Red Sox' David Ortiz Unleashes An Expletive During Televised Speech; FCC Says 'F**k It'

from the considering-the-Bostonian-'spirit,'-it's-amazing-it-was-just-the-one dept

At times, there's no one in a more unenviable position than the chairman of the FCC. When not dealing with larger issues like net neutrality and wireless competition, you're at the beck and call of every member of an Overly Concerned Citizens' Group that feels the need to start a letter-writing campaign any time an expletive hits the airwaves.

Bono fired off an f-bomb at the Grammys and someone let Nicole Richie make the most of her what-am-I-for fame by giving her a microphone and allowing her to explain how difficult removing cow shit from a Prada purse is. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has twice found the FCC's rules on so-called "fleeting expletives" to be a violation of the First Amendment. That, of course, matters little to angry letter writers who somehow believe The Children will be encouraged to swear by potty-mouthed celebs.

(As if every 8-year-old in the nation wasn't using these words already. I don't remember exactly when I started swearing but I do remember the first time I got busted for it: 4th grade. This may seem precocious [or developmentally-challenged -- YMMV], but keep in mind that Tim Geigner fired off his first expletive sometime during his second trimester.)

Do-gooders on one side, real people on the other. In between, the FCC stands as a porous bulwark against inadvertent live sweariness. It can't stop it. It can't even hope to contain it. And when someone hits the airwaves during a celebratory event following a horrible tragedy, chances are they're going to speak freely. And by "freely," I mean they'll be using the sort of language that most Americans use when emotionally charged.

It was, in five words, the encapsulation of a city's defiance – bowed, but never broken. Not even close. It also happened to be NSFW (not safe for work). Or children. Or anyone in Mr. Rogers' neighborhood.

It was the declaration by legendary Red Sox slugger David Ortiz in pregame ceremonies Saturday, which were broadcast nationwide.

"This is our f------ city, and nobody's going to dictate our freedom."
Normally, this sort of casual swearing would net the offending network a $1 million fine (which would then be thrown out by the court). Not this time. Instead, FCC head Julius Genachowski took to the new face of journalism -- Twitter -- and declared his (and his office's) solidarity with the people of Boston.
Perhaps Genachowski knew this was no time to be playing censor for a small (but noisy) selection of prudish busybodies. Perhaps he felt Ortiz's speech encapsulated the city of Boston so thoroughly it should not be (excuse the language) fucked with. Perhaps he realized that swearing is an indelible part of Boston's linguistic oeuvre, only equalled by its defiant refusal to pronounce the letter R.

Perhaps Genachowski, with one foot out the door, preferred to leave on a high note and with his (and Boston's) dignity intact. An incoming FCC head may reverse Genachowski's Twittered decision, but that person would need a heart of stone and a lobotomy to pursue any action against the network for airing a triumphant, cathartic speech unedited. Perhaps the classiest thing to do would be to let it ride and maybe throw JG a Boston-style parting gift.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 10:45am

    This article made me laugh at the sheer hypocrisy humans are capable of. Naturally.

    Fortunately for the ones among us that still have their sanity swearing is as covered by the 1st as pro-Nazi speech and anti-terrorism speech. Although not as equally enforced.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Akari Mizunashi (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 11:14am

    Huh. Apparently Ortiz is unaware of our government's involvement in dictating our freedom.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:09pm

      Response to: Akari Mizunashi on Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 11:14am

      Would it be too much to hope that he is aware and is subtly encouraging a greater level of political activism among his fans?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 1:47pm

      Re:

      Our government doesn't dictate our freedom. We vote them in and out in cycles, and they do what we let them do to our freedoms.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 2:42pm

      Re:

      Exactly what I was thinking.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dood, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:20pm

    jurisdiction

    But what jurisdiction does the FCC have on a non broadcast game? This game was on cable networks, not broadcast networks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      TheNutman69321 (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:56pm

      Re: jurisdiction

      The answer is none. Cable networks can put any kind of language they want on tv, most just choose to follow the same rules.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:21pm

    Keepin' it classy, minion.

    This yet again proves why you're all thought to be 14 years old. Not any weighty thoughts, sheerly giggling over naughty words.

    For the record, I know more of 'em than you do, historical and some foreign, but use ONLY where appropriate, else they lose force.

    And I'm NOT scandalized by this incident. -- Despite that a millionaire who benefits from a legalized monopoly said it. -- But the statement is just incoherent rage, a worse problem than the words.

