Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   GeneralEmergency (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 2:40am

   
   

   Very charming people.

   Very insightful folks.
   
   They made me feel much better and more confident about my own fledgling musical endeavors.
   
   I wish them well.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 4:54am

   
   

   They almost make the mistake of admitting that the art is second place, they joke about it, but they really are just trying to keep a job that they like, rather than having to 9 to 5 it. It isn't music for the sake of music, it's music for the sake of not having to work hard.
   
   In a lot of ways they remind me of Kevin Smith, media whores first, business people second, and artists a distant third.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 6:02am

   
   

   Where are the people saying other are not making money giving away their products for free?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   AR (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 6:09am

   
   

   Their Hyundai Christmas commercials were on TV for most of December where Im at. At the time it did peak my curiosity so I did a search to see who they were. I guess that was part their plan all along. It works.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   Rose M. Welch (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 6:34am

   
   

   Re:

   It isn't music for the sake of music...
   
   Yeah, Like Britney Spears or...
   
   Oh, wait.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Jason, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 7:08am

   
   

   Re:

   You haven't watched or listened to even 3 seconds of their music, have you? They may enjoy what they do, but your suggestion that they don't work hard...is a flaming pile of poo.
   
   You do know they write their own arrangments for covers, write their own songs, record each instrument raw(sometimes a dozen or more in one song) and record each vocal raw, right?
   
   "I guess I kinda don't like how there's such a pedestal for music culture and especially for band culture, it just feels fake; it feels like smoke and mirrors. I feel like music doesn't have to be like that. It can be something that's very normal and very accessible." —Jack Conte
   
   Media whores? Whatever.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 7:50am

   
   

   Re: Re:

   For someone who likes music, music in and of itself is not hard work. What is hard work is making music to someone else's expectations other than your own.
   
   Their goal is to avoid hard work and to make a living at it. They enjoy the process, more power to them. More importantly, the goal is to make a living, not to make the greatest music ever. That's okay, they are a great example of modern times.
   
   More power to them,let's just hope the whole music world doesn't turn into this.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   teka (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 8:07am

   
   

   Re: Re: Re:

   in other words,"Yes, but these are not Real musicians, so any success they have does not count"
   
   This one goes right up there on the wall next to "This only works for small bands" and "this only works for large bands".
   
   I also enjoy the back-handed compliments of..
   "For someone who likes music, music in and of itself is not hard work."
   
   "That's okay, they are a great example of modern times."
   
   "More power to them,let's just hope the whole music world doesn't turn into this.".
   
   It is like a condescending head-pat from some great authority figure before waggling their finger from on high.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   James, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 8:20am

   
   

   Pomp.

   What is interesting is how cover song bands are big on youtube.com.
   
   This band's original music is not very good.
   
   Do they have to pay big star artists a fee to cover their songs?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 8:45am

    
    

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    You got that wrong. They are real musicians, and they are really talented. But their goal isn't to be great musicians, their goal is to make a living. They aren't there specifically for the art and the money will follow, they are there for the money and the art will follow.
    
    If anything, it is everything that people here try to pin on the label system.
    
    As for backhanded compliments, you got that all wrong too. For people who love music, music isn't hard work. All the hours put in is for something they love, not something they hate. They aren't filling in TPS forms and arguing with a printer than never works right, they are doing what they love, what they would choose to do with they were entirely free of any responsiblity in life. It may appear as a lot of work, but if they really love music, it isn't work at all.
    
    Finally, "More power to them,let's just hope the whole music world doesn't turn into this.". is my personal opinion. I hope the music industry doesn't degrade down to this level, because their music isn't seemingly as important as their too cool for school 3G lifeverse and quest for a paycheck from it.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    m3mnoch (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 9:05am

    
    

    Re: Re: Re:

    For someone who likes music, music in and of itself is not hard work. What is hard work is making music to someone else's expectations other than your own. 
    [... snip ..]
    More power to them,let's just hope the whole music world doesn't turn into this.

    holy crap, but that's prolly the funniest thing i've ever read on here.  it's like you're praying that art goes away to be replaced by corporate jingles.

    seriously.  i almost blew coffee out my nose laughing when i read that.

    m3mnoch.

    p.s.  tears!  i'm laughing at you so hard i have TEARS!!!

