A Sad Statement: The Best Way To Deal With Patent Threats Is To Be Less Open
from the bad-for-innovation dept
Colleen Chien and Stefani Shanberg have a post over at TechCrunch that provides ten suggestions for how startups can and should deal with patent threats from trolls these days, which is unfortunately depressing. It’s not because the ideas aren’t good — they’re exactly what most startups probably should know. But the last item really bugs me:
10. Advice For All Times: Don’t Be An Easy Target
Trolls pick their targets by studying websites, looking at product specs, and trying to make out a case that you need their patent. Don’t make it easy for them. Require registration before granting access to whitepapers, detailed documents, or video tutorials that delve into the behind-the-scenes details. Think twice about being on customer lists or advertising the ins and outs of your business, the products you use, etc., unless there’s a good business reason for doing so. Often it is the companies that advertise most successfully that are the most frequent targets of troll demands — troll threats should not drive business decisions, but don’t be surprised when your successful marketing campaign is followed by an onslaught of troll letters.
This isn’t a surprise. Of course, we’ve highlighted how companies often get hit up by patent trolls right after they make news. But what this is really saying is “don’t be open.” And while that may be a good strategy for a company seeking to avoid patent lawsuits, it’s a horrible strategy for increasing innovation. Research into innovation and economic growth have shown time and time again that what helps create that kind of innovation is more openness and more sharing. It’s the information sharing that made Silicon Valley into Silicon Valley.
What’s stunning — and depressing — is that the patent system is supposed to be the thing that encourages innovation. And yet, because it’s become totally dysfunctional, one of the recommendations for how to avoid running afoul of it now… is to do the exact thing that holds back and limits innovation. What a shame.
Filed Under: innovation, openness, patent trolls, patents
Comments on “A Sad Statement: The Best Way To Deal With Patent Threats Is To Be Less Open”
Missed one option
11. Do not have any contact with the USA.
Wrong, wrong, wrong
That article is just wrong, wrong, wrong
You want best advice to avoid patent threats? ?Number one best advice: Startup somewhere else. Stay out of USA.
Re: Wrong, wrong, wrong
That’s ignoring a pretty big market, wouldn’t you say?
Re: Re: Wrong, wrong, wrong
World production is about $60 trillion, last I checked. US economy is about $15 of that or so.
One-quarter of the world economy. One-hundred percent chance of getting sued into oblivion?as soon as you show enough profit for the vultures to swoop down. Do the math.
?
From a comment on a related story over at Ars…
Re: Re: Re: Wrong, wrong, wrong
Yeah, like I said, “One-quarter of the world economy” constitutes a “pretty big market.”
BTW, I think your math might be off regarding that 100% chance.
Re: Re: Re:2 Wrong, wrong, wrong
No.
Every. Single. Successful. Company. Is. Frivolously. Sued.
Every single one. The only difference is some have the luck or resources to win in court or simply cut a cheque.
Re: Re: Wrong, wrong, wrong
If staying out of the US market is the difference between having a successful, if slightly smaller, business, and having no business at all due to being sued into oblivion due to a barrage of shakedown letters from patent trolls… suddenly the slightly, or even moderately smaller market you’re selling to becomes all sorts of acceptable in comparison.
Re: Wrong, wrong, wrong
I have been slowly thinking of the same line as you did.Why even bother to start up here in your own Nation when your own Nation will do nothing to help you innovate.The US Patent System is so messed up it is not leading innovation but restricting it and so goes USA Innovative Tech.
Down the Drain or in Reality Down a Lawyer’s Pockets and some A-Hole Patent Troll or some other Company buying A-Hole Lame Nonsense Patent.
There must be some cool Nations where you can start up a decent Company, not be sued, live in nice climate, and feel welcomed and wanted.
Re: Re: Wrong, wrong, wrong
The problem with moving else wghere is that sooner or latter the USA patent system will be imposed on yur chosen destination by a trade treaty. At that point you will be sued for back royalties.
Looks like the patent system is coming to fruition. Great plans take time haha, what a disaster.
I just have to say, those who want a piece of the pie have led to this problem. Every time an argument about patents and monopolies comes up, you have usually only two extremes. Those who want it and those who find it morally bankrupt. The ones who want to use it sometimes admit they want what so few of these bratz have managed gain.
Point being copyright and patents to me, have been made to overtime do just these things they are doing. It was just a matter of time, much like where the USA is trying to head towards now. ohhh snap.
Re: Re:
If you rephrase that in English it will be easier to understand.
Re: Re: Re:
He’s just speaking in his own English dialect that no one else can really understand.
Re: Re: Re:
I’m sorry, I don’t speak slow enough for simpletons. Never will, is it a wonder you are so behind?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
C’mon, man. Are you really going to defend this abortion of a sentence: “Point being copyright and patents to me, have been made to overtime do just these things they are doing.”?
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
HOW great sage! Where did I befuddle!?! It says what it means?
It’s JUST as laughable that you’re doing exactly as I claimed your types do. Avoiding the point, all the while as transparent as can be. Just admit you want to be a circle jerking fat cat and using rare sentence structure to hide you sin.
Re: Re: Re:3 Re:
Damn! His science is too tight!
I can attest that this is good advice. I have investigated websites and marketing materials attempting to find out of services infringe a patent, and it’s a lot harder if it’s not all laid out for the world to see.
Whether that’s a sad state of affairs is up for debate. If you assume that patent infringement is not a bad thing, then it’s a sad state of affairs. If you assume that patent infringement is a bad thing, then it’s just like any other bad thing you shouldn’t put out in the open for everyone to see.
