A Tale Of Two Hit Songs Inspired By Past Hits... And The Very Different Way In Which Copyright Holders Reacted

from the one-good,-one-bad dept

There were two very interesting stories last week concerning hit songs allegedly "inspired" by hits from previous decades, but the stories are quite different. First up, was the news that Robin Thicke (along with Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris Jr.), whose song Blurred Lines appears to be the undisputed hit of the summer this year (with some controversy over the content), had filed for a declaratory judgment against Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music, after those two claimed that Blurred Lines infringes on Marvin Gaye's Got to Give it Up and Funkadelic's Sexy Ways. You can listen to them below:




Frankly, I can hear the similarities between Blurred Lines and Got to Give it Up (that bass line is pretty damn similar), but, as the filing for declaratory judgment notes, having a similar "feel" or "sound" is not copyright infringement (hello idea/expression dichotomy). As they note, Gaye's heirs appear to be "claiming ownership of an entire genre, as opposed to a specific work."

As for the Funkadelic song, I don't hear it at all. But... this is Bridgeport, we're dealing with here, the company that George Clinton continues to claim forged documents to gain control over his copyrights, and which is without a doubt the single most aggressive of the sample trolls out there, going after anyone who uses even the tiniest snippet of some of the copyrights it controls (even if they were obtained by dubious means). Bridgeport has gone after musicians even when they distorted tiny snippets of music so much that the average listener couldn't recognize the original. So perhaps it claims something similar is happening here.

Either way, the threats came in and Thicke, Williams and Harris decided to strike first with a declaratory judgment. Good for them, but shame on Bridgeport and Marvin Gaye's heirs. Especially with Marvin Gaye, while the songs may have a similar feel, they're different songs. They're both enjoyable in their own ways, and the success of one doesn't take away from the other. In fact, it seems likely that the massive success of Blurred Lines is driving more interest in Got to Give it Up and other Marvin Gaye songs.

However, compare that dispute to another, very similar, dispute. It appears that there was some controversy over the fact that the band One Direction's latest song, entitled Best Song Ever (I'd put a joke here, but it sorta speaks for itself), is conspicuously similar to The Who's classic song Baba O'Riley. Again, to the comparisons:


Again, here, the similarities are pretty obvious and unmistakable. However, unlike Bridgeport or Marvin Gaye, The Who's Pete Townshend has said that he loves the fact that others are inspired by his works and has no issue with it at all. He was specifically asked if he was going to take legal action against One Direction, and pointed out that so much great music involves copying and building on the works of others:
No! I like the single. I like One Direction. The chords I used and the chords they used are the same three chords we've all been using in basic pop music since Buddy Holly, Eddie Cochran and Chuck Berry made it clear that fancy chords don't mean great music – not always. I'm still writing songs that sound like Baba O'Riley – or I'm trying to!. It's a part of my life and a part of pop's lineage. One Direction are in my business, with a million fans, and I'm happy to think they may have been influenced a little bit by The Who. I'm just relieved they're all not wearing boiler suits and Doc Martens, or Union Jack jackets. The funniest thing is that in Canada this year I met with Randy Bachman once the leader of GUESS WHO who told me that he not only copied Baba O Riley for their hit You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet, but he even called his band after us. Why would I not be happy about this kind of tribute?
What a fantastic response in almost every way. And what a stark contrast to the heirs of Marvin Gaye and so many other copyright holders who seem to freak out when others are inspired by their works. Now, if we could just get Townshend to stop blaming Apple for the problems of the recording industry...


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Colin, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 1:11pm

    He was specifically asked if he was going to take legal action against One Dimension

    "Direction." Just a head's up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Starke (profile), Aug 20th, 2013 @ 1:24pm

    Re:

    It's a reasonable mistake to make, given their relative depth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Aliasundercover, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 1:31pm

    Heirs vs. Artist

    Tribute and influence matter to an artist, perhaps not so much to an heir.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Peter (profile), Aug 20th, 2013 @ 1:36pm

    Pretty different

    I hear a lot of differences -- it's pretty obvious they are completely different songs, although AT FIRST GLANCE there are a lot of similarities, especially for the first few notes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Alt0, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 1:37pm

    Music Creator vs Copyright Owner
    One wants to GIVE the other TAKE
    and the "owner" a greedy Estate yet, no involvement in the creation of the material, just looking for a payday.
    Go get a job losers!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 1:52pm

    Re:

    Can you say Freudian slip?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Aug 20th, 2013 @ 2:00pm

    I wonder...

    No! I like the single.


    I wonder if Townsend would have answered this question differently if he hated the single...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 2:11pm

    I didn't know that inspired was now a synonym of "taken directly from". When did that change? Oh wait... it didn't.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 2:15pm

    The musicians get that they each build upon each other. The heirs who never contributed a damn thing, feel entitled to something for nothing. The labels are just plain greedy. Perhaps this is why copyright is intended strictly for the author and not for the authors heirs or record labels. The system has been corrupted by politicians who just don't understand how to create anything.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 2:27pm

    Re:

    What are you talking about? Politicians know how to create. They create lies and BS, must be because the majority of them are evil lawyers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Divide by Zero (profile), Aug 20th, 2013 @ 2:45pm

    I know it's been said a million times before, but the fact that the ESTATE can continue to control an artist's work is just wrong. They had nothing to do with it, so they should just STFU and go contribute something useful instead of just claiming on what their forebears did. Marvin Gaye did the work, the credit & reward should stay with him and no one else.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 3:39pm