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 10:47am

    
    

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Degrade? Too late.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    

    bob, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 12:38pm

    
    

    Re: Pomp.

    Royalties? Perhaps they do. But I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't. That would be uncool.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    

    JeffR, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 1:26pm

    
    

    Re: Pomp.

    Counter-examples to your assertion that their original music is "not very good":
    
    -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il-OFaFzHQM
    -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uolz7V12evc
    -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9KMgg7T_sg
    
    See also Gulf by Jack, without Natalie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBUUOJpFg9Y

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    

    RadialSkid (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 1:41pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "But their goal isn't to be great musicians, their goal is to make a living. They aren't there specifically for the art and the money will follow, they are there for the money and the art will follow."
    
    Wow...please tell me you aren't one of those people who attacks CC-licensed musicians as "amateurs" and lionizes "professional content" instead? Because if so, that would make you a pretty serious hypocrite.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 2:31pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Nope, I judge musicians by their musicianship and to some extent why they are doing it. I like the dedicated ones, the ones who are doing it because they love music first, and everything else second. Think of someone like a Bruce Springsteen who loves the music so much you almost have to pry him off stage, he enjoys that part so much.
    
    These two may or may not be talented musicians, they are obviously capable of playing many instruments, which makes them talented in that way, I guess. But it would appear that they are allowing the money angle drive their art, making decisions based on making a living rather than the art itself.
    
    Making money doesn't make them great musicians, it makes them perhaps business people who play instruments.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

17.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 2:32pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Actually, considering they are doing it for the money, are they not really the jingle players?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

18.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 2:36pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Pomp.

    Having gotten a deeper understanding of them, I can say they a pretentious "artistes" with plenty of technical talent but not really much going on. I cannot imagine people wanting to listen to this stuff for very long. It is self indulgent to the point of being self-defeating.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

19.  

    

    Michael, Jan 28th, 2011 @ 3:13pm

    
    

    Pomplamoose ... Now known in Australia ... by this Techdirt Article

    & we think Pomplamoose is great, but is it Australia or me that is the last to know?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

20.  

    

    Karl (profile), Jan 28th, 2011 @ 4:13pm

    
    

    Worst band ever?

    Ha ha, the first time I heard of this band is when I read a bunch of posts on Facebook from people who violently hated their Christmas commercials.
    
    Many of my friends didn't even think they were a real band. They thought some suit from marketing had visited Portland once, and hired whoever he saw on the street to act like musicians.
    
    They've been called "hipsters," but they're not even up to that. Hipsters, at least, are over-the-top annoying, so you can laugh at them (think Ear Pwr). Pomplamoose is aggressively mediocre. Their music is as vacuous as the singer's deer-in-the-headlights stare.
    
    ...Of course, they're not any worse than the Top 40 "musicians" they cover. Plus, if they can make money from music, anyone can.
    
    Okay, rant over. Time to get back to work.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

21.  

    

    MadderMak (profile), Jan 30th, 2011 @ 7:23pm

    
    

    Re: Pomplamoose ... Now known in Australia ... by this Techdirt Article

    Just you - sorry

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

22.  

    

    Williston, N.D., Mar 18th, 2011 @ 6:33pm

    
    

    Sarah Blasko

    Just heard them for the first time a few minutes ago. The vocalist sounds reminiscent of Sarah Basko, the famous Australian singer over there, but even better. Wonder how the song 'Dont U Eva' would work out, or 'Planet New Year'. The two outfits might even make a good song together sometime.
    
    The best of luck.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment