Document Surfaces Showing NSA Intercepted Communications Of Prominent Americans During Vietnam War

from the if-it's-available,-it-can-be-abused dept

The NSA's abuse of American citizens isn't solely limited to the current revelations. A recently uncovered document shows the NSA intercepted the communications of over 1,000 American citizens in the late 60s and early 70s. Some very notable names are on the list of those surveilled under this program, formally referred to as "Minaret."

During Minaret's six-year lifetime, the NSA secretly monitored the overseas telephone and cable communications of 1,650 U.S. citizens, most of them anti-war dissidents, civil rights leaders, and members of what the occupants of the White House at the time deemed to be extremist or subversive organizations. A declassified document found at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library in Ann Arbor, Michigan, while not mentioning the NSA, confirmed that from 1967 to 1973, the U.S. intelligence community monitored the foreign travel and overseas communications of anti-war activists such as David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, Bernardine Dohrn, Kathy Boudin, and Robert Franklin Williams, as well as a number of prominent African-American militants, such as Eldridge Cleaver and Stokely Carmichael.
It wasn't just activists and militants being stalked by the NSA under this program. It was also prominent DC politicians and civil rights leaders.
Civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Whitney Young were on the watch list, as were the boxer Muhammad Ali, New York Times journalist Tom Wicker, and veteran Washington Post humor columnist Art Buchwald. But perhaps the most startling fact in the declassified document is that the NSA was tasked with monitoring the overseas telephone calls and cable traffic of two prominent members of Congress, Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and Sen. Howard Baker (R-Tenn.).
This program, which apparently operated at the behest of presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, was noxious enough that the NSA's current representatives referred to it as "disreputable if not outright illegal" when asked to comment.

Most of the citizens targeted by Minaret were strongly anti-war. Some were just merely anti-establishment. Others, like humor columnist Art Buchwald and Sen. Baker are a bit more of a mystery. Frank Church, whose Church Committee exposed widespread wrongdoing within American intelligence agencies, appears to have been "investigated" during the course of his investigations, albeit most likely for his anti-war stance, rather than his investigative work.

The most surprising aspect is the surveillance of members of Congress, something the agency doesn't seem to be doing at this point in time, although it certainly has the capability. The fact that it has done so in the past isn't very comforting. (And the fact that past presidents utilized the intelligence agency to keep tabs on personal "enemies" lists isn't very comforting either, but at least Nixon's downfall gave us the heads up that such lists existed.)

It's no surprise the agency was tasked with watching activists and civil rights leaders. The FBI had been doing this for years under the direction of J. Edgar Hoover, and the Vietnam War/ Cold War created a low-level resurgence of the Red Scare. Even those on relatively good terms with the White House found themselves added to the Minaret list if they stepped out of line (or simply experienced a regime change in the White House).
One of the most cautious of the major African-American civil rights leaders, National Urban League Executive Director Whitney Young, had a good relationship with President Johnson and was frequently invited to the White House as a member of LBJ's informal "civil rights cabinet." He initially avoided voicing any criticism of the Vietnam War and thus was not put under surveillance by the FBI. In October 1969, however, shortly after Nixon took office, Young publicly turned against the Vietnam War. The war, he argued, was "tragically diverting America's attention from its primary problem -- the urban and racial crisis -- at the very time that crisis is at its flash point." This single act most likely prompted someone, most likely the FBI, to add Young to the Minaret watch list despite the fact that Young had never been accused of ever doing anything that could be described as illegal or subversive.
Journalist Tom Wicker, Washington bureau chief for the New York Times, was likely surveilled because of his critical reports detailing Johnson and Nixon's mishandling of the Vietnam War. If Johnson didn't add Wicker, then Nixon definitely did, seeing as Wicker also made Nixon's personal "enemies" list. Humor columnist Art Buchwald also criticized the war and his addition to Minaret's tracking shows these administrations weren't too amused with his jabs at their foreign policies. (Not that Buchwald's work couldn't be as scathing as any "straight" article.)

FP's Matthew Aid and William Burr find Sen. Baker's appearance on the list strangest -- perhaps only explainable by Nixon's wide-ranging paranoia.
The most inexplicable name on the watch list is Sen. Howard Baker (R-Tenn.), who served in the U.S. Senate from 1967 to 1985, including a term as majority leader from 1981 to 1985. Unlike Church, Baker, the first Republican to ever be elected to the Senate from the state of Tennessee, was a fervent supporter of the U.S. military's role in the Vietnam War. He was critical of the Johnson administration for not doing enough to win the Vietnam War, but he consistently defended the Nixon administration's handling of the conflict, never wavering in his support despite the growing chorus of criticism of the conflict among his colleagues in the Senate. Baker hardly fits the profile of the other watch-list targets, so perhaps it was a matter of Nixon wanting to know what Baker was saying about him in some of the senator's conversations.
When the program hit its peak (1969), the NSA was collecting over 150,000 communications each month and passing its findings on to the White House. The NSA knew the program operated in a very gray area (the page acquired here mentions that the program is "almost certainly illegal"), and sent each report via an agency courier. The reports themselves were stripped of any identifiable information -- well, anything identifiable that would trace the document back to the NSA. Reports were issued on plain bond paper, completely devoid of logos or any other NSA-related markings.

When defenders of the NSA like Michael Hayden claim that the agency's employees are "bound" by the limits of the law and would not exceed their "authority," he's obviously just plain wrong, if not simply lying. This program alone shows the NSA is perfectly willing to work outside the legal limits, especially when granted the "authority" to do so by its superiors.

The current NSA may have issued a statement distancing itself for its past work, but the fact remains that as long as the capabilities are present, the authority to bypass the law may present itself. While we'd all like to believe that Nixon's actions were an anomaly, seeing that Lyndon Johnson acted just as vindictively towards his enemies indicates that any president can wield this power for his own ends.

No evidence has been produced that a Minaret-esque program currently exists, but the machinery is already in place. All it needs is for someone to flip the switch.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    silverscarcat (profile), Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:03am

    Wait a sec...

    This program, which apparently operated at the behest of presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, was noxious enough that the NSA's current representatives referred to it as "disreputable if not outright illegal" when asked to comment.

    Holy pot calling kettle black, Batman!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:21am

    Now history diverting from calling for indictments and JAIL.

    First, yeah, we know. -- You should catch up on the history of corporations, and what happens with rampant speculation on Wall Street in absence of strong regulation too. History repeats because every new generation refuses to learn from the past.

    Anyhoo. All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to wander off into endless distractions.

    This news to you doesn't help us end today's abuse and tyranny, does it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:25am

    Re: Now history diverting from calling for indictments and JAIL.

    This news to you doesn't help us end today's abuse and tyranny, does it?


    The existence and purpose of Minaret isn't new knowledge to people who've been following this sort of thing, but the document release is certainly news. And yes, it absolutely helps us to end today's abuse and tyranny. Anything that raises people's awareness of how these things work helps to end abuse and tyranny.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:25am

    so, they have been extremely naughty boys for even longer than any thought and definitely for longer than anyone would dare to admit!
    it seems to me that the witch hunts that used to go on over 'reds under the beds' days ought to start up again but with a different agenda, concentrating on a different section of the community, namely, the security agencies and the top guys!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:30am

    "Document Surfaces Showing NSA Intercepted Communications Of Prominent Americans During Vietnam War"

    Look, if it wasn't for the NSA's comprehensive spying programs, a great catastrophe could happen in the US. Something as dreadful as, say, a few planes smashing into key buildings and killing thousands of civilians.

    Thanks to the NSA, you are perfectly fine*.



    * Except for that whole 9/11 thing...and that Boston thing...and probably a few more I am not remembering...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:36am

    Re: Now history diverting from calling for indictments and JAIL.

    In order for people to prevent history from repeating itself and learning from the mistakes of past generations, wouldn't one need to KNOW and LEARN about history? Why are you saying this article is a diversion, and doesn't help? How can learning that the US intelligence agencies have a long history of violating the law NOT help when calling for heads to roll in 2013?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:48am

    If congress believes NSA can sweep up everybodies data but theirs, then there is this bridge.....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 11:55am

    Re:

    how much do you want for that bridge?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 12:18pm

    typo?

    The most surprising aspect is the surveillance of members of Congress, something the agency doesn't seem to be doing at this point in time, although it certainly has the capability.