    But it's NOT swearing, it's not cursing, not even profanity! It's simply VULGAR. You're right that any 8-year-old can use them. But why would an adult do so habitually? And put it out front on a supposedly professional blog?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:26pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      You're a child.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      AC Unknown, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:28pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      Take your high-horse morality elsewhere, Blue. Better yet, get off your high horse and shut up.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chosen Reject (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:37pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      And I'm NOT scandalized by this incident. -- Despite that a millionaire who benefits from a legalized monopoly said it
      Are you finally admitting that legalized monopolies are bad? Or are you still just pretending to be a populist?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:47pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      And your continued posturing yet again proves why you're thought to suffer from crippling obsession issues.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:54pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      So basically, your comment can be summed up as "I'm hasn't_got_a_clue, I'm paid to take a stance opposite whatever is written on Techdirt, so how can I write it?"

      Also question - If "fuck" is not swearing, not cursing, not profanity...then how is it vulgar?

      I also love the phrase you have up there "I'm not scandalized by this incident". That sentence actually tells us a lot about you. None of us said that hasn't_got_a_clue would be. There is no mention of you in the article, yet you had to defend yourself from an unwritten accusation, for some reason.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 1:26pm

        Re: Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

        I said it before and I'll say it again - he shows the hallmark signs of narcissistic personality disorder. It's worrying.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 1:26pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      Habitually?! Are you sure you know what that word means? Because it sure the hell does not mean one time, which is exactly how many times David Ortiz.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 3:51pm

      Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.

      Blue didn't use one single "bad" word in his entire post, yet the quote "This is our fucking city, and nobody's going to dictate our freedom." holds infinity more maturity.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Libby Stack, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 12:36pm

    Tittering like teenagers

    I don't have a problem with the F Bomb and still don't understand why in today's culture there are still those who titter about it like pre-adolescents. When overused, it just proves to me that the person has a pretty limited vocabulary.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 1:10pm

    There are no bad words. Only bad intentions and actions expressed with words. Those who are outraged by the mere use of a few words either lack the intellegence, courage and/or self-esteem to think logically for themselves and see through the control that they continue to subject themselves to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Watchit, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 1:49pm

    Missing a few letters there, Tim

    The correct quote is:
    "This is our Fucking city, and nobody's going to dictate our freedom."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      WDS (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 2:08pm

      Re: Missing a few letters there, Tim

      The area with the dashed version is shown to be a quote to the Christian Scientist article linked directly above it.

      It is an accurate quote of their modified quote.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    slopoke, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 2:08pm

    You Got It Wrong Tim

    People from Boston have no problem with the letter R. You just don't know the rules. If the word has an R you drop it. If it doesn't you add one on the end.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    David (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 2:17pm

    It does start early.

    I was playing Mario with a friend's 5 year old nephew, and dropped the f-bomb, then looked at me and said: "Shit, please don't tell my mom!"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    diadmer (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 2:27pm

    What the fuck happened to TechDirt?

    I haven't browsed TechDirt in a while due to some onerous workload, but I recently returned to find this article and wonder aloud whether I should bother reading any more.

    I'm not sure why I thought I would read here an interesting take on the balance between free speech protection, balanced against the need to protect children from unexpected exposure to mature content. You know, like the issue of whether stores should be criminally penalized if they sell M-rated games to children.

    Instead, the author here scarcely mentions some Supreme Court cases while engaging in a cavalcade of insults and ad-hominem attacks. "Do-gooders on one side, real people on the other." (People who do good aren't real, and people who are real aren't good? What the fuck kind of cynical world do you want to live in?) "Prudish busybodies"? And a hearty helping of "I was a foul-mouthed kid, therefore [yours is/yours should be/what's wrong with you]?"

    Nothing but a brush-off of the concerns that a kid watching his baseball idol or other celebrity use profanity might actually indeed, inspire the kid to use it? And what consequences s/he might face? Not just from his own "prudish busybody" parents, but moreso from his schoolteachers, or future employers? No point in going to see if there's any, you know, scientific research on the subject, or other expert opinions? Just a bunch of smart-mouthed insults?

    Top-notch editorial journalism right there, yup...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 3:16pm

      Re: What the fuck happened to TechDirt?

