Oh Look, Rep. Mike Rogers Wife Stands To Benefit Greatly From CISPA Passing...

from the no-conflict,-no-interest dept

It would appear that Rep. Mike Rogers, the main person in Congress pushing for CISPA, has kept rather quiet about a very direct conflict of interest that calls into serious question the entire bill. It would appear that Rogers' wife stands to benefit quite a lot from the passage of CISPA, and has helped in the push to get the bill passed. It's somewhat amazing that no one has really covered this part of the story, but it highlights, yet again, the kind of activities by folks in Congress that make the public trust Congress less and less.

It has seemed quite strange to see how strongly Rogers has been fighting for CISPA, refusing to even acknowledge the seriousness of the privacy concerns. At other times, he can't even keep his own story straight about whether or not CISPA is about giving information to the NSA (hint: it is). And then there was the recent ridiculousness with him insisting that the only opposition to CISPA came from 14-year-old kids in their basement. Wrong and insulting.

Of course, as we've noted all along, all attempts at cybersecurity legislation have always been about money. Mainly, money to big defense contractors aiming to provide the government with lots of very expensive "solutions" to the cybersecurity "problem" -- a problem that still has not been adequately defined beyond fake scare stories. Just last month, Rogers accidentally tweeted (and then deleted) a story about how CISPA supporters, like himself, had received 15 times more money from pro-CISPA group that the opposition had received from anti-CISPA groups.

So it seems rather interesting to note that Rogers' wife, Kristi Clemens Rogers, was, until recently, the president and CEO of Aegis LLC a "security" defense contractor company, whom she helped to secure a $10 billion (with a b) contract with the State Department. The company describes itself as "a leading private security company, provides government and corporate clients with a full spectrum of intelligence-led, culturally-sensitive security solutions to operational and development challenges around the world."

Hmm. Sounds like a company like that would benefit greatly to seeing a big ramp up in cybersecurity FUD around the globe, and, with it, big budgets by various government agencies to spend on such things. Indeed, just a few months ago, Rogers penned an article for Washington Life Magazine all about evil hackers trying to "steal information." In it, there's a line that might sound a wee-bit familiar, referring to the impression of hackers as being "the teenager in his or her parent's basement with bunny slippers and a Mountain Dew." Apparently, both of the Rogers really have a thing about teens in basements. The article is typical FUD, making statements with no proof, including repeating the NSA's ridiculous allegation that hackers have led to the "greatest transfer of wealth in American history." It's such a good line, except that it's completely untrue. The top US companies have recently admitted to absolutely no damage from such attacks. The article also lumps in "hacktivists" like Anonymous, as if they're a part of this grand conspiracy that needs new laws.

Tellingly, in the print version of Washington Life that this article appeared in, which you can see embedded below, you'll note that there's a side bar right next to her article about the importance of passing cybersecurity legislation in Congress. Guess what's not mentioned anywhere at all? The fact that Kristi Rogers, author of the fear-mongering article, happens to be married to Rep. Mike Rogers, the guy in charge of pushing through cybersecurity legislation. That sure seems like a rather key point, and a major conflict of interest that neither seemed interested in disclosing. Oh, and Kristi Rogers recently changed jobs as well, such that she's now the "managing director of federal government affairs and public policies" at Manatt a big lobbying firm, where (surprise, surprise) she's apparently focused on "executive-level problem solving in the defense and homeland security sectors." I'm sure having CISPA in place will suddenly create plenty of demand for such problem solving.

A few months ago, on one of his FUD-filled talks about why we need cybersecurity, Rogers claimed that it was all so scary that he literally couldn't sleep at night until CISPA was passed due to an "unusual source" threatening us. The whole statement seemed odd, until you realize that his statement came out at basically the same time as his wife's fear-mongering article about cybersecurity. I guess when your pillow talk is made up boogeyman stories about threats that don't actually exist, it might make it difficult to fall asleep.

Either way, even if we assume that everything here was done aboveboard -- and we're not suggesting it wasn't -- this is exactly the kind of situation that Larry Lessig has referred to as soft corruption. It's not bags of money shifting hands, but it appears highly questionable to the public, leading the public to trust Congress a lot less. At the very least, in discussing all of this stuff, when Mrs. Rogers is writing articles that help the push for CISPA, it seems only fair to disclose that she's married to the guy pushing for the bill. And when Mr. Rogers is pushing for the bill, it seems only right to disclose that his wife almost certainly would benefit from the bill passing. And yet, that doesn't seem to have happened... anywhere.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 5:55am

    Even the "hard facts" Rogers put up at twitter yesterday were easily debunked or questionable and open to interpretation at best. The questions that arose on twitter were never answered by rep Rogers...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Greevar (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:04am

    But, but, but

    This will create more jobs, right? If defense contractors get more money, surely that translates to more jobs, doesn't it? CISPA is a job creating bill! How could it be bad?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:17am

    So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    It's okay as a tactic, IF you were consistent about its use and applied it to everyone when the facts are there, but here just means you're totally out of substance and have started attacking wives of people in Congress. Great idea, Mike. This too will help you gain influence in DC.

    My opinion is that Rogers is just plain fascist: what you allege of his wife's (incremental, she's already getting heaps of money) interests in this probably don't affect him at all.


    Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up same place!
    http://techdirt.com/
    Where Mike fights CISPA without mentioning major data sources Google and Facebook.
    02:17:14[c-290-5]

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:20am

    I'm shocked - not.
    And they wonder why their approval rating is so low.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:24am

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Usually, when you turn up and attempt to counter someone's accusations of corruption, you do things like showing how the wife is actually the most philanthropic person alive and gives millions to starving children in Africa.
    Blue, your method is to unzip your trousers, smack people in the face with the rubber tube that replaced your dick, and not show any counter-evidence at all.
    And you wonder why we mock you all the time. I see you still haven't taken even the simplest steps of protecting your user-name, despite screaming about how we were "stealing" it multiple times. I see you're just like your copyright cartel paymasters: lazy and expecting everyone else to do the job of protecting what you deem important.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:27am

    Hey, they're being honest - 'hackers have led to the "greatest transfer of wealth in American history."'.

    Just not from people to hackers, but rather through 'Cyber-Security' contracts and lobbying.. :D.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    TDub, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:28am

    Did I read this right?

    "So it seems rather interesting to note that Rogers' wife, Kristi Clemens Rogers..."

    In that embedded pdf, the author of the article is a Kristi M. Rogers. Is that the same person? Am I reading this right? Please let me know if I am wrong...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:31am

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    So...to you, an Ad Hominem fallacy is OK as long as we are consistent?

    Interesting...yet, unsurprising. Explains a lot about the way you act.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Zakida Paul (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:34am

    I am watching House of Cards on Netflix at the moment. Have seen just 2 episodes but it seems to have captured the corruption, double dealing and sleaze of DC perfectly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:39am

    Re:

    Time to start the war on hackers. I'm sure it will be as successful as all the other perpetual wars being "fought".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Jasmine Charter, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:40am

    OMG!

    OMG! Corrupt politicians?! In Washington?! Who would have guessed?

    /sarcasm off

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:45am

    Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    I have to wonder why this charachter who gives ad homs, mocks and jibes others in his comments and then as soon as anyone does or says something that he perceives as a threat to himself because of a result of his comments he then posts comments for Mike to do something about it and this Mike is the one and same person that this character redicules the most with their comments. Don't expect someone to help you that you have pissed of and ridiculed beforehand is what i say because they are the ones that will help the least or not help at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:46am

    there may well not be 'bags of money changing hands' but you can bet your arse that it will mean a substantial reward for both of them when the bill gets passed. nothing of this nature is ever done for free! and when it's the tax payers money that's being spent, no one gives a toss on the cost or who gets the money. this 'under the counter' dealing should have been declared before anything was done. i'm not saying it would have made any difference because Congress are in the game to get as much personal reward as possible and the old 'you scratch my back, i'll scratch yours' will be seriously in play. that doesn't detract from the position of secrecy and why Rogers is pushing so hard. it should have been made common knowledge before even the vote earlier!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:53am

    Re: Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Exactly. His is a personality that is predictable. I deliberately wrote that shotgun death threat in the EFF article in such a way that I knew he would respond with "OMG MIKE, Save me from this bloodthirsty lunatic!!!!"...when any person with two working brain cells would put two and two together and realize that
    1) I'm from Ireland (having stated so many times) where, unlike the US, guns aren't exactly common (I'm 24 years old and have never seen a real one)
    2) It would be next to impossible for me to identify blue.
    Thus, my death threat was obviously not to be taken seriously.

    Blue, it is your own actions that have reduced you to a laughable caricature of a human being. You literally have no-one to blame but yourself. You regularly contradict yourself and make ad-hom attacks (unlike this article, where Mike shows means, motive and opportunity for corruption) without any hard evidence whatsoever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:54am

    Wish people in our goverment could see this bill for what it is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    gorehound (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:03am

    Rogers is a real POS.........sells out us Citizens for some Power and Money.POS Corrupted Man.
    Very disgusted at this Government.soon the people will have had enough.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:06am

    Either way, even if we assume that everything here was done aboveboard -- and we're not suggesting it wasn't

    Of course you are, Mike. Give me a break. So fucking dishonest.

    And when Mr. Rogers is pushing for the bill, it seems only right to disclose that his wife almost certainly would benefit from the bill passing.

    You never explained how she would benefit. If she's no longer with the company, how would she benefit? Talk about FUD.

    nd yet, that doesn't seem to have happened... anywhere.

    If Rogers had disclosed the conflict, where would he disclose it to? Do you even know? Or are you just spouting your usual anti-government, hated-fueled, moronic dipshit FUD?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:08am

    Re:

    Was just going to say the same thing. Life imitates art.

    And HOC is definitely one of the best shows in many years. So incredibly good.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    spiralsoflite, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:09am

    Re: Did I read this right?

    I am also confused...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:10am

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Look who is criticizing ad homs! Our friendly loopy "ad-hom"_of_the_blue!

    It's so overflowing with irony that I genuinely laughed!

    My opinion is that Rogers is just plain fascist: what you allege of his wife's (incremental, she's already getting heaps of money) interests in this probably don't affect him at all.


    Your opinion is as loopy and twisted as your comments here. First you are attacking him with the label fascist in the same manner you seem to be criticizing Mike in your first paragraph! That gotta be some serious psychiatric disorder. The cognitive dissonance is overwhelming! And then you further stick your head into the psychiatric case study target by denying his wife affects him when it's crystal clear that this may be happening yes.

    Just wow ootb. Go find professional help, you need it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    Anonymous Howard (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:14am

    Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    The Real Michael, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:14am

    I suppose that it's just by sheer coincidence that at the same time they're trying to eradicate online privacy via CISPA, the government is building a huge 1 million sq. ft. facility located in Bluffdale, Utah to intercept, store and analyze huge amounts of data, including every transaction, phone call, satellite information, etc.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:15am

    Re:

    Well, considering he doesn't specify whether he's talking about his fantasy north Korean hackers invading sophisticated systems in the US using their rudimentary OSes built on Assembly or real hackers meddling with stuff just for the pleasure of discovering problems or further developing and improving something... You may be right.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:16am

    Re: Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    I'm well aware I fed the troll this time but I found it disturbingly funny. I think we should help him. God knows what his mental disorder can do in reality.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:16am

    Re:

    Does this mean that all my electronic hoes are worth $15m when this bill passes?

