Canadian Politician Removed From Provincial Assembly For Threats She Didn't Make On Facebook Group She Didn't Join

from the wut? dept

We’ve heard stories in the past about people being blamed for the comments of others on Facebook groups, such as an attempt to hold parents responsible for the groups their children join. While my position is that such blaming is reactionary and silly, there is at least a modicum of a tangential relationship between the parties. So what should the response be if such a relationship doesn’t exist? What if someone is added to a group without their knowledge and members of that group advocate violence? What should be done then?

Well, if you’re a member of the Newfoundland House of Assembly in Canada, apparently you are removed from the house of assembly proceedings entirely. Such was the case with Gerry Rogers.

Earlier Tuesday, Justice Minister Darin King said Rogers was a member of the Facebook group Kathy Dunderdale must GO!!! in which users had posted comments containing death threats against the premier.

“What kind of message is that sending to the people of the province, to our children in the province, when we talk about bullying and harassment and intimidation?” said King.

Bullying? Well, the definition of the verb is “to treat abusively; to affect by means of force or coercion.” Call me crazy, but it seems to me that forcing someone out of the duties of their elected office as a means for coercing them to apologize for something she had absolutely nothing to do with sort of meets the criteria, doesn’t it? That’s exactly what happened here, as Rogers aptly contends.

“I did not join this Facebook group,” Rogers told reporters during the recess. Rogers said that she thinks that the government does not understand how Facebook groups work. “I was added to this group without my knowledge, without permission, and by somebody that I do not know,” said Rogers.

Premier Kathy Dunderdale, against whom the threats were made, responded specifically to that point, insisting that the government did indeed understand how Facebook groups operate, but it’s up to each member of government to monitor all the comments on all the groups they belong to, whether they had chosen to belong to them or not. She also said:

“I’m not going to be bullied or intimidated into doing something that I don’t think is in the best interests of the people in this province,” said Dunderdale.

No, Madame Premier, that privilege appears to be reserved for Gerry Rogers, and the people she represents, I might add, unless your government wants to rethink its concepts over whether to blame people for the actions of others.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: facebook groups

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Canadian Politician Removed From Provincial Assembly For Threats She Didn't Make On Facebook Group She Didn't Join”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
22 Comments
Rikuo (profile) says:

So…did someone hack her Facebook account and add her to the group without her knowledge? The original article doesn’t say. To join a Facebook group, you have to Like it. Does Facebook allow you to just add random people to groups without asking them?
Also, how in a democratic society, can an elected official be removed from office this easily, especially when the guy doing the expelling says he knows you didn’t make the speech? Surely the rules should be that you see this democratically elected official is ostensibly part of this hate group, but they can’t be fired until after a thorough investigation.

Ninja (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I find this particularly annoying. While there are degrees to who can add you to groups if it’s allowed in the permissions then they can add you to their groups/pages/events. It could be that one friend of hers added her to the group without any intention and never thinking it would derail into some hate stupidity.

As you said the huge red alert here is placing liability for what others did in the victim and implying she should police the internet by herself. It’s not only absurd but insane.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

“To join a Facebook group, you have to Like it.”

No you don’t.

“Does Facebook allow you to just add random people to groups without asking them?”

Depending on your privacy settings and those of the group, yes. I’ve recently been added to 2 different groups by friends of mine without my prior permission, though I’m unsure of whether you can do this for everyone, members of other groups you’re both members of, or just people you’ve friended.

I agree with the rest of your comments.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

The last time I looked I wasn’t able to find it. I’d really like to be able to, I hate getting added to groups I don’t want to be in – particularly with a “public” facebook account that pretty much automatically adds “friends” who request it, such as … oh … a politician might have.
Being able to send be a request to join? Sure. Automatically joining me even if it’s a group I would NEVER join on my own? Not so much. But there doesn’t seem to be a setting for that…

TexasAndroid (profile) says:

Re: Orly?

Indeed. This action is just setting things up for the playing of dirty political tricks. This time the politician may have been added innocently added (who knows). But if a politician can get in trouble for things that others do, you’re setting things of for the others to deliberately do things just to get the politician in trouble. There are plenty of much, much more offensive groups out there (KKK, NAMBLA, WBC). I would not be surprised if a number of politicians start finding themselves added to a number of such offensive groups.

art guerrilla (profile) says:

Re: Re: Orly?

yep, good point, droid…

in these sad, dark days, when you can be classified/persecuted as a terrorist for supporting some group that does humanitarian work, which you have no idea is SECRETLY deemed a terroristical organization because, well, just BECAUSE SOME POLITICO DIDN’T ‘like’ them, we are ALL vulnerable to being secretly renditioned by Empire…

…and KNOW THIS: that is EXACTLY what the powers-that-be want: we are ALL TERRORIZED by ‘our’ (sic) own gummint and (in)justice system, such that we are all rendered as neutered mice who dare not squeak, not men who walk proudly on their hind legs and FORCE ‘our’ (sic) gummint to do OUR BIDDING, not the korporatocracy’s…

all according to the plutokrats plan…
shut up and consume, sheeple, that is ALL you are good for…

art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof

Anonymous Coward says:

out of curiosity, what bill has she tried to propose or what bill has she agreed with that has made the government take this action? if they know how Facebook works then they will also know that things happen that you know nothing about. so, if Rogers was watching all the groups she belongs to, why would she watch a group that she doesn’t belong to?

as for being Justice Minister, it sounds to me that Darin King is the last person i would want in that position. how has any justice been shown here? what proof is there?

then please explain what it is that Dunderdale (should be Dunderfoot!) is not going to be intimidated or bullied into doing/not doing?

i suppose then, that those that have forced this person out of office are going to show the proof that she actually did as they have accused? i doubt it very much and refer back to my first comment. she has pissed off someone that has now used their position to get her fired and that was probably sticking up for the people rather than an industry or organisation.

Sarah Millin (profile) says:

hilarious follow up story

CBC investigated how well Kathy Dunderdale and the Progressive Conservatives do know Facebook and Twitter: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2013/04/17/nl-social-media-progressive-conservatives-417.html . Among other things they found Ms Dunderdale was following a porn account on twitter.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...