<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: It's not all about &quot;working&quot;, but about STATING MORALITY.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c362</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c362</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It worked for sodomy!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c261</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:21:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c261</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because before they internet and all the opportunities it presented came about, <b>it was</b>. <br />
<br />
Weren't signed with a label? No radio time, no presence in stores, nothing more than maybe playing local gigs, and since people had to know about you to be interested in listening to you, without a label that was pretty much as 'famous' as a musician could get, <i>and the labels knew, and took shameless advantage of, this.</i><br />
<br />
With the internet though, suddenly there <i>are</i> all sorts of new ways for artists to make a living, and best of all <i>without</i> having to sign over the rights to all to their stuff to the parasites in return for <i>maybe</i> getting rich and famous.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A decade ago, Yahoo was on top?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c237</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mason Wheeler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:21:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c237</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I remember 2003.  Back then, Google had already taken over the world of search, at the very least.  True, they didn't start building out the rest of their Internet empire until the next year, when Gmail launched, but in 2003 the writing was clearly on the wall and had been for a long time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: No, Mike, it's YOU who are &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c222</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:18:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c222</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The system DOES work, though I dislike MANY aspects of it, such as the star system that ridiculously rewards a few pretty faces while denying continuing income to the laborers who do the heavy lifting. -- Besides the fat cat gatekeepers."<br />
<br />
So...it doesn't work then. It isn't a fair system, therefore, it doesn't work in a context of Democracy, one of the pillars of which is equality.<br />
<br />
"Income limits are the obvious way, but that proven system doesn't fit into Mike's "libertarian" notions."<br />
<br />
I don't agree on income limits. I agree on spreading the wealth and rewarding people for their contribution. For example, in a corporation, the salary of the highest paid contributor should never be higher than X times the salary of the lowest paid contributor (X is to be defined). Want to get paid more, just start paying your workers more. Everyone wins in the end, I think.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>This is not really odd by the DOJ</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c844</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John William Nelson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:17:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c844</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This isn't odd.  Odd presumes the DOJ is prosecuting this case properly for the purpose of "bringing bad folks to justice."<br />
<br />
If you consider the reality that the DOJ took this case to disrupt MegaUpload at the behest of the copyright lobby, then it makes sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:17:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have another report vote for another rant that makes no sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c829</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:14:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c829</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More accurately you were leasing the car. Now what?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Orleans' spirit has fully recovered from Katrina.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c120</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:14:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c120</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>[no further comment required]</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Here's a Pirate Bay &quot;enabler&quot; who's been disintermediated from society!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:13:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://intellihub.com/2013/06/18/pirate-bay-founder-will-be-extradited-to-denmark/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://intellihub.com/2013/06/18/pirate-bay-founder-will-be-extradited-to-denmark/</a><br />
<br />
"Following a hacking-related trial in Sweden last month, Pirate Bay co-founder Gottfrid Svartholm is now expected to go through the same process in Denmark."<br />
<br />
I'll just jam it in as otherwise won't be brought up.<br />
<br />
Anyhoo, what occurred to me while reading that is that you KNOW intellectual property is a valid concept because those who own it take ACTION TO PROTECT IT. You may not like the action, but it's there. -- And you've certainly no obvious claim on someone else's intellectual property, so we establish that a) it's not yours, and b) the owners WILL protect it.<br />
<br />
Pirates just can't seem to grasp that they're not regarded as heroes by the larger society, just as little thieves. This guy wouldn't keep his paws off someone else's property, so now he's paying a price. Even I may not agree with the price, the ethics, and/or whether it's criminal, but at least I recognize that <i>leaving it alone</i> almost certainly won't land me in jail.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c812</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Automatic Grammatizator]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:08:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c812</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If there was nothing incriminating or illegal on the servers, then why was Megaupload shut down in the first place?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:06:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry, it's hard to ignore the hypocrisy dripping from Masnick. He talks about the hypocrisy of Fox with their pro-worker mantra, exploiting unpaid interns. Fair enough. Some how he manages to ignore that he's doing the same thing. He's making money on others work and not paying (or paying a pittance).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: No, Mike, it's YOU who are &quot;one-off&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c136</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:06:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c136</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fact free and wrong as usual I see.  <br />