    AWESOME!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:17am

    Re:

    I wouldn't call them Persons of Stature...oh wait!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:19am

    Re:

    She doesn't have to benefit financially or in some overt way at all. For all we know, she could honest
    ly believe in what she's preaching, that hackers will cause the end of the world unless CISPA passes.
    What Mike is discussing here is the "soft corruption", the appearance of corruption, the "revolving doors" between industry, politics, and lobbying groups.

    I'm going to spell it out as simply as possible, so that you can have NO excuse for not understanding.
    Woman A works for a company that stands to gain financially if the government passes legislation that leads to more contracts with companies like the one she works in. That gives her a motive to want legislation like this passed.
    Her means is to quit her job (I guess to ostensibly avoid any appearance of conflict of interest) and joins a lobbying group. Stories of favours being traded, of promises of jobs and people going from industry to politics to lobbyist to industry to politics to lobbyist are all too common.
    Her opportunity just happens to come in the form of her HUSBAND, the guy pushing this bill. Even if she honestly believes in the bill, that it will save the world, and even if he honestly believes in the bill, the facts are that there is at the least the appearance of corruption going on.

    So go on. Which is more likely? That this lady out of the goodness of her heart just happened to lobby for legislation that will aid her friends in a certain industry financially and her husband just happened to be the politician pushing for it?
    Or that there is corruption going on, which is all too common on Capitol Hill.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:19am

    Silly Mike, you should know that blatant conflicts of interests by politicians are only a story when there ISN'T such a conflict.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    Anonymous Howard (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:23am

    Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:24am

    Re: Re:

    I still don't see it. What is her current conflict of interest? Does Mike even know where Rogers would report one if there actually was one? Did he check there (and is it even public information)? This article is pure FUD. Nothing is beneath Mike Masnick, super FUD-packer extraordinaire. Accuses politicians of ethics violations (and ex-President's of federal crimes) without doing even the most basic research or journalism. Total fucking joke. Total fucking idiot.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    The Old Man in The Sea, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:32am

    First question to ask of Jolly "Mike" Rogers

    Do you have a 14 year old in the basement?

    Second question to ask is

    Were you a 14 year old in the basement?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Rob, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:32am

    Re:

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Rob, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:35am

    Re: Re:

    Okay, that was a fat-finger there.

    I was gonna cynically ask if maybe the people in government could see the bill for what it is and just be OK with it. They know they'll get theirs, too.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:36am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "I still don't see it" (after you laying it out for me step by step, I'm too stupid and or willfully blind to see anything)
    "What is her current conflict of interest?" (Despite being told about revolving doors and the fact her husband is the one pushing for this bill...the article is more about his appearance of a conflict of interest)
    As for where Rogers would report it to? I dunno...his peers? He could stand up in the House and say "Oh by the way, I've gotta disclose the fact my wife is a lobbyist for an industry she recently worked for that would benefit greatly if this bill I'm pushing passes" with cameras in his face and reporters holding a million microphones in front of him.

    Do you even know the meaning of FUD? FUD is when something lacks substance. This article DOESN'T. Mike has gone to some lengths to lay it out. It's not like anything here is a lie. So go on. Where's the FUD? Is Rogers married? Was that a lie? Did his wife actually work for an industry that will benefit from this bill?

    Ya know what this reminds me of? A certain former French president introduced a tax on blank media, and a portion of that tax would go to artists. I suppose the fact his wife was a professional singer signed to a record label was just a big coincidence wasn't it? It's very similar to what's happened here. A wife stands to benefit financially from legislation, whether overtly now or covertly later (it is very likely that Mrs. Rogers has been promised a job back in the same industry later, with a much higher paycheck) if her husband ensures legislation gets passed and signed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    Akari Mizunashi (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:37am

    Aren't most bills passed into laws these days financially benefiting someone else?

    It's par for the course. Hell, even when this country was facing an economic crisis, thanks to the housing market crash, an emergent "bailout" couldn't get passed unless it was including benefits to make someone else rich.

    I hate our government. I really, really hate our government.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:38am

    Re: Re:

    Because she believes the law is good doesn't make it good. That's why the Government should be laic. Considering the amount of opposition and all the analysis that pointed out the privacy concerns this wouldn't be as bad if he pushed for amendments to patch the flaws pointed out.

    Even if we disregard financial gains and assume goodwill it's the same as letting the Pope push for bills that ban condoms just because the Church frowns on them along with their billion catholics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:38am

    So it seems rather interesting to note that Rogers' wife, Kristi Clemens Rogers, was, until recently, the president and CEO of Aegis LLC a "security" defense contractor company, whom she helped to secure a $10 billion (with a b) contract with the State Department.

    Wait. She has a conflict of interest because her former employer may benefit from the passage of CISPA?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:43am

    Re:

    Oh, and Kristi Rogers recently changed jobs as well, such that she's now the "managing director of federal government affairs and public policies" at Manatt a big lobbying firm, where (surprise, surprise) she's apparently focused on "executive-level problem solving in the defense and homeland security sectors."

    Also, look for LLC on http://www.manatt.com/Clients.aspx

    You'll be surprised ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    Josef Anvil (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:44am

    Re:

    "It's not bags of money shifting hands, but it appears highly questionable to the public, leading the public to trust Congress a lot less."

