LOL Did anyone not see Prenda pleading and whining about having to post the additional bond coming?

It really is no surprise that Prenda would try and once again side step Judge Wright’s order, they took the same steps when they tried to appeal the sanctions and the posting of the first bond.

The only credit I will give them is they got Rosing from Kliendinst to write it, instead of one if Duffy’s brilliant retorts ( much like his genius fail at a faked spam rejection reply )

Of course we all knew they would plead and whine about having to pay, but you have to love where they are claiming to have no money to pay for an additional bond, nor money to pay any penalties imposed on them.

Funny thing they are saying they no money to put forth for a bond, nor to pay any additional penalties…but yet in Paul Hansmeier’s deposition with Pietz and Ranallo about AF Holdings, Hansmeier stated that any settlements paid by infringers went into Prenda accounts.

Now if you recall Hansmeier stated that the monies went into Prenda’s account, and that no money was paid out to the client AF Holdings. Hansmeier also said that Lutz was not paid any money from those settlements and neither was anyone else connected with AF Holdings.

Hansmeier also I believe stated that no disbursements were made from those settlements and the monies stayed in Prenda’s account.

So if Prenda made no disbursements of any kind then the money which was to be used for future copyright infringement litigation should still be in Prenda coffers one would think.

Prenda would have had to either turn those monies back to the client or distribute payment of the monies to various parties. I can’t see how they can claim no funds when they claimed in that deposition that they had distributed none of the money out and it was sitting in their account.

I would say that is quite the contradiction in terms, but I am sure if Pietz files an objection to their emergency stay play he will point out the glaring contradictions made in their affidavit.

I love how Duffy plays loose with his claims in the affidavit especially where he say’s Prenda has files no new cases. Technically he knows that is correct in the loosest terms, but he fails to say under our new Law Office we are still filing troll suits to keep the money rolling in.

I cant wait to see what Pietz has to say and how Judge Wright and the court they applied for the emergency stay will have to say about this lame attempt once again to side step having to appeal in front of Judge Wright like they should have done.

As much as they tried last time for an emergency stay and it got denied because they didn’t follow the proper steps, I assume it is going to get denied once again for the same issues. Should be interesting to see iof they post the additional bond.

I doubt they will do so because they know if they lose their appeal, Prenda is out that 238k. I believe they did that first bond specifically without the stipulations they were told to discuss with Pietz for the bond so they could escape in a variety of loop holes from having to pay.

Pieta is too smart for that, and Prenda knows it is in a corner and with no wiggle room that means that cash would be gone and they would be on the hook for it (mind you I think they would have screwed the insurance co that put it up though… my opinion of course)

It will be interesting to see how Prenda, Duffy and especially Steele try and weasel out of this, desperation is upon them.

I wonder what The IRS Criminal Division will think when they read the affidavit that claims there are no finds to pay the bond nor any penalties. Should be interesting especially coupled with the fact that Hansmeier claimed they paid no monies out and the monies stayed in Prenda’s account.

The IRS Criminal Division I am sure will be interested to know where that money went and what people became recipients of those funds and why.