stories filed under: "it"

Tue, May 25th 2010 12:16pm

Filed Under:
it, law, privacy, security

Reminder: 'What IT Needs To Know About The Law' Webinar Tomorrow

from the don't-miss-it dept

A reminder for folks that tomorrow, Wednesday May 26th, at 9am PT/noon ET, we'll be holding the next webinar in our IT Innovation series, What IT Needs To Know About The Law. I've been working on the content for this webinar with Dave Navetta and Larry Downes, and it's shaping up great, covering many of the issues we talk about here on a regular basis. In fact, there's so much good stuff, that we're down to figure out what we're leaving out -- perhaps to revisit at a future date. Either way, it should be chock full of good info that will be useful for any IT person, so don't miss it. Sign up now, and stop by tomorrow with questions ready. As with our past webinars, this one will be interactive. We'll be taking questions from attendees throughout the webinar. Please join us.

Insight Community

Thu, May 20th 2010 4:09pm

Filed Under:
innovation, it

Closed: 30 May 2010, 11:59PM PT

Earn up to $200 for Insights on this case.

Permalink.

packaged

Looking For Feedback On IT Innovation Resources

As you know, we've been running the ITInnovation.com tab within Techdirt since last year, sponsored by Sun (now Oracle) and Intel. We've had a series of fascinating discussions within blog posts and webinars during that time. We've also continued to regularly refresh the IT Innovation Resource Center, which includes a rotating list of useful tools and white papers provided either by us or the sponsors of IT Innovation.

We'd like to get some feedback and insight into the quality of these resources and how they might be improved upon. Listed below are six currently available white papers in the Resource Center. If you are familiar with these topics (i.e., you work in IT), please review the white papers and write up your insights and comments on the whitepapers: what's good about them, what could be improved, what would make them more useful, etc. You are free to provide insights on as many of the white papers as you would like, but we ask that you submit insights on each white paper as a separate insight, rather than combining them into a single response.

Best Practices for Managing Datacenter Costs via Application and Server Consolidation
Server sprawl, software licensing fees, and facilities costs are sending datacenter operational expenses through the roof at a time when every penny is being scrutinized. As a result, low utilization rates and wasted power/cooling resources are no longer acceptable, and smart companies are looking to consolidation and virtualization to trim expenses and increase operating efficiency.
Why Solid-State Drives Usage Scenarios Are Expanding for the Datacenter
To accomplish the objectives of making more-efficient use of IT resources, lowering power consumption, and reducing operating expenses, many companies are turning to server consolidation and virtualization efforts—endeavors that increase server CPU utilization and reduce the number of discrete servers in a datacenter.
The New Economics of Midsize Enterprise Computing: Oracle’s Sun Systems Based on the Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500 Series
Midsize companies often face the same competitive pressures as large-scale enterprises. However, they may not possess the resources and staff to invest heavily in complex computing systems. Yet it’s critical for IT organizations within these companies to ensure that they have the strongest, most expandable systems in place, so that their companies have the requisite flexibility to adapt quickly to changing market conditions, roll out new products and services in shorter cycles, and become more effective competitors.
New Blades and Networking Solutions Ensure Solid Return on Investment
Traditionally, when companies need more computing power to deal with expanding amounts of data, they increase the number of servers, the number of compute cores per server, and the memory capacity of each server. Today’s high-powered blade servers save space and help enable significant gains in computing performance, especially when workloads are consolidated efficiently and datacenter resources are utilized most effectively. To accommodate this increase in capacity, however, the network infrastructure carrying the data must also be upgraded.
Reassessing Server Costs for Midsize Companies
Most companies keep their servers for three to five years—a time frame that seems reasonable given current economic conditions. Despite the savings this would seem to imply, however, extending server life in the datacenter in this way may not be the best strategy, even in the toughest economic times.
Oracle Solaris Operating System — Optimized for the Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 and 7500 series
This document is intended as a technical guide for developers and system administrators that want to understand the precise details of how Oracle® Solaris and the Intel® Xeon® processor 5600 and 7500 series can improve your application solution environment.