    "the president and CEO of Aegis LLC a 'security' defense contractor company, whom she helped to secure a $10 billion (with a b) contract with the State Department."

    Reconcile the two quotes please.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:46am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Oh yeah. Blue - one honest question. In today's Author's Guild article, you responded with a link to a discussion you had with Mike two years ago, in 2011. Okay...how were you able to scrounge up that link?
    I mean...how? What method did you use to determine where a discussion you had with Mike was, on what article and when? You don't have a signed in account here, so it's not as simple as going to that and going backwards through your comments to find that article.

    No, the only method I can think of is that you are neurotic enough that anytime Mike actually does respond to you...you bookmark that page or make some sort of note of it. I can see you at the computer, constantly typing away and making your useless comments and then...bam! You get a response, shriek in rage, excitement and joy (because honestly, I can picture feeling all three emotions at once), jumping out of your seat, grabbing a notebook and pen and scribbling furiously at it. In fact, this is what I picture you to be (just mute the audio)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv4E9175EOY

    So tell me...how did you come up with that link, without looking like Mikami in that video?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:52am

    Response to: Anonymous Coward on Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:06am

    I can practically see the Random Argument Generator at work here.

    [quote]
    [Dismissal x3]
    [quote]
    [Error 404: could not find "common knowledge"][Dismissal]
    [quote]
    [Question][Assumption that author cannot answer said question][Dismissal]

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:52am

    Re:

    Revolving door. Defense contractors as a whole would benefit from this bill. So she quits one particular company, joins a lobbyist group, gets her husband to push for the bill, then gets a job in another defense contractor with a much higher paycheck. Similar situations have happened before. It doesn't take a genius to think of this scenario.
    Or maybe the job will go to the husband.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    identicon
    jackn, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:55am

    Re: Re:

    Its not bags of money, its truckloads.

    Hope that helps.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    identicon
    jackn, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:57am

    Re:

    they can, and they like it!


    Put yourself in their position. Wouldn't you steer a few million to yourself if you could? of course.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    identicon
    jackn, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 7:59am

    Re:

    disclosure is fairly common. There are documented procedures.

    Executives are allowed some fraud, but the have to disclose it FIRST. Then its ok.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    identicon
    jackn, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:01am

    Re:

    yes, you've got it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:02am

    Re:

    Aren't you one of the fools who whine like little babies about conflict of interest every time Mike posts something positive about Google because he once helped do something with them? Yet, here we have a direct, immediate conflict of interest and it should be ignored because you're too dumb to work out disclosure methods? I do like the way you clearly advertise your hypocrisy.

    "You never explained how she would benefit"

    She was the former CEO and president of a company that may stand to benefit greatly if her husband's plan is passed. There's a possibility that her package included some form of share or remaining connection to the company, or that she has close friends and colleagues who will thank her for their profit later on.

    Even if she has managed to sever all ties and no longer has any connection, that has only happened very recently - the legislation was introduced 18 months ago. Even if no conflict of interest currently exists, it damn well did exist for over a year from the time the bill was introduced to the time she left Aegis. Her jumping ship before the bill stands to pass does not remove the conflict that was happening while she was still employed there.

    Your dishonesty is as transparent as ever.

    "FUD"

    You're the expert, although you still seem hazy about what it really means.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    icon
    Morality124 (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:03am

    Re: Did I read this right?

    Yes she is. Kristi Clemens or Kristi M. Clemens was her original name, until she married Mike Rogers, after which she became Kristi Rogers, fullname Kristi M. Rogers, and sometimes Kristi Clemens-Rogers/Kristi Clemens Rogers. Also see here.

    Hope that clears things up. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:15am

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Ooh, the irony!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    Peter W, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:25am

    outsider who thinks he is an insider

    As a person who has been working in Cyber Security (Formerly IA, IS, IT etc) for 10 years as a contractor and now is a government (DoD) employee. I can tell you your assertions of the boogeyman are uninformed.
    The DoD systems I work daily to protect get pummelled by intrusion attempt (foreign and domestic).
    My friends in the private sector tell me of intrusions that have stolen everything from customer lists to plans for upcoming product releases. But they have been told not to divulge these intrusions due to stock market worries.
    For a person who has a company that claims to be about insight, I would recommend speaking from facts not opinions in regards to the need for cyber security.
    Your opinions of the Senator and his wives possible benefits may be true. But your assertions that the need for improved cyber security are not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:34am

    Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    First of all, not divulging those things is illegal.

    Secondly, alot of these "intrusions" are human error, weak security systems, or just plain unsecured systems, or a leak from within rather than without.

    All I see is bleating for increased cyber security to protect from those minor threats. Or perhaps the omnipresent DDOS attack, which will be launched by Anonymous in 20xx, the year of megaman, which will take out all our security grids.

    And thirdly, these things are obviously being dealt with NOW, it is not the job of the government to make things EASIER for itself when it comes to violating peoples rights. Those rights are supposed to be difficult to get past for a reason, because it is part of fundamental liberties. Cybersecurity has nothing to do with hoovering up personal information, and alot of it could be done with the advent of just "implementing basic security protocols".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:38am

    Re:

    So you like this politician and feel he is not doing something dishonest?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:42am

    Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    Umm...who and what exactly are you criticizing?
    Are you criticizing Mike for the "boogeyman"? If so, he's the one talking about the politicians who are screaming about a boogeyman.
    Also, what does your last sentence mean? The need for improved security? Surely, basic steps at protecting digital information can be used, all without needing legislation. It's not like people are leaving their front doors unlocked, thieves are strolling in taking what they will and then magically a new law passes that somehow by virtue of its existence stops all of this...when all you have to do is take basic steps to protect yourself.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    icon
    Chosen Reject (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:44am

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:46am

    Re:

    Wait. She has a conflict of interest because her former employer may benefit from the passage of CISPA?

