Apple Continues To Scream To The World How Competitive Samsung's Tablet Is By Getting It Banned In Australia

from the what-are-they-missing dept

Honestly, I'm at a loss to explain Apple's patent lawsuits against Samsung, which seem mainly targeted at the company's Galaxy Tab 10.1 product, which competes directly with the iPad. Having spent time with both devices, I can say that they're certainly competitive. The hardware is pretty similar, but Apple's software is still miles ahead on the tablet form-factor, though I'm sure Android will at least start to get better now that more tablets are on the market. But, really, all Apple has done with this lawsuit is to signal to the world (loudly) that hey, we're really freaking scared that Samsung has built a better product than we have.

The latest in the worldwide legal fight is that Apple has convinced Australia to block the sale of the device in that country, while it reviews some of Apple's more ridiculous patent claims -- such as for "slide to unlock," "pinch-to-zoom," and... for the "edge bounce" feature that happens when you hit the "bottom" or "top" of a document. Seriously, Apple? Get over it. People copy design elements all the time. Apple has done it as well. And the end result is everyone works hard to make a great new product. Going after Samsung for making a quality competitor just looks petty. Go compete in the marketplace.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    JayTee (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 1:20am

    Pinch zoom sucks

    I personally hate pinch zooming, it's okay at best but its never particularly accurate, zooming in is fine but trying to return to 100% is often tricky. Why are they fighting over such a mediocre feature?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 1:43am

      Re: Pinch zoom sucks

      Donít use it, then. Stick to one finger, if two fingers is too much for you.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Qritiqal (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 5:24am

      Re: Pinch zoom sucks

      You don't pinch to get back to 100%, you double-tap (just like in Zombieland).

      On that note, I'm surprised Apple didn't sue the makers of Zombieland for using the term double-tap!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        JEDIDIAH, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 2:44pm

        Re: Re: Pinch zoom sucks

        > On that note, I'm surprised Apple didn't
        > sue the makers of Zombieland for using the
        > term double-tap!

        There's prior art and that prior art was originated by people who know how to use guns and explosives.

        Disney backed down on trademarking Seal Team 6 too.

        Angry Seal? A whole platoon of them? No thanks.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Prisoner 201, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 1:20am

    Why do you hate businesses that just want to watch the money roll in and not bother with all the "competing" stuff?

    Why do you want honest Americans to lose their jobs, just because their product is inferior?

    Can't consumers just stop demanding more and more and, you know, just be happy with what they got for a change?

    Is it so hard to just, you know, keep paying for the same old stuff?

    Is it so hard to support the American honest hard-working single mom supporting peace loving patriotic CEOs that need that new yacht to be truly happy?

    Is it?

    And if it is, I must ask you, Mike, why are you Hitler?

    Well, wich way is it, Mike? Are you with Apple, or are you Hitler?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Sean T Henry (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:24am

      Re:

      Are you forgetting Hitler had Volkswagen created as a car "for the people" not to copy others and sue/bar the sale of other cars in other countries when they do the same.

      So Prisoner 201 are you for the people or for limiting the peoples choice.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      aikiwolfie (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 2:46pm

      Re:

      Hitler advocated men should have at least three wives. Doesn't seem so bad unless you were wearing beer goggles when you chose them.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dave, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 2:30am

    Wait, what?

    As of May this year, Apple had 82. Of the tablet marketshare. Samsung had 4%.

    Why, exactly, would that scare them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jeff, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 2:57am

    This confirms what I have been saying for years.

    Apple hates... HATES competition. They will almost do whatever it takes to remove competition.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am

    I'm beginning to wonder if the actions of Apple as a corporation have become a direct extension of Steve Jobs attitude towards life in general.

    A former employer of mine once said: "A fish stinks from the head down." -that has stuck with me all my life.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Just John (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 4:31am

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am

      AC, it is just an extension of Jobs now.