20 Insights

View Case

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick

Tue, May 18th 2010 12:34pm

Filed Under:
it, legal defensibility, privacy, security

Permalink.

New Webinar: What IT People Need To Know About The Law

from the putting-on-that-legal-hat dept

A few weeks ago, we had a post about why IT people need to be knowledgeable about the law, rather than just about technology. It was based on an excellent article by Dave Navetta on The Legal Defensibility Era (pdf). For years, IT folks have recognized that they often wear two hats, switching between a technology one and a business one, as they often have to explain or justify the business tradeoffs of the IT decisions they make. But these days, they also really need to add a legal hat.

Given the immense interest we received in this particular topic, we've decided that it will be the topic of our next webinar in our IT Innovation series: What IT needs to know about the law to be held next Wednesday, May 26th at 9am PT/noon ET. We're thrilled that Dave Navetta, who wrote the article that sparked the original discussion, will be participating and discussing this "era of legal defensibility" that IT people need to understand. Dave has built a career around bridging that gap between IT folks and legal folks, and is obviously perfect to be part of this discussion. With him will be Larry Downes, most recently the author of The Laws of Disruption, which is all about how the legal realm is hugely important to understanding business and technology in the world today, and how anyone looking to succeed in the internet age needs to understand some of these key legal principles. Larry's a well-known writer, speaker, pundit and consultant on this important intersection of the law and the technology world, and between David and Larry, the discussion should be quite a lot of fun. Once again, I'll be moderating.

I'm really excited about this particular topic and the two speakers. We've been preparing for the webinar over the past few days, and there are a ton of interesting topics to discuss, concerning how the law is impacting security, privacy and the wider IT world. Depending on timing, we may dip into some other areas, including intellectual property law, Section 230 and the like. Given the discussions we regularly have on this site, and how important legal issues have become in the IT world over the past few years, this is going to be a can't miss discussion, so sign up now. As with previous webinars, the discussion is designed to be interactive, and we can take questions from the audience via the web interface during the event, so please come ready with questions.

29 Comments

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick

Fri, May 7th 2010 5:09pm

Filed Under:
it, legal defensibility, security

Permalink.

Why IT Security Guys Now Also Need To Be Legal Experts

from the welcome-to-the-modern-world dept

Every so often we get complaints from people who point out that this site is called "Techdirt," and yet quite frequently talks about the legal issues. There are a few different responses to this, but one of the key points is that, if you're in the tech field these days, you actually really do need to be pretty familiar with the law in a lot of ways. This is a point that I've been thinking about a lot lately, so it seemed like great timing when Michael Scott directed our attention to an article about how IT and security folks now need to recognize that legal risks are a big part of the security realm:

The era of legal defensibility is upon us. The legal risk associated with information security is significant and will only increase over time. Security professionals will have to defend their security decisions in a foreign realm: the legal world. This article discusses implementing security that is both secure and legally defensible, which is key for managing information security legal risk.

It certainly takes things pretty far outside the world where information security folks are used to living. And while there may be a sense of being able to defend the technological decisions should there be a security breach, reaching the level of "legal defensibility" involves a whole different set of issues.

The blog post linked above notes that we're still early in realizing this overlapping arena of security and law, and it's important to have folks from all of these disciplines work together:

Now is the time for legal, privacy and security professionals to break down arbitrary and antiquated walls that separate their professions. The distinctions between security, privacy and compliance are becoming so blurred as to ultimately be meaningless. Like it or not, it all must be dealt with holistically, at the same time, and with expertise from multiple fronts. In this regard we must all develop thick skins and be not afraid to stop zealously guarding turf. The reality is, the legal and security worlds have collided, and most lawyers don't know enough about security, and most security professionals don't know enough about the law. Let's change that.

