<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c648</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:03:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c648</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[and if the cops really needed the video evidence for whatever reason they should have brought their own cameras and provided their own video evidence. That they failed is no one elses fault but their own. In fact, under these circumstances, it should have been their own responsibility to prove their innocence with their own cameras. They didn't meet that responsibility. They should be punished. <br />
<br />
They should separately pay for taking those cameras. The person whom the cameras was wrongfully taken from should be rewarded well. Do you know why? It will encourage more people to record the cops because, if they record the cops and the cameras are wrongfully taken, those making the recordings get rewarded. That is a good rule. Otherwise people will be discouraged from recording the cops knowing that they can get their cameras forcefully taken from them and not be compensated and accomplish nothing when the evidence is deleted. That's not a rule we want. The fact that these people had their cameras taken from them and should get compensation is independent on whether or not the cops are guilty of murder. Yes, the cops should be convicted of murder. But, separately, these people should be well compensated for having their cameras taken.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c636</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:57:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c636</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See, you're missing the point. The authorities should be held accountable for the cameras being wrongfully taken regardless of whether or not the cops are really guilty of the murder. They wrongfully took that footage and they should pay just for that, separately.<br />
<br />
They should be convicted of murder, yes, but that's a separate issue. They should separately be punished for the wrongful confiscation of (potential) evidence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c619</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:55:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c619</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By the way, you oughta slow down a mite, bud.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c606</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:54:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c606</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Their phones were wrongfully taken. The cops should personally be held accountable for that. No legal technicality can change that.<br />
<br />
But I suppose cops getting away with murder and the forceful and wrongful confiscation and destruction of evidence is OK. People like you will defend them.<br />
<br />
That's just the American way, isn't it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1320</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CDW]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:53:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1320</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Writing his song and expressing his political opinions are not crimes.  It is so sick and so ugly that these idiots arrested him.  His free speech is no one else's business, and this sick reactionary society needs to look in the mirror.  The US government murders children in Pakistan, Yemen, Afganistan...every day, so it is the federal house of horrors, and if you're offended by his song, then that was probably his point.  Or is all provocative art terrorism?  Start arresting the drag queens again too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c784</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:51:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c784</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"The Times lawyers specifically stated they would be okay with use of a different publication's content..."</i><br />
<br />
Wow, they've really taken the moral high road there. They're all pissy about someone building off their work, but don't care if you build off somebody <i>else's</i> work instead. Is this the copyright equivalent of NIMBY?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c584</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:48:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c584</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>What have they to gain here?</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Well, ain't they said they gonna sue?  <br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c672</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:35:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c672</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["You want any data related to you removed from google there is a button you can press to scrub yourself from their system. Otherwise if you don't want to give them access to the data you create you can feel free not to use their free services."<br />
<br />
Although on second read...I recall that one could do this but only if one is logged onto Google+...which means they are still tracking your every move and can target ads to you with the advertising companies they own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c149</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not an Electronic Rodent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:34:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c149</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>...just as soon as they come up with unbreakable DRM</blockquote>They did.... but then they couldn't work out how to get the content to play afterwards... /tongue in cheek]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c568</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:31:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c568</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In fact, going against the cops is more dangerous than siding with them. They have more to lose going against these violent cops if they did act unjustly because then they may attempt to retaliate. The witness's testimony against the cops benefits them little if they are telling the truth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not an Electronic Rodent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:31:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>"firewalls come with everything enabled, and you then have to figure out what to close down.</blockquote>To be fair to firewall manufacturers, he was (presumably) talking about "everything enabled" <i>outgoing</i> since I don't thik I've ever come across a firewall enabled <i>inbound</i> by default but he still has a point. <br />
<br />
Of course the reason they are that way is because then <i>some</i> level of security can be obtained by (and more importantly sales made to) those whos networking skills are at the "Um... firewalls... those are good, right?" level because anything else usually elicits a blank look and the question "What's a port and why do I need 80 of them?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c651</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:30:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c651</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you sure he's rambling, or are you being the blatant fanboy jackass that Wally knew would come to Google's defense.  He was even backed up by a user in the industry so I really think Wally knows more than you wish people to believe by your statement towards him.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090516/0820434902/dailydirt-commencement-speeches.shtml#c35</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:30:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090516/0820434902/dailydirt-commencement-speeches.shtml#c35</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you were to figure it out, I would recommend making the decision well before college graduation, by which I mean when you either decide not to go to college or when you choose your majors.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c563</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:29:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c563</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[(but they do have to lose, if it is proven they lied they can get in trouble. Nothing to gain, everything to lose, they are likely telling the truth).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c555</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:28:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c555</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why would they lie? What have they to gain here?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c111</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c111</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm ok with letting our brilliant programmers secure backdoors...just as soon as they come up with unbreakable DRM]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A plan for Prenda</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c649</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c649</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which would explain why letters dated the same date as the order, and hastily scanned crooked, were sent out from a firm that the state had already closed down...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c535</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c535</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Eye-witness testimony is notoriously sketchy. "<br />
<br />
I agree. Blue is missing the point. No one is ignoring eye witnesses completely but camera evidence would be nice. For that potential (and likely) evidence to be put into the hands of the very suspects of the crime (the police) before having a chance to escape and then for those suspects to show nothing (they failed to produce any footage from that confiscated evidence absolving them of guilt and they failed to provide us with their own footage) is outrageous and, to me, should presume guilt. As a rule we, as a society, should not make it advantageous for cops to wrongfully confiscate and destroy evidence and if these cops are not convicted here then we have made such a thing a rule. Future cops need to know that when they are suspect they can not confiscate evidence like this without first being able to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, their innocence (which they have failed) or else they will be presumed guilty. This is unacceptable. What happened here, in all likelihood, is that footage was taken and deleted and anything after coming from law enforcement and various investigations is a circus designed to coverup the truth. I'm not buying it. I want murder convictions just for the cameras being confiscated the way they were.  That should have never happened. and whoever confiscated those cameras need to be punished, severely.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Militarization</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1739</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silver Fang]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1739</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The police are being militarized in terms of equipment, clothing and weaponry and now even their attitude toward the citizens they are supposed to serve. They seem to view us the way US soldiers viewed the citizens of Baghdad when the US invaded Iraq ten years ago. How long before they are driving tanks through our neighborhoods?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c637</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c637</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where is this imaginary button?  Unless you're talking about the "Remove Search" or "do not save search" in the options menue Google provides...but then again those are only saved as cookies on YOUR computer so YOUR system is tracked even without that option.  The truth is that Google does not provide a magic button to users of their search engine to have their information on where they clicked stricken from Google's servers.<br />
<br />
3/4 of Google's revenu in 2010 came from advertising and less than 1/100 came from search technologies.   When you do the math, you start to realuze Google's priorities have shifted towards catering to advertisers rather than web users.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>