Current Insight Community Cases

Justifying Your Datacenter Management Improvements

Essential Datacenter Tips On Application Performance Monitoring

The Importance Of Skilled Immigrants To The American Economy

Help A New Kind of Music Label Revolutionize The Industry

Mandates To Buy American Should Be More Carefully Considered

CwF + RtB

-- get "looooots of t-shirts"

Brought to you by Floor64 and the Techdirt crew.

stories filed under: "trading"
Too Much Free Time

Too Much Free Time

by Mike Masnick

Mon, Apr 6th 2009 4:55am


Filed Under:
april fool's, fake money, trading

Companies:
zecco



Bad April Fool's Joke: Give Away Millions In Fake Money; Users Start Trading With It

from the how-to-define-a-bad-idea dept

See Update Below. Well here's an idea that must have sounded good at one point. Upstart online brokerage Zecco (already known for pulling attention-grabbing stunts) had the bright idea for April Fool's Day to load up users' balances with much more money than they actually had -- sometimes millions more. Except... it looks like they never bothered to make sure people couldn't use that money. So plenty of users started making trades with the fake money... and when Zecco realized it, the company apparently started to force sell, even at a loss, charging the losses to the customers along with a "$19.99 broker-assisted trading fee." Oops. Update: Consumerist has updated their post with a message from Zecco claiming that it was not an April Fool's joke, but noting "Some clients may experience incorrect display of Buying Power and Account Balances." It's not entirely clear how those "incorrect displays" were apparently off by millions in some cases. Update 2: Zecco is again insisting this was not an April Fool's joke and that it was "a bad feed" from a vendor. It's not entirely clear why it took the firm 5 days to explain that, however...

22 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
Scams

Scams

by Mike Masnick

Mon, Jan 28th 2008 6:21am


Filed Under:
billions, fraud, jerome kerviel, security controls, trading



Exactly How Do You Hide $73 Billion In Fraudulent Trades?

from the bet-big,-lose-big dept

At the end of last week, the latest banking scandal started hitting the wires as news broke of a low level trader for the French bank Societe Generale was somehow able to lose the bank $7.2 billion by sneaking around various control and security systems to make a series of complex bets, well beyond what he should have been allowed to do. Many people are comparing it to the case of Nick Leeson, who brought down Barings bank over a decade ago -- though, with Leeson, it only took a little over a $1 billion. And, over the weekend, the details got worse. That $7.2 billion loss came on bets up to $73 billion. It certainly raises plenty of questions about the controls that are in place. No matter how sneaky you are, you would think that $73 billion would be pretty hard to trade without anyone noticing. Apparently not. The trader in this case, Jerome Kerviel, supposedly had a detailed understanding of the security systems thanks to an earlier job at the bank, that involved monitoring the trading systems and then used other people's accounts and falsified documents to hide his tracks. Even so, you would think that someone would have taken notice of $73 billion moving around. Societe Generale claims that, unlike Barings, it can easily survive this fraud and will even turn a profit. Of course, at the same time, it also announced it needs to raise $8 billion -- and given the size of the loss, that certainly makes it sound like the bank needs to replace that money pretty quickly.

21 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
Deals

Deals

by Joseph Weisenthal

Wed, Aug 22nd 2007 3:08pm


Filed Under:
brokerages, dotcom, trading

Companies:
e-trade, td-ameritrade



TD-Ameritrade To Place Buy Order For E-Trade?

from the discount-deals dept

It's being reported today that two companies closely associated with the last stock market bubble, TD-Ameritrade and E-Trade, are in talks to merge. Both companies have evolved to become comfortably profitable established firms, but throughout their history they have been dogged by steep price competition and high customer acquisition costs (as evidenced by the constant stream of TV advertising from both firms). Furthermore, active management of individual stock portfolios has never again reached the heights experienced during the bubble, as investors have turned to things like ETFs and other index funds, which don't lead to as many commissions. A merger could help both sides reduce costs, although there's still a lot of competition in this space, which would make it hard for them to raise prices too much. That being said, Dealbook points to some reasons to doubt the significance of these rumors. The two sides have said in the past that they'd be interested in exploring a combination, but there's nothing new now to suggest a deal is imminent. Furthermore, any deal would be beset by organizational challenges, as TD-Ameritrade is a unit of the larger Toronto-Dominion Bank, meaning E-Trade management would have to step out of the way. So, most likely, the two sides are likely to remain separate, and you can expect a continued flood of annoying brokerage ads (until the next time the market nosedives, that is).