    Exactly. Dipshit FUD Boy never cites for us the rule on disclosures of conflicts of interests, and he never explains how her prior employment creates such a conflict. Nor does he even bother to explain how he determined that this conflict, if there even was one, wasn't disclosed. This is just a stupid, angry attempt to discredit a sitting Representative based on nothing but FUD and idiocy. Mike Masnick has struck again. What a fucking idiot. And of course he won't defend any of this in the comments. He's too busy writing his next brain-dead hitpiece for his idiot followers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 8:58am

    Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    If Hitler is the penultimate fascist...who's the ultimate? Just wondering...
    And for what it's worth...I've said things similar before. Hitler did restore the German economy where all the other post WW1 German governments had failed...if you ignore the fact he did so through a mixture of slave labour and removal of worker's rights and destruction of trade unions.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    icon
    Jeff (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:02am

    Re: Re:

    Sounds like somebody has a serious case of the frownies!

    Please use this doll and tell us where the mean man touched you...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:04am

    Re: Re:

    "Exactly. Dipshit FUD Boy never cites for us the rule on disclosures of conflicts of interests, and he never explains how her prior employment creates such a conflict."

    Because he doesn't need to. Because, unlike you and the rest of your ilk, his readers are intelligent and educated, and able to figure out what he's left out.
    And what do you mean by "wasn't disclosed"? Did Rogers in fact stand up in the House and say "By the way, my wife is a lobbyist who has friends in the industry who will gain financially to the tune of BILLIONS, with a B, if this legislation passes...and yes, she is withholding sex from me unless I do everything in my power to get this passed". If he did disclose, provide proof that Mike is wrong.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:06am

    Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    So, you used to be one of those "cybersecurity" contractors, eh? What was it like getting paid millions to install Norton Antivirus on a few computers? Must've been easy living.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    icon
    Chosen Reject (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:12am

    Re: Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    I consider Benito Mussolini to be the ultimate fascist, but only because he was one of the first, and one of the founders of the fascist movement. Hitler (or maybe someone else) may have been more fascist, but I haven't bothered myself to come up with a Who's Who of fascists.

    Yeah, Hitler did get the German economy going, but so what? If I had a choice of living under Hitler or the Germany before Hitler, I'd choose the latter. Freedom means a lot more to me than the economy. Blue's praise of Hitler just shows to me he isn't a populist that cares for the people. That's all a charade he puts on. He claims he's for the little guy, against big corporations, etc, but he's for government granted monopolies and knocks Mike any time Mike talks about government corruption or the like.

    Like "The Prince", or Hitler, Blue like his subtle form of evil. Pretend to be for the people, when you really just want to rule over them completely.

    Note: I'm not accusing Blue of supporting Holocaust Hitler or warmongering Hitler. I'm pointing out that blue praises fascist Hitler.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:14am

    Re: Re:

    Bags of money changing hands implies the direction of the money flow is into the hands of legislators. Securing a $10B contract is money flowing into the hands of industry.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:27am

    Re: Re:

    It's art imitating life. This isn't exactly a new thing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  63.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:39am

    Re: Re: Re:

    If you think the person running this website is a total fucking idiot, the why the hell are you here every day reading it? That sounds like even bigger idiocy to me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  64.  
    identicon
    limbodog, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:39am

    Anyone willing to file a complaint with the Ethics committee?

    http://oce.house.gov/public-input.html

    I'd be willing to do it, but I feel like whoever does so should be more knowledgeable about this than I.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  65.  
    identicon
    wec, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:39am

    So, if she is a lobbyist, who does she lobby?. Probably her husband and his cohorts. Isn't that a conflict of interest or the use on undue influence. Also, does her paycheck have anything to with the bills she lobbies for and they get enacted?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  66.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:40am

    Re: Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Fascism cannot persist without the consent of the people, and so it always provides some benefit to the people so that they'll play along. That doesn't justify fascism or make it a good thing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  67.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:49am

    Re: Re: Re:

    IMO, if there is a large conflict of interest, the proper thing to do is not to "report" it somewhere, but simply to stay away from the bill. If the conflict is large enough, you should abstain from even voting on it. You certainly don't become the driving force behind it.

    Heck, the Supreme Court will let a decision go 4-4 rather than have a member with a conflict cast a vote. But then, the Court actually cares about the appearance of conflicts of interest. Congress, apparently, does not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  68.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:49am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Because he doesn't need to. Because, unlike you and the rest of your ilk, his readers are intelligent and educated, and able to figure out what he's left out.

    So smart people just throw out FUD about a sitting Congressman violating the House Ethics Rules without actually presenting evidence that a violation occurred? LOL!

    And what do you mean by "wasn't disclosed"?

    There are procedures for disclosing conflicts of interest, dipshit. I thought you were "intelligent and educated"?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  69.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:59am

    Re:

    It's actually based on a British series of the same name, which deals with those themes, IIRC, in the mid-70s.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  70.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:04am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    You know you're in trouble when your Supreme Court believes far more in your nation's ideal than its politicians.

    But then what's new?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  71.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:04am

    Re: Re:

    "He's too busy writing his next brain-dead hitpiece for his idiot followers."

    A group of which you are a part of, apparently:

    You follow (stalk, actually) him, and you are an idiot. QED.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  72.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:17am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "Nor does he even bother to explain how he determined that this conflict, if there even was one, wasn't disclosed."