Indeed. In fact, this is part of the reason that I made sure there was at least some legal discussion in our upcoming webinar on security in the cloud -- because it's an important aspect of security these days, and the cloud raises some serious legal questions (if you haven't registered yet, please do!). But making sure that legal and security/IT people are talking about this regularly is important. Otherwise, you can bet that the legal folks are going to make decisions that are going to come back to haunt those in the IT and security worlds...

28 Comments

Studies

by Mike Masnick

Tue, Feb 16th 2010 10:10pm

Filed Under:
it, job satisfaction

Permalink.

Do IT People Hate Their Jobs?

from the they're-not-real-thrilled-about-them dept

A recent study suggests that IT people really don't seem to like their jobs very much. Apparently, only 4% of IT people found themselves "highly engaged" with their jobs -- a number that has dropped from the still low, but not as low, 12%, two years earlier. There are concerns, of course, for what this means for companies and their IT staff. It certainly raises some questions about whether or not this is a potential issue going forward, and how companies might deal with this. Are the problems caused by the way IT people are treated? Or does it have more to do with their own worries about the future of the IT profession? And given that so many people in IT aren't particularly enthusiastic about their jobs, how can that be dealt with?

105 Comments

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick

Fri, Jan 22nd 2010 4:47pm

Filed Under:
data centers, it, security

Permalink.

If Data Centers Are Understaffed, What Does That Mean For Security?

from the seems-like-a-problem dept

While I'm always a little skeptical of the numbers found in vendor surveys, it wouldn't be too surprising to learn that the recent findings that half of all data centers find themselves understaffed are at least close to accurate. About 16% of the total surveyed claimed that their data centers were "extremely understaffed," with another 34% saying they were just somewhat understaffed. Reasons for the understaffing included both the difficulty of finding qualified people for more technologically complex datacenters and general economic cutbacks -- neither of which are particularly surprising.

The bigger question is what impact this will have. Chronic understaffing in a data center could lead to serious security issues, increased downtime (decreased reliability) and certainly decreased responsiveness to problems. With many of the survey respondents also claiming they're hoping to decrease headcount even further, this could become a bigger issue going forward.

The report also claims that the survey's creators were "surprised" to find out that mid-market companies were more likely to experiment with new technologies, as compared to the big companies, but I don't find that surprising at all. Big companies are pretty resistant to change (especially if they have some big IT project that is "working.") Still, if those companies are finding their data centers regularly understaffed, it could create more difficulty in getting getting new projects successfully off the ground. So I'm curious how companies are dealing with these issues and trying to avoid problems with understaffed data centers, while still being able to try out new technologies and services.

7 Comments

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick

Thu, Jan 21st 2010 5:30pm

Filed Under:
business, it, productivity

Permalink.

Should IT Be Run As A Business?

from the yes-and-no dept

Slashdot points us to an article trying to debunk the concept that "IT should be run as a business," with "employees" as customers. Of course, like many catchy phrases, I don't think that many IT departments really followed this concept to the ridiculous logical conclusions. It does have some useful concepts -- such as giving IT folks more reason to actually listen to what employees have to say. But it misses the larger point, that IT is there to serve the business as a whole, and that means making the overall business more efficient, while keeping it secure, and that can sometimes conflict with the views of individual employees.

The argument made in the article, and it makes sense, is that IT really needs to be much more tightly integrated with the overall business, to really understand how to help. When it's viewed as a separate silo or even "business," then the solutions that come out of IT really aren't as helpful as can be. Separately, it also increases the likelihood of outsourcing the IT function, since it can be easily "separated." But by more closely integrating the IT function into actual business processes, not only does IT make itself more indispensable, it can focus on creating actual process improvements and solutions, rather than just taking a list from someone of what they think they need (perhaps without understanding what the technology enables) and delivering it to spec.

26 Comments

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick

Wed, Jan 20th 2010 6:46pm

Filed Under:
iphones, it, support

Permalink.