      I am in the industry, working on competition, so I watch Apple constantly.

      If you watch Jobs public comments, you will notice he can be particularly rude to anyone or anything that competes with his "magical" devices.

      I admit, they built Sheraton Eco-system around the product, which is why they do good, but they miss fundamentals that Android addresses.

      I have a choice, in form factor, size, price, quality, etc. that you do not have with Apple.

      I have a choice in how I interface with my device, while Apple forces you to use their itunes, like it or not.

      See, Apple, from all current approached I see lately, is no longer trying to give the customer what they want, but instead is trying to tell the customer what they can buy.

      Now that they see that the customer does not always agree with this, they are instead going after those who *gasp* give the customers a choice.

      To me, it all stinks of technological tyranny.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Just John (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 4:44am

        sorry for the typos

        Sorry for the typos, I was typing this on my Android Phone.

        I admit, they built a great eco-system around the product*

        Futher notes, please check how Jobs denounced flash player, then after Android announced and started putting flash player in their system, Apple suddenly changed it's stance.

        Guess people still showed that they would rather buy what they wanted, not what they were told to get.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Ed C., Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 4:44am

        Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am

        "To me, it all stinks of technological tyranny."

        Apple has flirted with that for quite a while now. I think the best statement of the Apple market was "you can have any color of turtleneck you want, as long as it's black."

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Sean T Henry (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:30am

          Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am

          "you can have any color of turtleneck you want, as long as it's black."

          *Disclaimer - Turtleneck is only compatible with the iWasher and iDryCleaners, failure to comply results in spontaneous combustion.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Ninja (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 10:29am

          Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am

          I use the term Nazi to describe Apple. And like the Nazi had beautiful and tidy command centers Apple also cares about the appearance ;)

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        JackSombra (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:37am

        Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am

        "See, Apple, from all current approached I see lately, is no longer trying to give the customer what they want, but instead is trying to tell the customer what they can buy."
        There is no "current" to this way of doing things, it is how apple have always acted.

        Just sometimes what they tell the customer they want is actually what customer wanted (knowingly or not) and apple profited greatly, especially if their competitors took a long time to catch up (decent looking desktops, portable music players, smart phones)

        But, just as many times they get it really wrong (but never admit it or change direction) and even when they get it right their competitors have learned to catch up fast (large part due to Android).

        No serious ipod competitor ever appeared
        Took years for a serious iphone competitor to appear (and many now surpass it technically)
        Only took about 6 months for multiple ipad competitors to appear and would say in about 6 more months many will be surpassing it

        Apples undisputed "tech king" title that it has had for roughly the last 4 years is past it's peak and the only direction for it now is down

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btr1701 (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 12:43pm

      Re:

      > A former employer of mine once said:
      > "A fish stinks from the head down."

      That's cute, except it doesn't. A fish stinks all over, equally.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Jeff Seale (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 4:30am

      Re:

      ...and if that attitude has led to his health problems? Hmmmmm?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John Doe, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 4:05am

    Apple has stopped innovating

    It seems that Apple has stopped innovating. A friend of mine who drank the apple juice says this as well. Google, with Android, has put out a superior product that has already surpassed Apple in the smartphone market and now Apple is afraid that is going to happen in the tablet market. With Apple's current strategy of litigation over innovation, Android will soon surpass iOS in the tablet market as well.

    Its too bad Apple is stuck defending their stalled development and walled garden rather than continuing to innovate. It seems maybe they are out of ideas.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Rene, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 5:14am

    Apple vs. Google

    This lawsuit is not against Samsung but against Google. Apple warned Google about introducing multitouch features in Android, and now is just doing what promised; clearly they start from the most successful product, which happens to be Galaxy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:53am

      Re: Apple vs. Google

      Apple warned Google about introducing multitouch features in Android, and now is just doing what promised; clearly they start from the most successful product, which happens to be Galaxy.

