How China Is Going Global With Its Censorship

from the art-of-persuasion dept

It is neither a secret nor much of a surprise that China keeps its media under tight control. But one knock-on consequence of its rise as a global power is that it is now seeking to extend that influence to those located outside China, including mainstream Western media. That trend is explored in a new report from The Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), entitled “The Long Shadow of Chinese Censorship: How the Communist Party’s Media Restrictions Affect News Outlets Around the World.”

It’s well researched, and contains plenty of documented examples of situations where China has applied pressure to media organizations in various ways — subtle and not-so-subtle — in order to re-frame discussions so that they are more favorable to itself and its agendas:

Since coming to power in 1949, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has constructed a multi-layered system for censoring unwanted news and stifling opposing viewpoints within China. Over the past two decades, this domestic apparatus has spawned mechanisms that extend some censorship to media outlets based outside China. Reflecting the adaptive nature of Chinese authoritarianism, such pressures are a complex mix of overt official actions and more discreet dynamics. They manifest themselves in four key ways:

Direct action by Chinese diplomats, local officials, security forces, and regulators both inside and outside China. These measures obstruct newsgathering, prevent the publication of undesirable content, and punish overseas media outlets that fail to heed restrictions.

Economic “carrots” and “sticks” to induce self-censorship among media owners and their outlets headquartered outside mainland China.

Indirect pressure applied via proxies — including advertisers, satellite firms, and foreign governments — who take action to prevent or punish the publication of content critical of Beijing.

Incidents such as cyberattacks and physical assaults that are not conclusively traceable to the central Chinese authorities but serve the party’s aims and result from an atmosphere of impunity for those attacking independent media.

CIMA’s report offers a fascinating snapshot of a development that is important for both the media and online worlds. Although the details may change over time, the basic methods are likely to remain the same, which makes this a valuable primer of what to watch out for in the future.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “How China Is Going Global With Its Censorship”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
9 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Machines that can be used to publish media are controlled as well

Anyone who wants to buy printer that has printing speed faster than page per minutes must acquire written permission from the authorities.

Anyone who wants to setup server that allow users to post article/comments must obtain written permission with authorization number from the authorities, and such number must be displayed on every major page of the website.

Internet is not a media that can be easily controlled, so the form of control is much more limited. However, without written permission from authorities (again!), your VPN connection will be automatically disconnected on router level every 15 minutes or so.

Anonymous Coward says:

no needs the Chinese for this. Cameron over in the UK is doing a pretty good job all on his own! he is going along with whatever he is told by any industry, particularly the US entertainments industry, Hollywood, Riaa and BPI, without anyone ever being able to defend themselves in court and is allowing web sites to be blocked willy-nilly, all on the say so of those industries. there is no listening to anyone else, from any other section. there is also no ‘why dont you try to do what customers want? why dont you try to do what other industries are doing?’ then add in that the UKL has just added another 20years on to copyright terms and you see the ‘China of the West’ in action!!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: lolwut

How exactly do they go about punishing non-Chinese publications?

From pp.6-7 of the full report:

The Chinese authorities? transnational media controls manifest themselves differently in different environments. Within China, local officials, security forces, and regulators forcibly prevent foreign correspondents from accessing sensitive locations or interviewees, intimidate their Chinese assistants, and block websites. Outside China, diplomats urge senior executives to alter content, compel businesses to refrain from advertising in disfavored Chinese-language media, and in extreme cases, pressure other governments to suppress CCP critics.

And, further from p.8, at the the beginning of the section entitled ?Overview: A Transnational Toolbox?:

Since coming to power in 1949, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has constructed a multi-layered system for censoring unwanted news and stifling opposing viewpoints within China. Over the past two decades, this domestic apparatus has spawned mechanisms that extend some censorship to media outlets based outside China. Reflecting the adaptive nature of Chinese authoritarianism, such pressures are a complex mix of overt official actions and more discreet dynamics. They manifest themselves in four key ways:

? Direct action by Chinese diplomats, local officials, security forces, and regulators both inside and outside China. These measures obstruct newsgathering, prevent the publication of undesirable content, and punish overseas media outlets that fail to heed restrictions.

? Economic ?carrots? and ?sticks? to induce self-censorship among media owners and their outlets headquartered outside mainland China.

? Indirect pressure applied via proxies?including advertisers, satellite firms, and foreign governments?who take action to prevent or punish the publication of content critical of Beijing.

? Incidents such as cyberattacks and physical assaults that are not conclusively traceable to the central Chinese authorities but serve the party?s aims and result from an atmosphere of impunity for those attacking independent media.

(Footnote omitted; emphasis in original.)

wtf, tl;dr, lolwut?

John85851 (profile) says:

Isn't this similar to what the US does?

I think it was only a matter of time until we saw something like this. After all, if the US government can influence other countries’ use of the Internet (based on policy from the MPAA and RIAA), then why shouldn’t other countries do the same?

I’m just waiting for the day when a US official says China or North Korea or Iran is being “outrageous” about trying to control the internet when it’s the US who puts pressure on other countries to enforce copyrights.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...