    You basically said that Mike lied when he said that the conflict of interest wasn't disclosed. If it was, as you are implying, then provide some proof. Otherwise your claims lack merit and are meaningless.
    Also, we don't need to be told about the exact rule for disclosing conflicts of interest whenever someone reports that there potentially could be one. So I don't know why you are harping on about Mike not mentioning the precise rules and procedures. Mike doesn't need to. For the purposes of his article, he just needs to say "I've got Politician A here, he's the main guy behind Legislation B, he's married to Woman C who just so happened to work for Industry D that will make a ton of money if Legislation B passes". Are the rules as simple as standing up in the house and going "My wife is a lobbyist lobbying for this bill, I can't vote or introduce this bill or do anything, cause then there's the appearance at the very least of a conflict of interest".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  73.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:24am

    Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    As a person who has been working in Cyber Security (Formerly IA, IS, IT etc) for 10 years as a contractor and now is a government (DoD) employee. I can tell you your assertions of the boogeyman are uninformed.
    The DoD systems I work daily to protect get pummelled by intrusion attempt (foreign and domestic).


    I don't deny that there are intrusion attempts, or that they're going on all the time. I question how *serious* those attempts are or how much damage they could actually do. To date, they have not done that much damage.

    My friends in the private sector tell me of intrusions that have stolen everything from customer lists to plans for upcoming product releases. But they have been told not to divulge these intrusions due to stock market worries.

    Again there is little to no evidence to support this, and companies have reported no serious losses. If this was as horrible as you claim, we'd see some impact from it.

    Furthermore, at no point has anyone explained how this new legislation will actually help to stop attacks or why the information sharing was not currently allowed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  74.  
    icon
    GrahamMan (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:32am

    Re:

    See it for what it is? You mean a pay day for them if they vote for it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  75. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:48am

    Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    Hey Mikey,

    Please explain how his wife has a current conflict of interest because of her former job. Or can you not even back up this stupid assertion?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  76.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 10:55am

    Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    Hi dumbass. How many times do I have to comment with the words "revolving door" or do you willfully ignore those comments? Revolving doors are a reality in US politics. There are people who have gone from politician to a job as a lobbyist pushing for a bill, to then working for an industry that benefits from that bill.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  77.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 11:12am

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    "...you're totally out of substance and have started attacking wives of people in Congress..."

    ...who are working for companies directly profiting from their husbands' work, boy.
    OotB is proof positive that there should be an intelligence test for posting to blogs.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  78.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 11:33am

    Interpretation....

    Based on this information, I would interpret his statement, "..."unusual source" threatening us..." to be:

    "..."My Wife" threatening me..." if I don't get this passed....

    Who in their right mind wants to piss off their wife? What's billions of wasted dollars in vaporware threats compared to an angry wife?

    Just saying....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  79. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 11:43am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    Yes. I understand the generalized FUD about "revolving doors." You and Mike have yet to demonstrate (1) that Rogers had a conflict of interest, (2) that Rogers had a duty to disclose it, and (3) that Rogers failed to disclose it. Let me know when you've got more than FUD and can actually demonstrate that he did anything wrong.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  80.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 11:51am

    Re:

    No they don't. They have money and power. The fuck do they care?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  81.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 12:04pm

    If the Congressman had any other job this would be a breach of ethics. However, he's a Congressman and they have no ethics...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  82.  
    icon
    Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 12:20pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    If you bothered to read and understand the article, you would have realized that:
    1) At the very least there is the appearance of a conflict of interest, as the article was explicit in stating.
    2) Mr. Rogers, as a member of Congress, is a public servant and his job is to work for the public interest. Wether or not there is a law or rule or procedure codified for this exact situation, there is an ethical duty for Mr. Rogers to disclose to the public he serves of the potential of a conflict of interest.
    3) He did not disclose it to the public he represents.

    Right and wrong are ethical concepts and not directly accounted for in all laws. He may not have done anything illegal, but what he has done is ethically wrong.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  83.  
    identicon
    KG, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 12:23pm

    A-Holes

    Why the hell are these people still in office? If ANYONE else pulled crap like this, they'd not only be FIRED but most likely facing fraud charges! This country is completely messed up beyond hope of repair. Sickening.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  84.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 12:31pm

    Re:

    Not all of us are that bad. Just the old farts in the office positions.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  85.  
    identicon
    toolbag, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 1:25pm

    Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Get outta her Mike Rogers

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  86.  
    identicon
    hp, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 1:47pm

    trust less?

    "Trust less" is the understatement of the year.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  87.  
    identicon
    Bearfoot, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 3:07pm

    Re: Re:

    Are you aware that "Most hackers" are people who guess common passwords or otherwise trick people into giving up passwords? It doesn't take THAT much computer power to steal a unguarded laptop now does it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  88.  
    identicon
    Chuck Wiley, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 3:30pm

    CISPA

    Let's see how many Senators who voted down the background check legislation for gun purchases yesterday vote for CISPA. There's no don't that there will be more than a handful and hopefully the media will call them out on their hypocrisy.

    I can't help but believe if this CISPA bill had the word gun or arms associated with it, it never would have even reached the floor of the House for a vote, let alone been passed.

    Such typical, two-faced responses from House members who fear what the government would do with a database of information on gun owners, but will gleefully approve any limitations on privacy as it relates to other spheres, such as the Internet. All in the name of the War on Terror (despite the fact that guns have been used to terrorize, and kill, more Americans than terrorists ever have or will).

    Why am I not surprised by their duplicity, hypocrisy and shameless, obsequious kowtowing to the lobbying industry (both for guns and the military-industrial complex) in this country?