      Er... I'll admit I've not been following this that closely so no idea what patents are being contested, but how does Apple claim to have any kind of multi-touch patent in general or even specifically for pinch-zoom?

      Surely things like Microsoft Surface pre-date iPhone and have the same functionality? Or is the patent system perhaps so broken as to allow that "doing exactly the same thing on a little device instead of a big one" is innovative enough to warrant a patent?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        JEDIDIAH, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 2:52pm

        Re: Re: Apple vs. Google

        Perhaps "pinch zoom" is just one of those trivial patents that doesn't really have any inventiveness to it. The industry is hip deep in those. They seem to come out any time someone wants to Patent Troll some competitor.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Just John (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 9:42pm

      Re: Apple vs. Google

      @Rene,

      Actually, it is not Apple Vs. Google, well, not directly.
      I think Apple might be afraid of going after Google because they could potentially loose, as well as having Google retaliate (via removal of permissions to use their Google products, which Google also actively supports on Apple devices).

      I think you need to get more familiar with the industry before you make a blanket statement about it.

      Google created the OS, they are not selling anything.
      Even their Nexus line, which is the official Google line, is created by other companies, marketed by other companies, sold by other companies, and maintained by other companies (HTC and Samsung for phone, Sony for TV).

      And as for "Apple warning Google about introducing multitouch features in Android", I would like you to please show me where you got this information, because given that I actually work with Google in my company (I am in fact the primary point of contact between my company and Google, so know lots of juicy details), I watch any news that happens on these fronts, and I have not yet seen this particular warning.

      Now, people, quit telling us about all the phones and tablets Google makes... It just makes you look silly (Didn't I hear this somewhere before???? They only make an Open Source OS, not a single phone or tablet...).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Rene (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 3:24am

        Re: Re: Apple vs. Google

        Please be so kind and google for info; there are many articles starting from 2009:
        http://www.edibleapple.com/apple-asked-google-not-to-use-multi-touch-in-android/

        and one year later:
        http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/02/apple-google-multi-touch-android/

        And unfortunately for Android, Google does lack the IP negotiation power Apple has.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Just John (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 3:47am

          Re: Re: Re: Apple vs. Google

          Well color me pickled, it appears you are right. But for future reference, please don't bother asking me to look up a claim you make, instead just show people where your claim came from. I try to do that when I make bold statements. Sorry, I will not be a witness against myself for your claim. I may be an idiot, but you have to prove it.

          Now second, I never claimed they Google has more IP power, I said Apple is not going after them directly. That could very well change in the future. So this is still not Apple vs. Google, it is Apple vs. those who dare to use Android (not the one who makes it). Apples and oranges, not Apples and Googles.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    pbarker (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 5:58am

    Mafia, er , Italian Americans v Apple

    The constant use by Apple of the term "double-tap" evokes negative stereotypes of professional assassins - so called "Mafia Hit Men".

    The entire Italian American community should rise up and demand that Apple stop using this racist term. Perhaps Johnny Cochran can file a class action lawsuit against Apple?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Matt (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 11:34am

      Re: Mafia, er , Italian Americans v Apple

      I doubt Cochran will be filing anything. Look it up.

      The "Italian-American" thing bothers me. Stick to gangster stereotypes, instead of ethnic ones. I know it was funny in your head, but there are some who are rightly sensitive to being lumped in with criminals and their supporters just because of where their parents were born.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NullOp, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:04am

    Remember...

    Remember those salad-days of youth sitting in the college classroom listening to the professor talking about free markets and how competition makes everything better? Ahhh... Little did we know it was all a dream and real companies never want to compete they just want monopoly and will lie, cheat and steal to get it. They'll even manipulate governments. Geez we were young....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Amit G, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:14am

    Re: Apple has stopped innovating

    @Vincent Clement: Apple did not innovate over the air updates. My first generation PalmPre and now my Android phone are able to do it. My Android phone asks, if I want updates only when I am in wifi or do not care. So to say that Apple is being innovative because of that is just WRONG!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nicedoggy, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:15am

    I think Jobs is thinking about second chances when he screwed up with the APPLE II, which sold for almost 30 years and became a legend among geeks everywhere, but was beaten by IBM that put out an open platform(i.e. the PC) to counter Apple.

