RSS
Don't MMS Messages Already Cost Money?
On this one, I'm asking for help explaining what's going on. I was under the impression that you needed to pay in order to send an MMS message, but suddenly Vodafone is making a big deal of saying that their plan to stop MMS spam is to... make senders pay to send MMS spam. If they're already paying, then how is it news to ask them to pay again? Or, is there something being missed here, where they're really talking about some other way of sending MMS spam that doesn't already involve paying some sort of fee that now will require a fee?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Beastie Boy Mike D Forces AT&T To Let Shareholders Vote On Net Neutrality
- Congress Trying To Regulate Certain Wireless Spectrum Issues... In A Payroll Tax Bill?
- Verizon Wireless: Paying Online Is More Convenient, So Now You Have To Pay $2 To Do So [Updated]
- Is Verizon Wireless Violating Its Promise To Be Open By Blocking Google Wallet?
- Innovation In Wireless: The Disruption In Connectivity
Add Your Comment