    Savage Garden's 1996 hit "I Want You" bears a striking resemblance to Reunion's 1974 hit "Life Is A Rock But The Radio Rolled Me". Bizarre coincidence or blatant rip-off? Listen to them both and you be the judge. As for me, well, I'm not a great believer in coincidence.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    k-h, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 3:57pm

    Penguin Cafe Orchestra

    The introductory riff in the one-direction song sounds pretty much to me like Penguin Cafe Orchestra's Perpetuum Mobile.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Fcorona (profile), Aug 20th, 2013 @ 5:45pm

    Re:

    I don't think he is going to be enjoying any reward since he is no longer around. Although I don't agree with this litigation as the songs are not similar enough, I do think that at the minimum credit should be given when it is an obvious ripoff.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 6:27pm

    Ironic that One Direction stole "Baba O'Riley" for what is nothing but teenage wasteland pop.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 10:28pm

    Re: I wonder...

    *heard the single.

    He can't seriously like One Dimension, if he does I'm burning my Who collection.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 10:30pm

    Re: Re:

    They don't want credit, they want money!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Aug 20th, 2013 @ 10:51pm

    Re:

    There's only so many combinations of notes people can come up with. And it's quite possible that something your heard (years ago) will be stuck and influence your own creations down the line. Nothing fishy about it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    any moose cow word, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 11:04pm

    Re:

    Well, most artist get it, but copyright law got the way it is in part because some creators are greedy too. I'm talking about the "original" artist who bash others for "taking" their works after building their own careers by "taking" from those who came before them. And the creators who decried the moral "right" to never have their works touched by another mortal while they still draw breath...or for 70 years after. Those creators have been quite vocal for years, often with huge support from their publishers.

    However, the majority of creators who understand and care for their art, the ones who know better, remain silent. Rarely does anyone see the need to stand up and state the obvious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    any moose cow word, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 11:22pm

    Can't say I care much for any of the songs, but none of them are all that similar. The bass line of the first two doesn't sound alike. The first seems like a basic loop where as the second has an actual bass player. Unless it's a loop from some small part of Got to Give it Up, there's no case at all. And even if it was, there's still no meaningful level of infringement. To me, it'd be like having two movies were one of the characters has a fro and shades and saying one is infringing on the other.

    In the second case, it's obvious that some "copying" was involved, but it's still fairly small.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 2:16am

    Re:

    Yeah the song sucks.

    If "inspired by" now means "diluted and unmemorable shadow of the original", that's really unfortunate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Aug 21st, 2013 @ 3:49am

    Several comments and just one LOL over a joke concerning One Direction? Kids these days. I'm sure if it was Justin Bieber...

    Oh wait...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    equireLLC, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 5:46am

    Its different

    Pete Townsend is a musician, he created tons of music much of it very successful. Marvin Gaye’s family are not successful music creators, so they have to paw and scrape after anything the genetic lottery might allow them to lay claim on. Blurred Lines is barely a song, it’s just a chorus repeated over and over, when you make something that simple, it’s going to sound like a lot of other stuff (where is Prince in this?).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Shon Gale, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 6:34am

    Randy Bachman was in Bachman Overdrive, not Guess Who.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 7:50am

    Re:

    You're right it didn't change, it has always meant that. The only thing that has changed is what you know. Learning is fun.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    celeter, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 9:16am

    Re:

    Really?
    Randolph Charles "Randy" Bachman, OC, OM (/ˈbækmən/; born September 27, 1943) is a Canadian musician best known as lead guitarist, songwriter and a founding member for both the 1960s–70s rock band The Guess Who, and the 1970s rock band Bachman–Turner Overdrive. Bachman was also a member of the band Brave Belt with Chad Allan, Union and a band called Ironhorse, and has recorded numerous solo albums.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    Sheogorath (profile), Aug 21st, 2013 @ 10:29am

    The Who's Pete Townshend has said that he loves the fact that others are inspired by his works.
    The above quote is bullshit on Townshend's part. I was inspired enough by 'Behind Blue Eyes' to create a pro-Autistic version of it, and when I contacted Townshend for permission to publish it as simple lyrics (not a recording), he said no, claiming that he didn't want his works to be 'destroyed by any distortion'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 4:01pm

    Re: Re:

    That is true.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    CharonPDX, Aug 23rd, 2013 @ 8:08am

    Re:

    No, I'm pretty sure one dimension is accurate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    E., Aug 23rd, 2013 @ 4:44pm

    Irony and the Who (who are cool)...

    Wow. Irony... just tried the Marvin Gaye song... and it was taken down for copyright infringement.

    Don't think that the song that copied from it was that similar, imo.

    The one that was similar to the Who's song was more alike. Good for Pete Townsend though. Have some respect for him for having a good attitude over this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Adam Whyte, Sep 16th, 2013 @ 4:31am

    I think alot of producers look at old songs to revamp or to get an idea, that's where you get samples from sometimes, like 50 cent's buzzing song the beggining of that song was taken from an old 70's classic. As long as you don't sing the same song and the beat is changed then i don't see anything wrong with it, i play all some of the songs mentioned above as i'm a wedding DJ for my mobile disco business and often get asked for these tracks just shows people don't care they just love the music.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This