    What a joke Congress is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  89.  
    identicon
    Busing raping, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 4:09pm

    In basement raping

    Mike Rogers must be too busy to notice all this. He's probably in the basement raping teenagers

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  90.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 4:29pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    This assumes that the article is "all" fact. The contention is that it isn't, so the answers are not in the article.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  91.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 4:42pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    And yet the article lays out his citations (that would be the blue linking text?) and logical process through the issue. Can you offer up anything at all that refutes the information that is being presented? Citations will be needed to support your argument, of course.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  92.  
    icon
    samsays (profile), Apr 18th, 2013 @ 4:49pm

    Link

    Now look into the link between Aegis and Craft international via Tim Spicer, founder of Aegis, and Mark Tim Spicer, Co-Founder of Craft International.

    Craft International was providing "security" at the Boston bombing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  93.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 5:00pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    Simple logic requires no citations.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  94.  
    identicon
    Rose McDonald, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 5:46pm

    Mike Rogers' wife and CISPA

    Gee, a Republican; what a surprise!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  95.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 5:59pm

    Re: Re:

    They had this wet dream about taking back 'merica and having a puppet in the white house, they are still in denial.

    The only reason they still hold the house is due to gerrymandering, and yet they think it was not the message or their platform, but the way their message was conveyed.

    It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  96.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:03pm

    oh but they're working for us, remember? to heck with the republicans, democrats, libs, all of them. to heck with the whole government. I can't believe there are people out there who just can't figure it out. I know there are people here that have figured it out but the majority of the human race is so helpless and brainless that it makes me sick

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  97.  
    identicon
    Cowards Anonymous, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 6:14pm

    Mr. Roger's Neighborhood

    Mr. Rogers neighborhood sounds like a very scary place. Hackers, and 14 year olds, and basements. Oh my!

    It's a frightening day in the neighborhood,
    A 14 year old's hacking my neighborhood,
    Won't you spy on my neighbor.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  98.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:28pm

    Our wonderful, honest government at work. When our we going to vote these crooks out?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  99.  
    identicon
    Ed C., Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:41pm

    Cyber hygiene?

    Mrs Rogers' article included at the end is rather laughable. The attacks that supposedly cost so much money were mainly caused by poor security. Of course, rather than insuring that their systems and property worth billions is properly secured, such as not running card transactions from POS terminals over open wifi networks, they would rather have the government hunt down and prosecute the intruders at the tax payers expense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  100.  
    identicon
    Incognito, Apr 18th, 2013 @ 9:59pm

    Dunno

    Still, I don't get it. How CISPA will help them against hackers?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  101.  
    identicon
    RickZ, Apr 19th, 2013 @ 12:45am

    Criminal

    While the country continues it's economic melt down and ongoing craziness Congress is hard at work wasting our tax dollars, stealing and colluding with corporations and destroying any last remnant of our privacy. Sounds like just another day at the office. I hope they are called out and the media puts this in the headline news but with all the other things going on this will probably be ignored. Any videos made should include this information. Contact all the news department and hopefully his hometown picks up the story. Front Page news for his state newspapers would look great. Mr & Mrs Rogers this weeks corporwhores. While we all just get by they waste time with self-serving bills. Appalling! Is there not one honorable Congress member left?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  102.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Apr 19th, 2013 @ 4:21am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Those are not hackers. They just know how to explore human stupidity. For me (NOT AN OFFICIAL DEFINITION, this is my opinion)a hacker is that guy with a sheer knowledge of computers (and there are hackers focused on different things). For instance there are those that focus on finding security holes, those who trample with software to make it more useful (or remove DRM) or even those who meddle with hardware directly and things like that. There are different words that express these different types but I shamelessly lump them together in the same word. Some hackers use their awesome skills for not so good actions, unfortunately.

    But the word hacker by itself is not inherently good or bad. It just describes a skilled person when dealing with electronics in general. Although you could consider turning a small truck into a jeep some sort of mechanical hacking or something. It all depends on how loosely you use the word heh

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  103.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 19th, 2013 @ 4:58am

    This makes me want to watch House of Cards again.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  104.  
    identicon
    DeP, Apr 19th, 2013 @ 11:49am

    Re: Re:

    Oh dear. The rants ARE getting more and more extreme. Seems he's REALLY throwing the toys out of the baby buggy now. The mentality also appears to be consistent with that sort of age. Suspect it's because he's getting absolutely nowhere with his inane, insane and completely irrelevant comments and getting flagged at the first opportunity as a born trouble-maker. OOTB, why do you even bother? It's becoming patently obvious that you don't have an original thought in your rattly old brain and don't really have a life.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  105.  
    identicon
    cynic, Apr 19th, 2013 @ 5:44pm

    these muthafuckas are gonna do whatever they want no matter what we have to say about it, and then we will turn around and vote em in again the next time to get some more of our money. You watch.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  106.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 20th, 2013 @ 3:16am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: outsider who thinks he is an insider

    Humor us.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  107.  
    identicon
    Republic, Apr 21st, 2013 @ 1:49am

    See the dream2016.com for the candidate for repubs.
    196 repubs voted for it (CISPA) and only 29 against. 92 dems for it; 98 against. These are worthless traitors to this country and the wonderful law of it. Enough said.
    The lack of respect to their fellow man is astounding. They will get their very deserved punishment. If the excuse is made that these have no clue what they are doing, they should actually read the bill #1, or have no place serving people in the government #2. Don't worry about repubs seeking to destroy gun rights. They are going all in on the hopes of destroying the 4th as well. See the dream instead.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  108.  
    identicon
    Republic, Apr 21st, 2013 @ 1:52am

    Check out dream2016.com as the solution for the republican party.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  109.  
    identicon
    kleighx, Apr 21st, 2013 @ 7:22am

    REAL LIFE HOUSE OF CARDS

    Well this is not surprising at all!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  110.  
    identicon
    Papa Z, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 6:01am

    Re:

    And whose government do you really, really love?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  111.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2013 @ 6:42pm

    Herr Rogers won his position by disenfranchising college students. Take a look at his history, he won his seat by 111 votes, after pushing legislation that denied college students the right to vote in his district. He is the real life Kevin Spacey character from House of Cards.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  112.  
    identicon
    SenselessNoise, Apr 23rd, 2013 @ 3:21pm

    18 USC 208

    Can we charge Mike Rogers with 18 USC 208 - Acts affecting a personal financial interest?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  113.  
    identicon
    Ultimation, Apr 24th, 2013 @ 8:38pm

    Re: Did I read this right?