    Now history repeats itself and the iPhone is being sunk by another open platform.

    So what do the guy do?
    Close everything and start doing the same crap that eroded Apple's market in the 80's again, but with gusto this time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      John Doe, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 12:08pm

      Re:

      This is exactly what I have been telling people. He didn't learn his lesson the first time so will be doomed to repeat his own history.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:34am

    This is going to turn very ugly

    I predict this patent nuclear war is going to turn very ugly.

    In the past, companies have asked the ITC to seize and destroy competitors' patent infringing products. Basically they are saying, "I want to destroy your business".

    Now that Apple has actually pulled the trigger on getting a successful product banned in a developed country, expect the other shoe to drop.

    Other competitors are not just going to sit back and do nothing.

    They probably cannot "collude". But I'm sure they all know how they can act, in their own (eg, own shareholders') interest, to dog pile onto Apple.

    I predict this is going to turn very ugly indeed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 6:37am

      Re: This is going to turn very ugly

      HTC bought S3. S3 has lots of patents on graphics. HTC has already made noises about Macintosh infringing on S3 patents.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Brendan (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 10:38am

        Re: Re: This is going to turn very ugly

        This makes things worse, not better.

        Its the same saying its ok that north korea just built a hundred more nukes because we build two hundred. Somebody eventually has to ask why we need to build any at all...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          DannyB (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 7:59am

          Re: Re: Re: This is going to turn very ugly

          I agree with you, but . . .

          HTC is being attacked by Apple. Furthermore as this article is about, Apple has gotten a competitor's Android device banned in an entire country. Possibly for years.

          That's a nuclear strike. I don't expect HTC not to exploit its S3 patents to try to get all Mac's impounded and destroyed.

          Obviously it would be best if all software patents went away. And I hope they do. I hope those patents that Apple/Microsoft/et.all just paid $4+ billion for go up in a puff of smoke.

          But software patents now have to go away in multiple countries.

          So until our mutual fantasy of a world without software patents happens, the patent arms race will continue. But it now an active live fire exchange. It will get ugly. The reasons why are clear. Offense calls for defense. Strike calls for counterstrike.

          Oh, and I would also like world peace.
          And a pony too please.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      John Doe, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:17am

      Re: This is going to turn very ugly

      Frankly I wish we would get a patent nuclear war. If every company in the technology space would sue everyone possible and seek ITC injunctions against competitors products, we might see an end to this nonsense. Once they have all nuked themselves to extinction, maybe then we will see real innovation and evolution.

      The remnant of the surviving companies will crawl out of their bunkers like amoebas from the swamp. Patents will be reformed and/or peace treaties forged. They will start to divide & multiply. Eventually they will walk upright, use tools and discover fire. Finally, they will grow a brain and use it to create new things. A new age of civility will dawn and we will be in technological nirvana.

      Nah, could never happen.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        DannyB (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 8:09am

        Re: Re: This is going to turn very ugly

        Actually, I think the very best thing that could possibly happen would be if the ITC granted every software patent releated request to impound and destroy competitors products.

        The best way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it. Sad but true.

        Let me tell you a story about 20 years ago. (I was then a devoted Mac developer.) Motorola and Intel were suing/countersuing over microprocessor technology patents (x86 vs 68000). I don't know who started it. Both parties had requested injunctions on sale of competitors product. The judge granted both! Guess what? The VERY NEXT BUSINESS DAY both parties had settled out of court. Imagine that!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Shawn (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:23am

    I do not think Apple is afraid

    I do not even think they believe they will be able to STOP samsung. They are playing Mario Cart and are way out in front dropping bombs, oil slicks and koopa shells at the companies behind them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:25am

    I'm a patent noob, so I have to ask; I thought patents were for the implementation of an idea, not the idea itself, while copyrights protect written ideas?