<br />
Nigel]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c809</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:04:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c809</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>i dont understand. are these different from the carpathia servers? who is leaseweb, why have we never heard anything about them before?</i><br />
<br />
Megaupload used multiple hosting partners.  Carpathia was a US hosting firm. Leaseweb is Dutch, I believe.  They each hosted some parts of Mega, but not the whole thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c790</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:04:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c790</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They probably just know that the US is losing this case so far and our government acting as the MAFIAA's hired thugs in this case don't want property returned in usable condition.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>fixing the issue</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1096</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[troll hater]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:03:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1096</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Might I suggest not only hiding the reported comment but any comment in response to said reported comment, thus hiding the entire sordid threads created by the reported trolls.<br />
<br />
That would leave comments relative to the actual article easily readable for those who want relevance without the distraction of the troll comments and the comments to them, while still leaving the troll threads readable by expanding them for those so inclined.<br />
<br />
FTFY]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>No, Mike, it's YOU who are &quot;one-off&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:02:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'd thought that perhaps that was a one-off situation." -- WELL, college boy, yet again you find a HUGE gap between your notions and reality! Yet you continue to blunder along the same provedly wrong path. Quite the idealist.<br />
<br />
In fact, copyright works FINE every day for, oh, millions just in the US. And you never mention that, only focus on bad aspects. You need to go in with a lot of knowledge of how to not get ripped off, and a realistic assessment of your prospects, but that's true of ANY field. -- IF you were any kind of expert in the field, you could advise and be worth fees, but you're only a kibitzer who has to rely on T-shirt sales.<br />
<br />
The system DOES work, though I dislike MANY aspects of it, such as the star system that ridiculously rewards a few pretty faces while denying continuing income to the laborers who do the heavy lifting. -- Besides the fat cat gatekeepers. Income limits are the obvious way, but that proven system doesn't fit into Mike's "libertarian" notions.<br />
<br />
tl;dr. Blah, blah, right out of boilerplate, pejoratives, assertions, and complaint, NO concrete advice.<br />
<br />
This is basically just an attempt to tar and feather the OLD enablers so that NEW grifters can take their place.<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Take a loopy tour of <b>Techdirt.com!</b> You always end up same place!</i><br />
<a href='http://techdirt.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/</a><br />
Disintermediate Mike! He just gets between you and facts!<br />
Inspired by ACs at:<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/02014623044/politicians-car-dealers-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-buy-tesla-north-carolina.shtml#c34' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/02014623044/politicians-car-dealers-trying-to-make-it-illegal-to-buy-tesla-north-carolina.shtml#c34</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Backups</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c781</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:59:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c781</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If LeaseWeb didn't have backups nobody would ever lease space from them again.  This is conjecture, but informed conjecture: they repurposed the hard drives that they had had to keep idle waiting for the Megaupload situation to calm down.  They finally decided to just wipe them (has anyone stated how much data this represents?)<br />
<br />
If they were diligent they would have done a backup to tape before wiping them.  Alternatively, they could have just relied on their last backup.  I think it would be prudent for someone to make sure they locate those backups and keep them safe.<br />
<br />
The company I work for has 50TB+ of data that gets incrementally backed up each night, with a full backup each week; I would think LeaseWeb would be be engaging in something similar.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: So what's your precious Pandora EXCEPT gatekeeper?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c118</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:57:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c118</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have no idea what a gatekeeper is.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c110</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:57:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c110</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You really shouldn't speak of what you know nothing. Talking as if major labels were the only way for an act to make a living recording music is just profound ignorance of reality. Embarrassing post.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c1046</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:55:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c1046</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose someone has to say it. He's not working hard to censor. He's working hard to try and keep the most pathetic, bleating weepy creature I have ever heard on the net (OOTB, in case anyone is not clear about this) from throwing out even more totally misleading (understatement) information and "comments" (I use the word VERY loosely) that either have no bearing on the subject in hand or are just plain vindictive or venomous. It seems this nasty bit of work cannot comprehend the fact that everybody is openly laughing at his puerile efforts to get noticed and his resorting to infantile insults is the lowest of the low. Here's hoping OOTB suffers a nervous breakdown - and very soon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>