Cingular Sued In California For Bad Service, High Termination Fees
Watch out wireless carriers! You've made the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in California mad. They're letting off a little steam by suing Cingular in California for false advertising and unfair business practices. You can probably guess the charges. The false advertising is for advertising a mobile phone that works... and then many customers get home and discover it doesn't work particularly well. Then, they have very high termination fees, effectively forcing their customers to stick with them. However, it's not just Cingular they're going after. They say this is "just the tip of the iceberg", and they're planning on going after others as well. Hell hath no fury like consumer activists scorned. While this sounds a bit like grandstanding by this activist group, they do have a point. From the consumers' point of view, the wireless carriers have been notoriously bad in responding to complaints of bad service. The termination fees make sense for the carriers to try to cut down on churn - but not making exceptions for cases of bad service simply goes too far and turns customers into enemies (the kind of enemies who drool about jumping ship when number portability is allowed).
36 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Boom: Jury Says No Patent Infringement By Google In Oracle Case
- Russian Appeals Court Says Popular Social Network vKontakte Is Liable For File Sharing By Users
- Judge In Grooveshark Lawsuit Orders Blog To 'Preserve' Logs That Had Already Been Deleted
- Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Tenenbaum Case; Allows Charade To Continue
- Should People Learn To Code? Yes – If They Are Judges Ruling On Cases Involving Software






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Same Bahamas international roaming issue as Cather
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
ruining my credit-help!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Screwed out of $500 credit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
promising one thing and doing another
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
cingular billing unfair no customer care
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cingular & SunCom
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
fraud
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
cingular suncom merger in Virginia
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cingular not fulfilling AT&T contracts
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Thanks for this forum
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Do not upgrade or combine into Family plan
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
how do I join, find a class action suit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
whats the correct policy?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Bait & Switch on a Massive Scale
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
cingular
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Same Bahamas international roaming issue as Cather
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
1448.00 bill 11/2004
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cingular CROOKS
I assume Cingular cells thousands of phones (not for very long if they continue this proactice...) through Best Buy. They have no proper procedures in place for returned phones and it becomes the responsibility of the customer to prove that he/she has returned the phone. They treat (ex-)customers like criminals in doubting if the phones were returned.
I have returned every call they made and still they sent it to the collection agency!
I will NEVER buy anything from Cingular even if they pay me to do it.
CROOKS!!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
attorney answered funding questioned
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Bad service from cingular
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I want to join
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
How do I join lawsuit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
why this happens
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
phone upgrades
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
You ARE ALL IDIOTS
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
LEARN TO READ!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Retard
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
That's right
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cingular is going away SOON!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cingular Service
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Tell Everyone About Cingular's Terrible Practices
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
cingular must go
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Down with Cingular!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cinguloar bills even if you don't do business
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Retard
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
My plan was 500 anytime minutes with free nights and weekends as well as free Cingular to Cingular.
They applied my 500 anytime minutes to all calls made at the beginning of the billing cycle regardless of if they were made during the free times or conditions.
Subsequently this resulted in my being charged the high per minute rate towards the end of the billing cycle because they claimed I exceed the limit of the plan.
Almost a year into service with them my phone was constantly being shut off and I was told I owed ever increasing amounts. They claimed I was over $400 dollars in arrears.
Finally I sat down one day and went through the last year of statements and discovered what had happened.
To their credit they did give me the next 7 months for free.
After that I switched carriers.
People should be aware that the catalyst for this kind of ongoing rip off is a complicated statement/billing called estimated charges.
After recently signing up for AT&T(formerly Cingular) cable and internet I notice the same type of thing happening.
Every month I go online to pay my bill and notice that it says 'current charges'
and 'amount to be payed'.
The second being the amount expected and the first being a number more than double that.
For the life of me I couldn't figure that out till I meticulously wrote down each payment, went over each of the six months I have been using the service.
Finally I realized that there is a $129.00 charge notation on the very day my service was installed as well as the expected charge of $129.00 I payed the first month after service began.
But... and here is the thing. I was told $129.00 would be the cost of installation and first month of service. As it was and I paid.
But it four months later that suddenly that additional $129.00 noted the day my service was installed started appearing on my account statement as 'current charges'.
Only it isn't.
Because after several more hours of my time I discover what it actually is is something they call 'estimated charges'.
Sound complicated?
I think so.
Wonder if any other consumers are confused by this system. Wonder even more what is the purpose of this system.
Actually correct that. I really don't wonder.
Thats my story.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment