Greenheart Games Trolls Pirates With Altered Cracked Version Of Game Dev Tycoon

from the flawed-simulation dept

When we have talked about game developers messing with pirates in the past, I've actually found it quite entertaining. As much as I hate Ubisoft, it made me smile when they released a version of one game that filled the audio up with vuvuzellas if it was a pirated copy. I'd of course prefer they have done something a bit more forward-thinking than simply trolling pirates, but it made me laugh. Certainly I have no sympathy for the pirates, nor for Ubisoft, whose trolling attempt was a minor hiccup corrected when other cracks of the game came out.

While I have some of the same issues, I find it even more entertaining when a move like this is done by an indie developer, particularly when that developer goes out of its way to otherwise be exceptionally level-headed about the pirating of their game. Such is the case with Greenheart Games, who released their game Game Dev Tycoon, and simultaneously released a cracked version that trolled infringers magnificently.

The cracked version is nearly identical to the real thing except for one detail… Initially we thought about telling them their copy is an illegal copy, but instead we didn't want to pass up the unique opportunity of holding a mirror in front of them and showing them what piracy can do to game developers. So, as players spend a few hours playing and growing their own game dev company, they will start to see the following message, styled like any other in-game message:

"Boss, it seems that while many players play our new game, they steal it by downloading a cracked version rather than buying it legally. If players don't buy the games they like, we will sooner or later go bankrupt."
It's really hard for me to get mad at them for this. The cracked version doesn't disrupt the entire game, as Ubisoft's vuvuzella did. You do get to try the gameplay out for a bit before encountering the trolling code. It is a bit of passive aggression, but one which both makes a point and isn't angry or mean. Besides that, the effects of the trolling in the responses of some of the infringers are downright hilarious. On forums, the pirates were asking for help, saying things like "Can I research DRM or something?" and "Why are there so many people that pirate? It ruins me!" Detecting irony, it appears, is a skill.

All that said, and perhaps this makes me weird, my first thought once I'd stopped laughing was that the simulator had failed completely. If the result of piracy in the cracked version always results in ruin for the developer, then we know the simulator is flawed. After all, I'm fairly certain folks like Ubisoft, EA, and the like haven't been driven into the ground by piracy. Somehow they are still going strong. And what about indie developers that utilize CwF+RtB, like tinyBuild or contributors to the Humble Bundles? Why isn't there room for all of them within the simulation?

The answer, of course, is this is a trolling attempt, not part of the sim at all. And to their credit, the developers seem to be quite level-headed about piracy in general, particularly when this game's user-base is 94% from unauthorized versions (though that may have been sprung by the developer releasing their own cracked copy).
I'm not mad at you. When I was younger, downloading illegal copies was practically normal but this was mostly because global game distribution was in its infancy. To be fair, there are still individuals who either can't make a legal purchase because of payment-issues or who genuinely cannot afford the game. I don't have a quarrel with you.
Nor I with them, though I'd suggest that perhaps if they had attempted to work some of the aforementioned examples into their simulation, it would have been instructive on how they can actually embrace tactics that can make them a great deal more money than just trolling potential customers.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 9:50am

    If you ask the heads of Ubisoft, EA, Square-Enix et al if their companies were strong, they would say no. Square-Enix in particular has said that the latest Tomb Raider was a flop, for not meeting sales targets...despite selling three million.
    Here, Jim Sterling says it best
    http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/7121-Dark-Souls-and-Dark-Sales

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ninja (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 10:24am

      Re:

      That's rich coming from a company that has FFIV in their "fiasco" list. But seriously, if 3 million is a flop then I want to flop yearly. Sell it for 99 cents and you get almost 3 freaking million dollars in your lap. Now since they do have a bigger structure to maintain I can understand why this is less than stellar. Still, Tomb Rider, again? Mass Effect 85 (as if 84 of them weren't enough)? The big game companies are not even trying anymore.

      Anyway, these devs have the right attitude but they could have scored a much bigger win by honestly asking for support of the file sharing community. It's amazing how supportive this community can be with the right push.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Dark Helmet (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 10:53am

        Re: Re:

        I can assure you that Tomb Rider: Lara Croft, would far outsell 3 million units....

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:12pm

        Re: Re:

        I remember face-walling when I heard that certain games *cough Halo cough * had absurdly huge marketing budgets, to the tune of a HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS (huh, wonder why that number is so familiar...)
        And this is for the mainstream games. This is for one of the most well known games series of all time, one that has a huge fan-base. You don't need marketing at that point. With the internet, Bungie could have just sent a few e-mails to sites like IGN, saying "Hey guys, new Halo game in development, spread the word!" and they would have still made more or less the same amount of sales, while keeping that hundred million advertising budget and not wasting it.

        Business Management Lesson 1: Cut your costs.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Jay (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:14pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Kind of hard to do that. I have the PDF of Square's costs and one of them that struck me was the cost for DRM and "protecting their assets" which was to the tune of billions of yen which made no sense. They have plenty of money and revenue but spent it on copyright protection and their prices for digital goods have been too high.

          For whatever reason, they can't charge more money to get more out of the audience in the midst of a recession that's in its sixth year.

          And that's the lesson that most publishers have to learn. The market has shrunk and has moved into the digital for cheaper than what they got on consoles.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            PaulT (profile), May 1st, 2013 @ 2:00am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Pretty much. I'd love to buy the FF games for my iPhone, but the prices they're asking is more than I pay for some XBox 360 games (new Arcade games or older discs). No way in hell am I paying that, but if they offered a reasonable price for the format, they'd have a sale.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jan 9th, 2014 @ 2:18am

        Re: Re:

        You are so right with the statement above we as pirates can make things happen when pushed to make things happen but it would be a diff story if these game devs did reach out to the pirating commute and worked together.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Lowestofthekeys (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:02pm

      Re:

      I was discussing this issue with Hollywood on wired.com.

      They have the exact same mentality of big budget = great content.

      That's one more thing to add to the list of things that hurt Hollywood that aren't related to piracy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 10:57am

    Still broken

    Cute idea, but they still put out a broken version of their game. Those who don't realize it for what it is (which sounds like most of the folks playing it) are just going to think it sucks, and they'll tell their friends when asked. I can see why they only sold a handful.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:00am

      Re: Still broken

      There was a demo, no reason to pirate the game.

      Clever DRM that doesn't affect normal people is good DRM.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:16am

        Re: Re: Still broken

        Think about that for a moment. In order for the DRM to not affect normal people...it would have to be completely ineffectual.
        Think of the most innocuous DRM. Let's say...a serial number that has to be input upon installation. I still remember with horror back in the day when I had umpteen Sims 2 expansion packs and having to carefully keep the manuals safe.
        Or how about a disc check, which is something the user doesn't perceive - I remember failing disc checks even when the disc was in the drive - the DRM was scared of either the second disc drive or the fact I had a disc drive emulator like Daemon Tools installed.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Zakida Paul (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:21am

          Re: Re: Re: Still broken

          I was pissed off when I had to enter an activation code to play Football Manager 2009. Of course it had a device limit and, with Windows being Windows and needing to reinstall it every few months, it wasn't long before you had to go seek out how to deactivate a device. This was hidden in an obscure corner of the Sports Interactive website.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          zegota (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:30am

          Re: Re: Re: Still broken

          No one's saying this is effective as a DRM strategy, especially since pirates can easily release a cracked clean copy of the game (and probably have, by this point). It's simply a funny little action that results in some free publicity, as well as possibly making a pirate or two think a little about their actions.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:51am

          Re: Re: Re: Still broken

          Those affect normal people, so I'm not sure what your point was responding to me.

          Also the idea that you had to keep a physical object safe makes sense. Welcome to everything else that existed back then, although those things no longer apply the same way to digital media.

          Those are examples of bad DRM that affects the normal user.

          DRM that DOESNT affect the normal user is harder, but so is locking your door. Locking your door will stop the casual thief who will just check to see if its unlocked, but anyone with any degree of skill or determination isn't going to be stopped by a locked door, thus meaning no matter how deadbolted and secured that door is, they will just use the window.

          Theres a diminishing returns on the whole thing, so making intrusive DRM is counter productive, while light yet effective DRM can still persist without causing undue frustration by the user.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:58am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

            I'll try to be clearer. DRM, by its very nature, affects you, whether you're a legit customer or an infringer.
            My example of the disc check is actually a good one. There's a famous Youtube video of a guy going on a rant because his game's DRM affected him merely for having a second disc drive
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mt4BpnfAN-o
            I was responding to the way you you worded that sentence. "Clever DRM that doesn't affect normal people is good DRM". The only way for DRM to not affect normal people is if it doesn't do literally anything at all i.e. is completely useless. Once the DRM doesn't affect someone, it's no longer "clever", because you might as well have not included it in your program for all the effect it has.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:07pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

              It still has nothing to do with MY point. This "DRM" did not affect any legitimate person cause the DRM was never even IN the legitimate version in the first place.

              You are giving an example of DRM that affects all products and all consumers, and your disc check DRM example is flawed because these are examples of poorly executed DRM mechanics that rely on hardware or software requirements that people don't always conform to.

              Earthbound had DRM, to my knowledge, amongst my friends and on the internet, I pretty much never heard of any legitimate consumer being affected by it. Pirates sure did though.

              Other games have their own forms of "silent" drm, some of whom take it as a challenge. Serious Sam HD I believe had the unkillable scorpion. I don't remember many legitimate consumers being affected by that one either.

              Your assumption is that DRM MUST affect the consumer, but good DRM really SHOULDN'T, it should be a very light, very minimal hurdle that never deactivates the game. This will stop the "casual" day 0 pirate, especially if cracks don't catch it the first time around, and won't negatively impact consumers.

              Linking me examples of DRM done BADLY doesn't invalidate this point.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                icon
                Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:24pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

                DRM does affect, that's what it does. It's something that affects the installation and gameplay process, whether to a minor or major degree. DRM, even at best, is a silent judge, hidden while you're installing the game, but still able to spit out false positives.
                Most boxed copy PC games I buy say on the back of the box that their copy protection will fail if it detects drive emulation software...which most serious PC gamers have these days by default (Asus even bundles a licence for Daemon Tools Pro with their higher-end gamer-oriented motherboards).

                I agree with you, I wish all DRM were that benign. To give a quick real-life analogy, I wish DRM were as easy as a guy at the front of the store having a cursory glance at my receipt, without checking first if I haven't modified the trolley or without me having to recite a sequence of letters and numbers. However, even that is an affect on the normal player, however benign. It's still something that stands between them purchasing and playing/getting out the door.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:26pm

        Re: Re: Still broken

        This wasn't actually DRM. Their game is DRM-free.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:38pm

          Re: Re: Re: Still broken

          I don't know how to put this, but, it's sort of like saying "We're glad you like the game so much...and we invite you to play a legitimate copy of it if you wish to".

          It is a minor unobtrusive form of DRM. Serious Sam 3 had a red scorpion that would relentlessly follow you and kill you little by little if you played a pirated version of the game.

          The reason why Greanheart's form of DRM does not look like it is actual DRM is because it does not hinder game play like the forms the public is used to seeing...however, it will shame you into actually buying a legitimate copy of the game. So you don't have to worry about loosing the game, but it does remind you in a very tongue and cheek way to be fair to the developers of Dev Tycoon.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            John Fenderson (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:46pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

            It is not DRM at all. It's a modified version of the game. The real version of the game is completely DRM-free. As is this one.

            DRM is a mechanism to restrict the use of the product to terms the manufacturer dictates. This is not even remotely that.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:15pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

              DRM restricts copying or makes changes to the game to either hinder progess of the user, or simply asks them to actually buy the actual non-pirated version of the game. The point is that this game's pirated purposefully distributed pirated version basically does not hinder progress but does remind the user about how piracy can realistically have an affect on a small developer company who publishes their own games.

              I am only trying to see the silver lining on this particular case as it is quite true that piracy can in fact hurt small non-syndicated developers.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                icon
                Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:26pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

                I should also add that BASIC for the Altair 8800 was not Microsoft's first big software hit because of piracy..and Microsoft was just starting out as a company (Paul Alan and Bill Gates were the only two people running it at the time). Many bought BASIC (yes the punch tape version) legitimately for their business but made copies of the tape of BASIC they bought to run on more than one Altair 8800.

                I really commend Bill Gates for what he did to combat piracy...rather than make the copied software crippled in some way he wrote a letter to the various businesses politely asking them to stop pirating Altair BASIC. His letter on the loosest of terms is DRM.

                Now when you look at that and compare it to what Greenheart has done...maybe it is only a tongue and cheek thing so people would be tempted to by the real game rather than pirate it.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 2:11pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

                  Altair BASIC may have sold a lot, but not what we consider today to be 'Microsoft a lot'. The pivotal success story for MS was basically allowing piracy without a fuss for MSDOS up to amd including the world dominating version 2.1.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  •  
                    icon
                    Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 2:15pm

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

                    Altair Basic was their first piece of software. They were the first to deal with piracy on an economic scale because of it.. and you are right, they made less of a fuss about piracy. They went as far as to politely ask people to buy more than one copy of Altair BASIC for each of their computers rather than copy it. As a result of their actuions...they boomed in the business!

                     

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:36pm

        Re: Re: Still broken

        DRM that makes 94% of the people who play a game think that it sucks is not "clever".

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:53pm

        Re: Re: Still broken

        This isn't DRM. It's a honeypot.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonjdv, May 28th, 2013 @ 11:06am

        Re: Re: Still broken

        DRM is never good

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Atkray (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:24am

      Re: Still broken

      And they released the broken version at the same time increasing the likelihood that people looking for it would find it.

      I also thought this was amusing until I saw they were using the worn out "stealing our game" line.
      These guys are no different than EA or Ubisof, just not as well funded.

      Possibly a little more creative.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:49pm

        Re: Re: Still broken

        Greenheart does not really make all that money...nor does EA for that matter...most of EA is glomming off of developers as a publisher. Greenheart has a very legitimate reason for all this as they are a small company that publishes and develops its own games. Greenheart actually loses money from piracy and in my opinion, I think that they found a good balance to their DRM.

        I grew up on a Macintosh and a lot of the games on the classic Macintosh (yes I am referring to a Macintosh Plus right now) were in fact shareware. Duane Blehm was one of my favorite developers. He brought classics like Stunt Copter and Cairo Shootout.

        So piracy really did not help in the slightest when you develop and publish your own games. Though that is a very 1980' and early 1990's attitude towards it, it is still very easy to forget that little developer companies spend money on developing games we want to play.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:35pm

          Re: Re: Re: Still broken

          I don't quite follow the argument that a small developer/publisher loses money to piracy, but big developers/publishers don't. Are you just claiming that the effects of that loss are worse for a small company? How so when a big company spends much more to develop, distribute, and promote its games?

