Remember All Those 'Influence' Ad Companies? They May Have A Patent Problem

from the ah-google dept

It was just a couple weeks ago that we (skeptically) noted that there were a bunch of companies trying to create systems to use things like a "FriendRank" to use "influence" to help advertise. However, it looks like those companies may have to deal with a bit of a patent block. Slashdot points out that Google has applied for a patent on just such a process to establish a sort of "FriendRank." Of course, the fact that there are a bunch of companies all trying to do this (prior to this patent application being published) certainly suggests that this is hardly the sort of breakthrough that requires a patent (though, it seems likely that those other companies are also applying for patents, meaning we may soon have yet another patent thicket).

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Studies

by Mike Masnick

Tue, Jan 29th 2008 1:23am

So Who Will Spread The Word That There Aren't Influentials?

from the certainly-not-the-influentials dept

Clive Thompson always writes fascinating articles (seriously, if you want a detailed feature piece having to do with technology, Thompson is one of the best), and his latest is no exception. It's a profile of Duncan Watts debunking the importance of so-called "Influentials" in getting buzz on something. This concept was a big part of Malcolm Gladwell's "The Tipping Point," and has shown up as a key aspect of things like "word of mouth marketing." In fact, it's hard to find a modern PR firm these days that doesn't try to tout its relationships with "influentials" (even if that "relationship" really is "we have his or her email address"). Yet, what Watts found is that so-called influentials aren't that influential. If a meme is to take hold, there are a variety of things that can kick off the viral message, but it rarely comes from influentials. Sometimes it does, and sometimes they help push it along, but a viral message can actually be kicked off by almost anyone. Of course, that doesn't mean you should throw the baby out with the bathwater. As Mathew Ingram astutely notes, what this really means is that rather than targeting a small group of people, you still need to try to get a message out widely so that the random folks who will spread your idea can spread it. It doesn't mean that word of mouth marketing doesn't happen, it just means it has little to do with getting "big name blogger X" to write about your idea. It should be about getting a message out that anyone wants to talk about.

53 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Search Techdirt

And now, a word from our Sponsors..

15% off discount for Techdirt Readers

Popular Posts

Poll

Add Techdirt RSS To Your Reader

Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Older Stuff

Monday
3:49pm:	Heads Of Major Movies Studios Claiming They Just Want To Help Poor Indie Films Harmed By Piracy (47)
2:38pm:	USPTO Convinced By Amazon That Online Gift Giving Patent Is Legit (19)
1:31pm:	Tiburon Approves Recording Every Car That Enters/Leaves... Despite More Evidence Of Traffic Camera Abuse In UK (78)
12:18pm:	Label Exec Arrested For Not Using Twitter To Disperse Crowd At Mall To See Singer (53)
11:01am:	Spanish Court Dismisses Complaint From Nintendo Against Counterfiet DS Cartridges, Since They Add Functionality (12)
9:55am:	Dear PR People: If Your Exec Has A Comment, Our Comments Are Open (25)
8:44am:	What Kind Of Mickey Mouse (And Donald Duck) Lawsuits Are These? (23)
7:30am:	Prosecutors Ending Lawsuit Against Lori Drew (13)
6:06am:	Dear Rupert: You Don't Succeed By Making Life More Difficult For Users (70)
4:20am:	ESPN Writer Suspended From Twitter (59)
2:10am:	School Can't Handle Critical Community Message Board; Sends Legal Nastygram (21)
Friday
7:39pm:	Liberian Laws Are A Secret Due To Copyright; Even The Gov't Doesn't Have Them (43)
6:56pm:	Lily Allen: It's Ok To Sell My Counterfeit CDs, Just Don't Give My Music For Free (97)
6:10pm:	EFF Looks To Bust Bogus Podcasting Patent; Needs Prior Art (34)
5:28pm:	Google Blocking Set Top Boxes From Showing YouTube Unless They Pay Up? (64)
4:44pm:	Entertainment Industry: Yes, Please Keep Negotiating Secret Copyright Treaty To Save Our Asses (43)
4:02pm:	If Google's Book Scanning Violates Copyright Law, What About The AP's Book Scanning? (21)
3:05pm:	iPhone App Developer Backlash Growing (49)
2:14pm:	Norwegian Band Told It Can't Post Its Own Music To The Pirate Bay, Even Though It Wants To (24)
1:08pm:	If You Only Share A Tiny Bit Of A File Via BitTorrent, Is It Still Copyright Infringement? (79)
12:00pm:	UK Digital Economy Bill As Bad As Expected; Digital Britain Minister Flat Out Lies About ISP Support (25)
10:57am:	NPR's Daniel Schorr Blames The Internet For Ft. Hood Shootings (37)
9:49am:	No, ACTA Secrecy Is Not 'Normal' -- Nor Is It A 'Distraction' (28)
8:33am:	Murdoch's The Times Accused Of Blatant Copying, Just As It Tells The World You Should Pay For News (28)
7:15am:	Copyright Extension Moves To Japan (24)
5:46am:	Canadian Ebook Store Offers 'Free' Public Domain Ebooks -- Claims Copyright Says You Can Only Make 1 Copy (27)
4:01am:	There Are Lots Of Ways To Fund Journalism (14)
1:49am:	Winner Takes All, Long Tails And The Fractilization Of Culture (10)
Thursday
10:37pm:	The Lobbyists' Ability To Control The Message (29)
8:11pm:	In Going Free, London Evening Standard Doubles Circulation While Slashing Costs (27)

Quick Links

Current Insight Community Cases

Remember All Those 'Influence' Ad Companies? They May Have A Patent Problem

from the ah-google dept

So Who Will Spread The Word That There Aren't Influentials?

from the certainly-not-the-influentials dept

Which Internet Concern Worries You The Most?

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Monday

Friday

Thursday

More