    I think the bold word above should be spelled 'admitting to'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Jerrymiah, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 1:04pm

    Communications intercepted during Vietnam war

    About an hour before reading this article, I was just thinking about the fact that Most of congressmen and senators probable have all of their comms intercepted by the NSA. Is it just a coincidence.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Crusty the Ex-Clown, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 1:21pm

    Baker?

    Sen. Baker always supported Nixon, eh? He was watched, eh? What do you suppose they had on him? If they had him by the balls then of course his heart and mind had no choice but to follow them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 1:57pm

    Yes, we are witnessing history repeat itself with the current unconstitutional spy programs. Further proof that the primary mission of the people running these spy programs is industrial espionage, political blackmail, and suppression of dissidents who disagree with current leaders views.

    The individuals running who run these unconstitutional spy programs, will argue that all three of these missions fall squarely under the "National Security" banner. They will argue that these unconstitutional spy programs must continue "at all costs".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Edward Teach, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 2:21pm

    Spying on anti-war people

    yeah, that's the first thing you do, spy on them damn quakers and mennonites and all the anti-war riff raff. Personally I suspect that law enforcement spies on anti-war people because those anti-war people do stuff out in the open, without authentication, so it's easy to slip in a ringer. It's harder to have a spy in a smoke-filled back room, because all the Good Ol' Boys know each other personally.

    But it also goes to show that after "terrorists", the first thing any surveillance program is used for is to surveill those who are against surveillance programs. Protect your own integrity, I say, and devil take the hindmost!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 3:29pm

    Kill the Spooks

    This is proof that the spooks are nothing but an affront to democracy and all so called 'intelligence agencies' abolished.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 3:49pm

    Re: Re: Now history diverting from calling for indictments and JAIL.

    The American people are too shiftless, spineless, and brainless to do what it takes to end abuse and tyranny.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Mason Wheeler, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 3:56pm

    An anomaly? Really?

    While we'd all like to believe that Nixon's actions were an anomaly...

    ...we really don't, because deep down we know that what he did (what he's infamous and reviled for doing, at least) was just business as usual. He was playing the politics game by the long-established (if quiet) rules thereof. The only thing Nixon did wrong, and the thing he ended up getting punished (by other politicians) for, was get caught red-handed at it.

    Watergate was nothing particularly special. What we really ought to revile Richard Nixon for is the way he sold our country out economically, both to the Chinese (remember the saying "only Nixon could go to China"? Don't you wish, today, that he hadn't?) and to the health insurance cabals (our current problems with health care costs can be laid almost entirely at his feet, and he knew exactly what the consequences would be when he did it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 26th, 2013 @ 4:22pm

    Nothing to Hide

    Wouldn't it be a hoot if somehow Alexander's and Clapper's and their families's private calls and emails and keystrokes and text were all found on the internet somewhere.Everyday!

    I mean if they can monitor us why can't we monitor them?
    They probably have nothing to hide...right?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Starke (profile), Sep 26th, 2013 @ 10:31pm

    I could have sworn Minaret was public knowledge a decade ago. Hell, I've got a freakin' Spycraft Book (The RPG system) that mentions it, from 2005.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    Postulator (profile), Sep 27th, 2013 @ 2:48am

    The only reason no evidence has surfaced showing that the NSA is currently spying on members of Congress and/or the president is that no senior NSA officers have denied it yet.

    The pattern is clear: they say "but we didn't do x", and a couple of days later a leak is published showing that they did, in fact do "x".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Sep 27th, 2013 @ 4:05am

    Re: Re: Now history diverting from calling for indictments and JAIL.

    Besides, one should be aware of the past not to make the same mistakes in the present.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    FM Hilton, Sep 27th, 2013 @ 4:12am

    History repeats itself

    " This program, which apparently operated at the behest of presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, was noxious enough that the NSA's current representatives referred to it as "disreputable if not outright illegal" when asked to comment."
    I wonder if a future article will repeat this same claim in about 40 years?
    "This program, which apparently operated at the behest of presidents George Bush and Barack Obama, was noxious enough that the NSA's current representatives referred to it as "disreputable if not outright illegal" when asked to comment."
    Just change the names and the story stays the same.

    The program being discussed was one part of a constant surveillance program aimed at targeting the 'pinkos, commies, and freaks' that current administrations did not like, of course. J. Edgar Hoover was a specialist at this kind of stuff.

    I wonder if Keith Alexander is his distant cousin.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This