<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: average_joe</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c601</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Turing Institute]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:18:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c601</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Congratulations average_joe! Based on your logical fallacies, your countless attempts to debate "Mike", and your furious backpedaling on the current topic, the Institute has determined that you are not now, or ever have been, an artificial intelligence.  <br />
<br />
Further analysis indicates you are either: a meat puppet for Big Copyright, or a gerbil.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c597</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keroberos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:15:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c597</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How does this weaken copyright? How does engaging in non-infringing uses have anything at all to do with copyright? This is the most idiotic argument I've heard on this subject. Non-infringing use of copyrighted material was always legal before the DMCA. Everything that was infringing and therefore illegal under the copyright laws from before the DMCA, will still be illegal if this passes. Everything that was infringing and therefore illegal under the copyright laws from after the DMCA, will still be illegal if this passes. What changes? Nothing, other than your masters loose some control that they shouldn't have had in the first place.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c408</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Applegate]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c408</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good Bye Nutella<br />
<br />
Hello "Kroger Hazelnut Chocolate Spread"<br />
<br />
Or I will just make my own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1060</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Applegate]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1060</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>"if the listener takes offense to sexually related speech for any reason, no matter how irrationally or unreasonably, the speaker may be punished."</blockquote>Hey DOJ, DoEd, I am offended by your mandate, who gets to determine your punishment?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Your Post</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c1247</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donull]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c1247</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Very good post. <br />
<br />
I could read your blog all day. Intelligent, witty, &amp;c.<br />
<br />
Thank you,<br />
<br />
dc]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c594</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c594</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sony can kiss my arse.  I shall continue ignoring their shit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1023</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1023</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given how much Grossman is ridiculed for his thesis, perhaps musicians in particular and people in general should abandon the belief in the phrase 'Music has charms to soothe the savage breast' ?<br />
<br />
Advertisers spend millions to convince people to buy anything from sugared water to sexy unmentionables because they and their target audience believe those messages, subtle and not so subtle, works. How much did those Stupor Bowl ad spots cost? It is possible to persuade people to buy and to soothe their rage, but impossible to provoke passion and persuade to kill?<br />
<br />
There is no comparison between the military and violent entertainment games. Grossman made clear those distinctions in his articles and two books: On Killing and On Combat. Both of which am willing to bet none of his critics here have read. On Killing is on the Marine Corps Commandant required reading list.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c387</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OldMugwump]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c387</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why do people always cave immediately when they get a baseless C&amp;D letter? And then complain publicly about it?<br />
<br />
Why don't any of them simply say "Ha - you have no case. See you in court, asshole."?<br />
<br />
I don't get why people are so easily cowed.<br />
<br />
(BTW, I can't stand Nutella either.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c569</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rhodes]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:12:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c569</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Me rooting my phone takes rights away from copyright holders?<br />
<br />
Explain.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c563</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:11:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c563</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree 100%.  My point above was simply that even if it were to exist, it shouldn't be part of title 17 of the US Code.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c540</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:11:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c540</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And so what is the problem with changing the law to remove making certain appropriate behaviors from being challenged via tort?<br />
<br />
The argument about weakening or not weakening is a red herring.  Either you believe that circumventing protections to use a product you purchased should be allowed or you don't.  If you don't, then why, or what would you propose instead of this law to ensure people aren't the target of inappropriate torts?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c521</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:10:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c521</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>That AJ is pretending I said something I didn't, and then going on one of his trademarked temper tantrums, is priceless.</i><br />
<br />
Cute, but let's stick to the merits. What did you mean by "copyrights," then? And please address my point and explain whether you agree that this will indeed weaken copyright holders' rights. Thanks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c503</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:10:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c503</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If we added murder to copyright law does that mean murdering someone is an infringement of copyrights also?  It doesn't belong there.  You can debate about whether it should be a law, but it doesn't belong in copyright law.  It is being used by all sorts of entities that have nothing to do with copyrights.  It can be used to lock up non-copyrighted works, or even non-works (such as hardware).  It is not a copyright law, so it's removal either from title 17 or from law altogether in no way weakens copyright law.  That some copyright holders were able to use it is no different than that copyright holders are also protected by murder laws.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: HEY, TIMMY, don't forget the illegal WARS:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c997</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MissingFrame]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:08:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c997</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I guess all those other countries in the Genocide Convention are a bunch of pansies that's why the U.S. has to bring the arsenal and take out the assholes themselves. Why even have a Convention if the U.S. is going to be the sole provider of World Policing?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Put up or shut up.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c481</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:08:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c481</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Read Mike's post again.  As usual, you have misunderstood what he wrote.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c465</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:07:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c465</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The fact that someone called section 1201 of DMCA part of the copyright law doesn't make it really related to copyright in any way.<br />
<br />
Circumvention of DRM has nothing to do with copyright in itself. It might affect copyright, it might not. It's like saying that usage of wheels should be regulated by criminal law, since robbers use cars to rob banks (Cory Doctorow's analogy).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c464</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:07:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c464</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I said it doesn't weaken *copyrights*. I said nothing about the law. It changes the law, but it does not weaken anyone's copyrights.</i><br />
<br />
What do you mean by "copyrights"? And are you admitting that this does weaken copyright holders rights?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c460</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:05:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c460</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you're talking about a case where someone has done nothing wrong except assert their fair use rights?  Copyright has never been about stopping all forms of copyring and distribution.  The antircircumvention clause tried to add that, and did so in such a way as to end run around fair use, and to include all sorts of circumstances where copyrights weren't involved at all.  That's why the DMCA is cited by printer manufacturers and why it prevents unlocking phones.  Those issues have nothing to do with copyright.  The anticircumvention clause was misplaced in copyright law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Put up or shut up.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c448</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c448</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Read my posts. I've said the same thing several times now. Sorry if you're not understanding my point.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c445</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c445</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure that GeoHotz bought his PS3 and all the games he played on it too.  And he begged publicly that his Linux fix not be used to further piracy.  Didn't stop Sony from trying to ruin his life.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>