          Regardless of company size, lots of people here don't buy the argument that "piracy" = lost sales.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 2:08pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

            Never said I did either. But someone had to complain about a "worn out line" and...well I just had to chime in stating that the problem is real...some forms of DRM are not really as bad as others...but the whole point is as you stated.

            I do not condone piracy in any way, but I also know better ways of trying to control that situation than others...Greenheart's solution is a much better form of DRM as it is a less hindering way of asking people to buy a legitimate game rather than pirate it.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Marcel de Jong (profile), May 1st, 2013 @ 1:20am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Still broken

              Sure, it's a nice form of piracy combating/educating, but that still doesn't excuse the word "stealing".
              Infringement isn't theft.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Zakida Paul (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 10:59am

    I think it's a pretty good way to beat piracy. At least they are being proactive rather than going crying to the courts or their local Senator/Congressman.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:04am

    Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

    "If the result of piracy in the cracked version always results in ruin for the developer, then we know the simulator is flawed." ... '" If players don't buy the games they like, we will sooner or later go bankrupt."'

    The "sooner" part is that a LITTLE piracy can be tolerated. BUT when the common law principles of respecting copyright are undermined by Mike and the Mega-Grifters and piracy becomes yet worse, then the LATER effects are bankruptcy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:18am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      Didn't read the whole article again? Here lemme help ya. Here's a key part you willingly skipped over
      "After all, I'm fairly certain folks like Ubisoft, EA, and the like haven't been driven into the ground by piracy. Somehow they are still going strong. And what about indie developers that utilize CwF+RtB, like tinyBuild or contributors to the Humble Bundles? Why isn't there room for all of them within the simulation?"

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ninja (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:19am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      Yes, just like home taping has killed music and the VHS strangled the studios. Keep squeaking...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Chris Brand, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:19am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      I don't know whether that's true or not, although I have little doubt that many rightsholders believe it.

      I do know that when Copyright is used as the justification for censorship, for locking the cellphone I bought to a particular carrier, for rooting my computer, and generally as a weapon against competitors and customers, of course copyright will no longer be respected.

      Your move, rightsholders...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      AC Unknown, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:28am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      Ad-homs again, Blue? Go on and leave. I bet no one would miss you and your ranting.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Rich, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:29am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      I picture you in a shabby apartment, living on your MPAA stipends, eagerly hitting "Reload" waiting for a article to post drivel to. All the while, drooling on your self and cackling like the crazy cat-lady.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:43am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      Ha, that's a good one. Its the public that doesn't respect copyright laws. Who benefits when copyright lengths are extended decade after decade. Law enforcement become private contractors for entertainers. And you accuse Techdirt of undermining respect for copyright law?

      How many people write comments as ootb? One minute you rail against big industry corrupting the govt then with your next breath you fall to you knees to assuage the blasphemy you aimed their way

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Ruben, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:43am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      There you go again. There is no basis for copyright in common law. Stop spreading this blatant lie.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      RD, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:57am

      Re: Put in right sequence, your puzzlement clears up:

      "The "sooner" part is that a LITTLE piracy can be tolerated. BUT when the common law principles of respecting copyright are undermined by Mike and the Mega-Grifters and piracy becomes yet worse, then the LATER effects are bankruptcy."

      Here's a little hint for you shitbag: We are ALREADY in a world of "mega piracy." There isn't some looming, massive uptrend waiting to happen in file sharing, it's already here, and been here for a while now. And it's impact is MARGINAL at best. Companies are still making money. In some cases, obscene money. Hollywood is making more money than at ANY time in history WHILE we have "piracy." Ditto the music (but not necessarily the *recording*) industry. Not one single industry is anywhere NEAR to bankruptcy. It's a pipe dream from the ShillTards who can't make it (ie. failures, ie. you.) and have to scapegoat the rest of us for their lack of success and vision.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Varsil, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:28am

    Oh, to be a cracker...

    If I were, I'd probably put out a new fix--where you get an initial panic about piracy from the execs, and then it turns out that the free advertising is boosting sales.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    ixaxar, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:35am

    Stolen game

    They have a right nerve claiming loss of earning on a game they apparently developed for over a year that is an almost identical, and inferior, remake of Game Dev Story by Kairosoft.

    Rather than get angry about the very real problem of piracy and hold these people up as champions of the downtrodden indie developer why not call them the thieves that they are. They stole a game, remade it and then claimed it was their own work.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:44am

      Re: Stolen game

      You mean like what Call of Duty did to Battlefield or Battlefield did to Call of Duty? (I honestly don't know and don't care which one came first).
      So fucking what? I've taken the time to look at screenshots of both games and while they look similar, that's because it's what they are. They're simulators of you running a game developer. Besides, they're not quite the same game. Story is on Android and iOS, while Tycoon is Windows, Mac and Linux. The very different user interface on a portable OS would necessitate one game being very different to the other.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:20pm

        Re: Re: Stolen game

        Call of Duty and Battlefield may look similar but play entirely differently. This on the other hand is a blatant ripoff of Game Dev Story (which actually released for the PC back in '97, so your other argument kind of shows your utter disregard for the facts).

