National Institute For Mental Health Abandons DSM Just As American Psychiatric Association Prepares Massive Update

from the good-for-them dept

The American Psychiatric Association's infamous DSM or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is often called "the Bible" of classifications for mental illnesses, but it's perhaps almost as famous for its problems than for any usefulness. The list of criticisms and controversies over the DSM are pretty long, and there are significant concerns about the fact that it's not scientific, and that it falls sway to both extreme biases of psychiatrists and their overall profession as well as general cultural biases. The most famous bit of controversy, of course, is that it used to include homosexuality as a mental disorder -- which should be an indication of how trustworthy the book is (i.e., it's not, at all). More recently, the discussion to possibly include internet addiction (or, more officially "Internet Use Disorder" or IUD) in DSM-5 caused a fair bit of mocking.

That's why it's great to see that the National Institute of Mental Health has declared that it's effectively abandoning the DSM just as the APA releases the long awaited DSM-5. After highlighting many of the problems with the DSM, it notes:
But it is critical to realize that we cannot succeed if we use DSM categories as the “gold standard.” The diagnostic system has to be based on the emerging research data, not on the current symptom-based categories. Imagine deciding that EKGs were not useful because many patients with chest pain did not have EKG changes. That is what we have been doing for decades when we reject a biomarker because it does not detect a DSM category. We need to begin collecting the genetic, imaging, physiologic, and cognitive data to see how all the data – not just the symptoms – cluster and how these clusters relate to treatment response.

That is why NIMH will be re-orienting its research away from DSM categories. Going forward, we will be supporting research projects that look across current categories – or sub-divide current categories – to begin to develop a better system. What does this mean for applicants? Clinical trials might study all patients in a mood clinic rather than those meeting strict major depressive disorder criteria. Studies of biomarkers for “depression” might begin by looking across many disorders with anhedonia or emotional appraisal bias or psychomotor retardation to understand the circuitry underlying these symptoms. What does this mean for patients? We are committed to new and better treatments, but we feel this will only happen by developing a more precise diagnostic system.
As others have noted, this is a "potentially seismic move" since the NIMH is so central to funding so much research concerning mental health.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Dennis S. (profile), May 6th, 2013 @ 2:03pm

    A couple of good articles from The Verge; first one goes into some detail on DSM criticisms.

    The Verge - 2013-04-19 - Controversial update to 'bible' of psychiatry fuels debate over foundations of mental health - One book raises big questions
    http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/19/4243060/dsm-5-bible-of-psychiatry-mental-health-revisio ns-spark-boycott

    The Verge - 2013-05-03 - Federal institute for mental health abandons controversial 'bible' of psychiatry
    http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/3/4296626/nimh-abandons-controversial-bible-of-psychiatry

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 2:24pm

    You only need to look at the revisions to the DMC over the past 20 years to see that it's need at a standard is was overrated.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    ShellMG (profile), May 6th, 2013 @ 2:37pm

    I wonder if this will eventually affect the medical fields and diagnosis of mental illness. A lot of health insurance providers use DSM codes in billing and actual care can shift with the decimal point.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 2:43pm

    Insurance speed bump

    The medical insurance companies are what's going to get in the way of this. They want a specific diagnosis from their list (populated from the dsm) and they'll only pay for specific, approved treatments and medications for each specified diagnosis.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    TheLastCzarnian (profile), May 6th, 2013 @ 2:48pm

    This should move the field from its current semi-ridiculed status to full legit. Hopefully they'll move from the sedate-and-monitor system they have now to a test-diagnose-treatment system. The old one was useless. (Full disclosure: I adopted a child who had severe emotional issues.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Ezekial, May 6th, 2013 @ 2:54pm

    Whats wrong with having homosexuality listed as a mental disorder. Its what it is! Why else would someone want to screw someone of the same sex. Its a disgusting choice

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 3:11pm

    Re:

    It is an interesting problem. However, I think most people diagnosed will keep their mark and thus the effect will only be on newer cases. I konw several of the tests and I am not impressed by the methods used in the field in general for diagnosing purpose. In my opinion the DSM was more of a symptom of a profession who tried to run on past experience for way too long and didn't sufficiently move in on blood tests and later diagnostic equipment to identify useful markers.