      There's a few different writers on Techdirt and Tim Cushing's articles are almost always in this style. If you want articles that are more on the scientific, try the other authors.
      As for not questioning about whether Little Johnny may grow up to be a sewer-mouth? The way you wrote that part makes it sound like only the FCC, and the FCC alone, is what will prevent Little Johnny from dropping f-bombs at every turn. Simple societal pressures train most people not to, and there's no need for the FCC to do that. If they're in their 20's and still doing it, well, they only have themselves to blame. It's their mouth, their speech, their choice as to what they say.
      What the angle of this article is, there's a difference between society pressuring people to tone down on uttering expletives and making it illegal to utter them. I fully support everybody's right to utter as many f-bombs as they want...but that's totally different to me wanting to hang around them if that's all they say.

      Simply put, the notion that there must be a quasi-legal body that monitors the air-waves for expletives no longer makes sense. For one, it's a violation of free speech rights. For two, simple market forces would pressure the networks to not allow expletives anyway - if the FCC vanished tomorrow, it's not like suddenly the millions of parents who don't like to hear expletives on television would too. That would be a large demographic for the networks to want to sell too.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 3:49pm

      Re: What the fuck happened to TechDirt?

      Why should anyone look up scientific research or get expert opinions on the subject? The Supreme Court says that fining cable channels for fleeting expletives is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story. No need to give the other side equal time. They're wrong and they need to be told in no uncertain terms.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 4:56pm

      Re: What the fuck happened to TechDirt?

      "...the need to protect children...". Need? Who says there's a NEED to do any such thing?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 4:51pm

    Most do gooder parents don't have a clue it seems about their little Johnny. Nor do most others. I seem to remember in school it was always it seemed the preachers' son or daughter that was having to be fished out of trouble. Mainly because they were the high visibility child out of the group. The majority of the rest said the same things but got away with it.

    I would suggest that before these do-gooders get out trying to influence the world they look in their own nest first. Little Johnny is not always the angel he is portrayed to be.

    Of course that doesn't stop the busybodies from trying to tell you and everyone else how to live their lives. It's like they don't have enough to do to fill their own so they should make trouble for the rest. A small town gossip spreader at their finest.

    There's nothing wrong with a good hell or a damn or whatever in a mature crowd. If your child was watching this, what are you doing not overseeing what your child watches if it is that important to you?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 6:29pm

    F--- Boston!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Cowherd, Apr 23rd, 2013 @ 1:09am

    The only reason children or indeed people in general swear, is because other people around them make such a big deal about it.

    Remember the wisdom of the internet: Don't feed the trolls.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2013 @ 6:23am

      Re:

      The purpose of using expletives is to impart emphasis and context to the expression that is not conveyed by any other part of the language. The problem with children using them is that they often do not understand when the use is appropriate and when it is not. Contrary to what the prudish Moral Majority would have people believe, effective use of expletives requires a more advanced understanding of language and a more diverse vocabulary than those who do not know how to use them properly.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    doug barnett, Apr 23rd, 2013 @ 1:23am

    Wrong Question Every Time

    "swearing, not cursing, not profanity...then how is it vulgar?"
    It's vulgar.

    But who cares? When monotheism came into being, along came 10 or so Commandments.
    An important Commandment is to offer your good afterlife (against a bad afterlife) as your bond for keeping true to your agreement (ie, all the commandments) with the guy who decides the nature of your end-of-life payoff.
    Those who deal-in (Christians) do so with their word. Since no one can "swear" to hold a conflicting oath, Quakers stopped taking oaths, they had one with God already.
    The 'State' demands it's citizens kill (war, et.al.), Quakers said no and 12,000 rotted in the Roman silver mine at Lancaster, and elsewhere. Two men and Mary Dyer were hung in Boston.
    The Cesarian Christens, King James and the Racist, "Christian" Right-wing-nut Mr. Webster rewrote the meaning.
    (Speling is the entry card to the 1%, 12 years of education to spell th Webster-Way)
    This reduction of a man's "oath" into a "curse", a "verbiage error" gets so repressive that in apartheid South Africa, a Playboy magazine would land you years in jail.
    Disclaimer: I have served on the board of the most powerful FM radio station in America for years. See US Supreme Court; Pacifica Vs FCC. In 25 years, this OG quaker has heard it all. http://rsof.org

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2013 @ 8:37am

    this just in: ootb wants to be a senator when he grows up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Xander, Nov 15th, 2013 @ 4:21pm

    More Xander Bogaerts!

    I'm glad there wasn't a huge stink over something so trivial.
    So glad to see my red sox kicking ass! Pleeeease start Xander Bogaerts next season!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This