        There are similarities that arise due to genre conventions, and there are similarities that arise due to being a blatant ripoff. This is the latter. I mean they didn't even bother changing the name of the pseudo-statistics used to build your game.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:39pm

          Re: Re: Re: Stolen game

          Are you sure you and I are thinking of the same "Game Dev Story"? This is the one I mentioned,
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_Dev_Story

          the one released on Android and iOS.

          Hang on, turns out that that one's a remake of the 1997 one you mention.

          Even so, your accusation that Tycoon is a ripoff is a bit hard to believe. For one, if Tycoon is ripping off Story, then by default it would have to be ripping off the 1997 game...which would have been Win 95/98. The coders of Tycoon, if interested only in making a quick buck, wouldn't have taken the time needed to rewrite a game working on a 16-bit OS to work on today's 32/64-bit OS's. Or take the Android/iOS game and rewrite it from a touch-screen interface to a desktop mouse and keyboard environment, running on a completely different operating system through different programming languages.
          Besides, how can Tycoon be a counterfeit modern Story? Story hasn't been released on desktop environments since 1997 as you admit. That's a market that the Story developers haven't decided to sell to (which they very easily could have done in the three years since their game's re-release)

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:51pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Stolen game

            I didn't say it was a counterfeit, I said it was a ripoff. They just copied the entire game and repackaged it as their own. This isn't illegal, obviously, it's just scummy.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          THCW, Sep 7th, 2013 @ 12:44am

          Re: Re: Re: Stolen game

          You... are a complete and utter moron. The reason that these games are similar IS due to genre conventions. They are both game development simulators. Meaning that in both of them, you build up your own game development company. Meaning that in both of them, you make your own games.

          "I mean they didn't even bother changing the name of the pseudo-statistics used to build your game."

          Game Dev Story: Fun, Creativity, Graphics, Sound, Bugs (or Cuteness, Approachability, Simplicity, Game World, Realism, Niche Appeal, Innovation, Polish)

          Game Dev Tycoon: Design, Technology, Bugs (or Engine, Gameplay, Story/Quests, Dialogues, Level Design, AI, World Design, Graphics, Sound)

          So... where are these statistics that they didn't bother to change the name of? Because other than Graphics, Sound and Bugs, NONE of these statistics share the same names. And there is no reason for Greenheart Games to have not called Graphics, 'Graphics', etc. That'd be stupid.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:29pm

      Re: Stolen game

      They stole a game, remade it and then claimed it was their own work.


      They did? Where's your evidence? How did they get the code for the game they stole? Industrial espionage?

      Making a knock-off of an existing game isn't theft at all. It's making a knock-off. If they coded it themselves, then it was their own work. That it replicated a different game doesn't enter into it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 3:02pm

        Re: Re: Stolen game

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aec-bw4GBg
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEGx4i_FPes

        It is a ripoff no doubt about it.

        Funnier by the fact they are complaining that others are ripping them off too LoL

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        JarHead (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 4:53pm

        Re: Re: Stolen game

        I'm not familiar with those 2 games. But if your argument is because someone coded a game themselves then it's not a ripoff, well, I must disagree. What makes a game ultimately is not the codes, but the game design. Coding is a largely mechanical part of game dev, but most creativity is in the game design.

        So platform (16/32/64/128/512bit Windows/MacOS/Linux/Android/iOS/FireFoxOS etc) doesn't matter. As long as people perceive 2 games have their design alike, they will call it one ripoff another, and I tend to agree (though I don't care about it too much).

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Marcel de Jong (profile), May 1st, 2013 @ 1:47am

      Re: Stolen game

      They stole that game, did they? You mean no one can buy Game Dev Story anymore?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    ixaxar, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 11:37am

    Stolen game

    Oh, they also charged twice what Kairosoft charged too.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:06pm

      Re: Stolen game

      $7.99 or 5.15euro?

      hardly EA levels of greed.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:11pm

      Re: Stolen game

      Actually they charge INFINITELY more than Kairosoft charges, since the original PC version is available for free along with its sequel AND a translation patch.

      So...yeah.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:26pm

    I'm extremely disappointed by this article. For those of us who did any background research, there have been two things apparent about this story from the start:

    -This game is an utter ripoff of Game Dev Story by Kairosoft. Not "a similar game", I mean they took Game Dev Story and made the graphics uglier, removed much of the humor and charm, and then charged three times as much for it.
    -This entire thing was a marketing ploy, that all of the tech blogs gobbled up instantly to give a sub-par ripoff a bunch of undeserved attention. It's not even like releasing a 'pirated' version with adverse effects is a remotely new idea, either - sure, in this case it's ironic because the problem the pirates encounter is piracy itself, but that's just the story they needed to get a bunch of free advertisement from the blogosphere.

