Nearly 3 Years After Issuing C&D Notices, NSA & DHS Finally Admit Parodied Logos Don't Violate Federal Law

from the sticking-it-to-The-(lampooned)-Man dept

It took nearly three years for the NSA and the DHS to get the joke. The good news is that people like Dan McCall from LibertyManiacs.com is once again free to parody the two agencies, more than 2-1/2 years after being hit with C&Ds from both agencies for "misusing" their logos.

Today, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are acknowledging that merchants who use images and names of the government agencies on parody merchandise are not in violation of any federal laws.

The admission settles a lawsuit Public Citizen filed against the agencies on behalf of Minnesota activist Dan McCall. Public Citizen argued that McCall has a First Amendment right to sell parody merchandise using the NSA and DHS seals.

“This is an important win,” said Paul Levy, the Public Citizen attorney representing McCall. “Citizens shouldn’t have to worry whether criticizing government agencies will get them in trouble or not. This settlement proves the First Amendment is there to protect citizens’ rights to free speech.”
The C&Ds were issued in 2011. The first one, from the NSA, arrived in March. Someone must have told the DHS that it too was being mocked because it sent its own C&D a few months later. Paul Levy of Public Citizen went to bat for Dan McCall, filing for declaratory relief because issuing C&Ds over parodies is generally considered to be a stupid idea, especially when the plaintiffs attempt to use federal law to stifle speech.

With the host of McCall's merchandise, Zazzle, being at least as complicit in this debacle, Levy's settlement takes care to address future issues with two pre-written letters that the agencies will sign and send to the company that folded oh-so-willingly three years ago. In addition to the two agencies admitting they were wrong and that the statutes quoted in the C&Ds don't actually mean what they said they mean, there are instructions for Zazzle to "review" its users' content in light of this ruling.

While full concession from the government agencies is nice, one wishes they would have been a little more willing to take a joke rather than become the joke themselves with their C&D notices. Fortunately, McCall has been cleared to return to his mockery of uptight government agencies, something he should have never been forced to give up. And Zazzle needs to do a bit more to protect users of its service. A baseless C&D is only as powerful as the host allows it to be and Zazzle played government doormat to the detriment of McCall's business. That's unacceptable.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 19th, 2014 @ 10:20am

    'This settlement proves the First Amendment is there to protect citizensí rights to free speech.'

    strange that. all the law enforcement agencies and the entertainment industries think the the First Amendment only applies when they say, to those they say over what they say. perhaps this little snippet ought to be spread around a bit more? it might be handy in the probable not too distant future when the next bunch of people are sued for doing absolutely nothing wrong!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    limbodog (profile), Feb 19th, 2014 @ 11:59am

    I hope the creator can sue for lost revenue.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 19th, 2014 @ 12:25pm

    "It took nearly three years for the NSA and the DHS to get the joke. The good news is that people like Dan McCall from LibertyManiacs.com is†once again free†to parody the two agencies,†more than 2-1/2 years after being hit with C&Ds from both agencies for "misusing" their logos."

    Well,....at least they were kind enough to give us some parody material from the get go

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Sheogorath (profile), Feb 19th, 2014 @ 1:50pm

    Errata

    Zazzle played government catamite to the detriment of McCall's business.
    FTFY, Tim. You're welcome. ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Paul Alan Levy (profile), Feb 19th, 2014 @ 2:59pm

    Hear, hear about Zazzle

    You would think that their business model would encourage them to stand up to trademark bullies on behalf of their sellers!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Feb 19th, 2014 @ 6:35pm

    Re:

    The NSA will be the only one who listens.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    An Infinitude of Tortoises, Feb 20th, 2014 @ 8:40am

    Someone should tell Zazzle!

    Unfortunately, although the NSA and DHS may now acknowledge this right of parody, Zazzle still does not. I, too, am a shopkeeper at Zazzle, as Dan McCall used to be, and when I read the supposedly good news Tuesday of the court decision, I promptly recreated a design for my on-line shop that Zazzle had deleted last year on the grounds that it incorporated the taboo term "NSA". (In fact, they soon thereafter deleted an alternative version using "N.S.A." instead -- despite the fact that that text is clearly not covered in Sec. 15. (a) of the NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY ACT OF 1959, PL 86-36, http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/nsaact1959.htm.) Anyhow, I recreated the original version ("On the Internet, the NSA knows you're a dog") and even included within the description, as the first tag, "PARODY", and cited the "McCall v. National Security Agency" decision, complete with links, for good measure.

    Naturally, Zazzle deletes my design yet again on Wednesday, stating, as they have before, "We have been contacted by the intellectual property right holder and we will be removing your product from Zazzle's Marketplace due to infringement claims."

    So is the NSA still up to its dirty tricks, settlement be damned, or is Zazzle doing this on its own extralegal initiative? No idea, but if there's a class-action lawsuit here, I'd jump to join it!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This