    For example, say I'm the inventor/CEO of Swype. Can I patent Swype's function of dragging your finger over a virtual keyboard as an alternate way of tap-typing? I would think not, although I could copyright the code (i.e. the specific implementation of that feature).

    Assuming Samsung/HTC/Google didn't directly take the algorithms that Apple invented and copyrighted, couldn't they create their own implementation of pinch-to-zoom and slide-to-unlock? Or is Apple a special case?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Matt (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 11:49am

      Re:

      Close. Patents protect inventions, whether or not they are ever implemented. There must be an invention (not just a bare idea,) but it need not ever actually be implemented, even in prototype, provided you can demonstrate that it is novel and non-obvious, and that it can be done by someone sufficiently skilled in the art without further invention. Far and away the best way to demonstrate this last is to implement it.

      Few patents are actually implemented in the marketplace. The inventor may try and fail, or may never be able to actually get any production financed, or both inventor and the PTO may be wrong about the patentability of the invention.

      Copyrights protect expressions. In the case of written expression, like the code, they protect that code and can often be stretched to cover other, substantially similar code. Modern copyrights also protect the expression from derivative works - works based even loosely on the protected expression. The expression may not live only in the code - it may also live in the "look and feel" of the software. It does not live in the functional elements, although companies have found success convincing courts to read that protection into the copyright law.

      In the US, patents can protect novel, nonobvious business methods. That can allow the patents to protect ways of doing things. Also, a patent can protect a tablet computer with particular functionality, including the functionality to interpret particular signals or responds to particular inputs in a particular way. Patent maximalists would likely argue that such a patent is no different from a patent protecting a mousetrap that responds to tugs on the bait tray as a signal to close the trap.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      freak (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 11:54am

      Re:

      I'm not clear on the details, but no one else is answering you.

      I believe you can patent gestures made with devices, or even just the human body.

      Which is why when I search to verify this piece of information, I find a lot of posts about apple's gesture patents . . .

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        DannyB (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 8:14am

        Re: Re:

        I bet Palm OS (now owned by HP) has a lot of gesture related patents going back to the early 1990's. (Can you say palm graffiti?)

        HP is trying to get a product (Web OS) into a crowded market against competitors (iOS/Android) who are way ahead, and a competitor who is way behind (Win Phone 7).

        Wanna bet HP will get into this patent fight at some point?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:31am

    Miles ahead! really?

    >>Apple's software is still miles ahead on the tablet form-factor, though I'm sure Android will at least start to get better now that more tablets are on the market.

    Most people assume this to be true, but it simply is not. Apple's 3rd party app base may be miles ahead of Android's, but their OS is arguably inferior to android--certainly not "miles ahead."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Robert P (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:31am

    Apple's not scared

    I don't think Apple is signaling that they're scared with this patent lawsuit. I think they're signaling that they have boat loads of money and are using it to hinder competition as much as possible.

    After all, when you have more money than the government (Right Mike? :) ) you might as well use it to make sure you keep raking it in.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 8:17am

      Re: Apple's not scared

      > signaling that they have boat loads of money
      > and are using it to hinder competition as much
      > as possible

      Isn't that what made Microsoft evil?

      Tactics and strategy may have been different, but that's only because Microsoft didn't have patent 'nuclear' weapons and had to use 'conventional' anti competitive weapons of the day.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ed (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:01am

    I've seen this behavior before...

    Apple is the new SCO.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Vincent Clement (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 10:39am

      Re: I've seen this behavior before...