    It's only disappointing really because generally this blog tends to dig a bit deeper than average and ferret out things like "this blatantly clones an existing game" that have been overlooked thus far. I was really hoping for more.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:46pm

      Re:

      Yes, games rip each other off all the time, and no one fucking cares. There are hundreds of JRPG games that use the exact same game mechanics and even textures (especially if they're made in RPG Maker) and no-one gives a crap about that. I've played both Chrono Cross and Final Fantasy VI, and they're both similar games: top down perspective, small useable party, stat-based attributes, collectible equipment, exploreable world map, etc. (And yes, I know both were made by Square)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:01pm

        Re: Re:

        That "whooshing" noise you hear is the point flying right above your head.

        Chrono Cross and Final Fantasy VI are DIFFERENT GAMES. I'll even be generous here and assume you meant Chrono Trigger, since Cross is not actually top-down and came out years later - but Chrono Trigger and FFVI, while sharing many similarities (and indeed much of their core engine) still told different stories with different characters and different themes. This is more like if someone redid Chrono Trigger with bad Flash graphics, changed the main character's name to Krono, and re-released it as "Krono Trigger" with everything else in the game kept exactly the same (with a ridiculous hamfisted message about stealing thrown in for good measure). It wouldn't necessarily be illegal, but it would be scummy.

        Again: if you are too stubborn (or possibly too stupid) to recognize the difference between similarities due to genre conventions and similarities due to blatant copying of the entire game, then you're just not worth discussing this with at all. Yes, we get it, JRPGs have a lot of similar elements, and every FPS game has you looking down the barrel of a gun. That's not what's being discussed here at all, and you look increasingly dense for continuing to argue that it is.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Lowestofthekeys (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:12pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Discussing the similarities between games is not a relevant subject for Techdirt...

          Not to say the subject isn't important, but if you're looking for that kind of a discussion there's plenty of gaming blogs out there.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:22pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I'm sorry, but...what? Discussing one game completely copying another while simultaneously chiding users for copying it is relevant to both the article at hand AND the general theme of articles here at TechDirt. It's not like I'm sitting here giving an IGN-style review or anything, I'm drawing attention to a point that was completely ignored in the article while being absolutely pertinent to the issues being brought up.

            And maybe I missed the memo, but who made you the comment police to begin with?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Rikuo (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:13pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Okay I'll admit to getting Trigger and Cross mixed up. My mistake.
          I'm just wondering why you're getting so worked up about one game copying another. If true...then ignore the clone. Ignore the rip-off. Don't let it affect you. Don't buy it, don't play it. Just play the original.
          Star Wars: The Old Republic is basically a rip-off of World of Warcraft. Does the fact Old Republic exists somehow harm Warcraft? I would highly doubt it. In fact, Republic copying Warcraft harmed Republic far more than it did Warcraft, since I, and many others, started Republic, saw the similarities and said "Heck no. I've been here already".

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:17pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I am trying to ignore it, that's the point I'm trying to make with my first post. This game DESERVES to be ignored but instead we're all here in the comments section discussing it and giving it free advertising. That's what bugs me.

            And again, while I understand what you're saying - SW:TOR vs. WoW is not a clone on this level by any stretch of the imagination: it has its own plots, its own locations, its own powers...you get the point. If they had just taken vanilla WoW and thrown some Jedi skins over it, that's what is happening here (and incidentally would make a much better game than SW:TOR...wonder if such a mod exists?)

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:46pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              I think the only real reason why those games feel "copied" is that they came from the same developer house or genera. Anyone who has ever played the board game version of Dungeons and Dragons will tell you that leveling up and having certain amounts of strength...levels..etc...is A lot of Game Play elements which are used in similar various mannors.

              A more fair comparison of in house copying would actually be Secret of Evermore (Made by Square's one time only US development division Square Soft) and Secret of Mana (made by the legendary Square Enix). One has to look at the battle system and how you get basic access to use your powers. Admittedly though, Chrono looks a lot like Randi from Secret of Mana.

              Needless to say, griping about similarities in RPG's is a bit bothersome unless it is a blatant rip off shovel-ware title from some other company gleaming off the popularity of a genera (Wizard 101 is an example of the latter).

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:44pm

    Definitions

    "this game's user-base is 94% from unauthorized versions"

    In what sense is a crack released by the developer itself "unauthorized"? Are you still a "pirate" if you play a version that they distributed themselves for free?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:51pm

      Re: Definitions

      Are you still a "pirate" if you play a version that they distributed themselves for free?


      I don't know if you're still a pirate or not -- that depends on your overall behavior. But I think it's pretty clear that if you are using a version that the makers released intentionally for you to download and use, then you have not engaged in piracy in that instance.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:00pm

        Re: Re: Definitions

        Cheeky return of Shareware distribution perhaps?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          John Fenderson (profile), May 1st, 2013 @ 9:02am

          Re: Re: Re: Definitions

          Shareware never went away, people just stopped calling it that. But, really, this is more like demoware -- the "pirate" version is effectively nothing more or less than a demo of the game, with a clever embedded joke.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:58pm

      Re: Definitions

      Could be a very subtle way of gaining notoriety...possibly advertising the fact that there is a legitimate, non-cracked version of the game you could pay for and play.