In A World Of Bottom Up Technology, Should IT Support Your iPhone?

from the they-might-have-to dept

Back when the iPhone first came out, there were all sorts of stories about how it was no good for the enterprise. While it's certainly gotten better, it still does seem like the Blackberry is the enterprise smartphone of choice. Yet, many people really do like using the alternatives, and while the solution for many is to now carry around multiple devices, others are beginning to push for companies to support their own devices (iPhone or others). And this is becoming a bigger and bigger issue. These days, many technologies used in the office are coming from "the bottom up," meaning that they're personal technologies (hardware, software or services) that individuals are using/buying on their own first, and then realizing they're so useful, that they start using them at work too.

And that, of course, raises the inevitable question of whether or not the IT department should support those technologies. The easy answer (which I'm sure we'll hear many times over in the comments) is "of course not." But it might not be that simple any more. Ignoring or holding back those technologies entirely may actually harm overall productivity in some cases, and limit what employees can and should be doing. Now, obviously, I recognize the argument that a large part of IT's job is to keep things running and protect the overall setup from problems -- and letting in any technology and supporting it can make that very, very difficult. But it ignores the flipside of IT's role: enabling companies and their employees to be more productive through the use of technology. And, even if IT officially decides to not allow things like the iPhone, as the article above points out, it might not matter much:

Likely scenario: An employee is denied an iPhone (or possibly any company-provided smartphone) and decides to get his own personal iPhone for use at work. This surreptitious infiltration is actually a bigger concern than a handful of managers; at least with them you still get to control the configuration and deployment process. If you don't know that workers are using iPhones in your company, you can't secure them at all. You can't even be certain what data might be stored on them.

And since the iPhone is fairly easy for even novice users to set up -- they can sign onto wireless networks, access intranets, and even gain access to an e-mail server -- it's no stretch to imagine that a lone, unauthorized iPhone could seriously compromise confidential data, as well as access to your network and the services running in it.

So, a flat-out ban isn't going to do the trick, but actively supporting any technology people bring into the workplace is too much to handle and causes too many problems. So where is the middle ground?

39 Comments

Studies

by Mike Masnick

Mon, Jan 11th 2010 9:52pm

Filed Under:
costs, failures, it

Permalink.

Are IT Failures Costing $6.2 Trillion Per Year?

from the um,-no dept

I'm always quite skeptical about huge numbers that come out of studies, such as the "losses" claimed by the entertainment industry due to piracy. So I was pretty skeptical of a story (found via Slashdot) claiming that IT failures cost $6.2 trillion per year worldwide. If true, that would be a staggering figure. I have no doubt that IT "failures" are costly, but that number seems extreme. Just glancing over the report itself, it's definitely not based on any kind of stringent methodology, and seems to count any IT project failure as a total loss, and then adds in "indirect costs" which sound suspiciously like "ripple effects" which, as we've demonstrated before are actually ways to double- or triple-count the same dollars over and over again. It seems that many others see huge problems with the original report as well, even to the point of suggesting that its orders of magnitude off.

While the debate rages on over how to properly count the "cost" of such failures, I'm beginning to wonder how useful such a number is. Isn't a more useful discussion on how to prevent or minimize the impact of any such failures? The aggregate number may look good in being able to see some big number, but aggregate numbers can hide important details inside. For example, back in the early (and even late) 90s there were lots of reports about how computerizing your business was not shown to have added any productivity. A poor conclusion from this was that computering your business was not a smart idea. But the problem was that this was aggregate data. It failed to realize that many, many businesses had boosted productivity through the use of computers, and many of the large failures that wiped out the aggregate "gains" were from a few big businesses that did a really poor implementation. It didn't mean that computerizing was necessarily a bad idea, but that some of the biggest early players just did a bad job of it.

So, if we're going to be discussing IT failures, why not step away from that aggregate info and try to focus in on ways to actually minimize the impact of whatever IT failures might occur?

18 Comments

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick

Mon, Dec 7th 2009 12:56pm

Filed Under:
copyright, databases, it, schools, sql query

Permalink.