      Except that SCO was a sinking ship. Apple is hardly sinking. And if it was, it has enough cash to carry it through a decade or two of losses.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Scott, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:10am

    Funny thing is all you Apple Haters don't see or even understand that Samsung Stole Apples IP while manufacturing displays and chips for them, now all the Android blind can say how evil Apple is but facts are that Samsung stole and infringed on Apples Patents and is using thier desings, "This is not in dispute, Samsung said To bad"

    Now put it this way, if you spent 10 years designing and spending billions in R&D like Apple did, would you defend it or let some idiot steal it from you and wath them steal everything you designed and worked for for all those years.

    Now if any of you said let them steal my designs and let them use it as they wish. You are fools and lying to cover your irrational thinking.

    See its so easy to spot a Apple hater or fanboy of different products, they make statements like this Rant blog with no understanding of the truth or reason behind the action.

    And if you had been real interested, you would see that Apple is being sued more then they sue.

    So that blows holes in all your Apple is evil theory.

    This is the worst put together B.S. Blog I have ever read, Mike just shows how uneducated about the facts he is and how far he will go for a click bait Rant.

    Mike, your a fool if you believe all that bull you wrote, and your a fool, Apple has already gotten the courts to see they had been violated, but no you won't report that will you.

    Idiot.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Amit G, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:40am

      Re:

      So you are saying that if HP or Google takes Apple to court for using over the air updates, your all for it?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      JEDIDIAH, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:00pm

      Of course you hate your would be kidnapper.

      Your blithering about lame patents is irrelevant.

      Apple isn't providing what people want. When others choose to, Apple responds with dirty tricks rather than improving their own product.

      This is the exact opposite of liberty and a free market.

      Apple should be free to do their own thing. Just don't force the rest of us to put up with their crap.

      When I buy a Samsung product, it's for all of the reasons why it is quite unlike an Apple product.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Just John (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:35pm

      Re:

      @ Scott

      I love how you throw in ad hominem arguments to show your point, decrying "Apple Hater" or "Fanboy", then ending with labeling Mike an "idiot".

      Goes far in making your point.

      I'm not mad though, of course, I'm not Mike either.

      I have spent enough time in this industry, working on tablet projects based around Android, that I know your arguments are a fallicy.

      Fallacy 1: Innovation - Apple has not "innovated" anything, as almost everything they have done can be found in other, previous systems. The entire drag to move was implemented in almost any off page scrolling technique. Don't believe me? Look at any web browser, they use a "Bar" to drag the system. The difference is, as found in Windows Mobile, it doesn't work well, so the next step was to make the entire thing one big "bar", aka, drag the entire page, not just the smaller "bar". As an engineering background, this is not a novel idea, and has been used repeatedly. Just because I managed to get my piece of paper through the system first does not mean that I created the idea...
      I could go through almost every "innovation" that you list and disprove any innovation Apple has done as coming from them. Even the PC.

      Fallacy 2: That Apple has "unique" designs. The candy bar style phone has been around a lot longer then the iPhone. While some merits of Apple's suits do in fact seem to take on a "copying" concept, such as the round home button with the square in the middle, others seem more like "common sense" and less like "innovation". How else do you make a large screen phone seem sleek and sexy? A 4" flip phone, doubling the size to 8" and making it so awkward that it cannot even compete? Rounding it, squaring it? Maybe they should have patented some shapes instead. I have seen the comparisons, and while there are some things that can be pointed at between Samsung and Apple, and you can say "Yeah, they did copy that (Which might make sense to go to court over, but trust me, they are going for more then the "obvious"), some of those things just make obvious sense, and as debated over and over here on Techdirt, sense should not be patentable (Although it does appear that scarily, too many patents are being issued based on common sense instead of innovation) So, what happens? This companies broad patents are used to sue that company, which is defended by that companies broad patents, etc. In fact, I would say many of the companies in the current patent suits probably hold some broad patent that probably already covers what they are being sued for, and they are so broad in fact, that many end up overlapping.

      Fallacy 3: Apple is being sued more then they sue. You claim it is because Apple is the "victim" in this? Most of the lawsuits have been filed as a retaliatory strike. If you trace out almost every date for patent suit in the current industry, you will find it as follows: Apple sues company x, so company x sues Apple. In fact, go back to these original suits, and you will find Apple was one of the first to start this. I would not say they are the only, but it is my impression that they are the catalyst (We can even go back to the original Apple Vs. Microsoft if you want to see how back this has gone on). Unfortunately, now it has spread, and it seems that this has created a wildfire that will not stop for a long time.

      Fallacy 4: Apple has gotten the courts to see they are violated. Not completely accurate and non-opinionated there. While yes, they have won some judgments, they have at the same time lost some judgments. In fact, in some cases, the patents overlap to such an extent that they loose based on the very same patent they won, because the other side has a patent that covers overlapping ideas.

      So, overall, you have failed to "win over" anyone with your somewhat misleading, and in some cases, quite false, arguments. So now, you understand why I say your idea is idiotic (Just in case you missed the point in this, I am not calling "you"an idiot, thus making an Ad hominem argument, but instead is telling you that your points are idiotic.).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:18am

    Why are these features patentable?

    How are pinch zoom and slide to unlock different than left click to shoot and scroll wheel to change weapon in a PC shooter? The latter 2 are game mechanics, which aren't patentable. The 1st 2 are OS mechanics, so they are? They're the same thing, features in a piece of software.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    The CAT, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:25am

    Bunch O' Wimps.......

    It's sad to see Apple, who could have been the market leader, once again tripping over themselves. I used to use Apple computers back in the 80's and their "closed system, we don't play with others" mentality destroyed them then with the PC and Windows and today, it looks like Android is going to take their lunch money again and eventually have the market share in both the phone and tablet business. Apple needs to understand that the reason this is going to occur is because of their backwards thinking and selfishness in the tech community. Apple contributes nothing to the cause whereas open source Android educates the market and improves upon the mistakes of others.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Amit G, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 8:36am

      Re: Bunch O' Wimps.......

      You took the words out of my mouth. I was just thinking how they lost to PCs in the 80s and it looks like they are following the same path again. I hear it all that time that Apple is not a monopoly, and to use the excuse that its because they do not have enough marketshare is just bogus. If you want an iOS what are your options? Apple, Apple or Apple. This is one reason why I do not like Apple.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Chosen Reject (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 9:17am

        Re: Re: Bunch O' Wimps.......

        Apple isn't a monopoly. If you want a Suburban you're only choice is Chevy. That doesn't make Chevy a monopoly. If you want iOS, you go with Apple, but if you want a mobile OS, you have iOS, Android, WinPhone 7, WebOS, whatever that OS that RIM has, and others. By you're definition, Google, Microsoft, HP, and RIM are all monopolies as well.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Vincent Clement (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 10:41am

      Re: Bunch O' Wimps.......

      Closed systems didn't work back in the 80s because the market wasn't big enough. Today, a five percent market share can make you a lot of money.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    fb39ca4, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 9:36am

    Someday, you won't necessarily be restricted to Apple if you want iOS

    It is inevitable that someone will figure out how to modify the hardware drivers in iOS, making it so it can run on other smartphones, kind of like how you can install OSX on a PC nowadays.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 8:24am

      Re: Someday, you won't necessarily be restricted to Apple if you want iOS

      If you want iOS why wouldn't you want to pay Apple for their efforts?

      Like the Macintosh before it, the hardware is bundled with the software. Or vice versa, however you want to look at it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sean, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 11:22am

    Based on market dominance and infinitely better products I'm confident Apple isn't 'scared' of Samsung's 'superior' product. If we recall the Samsung phone that looked exactly similar to the iPhone, even matching some icons, it's amazing to think that anyone would believe Apple is nervous Samsung made a better product.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      JEDDIAH, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:02pm

      Actions vs. Rhetoric

      Clearly they are afraid of something.