    When that is said, psychiatrists already had a bad reputation compared to other doctors, so accepting biomarkers instead of "psychological tests" or "yes/no questionaire" is a tremendous improvement for my trust.

    Btw: This move is probably gonna revolutionize the treatment of what was known as "major depressive disorder" since it has been a public secret that the symptoms cover a variety of biochemical imbalances with several unrelated underlying conditions. When it comes to other diagnoses it is gonna be a lot more hairy. The pop-diagnosies of Asperger's or ADHD are gonna be almost impossible to keep up since everyone gets a benefit from ADHD medicin while nobody can see the exact symptoms for the highest functioning end of the autism spectrum.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Votre (profile), May 6th, 2013 @ 3:19pm

    Where's the fun in that?

    A truly scientific diagnostic tree based on hard and current 'best of breed' verifiable data? Where's the fun in that?

    One of our favorite games back in college was sitting around with a bunch of inebriated friends while a graduate psych major "referee" went through the DSM (III at the time) trying to see which of us could "scientifically" claim to be the 'provably' craziest among us.

    How can they just walk away from such a terrific form of entertainment?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 3:23pm

    Re:

    I concur, how could one prefer a mans hairy ass to a womans vagina, and be thought to be sane. homosexuality is fine, however, if both chicks are hot.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 3:30pm

    Re:

    You have to ask yourself several questions:

    Why does mental diagnosises exist?
    Is it relevant to treat?

    In the end, it is just not a mental disorder. It can be a personality disorder, though, but the psychitric diagnosis is used for the patients treatment and since it is irrelevant for other mental illnesses or perception of reality, it is not gonna help a patient to have that label.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 4:27pm

    I caution that this move might be designed by insurance companies. For decades they have pushed towards "biological-based" mental illness only. This may be a big step in that direction. The problem comes when a variety of obvious mental health illness are not biologically based (at first glance) such as those resulting from trauma, PTSD. That can't be cured with a pill.

    Often clinical experience is far ahead of the science behind what works and why. I'm familiar with trauma based disorders and I need to read more, but those disorders, such as the most common ones reported by veterans, run the risk of being thrown under the bus even though clinical treatment (not a pill) has been shown highly effective.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 5:02pm

    Re:

    You seem very sane.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2013 @ 7:13pm

    Ok - who's sane then?

    What is the list of behaviors that are not cited somewhere in the DSM-V as a sign of a 'non-normal' state?

    As 'abnormal' is thus defined, what is left must be 'normal' right?

    (Other analysis - what is the most common and least common behavior cited?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    DH's Love Child (profile), May 6th, 2013 @ 8:34pm

    Re:

    If I remember correctly, the DSM uses ICD codes which are used across all medical fields, so this shouldn't affect insurance billing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 7th, 2013 @ 2:09am

    to be fair, homosexuality WAS considered a mental illness until surprisingly recently. (1973 was when it was removed from the DSM. To put it in perspective, it was 9 years after the last execution in the UK)

    as for internet addiction, I would actually venture to suggest that it does occur. They aren't taking about people who simply use the internet a lot, but that's entire lives are the internet. Specifically, it mentions ignoring kids or a spouse in favor of spending time on the net. For example, I've heard of gamers who spent so long on a game that they starved (I can't remember if it was to death or not)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    relghuar, May 7th, 2013 @ 4:32am

    "Internet Use Disorder" or IUD

    I suggest they put it right among:

    Book Use Disorder or BUD
    Car Use Disorder or CUD
    Air Conditioning Use Disorder or ACUD
    Indoor-plumbing Use Disorder or IpUD

    sorry, lunchtime, no more UDs as I have to get to my personal favorite "Food Use Disorder" ... or FUD? :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This