MS Decision Analysis
from the it's-all-wrong dept
Here's Jerry Pournelle's analysis of the Microsoft decision. I tend to disagree with a lot of Pournelle's opinions, but this article is very thorough and makes a lot of good points.
<< Good-bye Sidewalk | Keen.com Launches >>
Here's Jerry Pournelle's analysis of the Microsoft decision. I tend to disagree with a lot of Pournelle's opinions, but this article is very thorough and makes a lot of good points.
<< Good-bye Sidewalk | Keen.com Launches >>
Lily Allen No Longer in Favor Of Kicking People Offline... Just Cutting Back Their Bandwidth (67)
Beat Reporting, Fair Use, Twitter And Free Expression: Mashing Up Some Thoughts (64)
More On Deserving To Get Paid (103)
Chris Anderson, Malcolm Gladwell And A Look At Free (63)
Is It Really So Wrong For A Reporter To Have An Opinion? (60)
Brought to you by Floor64
About Techdirt | Contact Us | Advertise On Techdirt | Submit a Story | Twitter | Facebook
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
Jerry's right but there's more to it than OS/2, Ma
Jerry covers a lot of ground in his article. He puts the death of OS/2 in it's proper perspective - no developers, no apps. Same with the Mac.
IMHO, Netscape didn't concentrate on their crown jewels enough. They stopped making the browser the number one priority and got bogged down with Netcaster and server software. As a company they grew too big, too quickly. MS didn't help by offering IE for free, but it wasn't the big hinderance. And it was possible to have Netscape as the default browser on a Win98 machine.
But I believe MS have been abusive. Their dealings with OEMs like Compaq, Dell, and hundreds of smaller companies made it uneconomical to put other OSes on PCs. Why bother to load OS/2 when you have to put on Windows anyway?
It's that kind of behaviour, the details of which we haven't really seen that MS should be stopped from doing. Perhaps the results of this trial will see that happen.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment