<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c833</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:32:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c833</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>You should learn what fair use means.</b><br />
<br />
Yes, you should.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c871</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:31:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c871</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There are chemical solvents for many plastics, they're used for things like shaping plastic objects and welding things together all without use of heat.  Splash a little on and the plastic goes soft like taffy.  You can easily deliver them with a squirt gun, so long as the gun is made of a plastic the solvent has no effect on.<br />
 <br />
Good luck trying to fly when your rotor strut is flopping around like a rubber band...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:30:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>I'm sure some will argue that this is just a "paywall," but it's actually the opposite of that. </b><br />
<br />
It reads more like a failwall to me.  It seems to be going against the basic grain, once again hoping a few people will pay to entertain the masses.  This one is a little worse, because it appears that those who do pay will be nothing more than those who don't pay and just pick the content up online for free.<br />
<br />
It's nice to see someone trying to tackle the issues at hand, but I think perhaps Jack Conte confuses his personal success with one that can be rolled out and essentially franchised.  He does well personally because he has the secret sauce ingredient in her personality that allows him to connect with people in ways most never can.  That is what makes his things work.  I don't know if that ability can be translated into this sort of system.  It really requires people to get past certain boundaries to really personally like an artist and basically to pay for others to enjoy them.  That is a hard sell.<br />
<br />
My feeling is that this will be a short term success (as all the anti-label types around sites like Techdirt) clamber to be patrons, but over time, donor fatigue sets in and the process slowly dies off.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c294</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:29:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c294</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[""Let's forgive indiscretions of the past" says the guy who mentions the Boston Strangler in conjunction to Jack Valenti whenever the opportunity arises"<br />
<br />
The deliberate public statements made by a mature adult in direct relation to his employment showing how clueless he was about his own industry are somewhat different to some dumb crap a teenager does that ends up online without his permission, don't you think?<br />
<br />
"I admire your optimism that people will do the right thing. We all live in a small town now where everyone knows what you did and what you're doing."<br />
<br />
I believe the point of the article was "we can't effectively erase things from the internet, so it's down to society to accept that these things happen when people are young and adjust opinions accordingly". Ultimately, everyone growing up in the fully online era is going to have things like this in their history. So, it's in everyone's best interests not to judge, say, a 30 year old based on something online from when he was 12. It might take a while, but that's definitely a more achievable goal than erasing a person's entire history from the internet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's not that hard</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c854</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:28:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c854</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Silly string infused with a stronger polymer.  That will bring down a drone nicely.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Interesting question</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c830</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:28:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c830</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems to me that the common sense answer would be that if you're directly above someone's land, but lower than the roof of a building on that land, you're clearly trespassing.<br />
 <br />
If you're higher than the buildings, you're in the public highway.<br />
 <br />
Of course, even if you're in the public highway, you might still be liable in the event of a noise complaint or for being a peeping tom.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: A few corrections</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c923</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:23:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c923</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, you have no facts, just a fantasy where you paint yourselves as the victims and ignore people who actually pay for music? You won't answer the realities of the market (tough shit, I pay for my Spotify subscription, not the]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Unlimited Talk</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c259</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josef Anvil]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:22:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c259</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is why they are full of shit.   They offer unlimited talk on a plan with a data cap.  <br />
<br />
Newsflash.  They run an IP network.  Translation: voice, video, and data are ALL broken down into packets and transmitted across the network.   So why is voice unlimited unless you use a chat app?  <br />
<br />
Because they have learned that the sheep will accept a data cap because data appears to be different to the user.  Nope it's all data.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c235</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:18:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c235</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just download an autotune plug in and do it like a pro!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:17:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Only a few people laugh compared to the hundreds that agree with him. Please escort OOTB back to your mental institute as I think he's had another aneurysm.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c474</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:17:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c474</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>EFF are the most rabid piracy apologists in the nation.</em><br />
<br />
The EFF are not, and have never been, piracy apologists, much less "rabid" piracy apologists.<br />
<br />
It's exactly like calling the ACLU "Nazi apologists" because they fought for the right to free speech in Skokie, or calling them "Communist apologists" because they fought the Palmer raids.<br />
<br />
Anyone who says something this ridiculous shows that they have a radical agenda against free speech and public rights. So, again, thanks for clearing that up.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c919</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:14:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c919</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That perjury clause is a real problem.  If you did check whether you or your company owned the intellectual property you're taking down, and you don't own it but take it down anyway, that's perjury.  But it's also perjury to claim you checked when you didn't even if the IP turns out to truly be yours.<br />
 <br />
Perjury is a federal crime, with a 5 year prison sentence attached.  Given how many false takedowns happen and how many are automated, it's astounding that people aren't going to prison over this.<br />
 <br />
A private citizen perjures himself once and rarely gets acquitted.  You can even get convicted of lying to the feds because the FBI wrote down something untrue about what you said to them.  But if an organization engages in a criminal conspiracy to commit perjury hundreds of thousands of times...nobody in the government cares.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: whatever</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c221</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:14:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c221</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How do you know how long it took?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Pirate the Beatles, Upload Crap of Your Own... Awesome...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c220</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:14:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c220</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Double facepalm!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c19</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Brown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:11:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c19</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bring it on!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c916</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:08:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c916</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Each individual incident of perjury carries a rusk if going to federal prison for up to five years if convicted.<br />
 <br />
At some level, there must be someone who said "I don't care how many false positives this program creates, we're using it anyway."<br />
 <br />
Assuming 0.1% of all automated DMCA takedowns are false, if you send out one hundred of thousand automated takedowns that person who approved the program could go to prison for 500 years.<br />
 <br />
Do people seriously not realize what danger they're in when they act in bad faith under penalty of perjury?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nice</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c18</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:07:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c18</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While I have some minor doubts about the success of this platform in the long-term (mostly for reasons having nothing to do with the platform itself), it's excellent to see more of these business models actually making it to the marketplace.<br />
<br />
Every single attempt is a benefit to artists, even if (God forbid) the attempt is unsuccessful. The worst that will happen is that it will lead to attempts that succeed. The best that will happen is that it will succeed, artists will have a platform that actually benefits them directly, and the public will benefit from artists' successes without having to sacrifice any of their freedoms.<br />
<br />
Whether this particular platform succeeds or fails, it's a win-win proposition for everyone, artists and the public alike.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Pirate the Beatles, Upload Crap of Your Own... Awesome...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c211</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:57:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c211</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[*Whooosh*<br />
What was that sound? Right, the point flying over your head..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>we can download as we have already paid?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c190</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:42:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c190</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[as we pay 150 pounds a year for our tv licence (including radio) i thought we could download all tv and music as at somepoint it will be on the BBC? /s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1345</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:42:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1345</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[With the notable difference that people would feel guilty for kicking the puppy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>