<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c768</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:54:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c768</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes... Aiding and abetting... Both of which require the act to be done with knowledge and intent, neither of which can you actually prove in this case. That is rather the point, I'd think. Completely outside the problems of illegally seized evidence and jurisdiction issues.<br />
<br />
The fact that you just out and out dismiss any counter arguments does not make you 'right.']]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Company Size</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:27:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Entrepreneurs are unable to develop their businesses beyond a certain stage as they lack exclusive rights to or control over their innovations.</blockquote><br />
Another reason for not scaling up is that they have enough income, and do now want to sell their company to a capitalist.<br />
Scaling up almost always result in the management, and then the workers being replaced. hat is why their are so many serial entrepreneurs. These are people who like running a small company, and hate corporate boardrooms with all their political infighting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c35</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:26:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c35</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike Masnick and Google just hate it when copyright law is enforced.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c766</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:19:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c766</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They may have created their own laws but other countries can ignore them, as most do apart from the few like the damn UK whihc will extradite people on an accusation with no proof of a crime being committed and where a crime is not against the law in the UK.<br />
<br />
I think it is seriously getting close to the need for a violent uprising by the people, lets do like France did and chop of their heads for their corrupt ways.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Free Speech</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c765</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:19:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c765</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Politicians hate people discussing politics in a public forum, it open them up to criticism. This is the sort of site they would like to shut down, by forcing site owners to not accept comments, or moderate every comment.<br />
Carried to is extreme, it would result in hosting providers moderating everything posted to sites that use their services.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>two can play the same game...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c746</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:13:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c746</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Websites are visited and gain more traffic not on the word of political activists which most attorney generals are but becasue their site is a cool place to visit and provides an environment to do what the visitor wants to do.<br />
<br />
It would hurt the attorney general more if a full page add was taken out claiming that the attorney general was corrupted into attacking a site than any advertisement against a business, especially if a few sites owners had to get together and attack them.<br />
<br />
Who is going to believe the AG when it is shown over and over again that they accept legal bribes and monies for themselves to use on whatever they want, where they receive paid holidays all the time to do attacks on others or to help pass laws. Seriously i don't think websites have any problem as long as they attack the AG where it hurts, in the press , with attacking their moral conduct in public , just as the AG has done and made acceptable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c21</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:05:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c21</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gnash, gnash, gnash. That sound is the noise of out_of_the_blue, furious that the evil general public corporations have kicked sand in the face of the glorious, righteous non-capitalist defenders of copyright. The moral horror!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c702</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:03:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c702</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["How exactly are you defining successful? Numbers?"<br />
<br />
Yes, isn't that how you define success for American movies? Are you now moving the goalposts because the results don't match your agenda, or are you going to finally give us an objective means to measure whether something is successful?<br />
<br />
"They're comically horrid."<br />
<br />
Sorry, your personal tastes don't matter when assessing the output of a foreign culture. Let me guess, you're one of those people who think that your personal taste dictates everything that should be made?<br />
<br />
They're certainly lower budget than American movies, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Most American output is crap, and there's enough people watching these things outside of India to demonstrate that there's a market even if you don't like them (e.g. Bollywood movies regularly break the top 10 in the UK, despite never being press screened or even shown outside of certain cities).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>First amendment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c721</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:53:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c721</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Davnel, the US Constitution only applies to government actions.  The 1st prohibits government restrictions on speech, but does not broadly apply to possible private restrictions.  A privately-owned mall, for example, can prohibit non-approved speech, including political speech.  Similarly, the 1st has no meaningful legal bearing on most moderation of on-line comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c2546</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:42:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c2546</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bit of tape, or folded paper as a lens cap fixes that problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c381</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:35:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c381</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>See the post that mike is so scared of that he's blocking IP addresses, keywords, and links...</i><br />
<br />
Umm....  Don't mean to burst your bubble but wouldn't that mean you wouldn't be able to post?  On my server, I would have marked your IP as spam long ago.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11570723510/is-encryption-effective-against-snooping-german-government-says-no-snowden-says-yes.shtml#c725</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eldakka]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:27:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11570723510/is-encryption-effective-against-snooping-german-government-says-no-snowden-says-yes.shtml#c725</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Unless the pad is re-used</blockquote><br />
<br />
Umm, then by definition it is no longer a one time pad. Therefore the security of a one-time pad is no longer applicable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c710</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:23:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c710</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Without restraint would be in public or on your own property.  Not other people's property as they have the right to remove it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>where's the camera?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c274</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:19:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c274</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i></i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c683</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:04:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c683</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How exactly are you defining successful? Numbers? Are you aware of what the population of India is?<br />
<br />
Go try watching a random current movie that's made there. They're comically horrid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c698</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:50:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c698</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, actually, it does no such thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: bout time</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c680</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:49:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c680</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You don't know what words mean.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Used Games</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1682</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:43:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1682</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I don't really think its a fair analogy here as we are not discussing material objects that physically degrade over time such as a house or car."<br />
<br />
Oh, really... what about a DVD, or a BluRay, or a CD, or a (well treated) Book then. A used game (on disc) degrades about the same, yet we don't have the MPAA, RIAA, or the Authours Guild trying to pull this shit with their physical products.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c704</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:41:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c704</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The United States is the government</i>.<br />
<br />
Or the <i>Ford Motor Company</i>. As in, what's good for them is good for America.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: So wait...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c693</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:39:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c693</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>And the <b>whistleblowers</b> are supposed to be the enemies of the country?</i><br />
<br />
Enemies of the <i>country</i>? No.<br />
<br />
Enemies of the <i>state</i>? Absolutely.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>