Re: Re:
It is easy to know if your services infringe a patent: they do.
Out of the hundreds of thousands patents out there, several will apply to your service. And you will always miss some, even if you do a patent search. What is more, some of them will be issued and published only after you are already making use of them.
Even using only technology from more than 20 years ago will not save you, since new patents are sometimes issued on old technology.
Patent infringement is a fact. Being less open only makes it harder to find.
Re: Re: Re:
“It is easy to know if your services infringe a patent: they do.”
Lol. Maybe so. But that doesn’t help the guy who is trying to figure out whether you infringe his specific patents.
In the interest of fostering innovation, scientists/engineers in a company’s employ should be required to maintain detailed lab notebooks (digital format is fine), and then publish them at COB each day on an unrestricted basis for the benefit of everyone outside the company. Who knows? Maybe the project you are working on could pass to market more quickly in the hands of one of your competitors, with your payback being satisfaction that you have helped society.
First rule of patents
The first thing that a patent attorney will tell you if you want to check to see whether your product infringes on any patents is not to look at any patents. That’s the worst thing you can do because now you’re willfully infringing on said patents. So basically what patents are supposed to do, increase innovation by publishing patents so people can license them for use in their own products without having to do the work, is not done because people don’t want to be found willfully infringing and paying triple damages.
Re: First rule of patents
That’s not really accurate (or at least not accurate for all cases).
“Willful blindness” can get you a willful infringement judgment as well, so it’s really going to depend on your situation whether a freedom to operate opinion or some other search makes sense.
Re: Re: First rule of patents
Wilful blindness requires a court case and a judgement against you. It’s still better to be “blind”, whether wilfully or not.
“A Sad Statement: The Best Way To Deal With Patent Threats Is To Be Less Open”
I’ve already said this on Techdirt before, a long time ago. It’s obvious.
Re: Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120702/09044019553/james-watson-co-discoverer-dna-says-patenting-human-genes-was-lunacy.shtml#c215
There you go.
Or...
Set your company up in such a way that nobody in their right mind would even think about suing you. Then you can be as open as you like.
Re: Or...
How?
Name it “Mafia-Connected Murderers LLC”?
Re: Re: Or...
Hmm, it would involve taking a pretty large hit to profits, but perhaps post, publicly, that say 25% of your profits will be donated to orphanages, animal rescue shelters, food banks, etc. with the list of recipients made public and able to be voted on and suggested on, by the public.
Anyone trying to sue a company like that would quickly find their name and the name of the firm they are from so toxic that no-one would ever be willing to hire them again.
Re: Re: Re: Or...
That won’t stop them. Patent trolls couldn’t care less about their image. If they could make profit from outright closing down orphanages, food banks, etc., they would do it without thinking twice.
Re: Re: Re:2 Or...
Good point, I suppose I was thinking about a person/company that has to be hired by someone to actually take action, in which case their image would be very much important to the one doing the hiring.
If they can cause the damage on their own on the other hand, then they really don’t care, and have no reason to care, how slimy they look.
toxifying doesn't work
“Anyone trying to sue a company like that would quickly find their name and the name of the firm they are from so toxic that no-one would ever be willing to hire them again.”
Patent trolls are hired by no one. They don’t care about having a good name. They are all essentially an empty office in Marshall, TX, a lawyer, and a guy making money off other peoples’ life’s work.
Re:
To be fair, I’m not exactly sure what you were saying, either.
Re:
“Whether that’s a sad state of affairs is up for debate. If you assume that patent infringement is not a bad thing, then it’s a sad state of affairs. If you assume that patent infringement is a bad thing, then it’s just like any other bad thing you shouldn’t put out in the open for everyone to see.”
There is a point where the troll patent infringement suits are so numerous compared to the cases the system was designed to protect against that the net impact of the patent system is negative.
At that point it provides more value to society to ditch the patent system entirely than keeping it.
In my opinion, that point was reached some time ago.
Re:
Well for a start, last time I checked “overtime” wasn’t a verb.
...supposed to be the thing that encourages innovation...
Sorry Mike, you’re officially a dinosaur.
While the patent (and copyright) system might have perhaps been meant to encourage innovation some 200+ years ago (and I’m not really sure it was its real motivation even back then), it hasn’t been used even remotely in that way for, like, over a century? So please, get back to present.
Trolling RULEZ! Innovation SUCKS!
Great Advice for the Inventor
Sure hide everything and subscribe to Masnick’s rag (oh wait it’s digital so it’s a drag?), Masnick’s blop, eh blopple-twiddle, twittle…yeah twittle.
Infringement is tallied backward 6 years so inventors don’t want to find start-ups they want to find their inventions being used by successful maturing companies.
Hiding the actual facts of your product increases the damages available to the inventor.
Thinking Differently
Right now, the legal system is being used to provide the incentive system for patents. Could the some of our present day innovation be directed at inventing a new way to reward and encourage inventions that does not involve taking someone to Court?
Re: Thinking Differently
This already happens! It’s even happened to me. It’s called honesty where someone or some company actually licenses your invention because they use it.
In my experience it is rare and almost never a large company.
Wrong, wrong, wrong
Ok, so now that you’ve retracted the “into oblivion” portion of your earlier statement, is there anything else you’d like to retract?
I just want to get all the retractions out of the way before asking you to back it up.
Wrong, wrong, wrong
Sure, but that’s not a very likely “if”, I think.
First rule of patents
That doesn’t make any sense.
A finding of willful infringement requires a court case and judgment, regardless of whether it’s based on knowledge or willful blindness.