Current Insight Community Cases

Propose a Webinar On Building A Business Case For IT Investments

Submit A Webinar Proposal On IT Productivity Metrics

IT Predictions for 2010 And Beyond

A Look Back At 2009 For IT

Picking The Right Spot For A Data Center

Check out our CwF + RtB experiment.
Brought to you by Floor64 and the Techdirt crew.

stories filed under: "simplicity"
Overhype

Overhype

by Timothy Lee


Filed Under:
complexity, preferences, simplicity

Companies:
facebook

More Isn't Necessarily Better When It Comes To Preferences

from the keep-it-simple-stupid dept

Facebook has unveiled a new set of privacy settings that have been getting some positive reviews in some quarters. While I'm always happy to see a company that's not afraid to experiment with new privacy protections, I think Facebook has some more work to do on this one.

One problem has been identified by Chris Soghoian: if you're in an academic network, you can theoretically limit access to your profile based on each viewer's academic status at your institution. So if you're an undergrad, you can set things up so that your friends can see those pictures of you doing body shots, but your professors and TAs can't. The problem is that apparently, peoples' status is self-reported, and can easily be changed. So a nosy grad student could temporarily switch his status to "undergrad" and to get access to an undergraduate's photos. This seems like a problem.

The more fundamental flaw, I think, is that there are now way too many options. The exact options I see on my Facebook account are different from the ones Chris sees, presumably because he's a student and I'm not. But on my version of the preferences, there are a dozen categories of information, each of which have 6 to 8 different options. For example, there are separate privacy settings for "profile," "basic info," and "personal info." Do you have any idea what is in each of those categories? I don't. And then you have to decide whether each category will be available to "Only Me," "Some Friends," "All Friends," and "Friends of Friends." And you have to decide which of your "networks" will be able to see that information. And you can provide a list of people to exclude.

This is a bewildering array of options, and it's likely to retard the usefulness of Facebook's privacy features. When it comes to user preferences, a handful of carefully chosen options is better than allowing users to adjust every conceivable setting. A well-designed user-interface should economize on the user's valuable time and attention by giving him a reasonable number of options that encompass the most likely use cases. If you give users a huge number of options, most of them will give up in frustration, leaving them in a much worse position, privacy-wise, than if you'd given them a smaller menu of easy-to-understand options to choose from.

Timothy Lee is an expert at the Insight Community. To get insight and analysis from Timothy Lee and other experts on challenges your company faces, click here.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Popular Posts
Poll

Which Internet Concern Worries You The Most?

 

 

 

 

 

 


Add Techdirt RSS To Your Reader
rss Add Techdirt to your Bloglines
Add Techdirt to your Google Add Techdirt to your My Yahoo
Add Techdirt to your Netvibes Add Techdirt to your Newsgator
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Older Stuff

Monday

1:04pm: Verizon Wireless Blocks 4chan; You Would Think It Would Remember What Happened When AT&T Did That (28)
11:55am: The Economist Notices That The Patent System Is Hindering Innovation And Needs To Be Fixed (35)
10:43am: Remix Culture Is About The Culture As Much As The Remix (28)
9:19am: Why Shouldn't Jurors Be Able To Use Technology To Do More Research? (117)
8:01am: Court Disagrees On Whether Or Not Schools Can Punish Students Over Fake Social Network Pages (26)
6:41am: Why Does The IEEE Make It So Difficult To Access And Share Research? (26)
4:45am: PayPal Suspends Payments In India? (26)
2:45am: Italy Blocks The Pirate Bay Yet Again (44)

Friday

7:39pm: How Patents Harm Biotech Innovation (182)
6:36pm: Because When MetroPCS Says 'No Contract,' It Actually Means 'Well, Of Course There's A Contract' (82)
5:40pm: Appeals Court Says Internet Content Should Be Held To Standards Of Strictest Jurisdiction (64)
4:48pm: Online Comic Book Store Stands Up To Olivia Munn Lawyers Over Parody Comic Book (22)
4:04pm: Comcast CEO Argues Rules Will Protect Customers In Merger, While Comcast Lawyers Argue Rules Are Unconstitutional (11)
3:03pm: Ten Good Reasons To Buy: The Newspaper Edition (39)
1:53pm: UK Whistleblowers Highlight The Dangers Of Widespread Police Surveillance/Database (39)
12:39pm: No, Copyright Has Never Been About Protecting Labor (177)
11:20am: USTR Insists Gov't Isn't Keeping ACTA Secret (56)
10:13am: Springsteen Pissed At ASCAP For Implying He Instigated Lawsuit Against Pub; Demands His Name Removed (40)
9:09am: Microsoft Exec Calls For 'Driver's License For The Internet' (103)
7:58am: NBC Universal Boss Jeff Zucker Lies To Congress About Boxee (100)
6:45am: Copyright Industry Responds To iiNet Ruling By Asking For Gov't Bailout; Aussie Gov't 'Studying' It (121)
5:13am: Is Spotify Looking To Enable CwF+RtB For Musicians? (18)
3:12am: ADM Says Video Mocking Them Is Copyright Infringement; Abuses Copyright Law To Stifle Free Speech (50)
1:17am: University Help Desk Employee Extorts Student Using Copyright (21)

Thursday

10:49pm: UK's Digital Economy Bill Does Promote New Music... But It's Songs Against The Bill (22)
8:48pm: You Can't Get Rid Of Anonymity Online, Even If You Wanted To (85)
6:47pm: Book Publishing Industry Just Now Realizing That Change Is Turbulent? (20)
5:05pm: This Has To Be A Joke: Music Duo Claims It Won't Sell CDs Again Until 'Piracy' Is Stopped (143)
3:55pm: JetBlue To Most Loyal Customers: We're Too Busy To Help You, Sorry (42)
2:45pm: Company Decides To Run For Congress (37)
More arrow
Quick Links
Close
E-mail It