    "Kristi Clemens Rogers" probably means her maiden name was Clemens. So yeah its the same person.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  114.  
    icon
    WysiWyg (profile), Apr 25th, 2013 @ 2:14am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: So, Mike, now you've gone TOTAL AD HOM.

    Actually, all Hitler proved was that it's easy to increase the standard of living for some if you do it by stealing everything of value from someone else, and then use them as slaves. Who would have thought huh?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  115.  
    identicon
    FFS, Apr 26th, 2013 @ 1:07pm

    Re: Re:

    Are you defending ours? Cause ours is shit. And pretty much every country's is. No one's doing it completely right but the simple things are being done wrong here in America, supposedly the greatest nation in the world can't handle the most basic principles that the country is supposed to be founded on. Liberty? Slowly being drained by bills. Life? They seem to be able to end it if you piss them off or fuck up their payments. Pursuit of Happiness? Nope, unless your happiness is a consumerist pop-culture obsessed one you probably won't find it here unless you're one of the people abusing the rest of society.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  116.  
    identicon
    Thomas, Jun 6th, 2013 @ 4:13pm

    You called it early Mike Masnick !!!

    It is now June 6th, 2013 and Mike Roger's just tweeted "Announcing The Cyber Economic Espionage Accountability Act with @SenRonJohnson and @RepTimRyan pic.twitter.com/WNRRN8dKHJ

    Looks like Mike Rogers is again jumping on the evil hackers trying to "steal information bandwagon you talked about in your article.

    Great way to foresee the future and soft corruption in action again.

    I stumbled on this article just today and could not believe how truthful it is now after Mike Rogers latest tweet. Keep up the great writing.
    Tom

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  117.  
    icon
    Thomas (profile), Jul 7th, 2013 @ 2:17pm

    Most branches..

    of the U.S. government completely ignore conflict-of-interest rules. Congress ignores it, the SCOTUS ignores it, the FCC ignores it. Nowdays they talk about "conflict-of-interest" instead of plain old bribery.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  118.  
    icon
    Rich Fiscus (profile), Jul 30th, 2013 @ 5:18pm

    In the absence of any official statement from Mike Rogers explaining his position with respect to potentially defamatory allegations by members of his staff against Mike Masnick it seems only fair to offer an explanation for the unwashed masses of ignorant halfwits populating the Internet. After years spent closely observing the species Vitulamen Sanguinem Parasitus, more commonly known as the garden variety politician, I have become something of an expert on their highly idiosyncratic communication style.

    Based on my years of study I am confident what appears at first to be an organized campaign of borderline defamatory rumor mongering is, in fact, a completely unintentional misunderstanding. This is much more common than you might suspect due to the difficulty in translating from that species' significantly more nuanced and sophisticated communication into the crude and limited vocabulary used by us ordinary folk.

    It is impossible for me to definitively identify the subtleties of Mike Rogers' staffers, not having witnessed the exchange personally. I can, however, provide some insight about how the benign behavior of these elegant creatures is often misunderstood by ordinary people. In the spirit of furthering relations between our two species I will endeavor to do so. I will also attempt to replicate the delicate nuance of their language in the hope increased exposure to it will increase your understanding.

    Let's start with the alleged comments by Representative Rogers' staffers to a Michigan reporter insinuating, but likely falling just short of actually accusing, Mike Masnick of defamation. There are many ways to characterize his staffers' actions. In some places it would be called innuendo, half truth, or perhaps even lying. A blogger with a legal background and significant experience in First Amendment defense, Ken White at Popehat for example, might refer to it as censorious thuggery. Such a person might even go so far to call it douchebaggery. On this very thread it has been described as corruption.

    On Capitol Hill they call that Tuesday.

    If you go back to the original Techdirt pieces which led to this reaction you will notice a similar communications gap. On July 26 Mike characterized Mike Rogers' selective and out of context quotes about Supreme Court precedents misleading.

    On Capitol Hill they call that Tuesday.

    A day earlier Mike called out Representative Rogers for conflating different NSA programs to paint a rosy picture which is entirely and categorically false.

    Once again, on Capitol Hill they call that Tuesday. I could go on but in every case the comparison would ultimately be the same.

    You might agree with me that Mike Rogers, purely for personal gain, blindly supports government programs which are clearly and blatantly unconstitutional. Like me you might suggest Mike Rogers is a typical crony capitalist, irreversibly corrupted by the lure of power, prestige, and a likely future of wealth and comfort lobbying for the equally corrupt corporations he has thrown his support behind. In fact you may believe, as I do, that his public statements alone easily meet the Constitutional criteria for impeachment and his protestations to the contrary amount to nothing more than a claim of first degree butthurt.

    Try to remember, though, that he truly does not understand any of that. In Mister Rogers' Neighborhood it's just Tuesday.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This