      If Samsung were really that pathetic, then Apple would have no reason to try and destroy them. The whole issue would be moot. It would be pointless and a big waste of money.

      Clearly they fear Samsung.

      They fear Android in general. They have reason to. The tide has already turned against them.

      Everyone that said "repeat of PCs" is being proven right.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Prashanth (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 7:49pm

    And you know what? I read a report yesterday saying that over 50% of both Android and Blackberry users plan to buy an iPhone as their next smartphone. So really, Android phones are almost like aspirational intermediates to iPhones, which is only helping Apple's business. So Apple has nothing to fear from Samsung, it seems; if Apple is that scared, that only further legitimizes Samsung's position in the marketplace.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Just John (profile), Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 9:52pm

      Re:

      @Prashanth

      Please cite your source, because I believe you are full of piss and vinegar. And please, make sure it is not a "US only" study, because, although this is hard to believe, there is a whole world out there, and Apple is loosing the world, not just the US.

      Here is one that would "dispute" your claim straight off:
      http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/02/canalys-android-rules-the-smartphone-world-samsung-couldve- do/
      http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/canalys-android-overtakes-symbian-as-worlds-best-selling-sma rt/

      That is two right there from a single site that sort of shows you are full of piss and vinegar. So, want to go back to the "Apple has nothing to fear from Samsung" comment?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Prashanth (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 3:35pm

        Re: Re:

        http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=154200 There's the source. Granted, that article unfortunately doesn't cite any visible sources to back up its claims (aside from referring to some magical "study", but that may be because there aren't any links to that study as of yet), but I see that you've totally misread my statement. I didn't say that Android doesn't have the majority of the market; what I did say was that over half of current Android users plan to buy an iPhone for their next smartphone, and for that reason, Apple has no fears. Note: I say this as a fan of Android, Linux, and open source stuff. So please, get some glasses and some lessons in reading comprehension.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Just John (profile), Aug 4th, 2011 @ 7:24pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Thank you for the link.
          The information, in some ways, is correct, because of Verizon offering iPhone.
          I have already seen information on this about how people who were buying Android were doing so only because they refused to go to AT&T, and their carriers were not offering the Apple product.

          I do not claim Apple is not a good system, nor that it is not a good and/or powerful product. I just hate Apple for other reasons (Restrictiveness, cost basis, patent trolling, etc.).

          The one fact that was not addressed though was the very thing I specifically commented on: Please show me about the world, not the US. This is clearly US based. From what I have personally viewed living here in Taiwan, this information is false on a world wide application level. Many countries actually prefer Android over Apple, although some prefer Apple over Android. The reason this is important? The US is not the center of the world, and profits by companies may actually be higher for total sales outside the US then inside. Again, this is why I specifically pointed towards information on the iOS Vs. Android in a global perspective.

          Please remember, there is something outside the fish bowl, and I am American proving that.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Prashanth (profile), Aug 5th, 2011 @ 2:40pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Sorry, I replied to your reply a bit late, and I forgot to apologize for not reading and comprehending (yes, I need reading comprehension lessons too :P) that this article was about Australia. So now, I apologize for that mistake.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Josh, Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 11:57pm

    Not blocking anything in Australia anyway!

    Interestingly, it seems apple did get an injunction, but for the wrong product. Now Samsung can't sell a product in Australia they were not planing to sell in Australia anyway... :-)

    http://delimiter.com.au/2011/08/02/apple-targeted-wrong-tablet-says-samsung/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    steve davidson (profile), Aug 7th, 2011 @ 9:39am

    Bad Marketing

    I agree, all Apple has done is draw attention to the competition. It confirms the leadership at Apple is shifting from visionary to corporate lawyers leading the way... instead of fighting back with a great ad campaign that promotes the ipad and new innovative features, just hire a battalion of lawyers...unfortunately as Microsoft can attest...the lawyers just cost you money, and damage your market focus.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This