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
Wall Street

Wall Street

by Joseph Weisenthal

Thu, Aug 2nd 2007 12:28pm


Filed Under:
trading



Fat Finger Reverses Stock Market Slump

from the fat-finger-fat-profits dept

The stock market has been taking a pounding over the past several sessions, but yesterday's action brought some relief as the major indices surged towards the close. There was no obvious catalyst for the move, although late-session reversals aren't all that rare. So, should investors be relieved that buyers stepped into the market? Not necessarily -- it would appear that the late really was simply caused by a so-called fat finger error. Basically, a trader at a major Wall Street firm messed up on an order and then had to do some major buying in order to cover for the mistake. Other traders, recognizing the situation, piled on, taking advantage of the sudden buying panic. These type of human errors happen from time to time, sometimes with great significant consequences for the offending firm or trader. In 2005, one such error at a Japanese firm ended up costing $251 million. This time, the consequences probably won't be so severe, although it still seems like it would be a good idea to develop some better preventative controls.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
San Francisco Music Tech 2009
15% off discount for Techdirt Readers



Popular Posts
Poll

Which Internet Concern Worries You The Most?

 

 

 

 

 

 


Add Techdirt RSS To Your Reader
rss Add Techdirt to your Bloglines
Add Techdirt to your Google Add Techdirt to your My Yahoo
Add Techdirt to your Netvibes Add Techdirt to your Newsgator
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Older Stuff

Wednesday

4:01pm: Funny How Those In Favor Of ACTA Are Against Treaty Providing More Access To Content For Vision Impaired (6)
3:15pm: Advertising As Content: Newspaper Raising Newsstand Prices For Thanksgiving Papers With Black Friday Ads (11)
2:14pm: Are Entertainment Industry Tactics Working? (50)
1:00pm: Photographer Compares Microstock Sites To Pollution And Drug Dealing (45)
11:48am: If Movie Piracy Is Really A Problem, It's Hollywood's Fault (77)
10:27am: If Google Visitors Are Worthless, It's Only Because Newspaper Execs Don't Know What They're Doing (37)
9:01am: Multitasking Is Our Main Activity (15)
7:33am: Greed vs. Due Diligence: Another Case Of Startup Fraud? (4)
6:01am: Anti-Piracy Group In Spain Fined For Bad Faith Actions Against File Sharing Systems (13)
3:55am: ABA Journal's Patent Application To Score Interview With USPTO Boss David Kappos (18)
1:44am: Can Universities Make Sure That Drugs Based On Their Research Are Licensed Reasonably? (19)

Tuesday

9:21pm: Companies Realizing That Content Is Advertising Via Web Series (12)
7:01pm: Could You Prove That The Government Was Watching You Illegally? (38)
4:56pm: Reuters, AP Refuse To Cover Cricket Matches Over Restrictive Press Accreditation Rules (21)
3:21pm: Comparing File Sharing To Payola: Could Have Had That Promotion For Free (34)
1:56pm: Jury Says Fictional Character Can Be Libelous (28)
12:44pm: Spam King Alan Ralsky Gets Four Years In Jail (28)
11:39am: Publishers Getting The Wrong Message Over eBook Piracy (39)
10:28am: Calling For An Independent Invention Defense In Patents (27)
9:12am: Microsoft Tries To Silence Revelation Of Bing Cashback Flaws; Leads To Revelation Of Other Problems (43)
8:03am: Don't Blame Facebook For Some Kids Beating Up Another Student (61)
6:46am: Hulu Telling Sites To Stop Embedding So Much (44)
5:00am: Once Again, If The Gov't Has Data, It Will Be Abused (42)
2:53am: As Expected, Social Networking Generation Running For Office Face Their Permanent Record Online (32)
12:55am: IMAX Sues Cinemark For Building Competing System... While Being An IMAX Customer (14)

Monday

10:26pm: Filmmaker Allowed To Use The Name Rin Tin Tin To Describe Rin Tin Tin (6)
8:25pm: Senators Begin Questioning ACTA Secrecy (32)
6:34pm: Brazil E-Voting Machines Not Hacked... But Van Eck Phreaking Allowed Hacker To Record Votes (15)
5:08pm: FCC Doesn't Think The Lack Of Competition Is A Major Barrier To Broadband? (36)
3:49pm: Heads Of Major Movies Studios Claiming They Just Want To Help Poor Indie Films Harmed By Piracy (47)
More arrow
Quick Links
Close
E-mail It