<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Too many thieves and pirates break ANY business model.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1075</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:10:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1075</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i><b>This rebuttal brought to you by your <i>friends</i> at the RIAA. Because we know what you really want, and we're going to take it from you anyway, so you might as well submit without resistance.</b></i><br />
<br />
<i>"And yet they magically expect some third party, who has no idea if the content was put up in an authorized manner or not to make that determination for them?"</i><br />
<br />
That is correct.  Magic is the "in" thing at the RIAA these days.  Our magic is decorated with the faces of dead presidents, which makes it more powerful than your magic.  By definition.  Get used to it.<br />
<br />
<i>"Really?"</i><br />
<br />
Yes.<br />
<br />
<i>"Do they not realize (or not care) what a massive chilling effect that would have on innovation?"</i><br />
<br />
We absolutely realize what a massive chilling effect that would have on innovation.  Since innovation is the enemy of our <i>Dead-Hand-of-the-Past</i>(tm) business model, creating chilling effects that stifle innovation and creativity is the exact objective of our actions.  Making a few adjustments to your general and (freedom of) speech-related liberties, and those of the world's population at large, is a desirable concomitant benefit.  But that's another topic for a different context.  Nothing to see here.  Move along.<br />
<br />
<i>"If service providers are required to proactively guess at what is infringing and what's not -- and face liability for guessing wrong -- then the obvious is going to happen: a lot less innovation in any service that includes user generated content."</i><br />
<br />
What's wrong with that?  That's the desired outcome of our actions. Jamming a stick in the spokes of the wheels of progress for our own personal enrichment (as well as that of our cronies) is the reason we exist.<br />
<br />
<i>"The risk of liability would be way too high."</i><br />
<br />
Exactly!  It's magic!<br />
<br />
<i>"That may not matter to the RIAA, who has never been a fan of the internet, but it sure as hell matters to the public, who has received tremendous value from the internet."</i><br />
<br />
The "public?"  Get real!  What relevance could the needs and desires of the "public" <i>possibly</i> have?!  This is <i>our</i> playground you're talking about!  We make the rules here!  Because we have magic (decorated with the faces of dead presidents)!<br />
<br />
<i>"I'd also imagine it matters quite a bit to tons of musicians who are not a part of the RIAA machine, who now use the internet to have a better career than they ever had under the old system."</i><br />
<br />
Who are <i>those</i> delusional fools?  They don't deserve our <i>Munificence-In-Exchange-For-Your-Soul</i>(tm) anyway.  If <i><b>any</b></i> musician draws breath, it's only at our sufferance!  (Also, due to the complexities of calculating how much our members are owed by their unrecouped slaves, we prefer to measure quantities of musicians numerically, rather than by global net weight.)<br />
<br />
<i><b>The RIAA now returns you to your regularly-scheduled programming.  Remember: We have the magic (decorated with the faces of dead presidents); you do not.</b></i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A nice sentiment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12122823187/guy-sues-twitter-taking-away-his-twitter-handle.shtml#c32</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:09:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12122823187/guy-sues-twitter-taking-away-his-twitter-handle.shtml#c32</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Not liking something that a company does isn't a reason to sue."<br />
<br />
You must live in a different America than I do. These days, this is the *only* reason to sue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>French news agency?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c371</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:08:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c371</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Would this be one of those French news agencies that thinks search engines owe them a living for sending readers their way?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c362</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:05:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c362</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is the difference between the RIAA and the MPAA just a nuance?  Seems like a rather minor difference.<br />
<br />
What about the difference between Righthaven and Prenda?<br />
<br />
What about the difference between Righthaven and the RIAA?<br />
<br />
The difference between Prenda and the MPAA?<br />
<br />
It's all just nuances I tell you!<br />
<br />
Oh, and who owns that video that four major Hollywood studios are taking down?  The ownership is just a nuance I tell you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Steal... sharing... all the same at Techdirt.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c338</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:02:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c338</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No matter how many times you repeat a lie does not make it true.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Just another politician.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c419</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:00:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c419</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The problem is with the debt problem, the government doesn't make the paper money, the banks do.  (Fractional Reserve Lending)<br />
<br />
In order to fix the debt problem, the banks can't be allowed to do FRL anymore and the government has to set how much money gets made every year with strict guidelines.<br />
<br />
