Cartoonist Donna Barstow Reappears To Generate More Negative Press While Attempting To Stifle Year-Old Negative Press

from the apparently-she-was-off-acquiring-bigger-shovels dept

Everything old is new again, copyright troll-wise. Just recently, we witnessed the return of one of internet's stranger denizens, one hit wonder Shaun "Tongues of Glass" Shane and his army of Twitter accounts deployed to ensure his oft-tweeted banalist poem is properly attributed to the gruff man with unparalleled page-turning skills.

Ken White at Popehat notes that another copyright-wielding troll has emerged from hiding. Donna Barstow, the "cartoonist" whose unfunny drawings drew the (highly negative) attention of Something Awful goons (that's their chosen name, by the way, not a statement of judgment), has ended her self-imposed hiatus by issuing a backdoor-entrance takedown attempt aimed at delisting White's highly critical post from 2012.

I wrote about her in July 2012, which resulted in a truly surreal phone call from her. I also wrote about her odd follow-up rant in which she suggested that copyright is a federal crime. Apparently she actually meant that copyright violation is a federal crime. I think.

Anyway, this morning (that is, nearly 17 months after I wrote about her) I got an email from Google indicating that she had complained that my post contained private information:

Hi,

We're writing from Google.com to bring the following page to your attention:

http://www.popehat.com/2012/07/06/cartoonist-donna-barstow-engages-in-modern-online-version-of-hey-guys-watch-this/

A Whois search indicated that you're the host for this page.

A concerned user contacted us to report that handwritten signature is published on this page. We hope that you'll assist this individual in restricting access to this private information by removing the page from the web. If it's changed to return a true 404 error via the http headers, please let us know and we'll also remove the listing from the Google index.

We appreciate your assistance. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Regards,
The Google Team


On 11/18/13 15:54:25 donnabarstow@gmail.com wrote:

your_name: D. Barstow
email: donnabarstow@gmail.com
webmaster_info_live: agree


number_url:
http://www.popehat.com/2012/07/06/cartoonist-donna-barstow-engages-in-modern-online-version-of-hey-guys-watch-this/


results_url_ssn:
https://www.google.com/search?q=donna+barstow&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=fflb


webmaster_info_contacted: agree

webmaster_info_whois:
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=popehat.com


hidden_subject_signature: Your personal information removal request for a handwritten signature
As you can see, Donna Barstow considers her signature -- the same signature she attaches to every cartoon she creates -- to be "personal information." Apparently, Barstow's idea of "personal" means "things anyone can access."
There's only one place Ms. Barstow's signature appears in my post about her — it's in her cartoon about Mexico, which I put in the post to comment upon it, criticize it, and report on ongoing allegations that some of her cartoons are racist or otherwise obnoxious. It's the signature that she displays to the world in all of the cartoons she publishes. It's "private" in the sense that you can't see it unless you look at one of her cartoons on her web site or published elsewhere by her.
White has written back to Google clarifying the situation. Presumably, Google won't follow through with this request, but stranger things have happened. It appears Barstow's earlier experience with the limitations of copyright law may have taught her at least one thing: the copyright angle probably won't work. Consequently, she has chosen to approach this from an entirely different (but still completely wrong) angle.

Speaking of stranger things, Rob Beschizza at Boing Boing points out that Charles Carreon may be behind Barstow's latest effort. His post dated November 24th details a conversation he had with the "poor woman" who contacted him about concerns that he might be posting about her at a site using Carreon's name. (The site is a "satirical diary" and is [quite obviously] not written by Charles Carreon, "Internet Lawyer".) In the long and winding post, Carreon eventually unloads plenty of hate in Ken White's direction and presumably did the same while calming Donna Barstow, victim of hundreds of self-inflicted wounds.

If this call was recent, Barstow's reaction time is horribly slow. The post she referenced in her conversation with Carreon appeared in July of 2012 (as did Popehat's). It looks as if Barstow's making a belated attempt to clean up her reputation and is apparently assuming it's so long after the fact that no one will care. Obviously, she's wrong. The takedown attempt aimed at Popehat most likely won't work and her effort has generated a minimum of three negative posts in response. Anyone else she targets will just contribute to the body of negative press she's accumulated since going nuclear last summer.

There are lessons to be learned here, but Barstow doesn't seem to have learned anything from her previous experience other than she's run the wheels off the copyright angle.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 3:57pm

    That bitch is tripping.

    Why in gods name would anyone want to start a legal battle with Ken Fucking White? Oh well it will be fun to see it play out and watch Ken destroy her ass.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Lurker Keith, Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 4:20pm

    holes & literacy

    Looks like Carreon fell out of the whole he dug the bottom out of & fell into a new one to dig into. The question is why doesn't he know how to stop digging, even when he ran out of stuff to dig?

    Also, they do know how to read right? They have to be illiterate to even consider going after Popehat like they do.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 5:36pm

    It amazes me

    This woman has a job as a cartoonist because following those links led me to nothing even remotely funny.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    roarshock44, Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 6:21pm

    lurker k: how did that get typed?

    i don't know, but i'm betting you and i and most people these days make those kinds of errors and errors of word omission on a frequent basis.  sometimes i am aghast at something that i even proofread and missed the error.  and it is usually an error i am well familiar with and know very well what is correct.

    one thing i have noticed in my keying-in is that i have become impatient and while i'm typing what i was thinking a moment ago, i've moved on mentally to the next thing i wish to say and have left the actual task of inputting to a habit monkey in my warped mental makeup.  that habit monkey will grab a similar word to the word i was actually quasi-thinking of (or a common internet erroneous usage or simply skip a word) and will be quite happy with it and even protective of it, insisting that what i wrote was good and shouldn't be subject to reconsideration.  i actually sense a level of irritation with myself for forcing the back-check and an unwillingness to commit to really thinking about what i actually keyed in.

    i've seen similar results, anyway, from others who i judge to be competent writers, so i wonder if this phenomenon is some kind of mental school-of-fish behavior on the part of most of us these days.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 8:37pm

      Re:

      I assume you typed that all sarcastically. Ether that or you're typing a three paragraph response about typos while, coincidentally, your shift key is broken.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 7:07pm

    so clueless!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    apauld (profile), Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 9:50pm

    Wow.

    I would think these morons would eventually learn not to mess with Ken White; and I love the fact that they never learn not to mess with Ken White.

    Beyond Ken's original post, Boing Boing and now Techdirt have covered this so far.... awesome failures by censorious douchebags.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 10:27pm

    I must admit I followed a link to Carreons excuse for a revenge site and immediately stumbled on this:

    When you care as little about your enemies as I do

    on the very same site he uses (and fails with) to get back at those "enemies".

    Hilarious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Dec 3rd, 2013 @ 7:16am

    "Hi,

    We're writing from Google.com..."

    Who the fuck are you? I don't care if you are writing from walmart, have a legal problem, call a cop.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This