US Tech Firms Attack Australian WiFi Patent
from the patent-nuttiness dept
In the last year or so, we've been seeing a lot of companies come up with random patents that they claim are violated by various WiFi implementations. One of the holders of such patents is the Australian government science organization CSIRO, who recently sued a Japanese owned firm in the US for violating those patents. That's scared a bunch of big US firms who have decided to take action. Microsoft, Dell, HP, Intel, Apple and Netgear have all teamed up to try to invalidate the patent. Note again the incredibly involved (and expensive) process to prove that a patent never should have been granted in the first place. And people wonder why the patent system needs to be reformed?
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Let's not jump to conclusions
I agree the patent system needs a serious overhaul, but lets not jump to the conclusion that this particular patent should not have been granted...after all, the CSIRO is no patent troll.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
But on the other hand, the Australian government develops this, patents it and now that the big name companies have been using it wants to nullify it? What is the point of developing it, if big name companies can steal your invention? This patent was handed down in 1996 ... 10 years ago.
This is not another "nutty claim". This is quite legitimate.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ya BUT
If you are a goverment agency that fails to recognize other patents, why then would you suddenly recognize your own? With NO product.. just an idea.. you have nothing to sue for. What have you lost with nothing for sale?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Ya BUT
CSIRO makes a lot of money selling its research, its patents, to industry.
Just because it's a government agency that develops and patents an idea does not mean it is not entitled to financial compensation, even if its only to cover costs with perhaps a bit more to fund other research.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment