Team Prenda Does Not Show Up In Court; Judge Is Not Amused

from the bad-day-for-prenda dept

Update: And here is the deep dive analysis by Ken.

We'll have a more complete report soon from Ken "Popehat" White, who was in the courtroom for the Prenda hearing today and will be writing about it for us (and for his own site), but for the quick version of what happened, with a huge assist from both Adam Steinbaugh and White, is that the judge has not made a ruling yet, but he is not at all pleased, saying "the client has been running everything. I know who the client is." There was no direct admission of who owns AF Holdings (other than that it had been transferred to another holding company, LiveWire -- as Pietz pointed out in his chart), but nothing else directly came out in court, apparently, other than Judge Wright's claim that he knows what's going on. In fact, he noted that the shell companies are "not even shells." This does not bode well for Prenda.

Of all the people ordered to appear, Team Prenda decided not to bother -- instead telling the judge they were available by phone, though the judge chose not to call. The only person (outside of Gibbs and Morgan Pietz) who did make it was Alan Cooper. But just one of the Alan Coopers. The caretaker one, who claims that his name was used illegally on various documents. In other words, as expected, Prenda and John Steele have still failed to produce another Alan Cooper who actually was associated with the shell companies. Apparently, Cooper showed up with voicemails left by John Steele which sound vaguely threatening, promising to tie him up in litigation -- possibly the defamation case that Steele filed against Cooper and the anonymous internet commenters. This will not help Steele's case. At all.

Apparently, Judge Otis Wright was not particularly pleased about this turn of events. Similarly, he blasted Paul Hansmeier for his deposition in which he tapdanced around pretty much every question. Remember, Hansmeier gave the deposition as the official designated "representative" of AF Holdings, one of the mysterious shell companies at issue in these cases, but Judge Wright pointed out that Hansmeiers evasiveness suggested he "doesn't know anything about his own firm." Or, you know, he's choosing not to say things.

Gibbs was put on the stand to testify, and apparently continued his "I was just taking orders" defense, in which he pointed the judge to Prenda. He also apparently claims he left Prenda because of the "online harassment and unwelcome exposure," though that wouldn't explain why he then became "in house counsel" for LiveWire, the shell holding company that was "acquiring" various Prenda shells. Judge Wright pointed out that Gibbs was the official counsel of record, and therefore the person responsible, even if he was attempting to throw Prenda under the bus. Gibbs also claimed that while he was "in house counsel" for LiveWire for two months, he never got paid (just like the Hansmeier deposition). It seems that no one associated with Prenda ever seems to want to pay anyone. Funny, that.

Also, Gibbs and his lawyers apparently tried to push back on the Verizon filing, which suggested that Gibbs failed to inform Verizon that the order allowing subpoenas to move forward in one of the cases had been killed by the court, and, furthermore, suggested Gibbs then lied to the court in claiming that Verizon had been informed. However, Verizon's lawyers showed up, and that apparently silenced Gibbs' lawyers.

Anyway, that's our quick update... There will be a ruling soon enough, but come back tonight when we post a more complete analysis from inside the courtroom.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Internet Zen Master (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 4:52pm

    Hmm...

    For some reason I can't help but imagine Judge Otis dressed up as Judge Dredd right now. Seems fitting, considering how FUBAR'd those fucking assclowns from Prenda are going to be by the end of the week...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 4:52pm

    As Ken from Popehat says,
    ... writing ASAP. First must have womb installed so I can have Judge Wright's babies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 4:53pm

    It seems that no one associated with Prenda ever seems to want to pay anyone. Funny, that.

    Oh, like Techdirt!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:11pm

      Re:

      And you know this, how?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:15pm

      Re:

      Um, there appears to have been a collaborative effort between a number of people to expose what was going on in the courtroom today. If you had been following the +Prenda tag on Twitter, you'd know about this.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:27pm

      Prenda using Hollywood Accounting?

      Prenda shells can't pay lawyers until they are profitable. Hollywood Accounting techniques and "fees" paid to another shell can ensure that profitability never happens.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        special-interesting (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:46pm

        Re: Prenda using Hollywood Accounting?

        Hollywood accounting is famous for pictures grossing over 110 million and NEVER fessing up on the common clause of 'percentage of profit'. (Profits? What profits? We don't have no stinking profits!)

        Hollywood accounting has got to be a stereotype phrase by now for: Don't sign that contract without a percentage of the GROSS receipts. (even if the percentage is much smaller the return is much larger.)

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Brad (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:14pm

          Re: Re: Prenda using Hollywood Accounting?

          Verily, a percentage of the gross is infinitely larger than a percentage of the net.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 2:43am

          Re: Re: Prenda using Hollywood Accounting?