Can You Copyright An SQL Query?

from the welcome-to-the-modern-world-of-ownership dept

Reader JohnForDummies alerts us to yet another example of extreme "ownership culture" found in a Stack Overflow query from a guy who works in IT for a school district. The school district needed to export a list of all its students every year to send to a company that handles their online exams -- and for years (before this guy was hired in IT), the district had contracted out the process to a guy who charged them $500 per year, to basically write and then run an SQL query that exported the data. Each year, all he had to do was change the date, but he still charged them $500. So the IT guy figures that he can change the date himself, but noticed that the contractor had put a nice copyright notice in the file:

// This code was writtend by [the guy]
// and is the property of [his company]...Copyright 2005,2006,2008,2009
// This code MAY NOT BE USED without the expressed written consent of
// [his company].

The Stack Overflow community basically suggested that the best course of action is to rewrite the query (even potentially asking the Stack Overflow community via a separate entry, with the details of what the query needs to do), but it does raise some basic questions about whether or not an SQL query can be covered by copyright. The answer, tragically, might be more complicated than it needs to be, but assuming that the query wasn't anything really out of the ordinary, it's difficult to see how a single SQL query, by itself, would be considered unique enough to be covered by copyright. However, I'm sure there will be differences of opinion here, so let's see if any of our copyright lawyer readership would like to weigh in on this one... As for the IT folks, it would be interesting to see what people think of the idea of copyrighting a single SQL query for something like this.

80 Comments

Older Stories >>

Follow Techdirt

A word from our Sponsors...

Hot Topics

New To Techdirt?

Explore some core concepts:

read all »

Techdirt Reading List

Amazon.com Widgets

Techdirt Insider Chat

Rikuo: I also find the concept of Kinect 2.0 hilarious. So if you've got a bunch of people on the couch watching a movie...don't move a muscle. Stare blankly. Don't move your arms at all or say anything, or the Kinect 2.0 will think you're giving it a command.

If you move your arm back to point to the liquor cabinet to tell the wife to pour you a shot of whiskey, the Xbox One will think you're swiping

silverscarcat: *Spies something interesting in the Crystal Ball* Well, that's interesting. I'm not sure what to think. Honestly, I'm not a big fan of the guy, but considering what the gov't did, I support him in that endeavor, but this... Seems to go too far.

dennis deems: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/22/1210687/-Obama-s-leak-freakout Best political cartoon ever? Top 10, surely

Hey the green bars are back!

Jay: Hmmm... Gonna have to hack my PSP...

silverscarcat: I need a new battery for my PSP. :(

It keeps shutting off if it's unplugged for more than 2-3 minutes, even on a full charge.

Mike Masnick: green bars are back, and hopefully functioning better than before. :)

silverscarcat: Oh look, AJ's having a cow and the internet tough guy is trying to be a stereotypical high school bully. *Rolls eyes* Hey, Mike, I know it's not in your nature to ban someone, but, damn, something needs to be done about this sometimes I think.

Rikuo: unfortunately, nothing can be done. IP address block? Useless since either AJ is on a dynamic IP or he's on a static but using someone else's equipment. Username block? That would only add fuel to the "CENSORSHP" fire

silverscarcat: Well, I think I'm going to leave for the day. That troll that plays the internet tough guy really should get laid, I think. It might help him think straight.

Rikuo: holy fucking shit...I want to be this man

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/05/fios-customer-discovers-the-limits-of-unlimited-data-77-tb-in-month/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars+Technica+-+All+content%29

Warning - Home Server pornz on that link

BentFranklin: in that article, where it describes his rack, what does 1u, 2u, 4u etc mean?

Jeff: @Bent - 1U, 2U, 4U are units of measurement for server racks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rack_unit

Dark Helmet: Hell, I"m just a silly tech services sales guy and I knew that...

yaga: DH you should have just stopped at silly.

dennis deems: Holy Cow http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/05/doctors-save-babys-life-with-3d-printed-tracheal-implant/

Get the Insider Chat!

A word from our Sponsors...