      Point of history here, this distribution method is almost exactly like some of the shareware used on 68K Macintosh games....gives you a taste of full game play but is slightly different because it prompts you to buy the game as you play the shared/pirated version of it. Some games cleared the registry number if you copied them to a floppy disk and then it got distribution that way...didn't stop the piracy one bit really because one person could tell the other the serial number or key. But it did get the game advertised cheaply in the days when most computer users did not have internet.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      CK20XX, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:04pm

      Re: Definitions

      Not only that, but because Greenheart Games has chosen such a unique way to combat piracy, they're probably unwittingly encouraging people to pirate the game just to witness that uniqueness. It's kinda like how the main reason people like Space Quest is because of all the different ways Roger Wilco can die, so you can't take that 94% figure at face value.

      Brentalfloss once did something similar. He released a pirated version of an album called "Bits of Me" onto bittorrent, and it scolded users who downloaded it. People loved it so much that they asked if they could buy it, so he put it up for sale on Bandcamp.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Duke (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 2:09pm

      Re: Definitions

      Are you still a "pirate" if you play a version that they distributed themselves for free?
      Maybe I've spent too much time among lawyers, but I can see it being arguable (down to the precise definition of "authorisation" used, the existence of implied licences, whether knowledge is important).

      It should pretty much scupper any claim for damages, though, unless there were some sort of statutory level for them - but only a crazy country would have something like that...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Togashi (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 2:21pm

      Re: Definitions

      I was thinking exactly the same thing.
      ...Initially we thought about telling them their copy is an illegal copy...
      How can it be an illegal copy if the copyright holder itself is making it available for free download? I would think that would at the very least be an implied license for it.

      Also, I wonder if their piracy and sales rates would have been different had they not released their "cracked" version of it. The majority of the responses that I've heard are that it's a slightly worse version of a game that's already available for free. Could be that nobody would have bothered to crack it, leading to a much lower piracy rate. Even then, would more people have bought it?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 12:55pm

    this makes me laugh

    just got off another site that was talking about this. some people download it and don't even see what it is. they think its just an obstacle in the game. im reading about one guy who is asking for help on some forum because he cant make games that turn a profit. best part? HE ASKED IF THERES A WAY TO PUT DRM IN HIS GAMES.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:27pm

    if the people being 'trolled' dont know theyre being ;trolled', they might think the game is broken and you lose every time, and never actually buy the thing. GG.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Rabbit80 (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 1:35pm

    Suggestion for the devs:

    I apologise if somebody else has already suggested this as I haven't read all the comments...

    If the developers are going to go to all this trouble, why couldn't they have put a simple "More info" button that:
    links to a website and has a little explanation of why the piracy message there
    that the gamer can carry on playing, but will find it impossibly difficult as piracy levels increase,
    and give the player an option to remove the restriction by buying the game?

    Turn some of the players into paying customers instead of pissing them off!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 2:11pm

      Re: Suggestion for the devs:

      " and give the player an option to remove the restriction by buying the game?"

      That is not DRM...thatt is called shareware...and those of us who grew up on pre-iMac Apple products got used to it PDQ and actually bought the games after ordering the legitimate versions or serial numbers to activate the full version.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Chuffed, Sep 7th, 2013 @ 12:52am

      Re: Suggestion for the devs:

      Well, to be fair, this game was all over the media when it first came out due to this. A simple search of the game's name on Google (which the owners of pirated copies are sure to do in a vain attempt to find a solution) will come up with dozens of articles about this anti-piracy method, and that will let them know what is happening.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 6:05pm

    So the lesson here is

    See, its perfectly fine to rip-off other people if you call yourself a 'hard working game developer' like Greenheart did with this shoddy knock-off, but if the poor peasants do it then its STEALING! AND THAT'S A CRIME SCUMBAGS!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 6:13pm

      Re: So the lesson here is

      or in other words: "If you make money from calling other peoples work YOURS, you're hard working and deserve everything! if you're poor and share what you have for free you're a criminal."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2013 @ 6:26pm

        Re: Re: So the lesson here is

        Like you stealing the complaints of numerous other AC trolls? Dirty rotten hypocrite.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Wally (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 6:29pm

      Re: So the lesson here is

      By that mentality, every other RPG ever made stole everything from Dungeons and Dragons.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 1st, 2013 @ 5:10am

      Re: So the lesson here is

      and how do you know its a shoddy knock off?

      geez people its a game about developing games. whats your criteria for what is a rip off? that they both have command boxes that say *develop new engine* on them?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Alana (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 8:01pm

    PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT.

    Hahahahaha.

    Oh man. These guys? They have the gall to complain about piracy when they stole the game idea from an already completed game, Game Dev Story, by Kairosoft?

    Wow.

    This is hillarious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Marcel de Jong (profile), May 1st, 2013 @ 1:52am

      Re:

      They stole an idea? How does that work?

      Remember, Inception was just a movie...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Coyote, May 2nd, 2013 @ 12:16pm

        Re: Re:

        Pretty blatantly copied the idea, actually, just with updated graphics and more facebooky goodness. Look up some of the screens of Game Dev Story, and the resemblence is unfortunately canny in many areas. Could barely be arsed to even change the art style -- they just made it more like facebook with higher res graphics and charged 8 bucks for it.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Cowherd, May 1st, 2013 @ 5:41am

    If your into trolling...

