fired power plants with nuclear power plants is both costly and less flexible than other options.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Responsibility</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c985</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zem]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:44:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c985</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["With the person who pulled the trigger"<br />
<br />
And here we see the other responsibility issue people refuse to take action about. It was done with a gun.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:43:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You've made the claim.  Now support it.  Let's say I'm infringing copyright law in some way that is illegal now but won't be if this bill is passed.  Now tell us, what am I doing?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c109</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:42:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c109</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[[q]Anticircumvention is a different wrong than infringement[/q]<br />
<br />
Who said it should be wrong? The DRM lobby? Everyone else says it's not wrong.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c710</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:41:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c710</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You understand that this is not spinning rust we're talking about?<br />
<br />
Right now we need to know the make and model of the cellphone and addon storage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Let 'em say what they want</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c323</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:41:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c323</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Truth isn't a defense to breach of contract, only to libel.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c300</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MissingFrame]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:40:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c300</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If it wasn't rigged it would be called a documentary.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c95</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:38:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c95</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You should reconsider your attitude, since there were people who were actually prosecuted based on this invalid law.<br />
<br />
Example: <a href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment_America_v._George_Hotz' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment_America_v._George_Hotz</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>these cops are guilty of Treason to the US and should be dealt with accordingly</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c708</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[known coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:37:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c708</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Everytime a cop abuses the law he is sworn to uphold, every time a public office holder takes a bribe, they are tearing down societies ability to believe in the truth and honesty of its officials.  These people are guilty of Treason against the government by their selfish and cowardly actions.  Everytime one of these things happens people trust their government less and less.  Believe their government less and less, and learn that their government is not for the people, but for the governing class.  Representatives of the people must be above reproach.  <br />
<br />
These people need to be tried and punished to the fullest extent of the law for their misconduct.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1038</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:36:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1038</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your comment is funnier this way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c92</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:35:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c92</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>This law fixes the old law.</i><br />
<br />
And it does so by WEAKENING copyright law, which is the ONLY reason why you support it. But, yeah, pretend like it doesn't weaken anything. Hilarious.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yet again, Mike can't find a lower bound.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1054</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:35:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1054</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry. Here's a working link to the video:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyoOfRog1EM' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyoOfRog1EM</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Justice</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1020</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:35:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1020</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He's worse than Nixon.  So was Bush.  The greatest trick the two party system every pulled was convincing the people there was a huge difference between them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c82</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:34:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c82</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>This doesn't "weaken" copyrights in any way.</i><br />
<br />
Wow, really? Of course it weakens copyright law--that's why you support it. Copyright law currently makes it illegal to circumvent certain technological measures. That is REGARDLESS of whether once circumvented, a person engages in copyright infringement. This would allow people to engage in circumvention, thus weakening the existing law that does not allow such circumvention. The only thing this does is weaken copyright law. And you would not support it otherwise. That you can't admit this is comical.<br />
<br />
<i>All it does is stop the absurd situation where you are found to "violate" copyright law despite not infringing on anyone's copyright.</i><br />
<br />
Why is that absurd? Anticircumvention is a different wrong than infringement. Copyright law is not only concerned about infringement.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>