Awesome Stuff: Open Standards And Open Safety

from the openness-is-good dept

For this week's awesome stuff, we're going to highlight two projects that seek to bring out into the open things that are being held in secret for no good reason at all.
  • Public Safety Codes of the World. We've written many times about Carl Malamud and his work with Public.Resource.org to buy up various "standards" that have been incorporated into US laws, and then making them freely available to the public, under the belief that the law should never be locked up and subject to copyright protections. Tragically, many standards are written by industry bodies, who then try to support themselves by selling (at exorbitant prices) copies of the details of those standards. But when politicians then write those standards into the law, it seems quite reasonable that the details of the standards really should be free. This is expensive work, since it involves buying up lots of standards and (all too frequently) fending off legal attacks. Given that, Malamud is seeking at least $100,000 to continue Public.Resource's work. The key goal behind this particular effort is to take many of the standards they've already scanned and turn them into HTML to make them much more accessible and usable.
    This is a good cause that you should support. Malamud has been doing tremendous work for years. So far the campaign has only raised about 20% of its $100,000 goal. That's unfortunate, since, as the project description makes clear, the more they can get, the more they can do with that money. If you have a couple of spare dollars around, please think about supporting this.
  • Next up is a really interesting project from Underground Meats, where they're looking to Open Source their Food Safety Model. I had seen a couple friends back this, but didn't really look into the details until later. Basically, this is a small meat processing facility that is trying to become a USDA-certified meat processor. Apparently, the process is incredibly cumbersome and convoluted (welcome to having to deal with government bureaucracy). There is, of course, good intent behind some of this: the process to make sure that your meat production is safe should require some effort. But, at the same time, as we've seen for years, many companies have used massive bureaucratic regulatory schemes as an effective way to keep out small and innovative competitors, because the barrier to entry is so high. Here, no one is complaining about the need for a detailed food safety and sanitary practice plan, known as a HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) as part of the process -- but they are annoyed that every company going through this process needs to start from scratch, rather than learning from and building on those who have already gone through the process. Most big companies who have gone through the HACCP process then lock it up, claiming that they're covered by copyright.

    That's where this project comes in. The folks at Underground Meats are looking to not just "open source" their HACCP, but public domain it, by putting using a CC0 license to effectively dedicate the work to the public domain so others can make use of it.
    This is a cool approach, showing where copyright can impact things way beyond basic content creation. If lots of small companies in regulated industries could use the lead of others, without cost, to get through the various regulatory hurdles, we'd likely see a lot more innovative and upstart competition in overly regulated industries. It would be cool to see others follow this lead. This project has about a week to go and is around 90% funded, so it seems likely that it will just nudge its way over the finish line before it's all over.
I wish I had a third crowdfunding project highlighting opening up safety standards, but this is all I can find so far. It's a start.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 5th, 2013 @ 9:50am

    Awesome stuff indeed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), Oct 5th, 2013 @ 9:54am

    For vegetarians?

    Well Mike, though I agree that this idea about open-sourcing HAPPC is a good idea, how does that affect me, a vegetarian? Fortunately (for me at least) the USDA isn't enforcing this on producers of vegetable material... :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Spaceman Spiff (profile), Oct 5th, 2013 @ 10:06am

      Re: For vegetarians?

      Although this may not affect me much now, I still consider that this may change in the future. At least, raising my own carrots is still an option! Raising my own cattle and pigs may be as well, but not as easy...

      Disclaimer: my wife grew up on a chicken/egg ranch, was a champion 4H member (her parents were 4H leaders), and she and her sibs raised cows, sheep, and such for food.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 5th, 2013 @ 12:03pm

      Re: For vegetarians?

      Open knowledge specially of safety is always(as in mostly) good.
      If you read the standards you learn how the food is analyzed, how it is prepared, how it is cleaned and tested.

      Some knowledge will be specific to meat others are not and can be used in for other things.

      It makes us all safe and it gives people something to point at and look out for.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 5th, 2013 @ 12:34pm

      Re: For vegetarians?

      how does that affect me, a vegetarian?


      Indirectly.

      It could affect your relatives. It could affect your friends. It could affect your bus driver. And so on.

      No man is an island.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Oct 7th, 2013 @ 4:59am

    Every standard should be open. You know, because standards are meant to be guidelines, public guidelines. Sure some manufacturer may choose to have more strict standards but there should be clear and publicly available stuff especially for things like food and general safety.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This