Older Stuff

Thursday
3:25pm:	Giant Patent Troll Intellectual Ventures Does 'Study' To Show How Much Everyone Loves Patents (22)
Wednesday
1:14pm:	How Key Decisions In Copyright Cases Can Impact The Pace Of Technological Innovation (34)
7:52am:	Chuck Schumer To Introduce Patent Reform Bill To Make It Cheaper To Fight Back Against Patent Trolls (10)
Tuesday
8:02pm:	OxyContin And The Art Of 'Evergreening' (46)
9:39am:	Barnes & Noble's Filing Clearly Explains Why The Patent System Is Broken And How To Fix It (49)
Monday
3:22pm:	Don't Let Patents Kill 3D Printing (84)
7:09am:	Google's Attempt To Bully Microsoft Back With Patents Not Going Too Well (42)
Saturday
9:00am:	Awesome Stuff: Refining The Wheel (4)
Friday
9:21am:	Patents As Weapons: How 1-800-CONTACTS Is Using The Patent System To Kill An Innovative Startup (52)
Thursday
11:55am:	CBS Will Sue Aereo In Boston, Preferably In The Alternate Reality Where CBS Is Winning (134)
Tuesday
7:28am:	The Copyright Lobotomy: How Intellectual Property Makes Us Pretend To Be Stupid (127)
Monday
11:59pm:	'Pay For Delay' Drug Deals Under Scrutiny In US, EU And UK (19)
Saturday
9:00am:	Awesome Stuff: Ferrofluid (12)
Friday
7:39pm:	Documentary On The History Of Apple And Microsoft Show It Was All About Copying, Not Patents (89)
6:39pm:	Here's Another Inventor Who Willingly Gave Away His Greatest Idea In Order To Establish It As A Global Standard (47)
Tuesday
8:24am:	New Study: USPTO Drastically Lowered Its Standards In Approving Patents To Reduce Backlog (23)
Saturday
9:00am:	Awesome Stuff: Lasers, Infrared And Photons (5)
Tuesday
3:52am:	Startups Realizing That Patent Trolls Are An Existential Threat (29)
Saturday
9:00am:	Awesome Stuff: Computers And Gesture Input Devices (13)
Friday
7:39pm:	This Is Not The Cloud Computing We Should Have (65)
9:55am:	Wal-Mart Wants Store Customers To Deliver Packages To Online Shoppers (40)
Thursday
2:02pm:	Why Google's 'We Won't Sue' Patent Pledge May Actually Suggest A Greater Proclivity To Sue Over Patents (34)
1:03pm:	Taxi, Limo Trade Group Hates Innovative Upstarts, Labels Them 'Rogue Applications' (19)
Wednesday
10:14am:	Whatever You Think Of The Google WiFi Settlement, It's Bad That It Requires Google To Attack Open WiFi (36)
Tuesday
7:57am:	Crazy Idea Of The Month: Allowing Patents On Mathematics (69)
Saturday
9:00am:	Awesome Stuff: Life Never Sounded So Good... On The Go (6)
Friday
9:18am:	India Says: 'There Is No Direct Correlation Between IP And Innovation' (31)
Tuesday
8:13pm:	Flattr Makes It Easier Than Ever To Support Content Creators Just By Favoriting Tweets (61)
Saturday
9:00am:	Awesome Stuff: Little Devices That Help You Out (15)
Thursday
11:01am:	Kickstarter Projects That Don't Meet Their Goal Are Not 'Failures'; They Help People Avoid Failures (40)

A word from our Sponsors...

from the don't-miss-it dept

from the putting-on-that-legal-hat dept

from the welcome-to-the-modern-world dept

from the they're-not-real-thrilled-about-them dept

from the seems-like-a-problem dept

from the yes-and-no dept

from the they-might-have-to dept

from the um,-no dept

from the welcome-to-the-modern-world-of-ownership dept

Techdirt RSS

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

I’m looking for research...

I have an app...

I have a business...

Hot Topics

New To Techdirt?

Company

Contact

Tools & Services

More