Of course, there's more to it, but that's the basic gist of it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12122823187/guy-sues-twitter-taking-away-his-twitter-handle.shtml#c12</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Mood Trolling]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:59:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12122823187/guy-sues-twitter-taking-away-his-twitter-handle.shtml#c12</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If not liking something a company does was reason to sue, OOTB, Bob, and AJ would be filing one a day to keep the reality away.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c515</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:57:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c515</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>while fearing for her life she didn't</i></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c269</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:57:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c269</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That electricity thing? That's actually theft. Think twice before you plug into someone's exterior power outlets.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: don't forget</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:56:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"As for his health, Brett's condition is stable (i.e. good), and is looking forward to hanging with all of his friends down in Grenada."</i><br />
<br />
FWIW, one can be in "stable (i.e. good)" condition with cancer, and still have a huge amount of medical expenses -- including ongoing drug regimen and regular expensive checkups.<br />
<br />
So, I don't think that statement disproves anything in the filing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oh no, don't throw me in the brier patch!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1063</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:56:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1063</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Since no one but the copyright holder can know what is and is not authorized, but they want everyone to take down content that even might be infringing anyway, that would mean that everything would have to be taken down.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Yes, that <i>that's exactly what they want</i>.<br />
<br />
They *want* links gone, so that they can control who gets to promote music.<br />
They *want* reviews and previews gone, so they can control what you see before you buy.<br />
They *want* Youtube gone, so that everybody has to go to Veho to view music videso.<br />
They *want* Apple and Amazon gone, so that everybody has to go back to record stores.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>if they had their presence(and profits) on the net essentially disappear overnight it wouldn't take too long before they'd start thinking that maybe a more moderate approach</blockquote><br />
<br />
No, their presence wouldn't disappear because they have distribution monopoly, but <b>everybody else's presence would</b>, which is exactly what they want.<br />
<br />
Piracy is a straw-man.  What they want is for *everybody else* to stop competing with them.  Moving from "the internet is a communications medium" to "the internet is a broadcast-only medium" would fuck everybody except them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Too many thieves and pirates break ANY business model.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1047</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:52:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1047</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I do think copying and sharing "someone else's" content <i><b>is</b></i> moral. In fact, sharing content is morally superior to hoarding it to leverage it for profit. I also don't ascribe any ownership to any content I might produce because it's not really mine, it's built on the common wealth of culture that belongs to every thinking being in existence. It's not mine nor any other person's property. Everything I have, or will, personally publish is, as far as I'm concerned, automatically part of the public domain. I'm not so stupid to think that I can make money by going against human nature's compulsion to share knowledge and culture. I know that if what I do is worth paying for, I can get paid for doing it. It's called being paid for <i>labor</i>. Idiots like you want to get paid for a product that doesn't exist. And what of the content I produce? It's advertising for my value as a content creator, so that people may know what I'm able to provide them. Content I publish isn't what's valuable, <i><b>I'm</b></i> what's valuable. If there is no me, there is no content created by me.<br />
<br />
So, I have no fears about people sharing content I create because I will never support my income on that platform.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c343</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trails]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:51:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c343</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This, times 80 million bazillion.  He's in a tough spot, how many people in similar situations did he nuke?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c335</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:50:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c335</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry but as much as I fell Gibbs that he got over his battle with Cancer, I have to throw some serious side eye at his claims of poverty. Didn't he just finish coming back from his Honeymoon?<br />
<br />
Gibbs was a huge part of the Prenda Team, he hired the council in the Sunlust case and Gibbs in the case before Judge Wright is the one who asked to have Judge Wright removed from this case for "Bias".<br />
<br />
Gibbs was a long time partner of this scheme and I used the word "scheme" lightly.<br />
<br />
Gibbs should have to pay his share of the order for costs. Gibbs could have walked a long time ago when he knew what was going on with Prenda and their litigation tactics, but he chose to stay till the very end.<br />
<br />
Now Gibbs is supposedly not with Prenda anymore, but yet he still has e-mail addresses at Prenda related ended entities.<br />
<br />
I don't but that Gibbs is totally out of the Prenda machine. I am more than wary that most of Team Prenda lawyered up before Judge Wright's hearing, and the Gibbs did as well.<br />
<br />
For a broke guy Gibbs sure can afford someone to represent him. Another rpoint of contention was that when Mark Lutz was all of a sudden the master CEO of these holding companies, why was Brent Gibbs listed as their corporate lawyer AFTER order to show cause was brought down?<br />
<br />
In one of the California cases, there was a request for Prenda or AF Holdings to put up a 45k bond, and Prenda complained to the court that it couldn't afford that bond and would not put a bond up, Gibbs was the lawyer in that case complaining about the bond.<br />
<br />
Sorry but I see Gibbs and everyone else with Team Prenda trying the poverty angle. Sorry Gibbs, your health may have been ravaged at one time by cancer, but you are and were more than just a hired gun in this little conspiracy, your place in these lawsuits goes quite deep and your were part of this for YEARS!!<br />
<br />
Gibbs is not as innocent as he claims and he deserves his share of this order for the 81k. Gibbs was also and has been listed in the documents as the lawyer for the Class Action Settlement Objectors suits.<br />
<br />
Gibbs was the lawyer in the Class Action Settlement Objector Suit letter that said for 30k we will drop our objection to this settlement.<br />
<br />
That 30k letter in that case was the one that the Lawyer handling that settlement sent a letter back to Gibbs stating he was in violation of the rules and could be seen as what it was. <br />
<br />
As a matter of fact that letter was filed with the court and  Gibbs was the author of a response letter back to the lawyer handing the settlement, where he told the other lawyer he was being unprofessional and launched a little attack in it.<br />
<br />
Sound familiar? That is the Prenda Modus Operandi. Gibbs is far from a victim in all this and his participation in the Class Action Settlement Objectors game shows that he has been more than a willing participant in the copyright lawsuits and the class action objectors suits.<br />
<br />
Sorry Gibbs, better get that chequebook handy!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c509</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:50:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c509</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>A California cop who was being video recorded by a smartphone said she was in fear for her life because the phone could have possibly been a gun</blockquote><br />
<br />
And yet while fearing for her life she didn't attempt to protect herself or the public she is sworn to protect by drawing her firearm.... Interesting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>on the topic of hitler quotes</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c704</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:50:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c704</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[May as well compete, seeing as it was brought up.<br />
<br />
IF we are going to apply Hitler quotes to a political side in America... Who do you think seems more Hitler-ish ?<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>The "right wing Hitler" quotes seem sorta right wing'y to me.</b><br />
inb4 some wrongly use inference to conclude I am a blind left winger.<br />
It's not a two sided, black/white thing. Something Hitler knew and used as propaganda to make people believe it was a two sided issue.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote> <br />
"The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands..."<br />
 <i>-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, pp. 180-181.</i><br />
 <br />
<br />
"In political matters feeling often decides more correctly than reason."<br />
 <i>-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 173</i><br />
<br />
<br />
"All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be."<br />
 <i>-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 180</i><br />
<br />
<br />
"But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."<br />
 <i>-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 184</i><br />
<br />
<br />
"It is a mistake to make propaganda many-sided, like scientific instruction, for instance... As soon as you sacrifice this slogan and try to be many-sided, the effect will piddle away, for the crowd can neither digest nor retain the material offered."<br />
 <i>-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, pp. 180-181</i><br />
<br />
<br />
"[Propaganda] must be aimed at the emotions and only to a very limited degree at the so-called intellect... The art of propaganda lies in understanding the emotional ideas of the great masses and finding, through a psychologically correct form, the way to the attention and thence to the heart of the broad masses."<br />
 <i>-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, pp. 180</i><br />
<br />
<br />
"[Propaganda] does not have multiple shadings; it has a positive and a negative; love or hate, right or wrong, truth or lie, never half this way and half that way</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hockyball!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c323</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:49:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c323</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A famous hockyball player claims to have the greatest number of homedowns in a single quarter. News at 26 o'clock.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c497</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[weneedhelp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:49:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c497</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bluff... Absolutely. In a heartbeat. At the very least it will make them think twice if they think they cant destroy the evidence. Illegal to lie to a cop during an investigation? Most likely.(obstruction) Ill take the lie, get to keep my video, accept those charges, and have an accurate account of what happened. Rather than getting my video deleted and having no other evidence than He said and I said.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>That's rough</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c332</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CTVic]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:49:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c332</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's a tough break, man.  But you'd think that after putting yourself <i>Fifty Grand</i> in debt in pursuit of a legal education, you may have shown up to class on the days that the professors lectured on moral turpitude, fraud, RICO and settlement scams.<br />
<br />
Glad I'm not in your shoes, Gibbs.  Big debt and a tough financial situation <i>really</i> suck, but I think we just found a good motivation for engaging in shady legal practices.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1036</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:49:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1036</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So the way to fight piracy is through enforcement of the law by the government and the way to fight government corruption is through enforcement of the law by the government?<br />
<br />
Yeah, brilliant analogy. You totally got me there.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>