<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Then and Now</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11133123507/steve-wozniak-speaks-out-against-nsa-spying-this-is-not-my-america.shtml#c616</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon retentive]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:22:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11133123507/steve-wozniak-speaks-out-against-nsa-spying-this-is-not-my-america.shtml#c616</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As I recall, Woz's first products were "blue" boxes built to rip off telephone calls.  Giving talented youth a reason and opportunity  to build up their society in spite of their youthful trajectories has it's manifest benefit:  I expect that Apple Inc would not exist had Woz lived in the modern America.  Either a jail term and branding as a cyber-terrorist, or software patents that only protect the status quo would likely have pushed the nascent tech giant to quit or become a vassal of HP/IBM/etc.   The outcome of that conjecture is a much poorer world where our smaller economic pie is horded by the few, a path I think we are well along now.<br />
<br />
This nation has been taught to be timid and fear ourselves, it is not the home of the brave anymore.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The only problem with digital only...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1696</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:21:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1696</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, but what a lot of the industry thinking is that they ignore that people have bandwidth and usage caps, so anythinig they have to download is bad enough, but if your game with its 'always on built-in DLC' (Diablo III, I'm looking at you) will chew through your available amounts for no actual benefit, like a lot of these 'innovations'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c784</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:21:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c784</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because the latest hollywood "masterpieces" aren't comically horrid, propagandist, simplistic eyecandy movies. /s<br />
<br />
Also, larger population do not necessary mean larger market for movies, at least not in a linear relationship like ootb suggested below.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:20:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's ok.<br />
<br />
It's not like by the year 2016 there is any chance that there will have been any technology changes in the internet that would make this program irrelevant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c774</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:16:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c774</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And a Temple of Doom and a bullwhip!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c755</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:15:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c755</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hadn't noticed Bollywood having any issues getting into international markets where there is a strong Indian sub-continental presence - Bollywood films aren't too hard to find here in the UK, for instance, albeit I'm sure that's only a fraction of the output.<br />
<br />
And any country producing such gems as 'Jersey Shore' cannot possibly complain about the local output of any other country!<br />
<br />
Disclaimer: I know the UK has 'The Only Way Is Essex' (TOWIE).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Had a think about it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:11:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You missed a major class:<br />
<br />
Those who want content but cannot get it by legal means, leaving piracy or do without as the only option.<br />
<br />
The content industry is very good at creating this cklass by regional releases, and withdrawing content from streaming sites when it is about to be broadcast on TV, cable or satellite.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c93</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violated]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:11:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c93</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good news indeed.<br />
<br />
The Internet is under attack on a global front where no matter in which country they strike we should always stand shoulder to shoulder with our brothers and sisters to strike down such bad legislation.<br />
<br />
We cannot allow the Internet to be harmed by those organization aiming to make a land-grab for control.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/02053123505/dick-cheneys-crystal-ball-says-that-nsa-surveillance-could-have-stopped-911.shtml#c1557</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[terry_allen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:09:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/02053123505/dick-cheneys-crystal-ball-says-that-nsa-surveillance-could-have-stopped-911.shtml#c1557</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know, I've always thought that it just didn't make sense that Valerie Plame's husband was the intended target of her outing.  I mean, this is Dick Cheney!  If he wanted, he could simply arrange to have the guy found in bed, naked, drunk, with an entire Girl Scout troop as his only visible companions.  And the only way he can get back at this guy is to intentionally blow his wife's cover?  No, sorry, can't buy it.<br />
<br />
What I <i>can</i> buy, though, is the idea that Valerie Plame herself -- who was, after all, working independently to answer that vital question of where the WMDs were in Iraq, or if they existed at all -- might have been the real problem for Cheney, and the real target.  A CIA agent loses a lot of her effectiveness once everybody in the world knows she's a CIA agent.  All Cheney had to do was figure out a quasi-legal way to get the information to the media.<br />
<br />
And there you are, another whistleblower dealt with.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c739</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:04:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c739</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you are telling me that they'll behave and never look at data without a warrant despite it being readily available. Right.<br />
<br />
Then they say 9/11 could have been avoided if they had all that data. How do both statements fit together? The only possible way they could look at the data if available would be to have a court warrant which means they'd need to argue that there's a probable cause and this could only be done by normal police work which would have raised some data first.<br />
<br />
Providing a warrant is given, the telcos store metadata as what was collected for a good while thus making such preemptive surveillance completely unnecessary. Their own arguments kill each other.<br />
<br />
No really, just a peek.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c744</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:04:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c744</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, but when you compare the average income in India with the US, plus what percentage of the population have access to movies, I suspect that Bollywood can only do better in its current format.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c724</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:03:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c724</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The same could be said of a lot of US output.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c779</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:01:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c779</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Judging by the amount of times you inanely spam each and every thread irrelevantly, not in the slightest. Obviously youe man-crush isn't returned, and you are beneath notice.<br />
<br />
The only downside to your obsession is that I may stop bothering to show pinked-out comments and miss some of OotB's slightly more lucid rants.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c778</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:00:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c778</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c759</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:59:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c759</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ooo, Paulbot spam as well as AJ-froth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c737</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:58:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c737</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, I think it's moved beyond crush and well into stalking.<br />
<br />
Aren't there some kind of cyberbullying laws that can be thrown at this clown? Because this very much sounds like self-admitted bullying to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>I hope he is wrong</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c297</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:57:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c297</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>I think the American public can accept the fact if you tell them that every time you pick up the phone, it</em>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c716</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c716</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because maybe it's idiotic spam. "Because he's scared of you" is a wild guess which is about as accurate as claims of WMDs in Iraq.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Of course...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Androgynous Cowherd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>What makes that particularly ridiculous, is that the pioneer of the three-strikes approach, France, is clearly backing away from it. For the UK to plough on with an outdated and discredited scheme regardless, is just farcical.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Of <i>course</i> it's farcical -- that's the UK's specialty! :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c942</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:54:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c942</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry, who got censored where in this story?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>