    This can be seen as a successful troll, even funny if you're into such things.

    But as far as "holding a mirror in front of them" goes, these developers failed to look into it themselves first. If they had, perhaps they would've realised that their business model -- like the business model they force upon the players in their game -- is based on releasing something and hoping players choose to pay for it just because.

    In a video game, they get to play god and make the virtual population behave the way they want. To buy games or pirate them, because they're programmed that way. In reality, people need reasons to do things. They won't pay you just because you want them to. You have to give them a reason to buy. Apparently, 94% of their audience have decided "because otherwise we'll go bankrupt" is not good enough.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), May 1st, 2013 @ 8:31am

    Here, play our game...you monster.

    My thought was that they were soapboxing, and the first impression I received about the "unauthorized" version (I equate compare it to the "pirate" version of No Time To Explain, except the feature is killer in-game software pirates rather than piratey re-skins.

    But what gets to me is their message is "you're evil if you play our game...unless you buy it first." Fine. I won't play your game. I won't get interested. Disinterested, I won't consider buying the unsabotaged version. I probably won't consider future versions, since Greenheart was that company who did that thing.

    (Much the way I don't trust Origin since at least earlier versions would scan your directory and file structure and send it back to EA for scrutiny.)

    Next time maybe Greenheart will do a bit of research about how sharing works, and how that can be used to facilitate monetization and include realistic piracy rather than simply preach an absolutist message.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 1st, 2013 @ 8:53am

    "Boss, it seems that while many players play our new game, they steal it by downloading a cracked version rather than buying it legally. If players don't buy the games they like, we will sooner or later go bankrupt."

    Tell that to the makers of Path of Exile. Free to play with an in game cosmetic only item mall. I've spent a good deal on POE because I love it! It's what I've been looking for after D2 and the fact that it's being constantly updated only makes it better.
    They even allow players to create custom items for the game with them if they spend enough. A couple new items "player made" just came out not too long ago.

    It was a rough start with the servers yes but for an indie company they dealt with it pretty fast.

    Now back to their game.
    I would not even pirate a copy of their shitty game let alone buy it. If someone decides to actually crack this it will not be because the game is good, it will be because they asked for it. I wouldn't even bother with it if it were up to me. Actually I wouldn't even allow a cracked version of this garbage to be released.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 1st, 2013 @ 11:20am

    When I first read about this, I thought it was cute, and went on with my day.

    After thinking about it, though, It occurred to me that this was both a wasted opportunity and a terrible (game design) idea.

    As a terrible game design idea, you have something that claims to be a simulation, attempting to emulate the realities of the simulated thing. To introduce the concept of massive piracy that makes turning a profit nearly impossible is questionable. To provide no recourse (freemium models, subscription services, DRM investment) breaks the simulation pretty horribly and gives the impression that this is a shallow polemic agianst a straw man.

    For comparison, imagine if Simcity had Keanu Reeves come to your city and start blowing stuff up if you used a coal plant. Police, national guard, etc. are helpless agians Keanu. If you bulldoze your coal plants and replace them with solar power, he goes away. From a gameplay perspective, it's workable (but pretty boneheaded); from a simulation perspective, it's completely divorced from reality.

    As for a wasted opportunity, it's a little simpler. You may as well argue that the "legitimate" version is a paid DLC for DRM, seeing at it (I imagine) completely eliminates the piracy issue.

    A better idea? One version, both sold and leaked. Piracy is an actual game element, but the effects aren't transparent. Ideally, the behind-the-scenes effects of piracy are based upon actual studies with solid methodology. To the player, they just have an (estimated) piracy rate listed among the various statistics for a game. If they consider piracy a concern, they can opt for alternate revenue models, or invest in DRM. DRM, just like in reality, may in fact reduce the piracy rate, or at least slow it down, but it can also have an impact on the bottom line through lost sales, increased burden on tech support, negative reviews, etc.

    Give the players the same information you have, and the same uncertainty of result, and they may be a little sympathetic. Give them a fantasyland trolling response and you'll get all the respect and attnetion that approach deserves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jack, May 2nd, 2013 @ 1:10am

    Comment

    Greenheart was unfairly baiting downloaders into attempting a crime that didn't, in the end, actually exist by using the title "CRACKED AND WORKING". Besides, this isn't even loosely the definition of "Trolling".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 5th, 2013 @ 8:40am

    Please note: the ...proper? Paid? Version has piracy and fan game events phrased much more reasonably, and actively rewards you for being calm and reasonable about it rather than busting out the lawyers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Uriel-238 (profile), May 5th, 2013 @ 9:40am

      Re:

      I think paid version, since they put out the cracked version themselves. Both are technically legit.

      But in that case, they could have just released it on the torrents and let it go, at worst with a plead page.

      A truthful simulation will speak for itself, and some people who torrent will buy later (and some people who buy will torrent later).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This