          Better yet, sign for a no refundable advance of what you think the work is worth, or even more if you can get away with it.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    BearGriz72 (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 4:55pm

    Popcorn at the ready!

    Waiting for Full Write-up...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      1Maenad, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:05pm

      Re: Popcorn at the ready!

      *grabs a handful* Thanks for sharing! Can't wait; this is going to be good!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Anonymous, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:02pm

        Re: Re: Popcorn at the ready!

        To all the popcornerers on this sight: There is some concern about the unlimited consumption of popcorn without appropriate countermeasures, including prune juice and excercise. Therefore it is recomended that one attach one's computer's to a treadmill, which one should only pause while typing (given the frequent requests for an edit feature, apparently typing while static is even difficult at times), attending the neccessary, or actually working. The prune juice option may be mitigated with copious amounts of Milk Duds. The effect may be messy.

        So the point is that while popcorn provides a bit of roughage, and certainly at times amusement while pondering expectant amusement, it is mostly air. Comments, refering strictly to popcorn, therefore are mostly air. While a bit of air will lighten many loads, and increase comment count, it often fails to actually, like, contribute, as I know the multitude of popcornerers are capable of. (Dang those preposition ending sentances that express the vernacular).

        Like feeding trolls, airfull comments rarely inspire insightful or funny votes, but rack up the comment count!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:04pm

          Re: Re: Re: Popcorn at the ready!

          Sorry for any unintentional typos, this was posted before I even finished my name, and not edited.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 4:58pm

    And after Verizon drops a bomb and makes it a huge plot twist the amusingly predictable happens. I think the judge will show them the full weight of the Hammer Of Justice (tm).

    I'm hooked, hands frantically moving from popcorn basket to mouth, soft drinks bubbling furiously!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Matthew Cline (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:01pm

    It's surprising how many of the people involved in this are willing to work for free.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Bill W (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:06pm

    Can't wait!

    Maybe this could be serialized into an afternoon soap? I'd watch!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    JohnnyRotten (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:07pm

    Of all the people ordered to appear, Team Prenda decided not to bother -- instead telling the judge they were available by phone, though the judge chose not to call. The only person (outside of Gibbs and Morgan Pietz) who did make it was Alan Cooper.

    I wonder if the Judge is filling out bench warrants right now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    alanbleiweiss (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:09pm

    Living just a few miles from the court, I was tempted to go, but then figured only Cooper, Peitz & Gibbs would be there and Wright would just issue bench warrants all around for the rest. Fortunately the #Prenda tweet stream kept me sufficiently entertained and the little bit of live tweeting that was done helped round it out.

    Can't wait for all the full write-ups later today/tonight!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:12pm

    was an arrest warrant issued for those that didn't turn up? if not, why not? i know damn well that had it been me or any other 'ordinary person' we would have been locked up and the key thrown away! the judge has got the chance to deal with these ass hats once (hopefully) and for all. i sincerely hope he takes this chance (within the law of course, but i dont care if that's stretched a bit!) and not waste it!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:18pm

      Re:

      This is a civil trial, not a criminal trial. Nobody on Prenda's team has been charged with any crimes (yet), so the consequences are different from what you or I would suffer if we skipped out on, say, a DUI trial.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:27pm

      Re:

      "was an arrest warrant issued for those that didn't turn up? if not, why not?"

      Probably because he knows it would be overturned on appeal, given the short notice and cross country travel involved.

      I think this was more of a "last chance to change my mind" thing for the judge. Look for sanctions in the near future... not for the failure to appear, but for everything else.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      special-interesting (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:03pm

      Re:

      Am and am not surprised on the no-show. Kind of like pleading the 5th but with silence instead.

      So far it has been only a civil action but this hearing was in relation to misconduct unbecoming of an attorney inside the courtroom and a prelude to more serious action.

      The judge may have wanted to issue warrants today but he was thrown two more bones to pick with Prenda. One is the issue with Allen Mooney (of various spellings) which at least doubles the likely contempt of court (and other) charges and somewhat need to be sorted out. Second is the Verizon being taken for a ride affair of which, justifiably, they are miffed about and also needs some thought.

      The quiet interlude before... -anticipation-

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:13pm

    WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

    A waste of bandwidth. Get on to something that's relevant beyond this one case.




    Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
    http://techdirt.com/
    Mike Masnick, the economist with the soul of a lawyer. Watch for (another in) his "At The Bench" series.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      PRMan, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:22pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      You should be happy he's stopped talking about your employers for once...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:25pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      I'm highly amused. This is great, relevant and my only input is you have to love that soul of a lawyer, economist and poet!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Gwiz (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:26pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      A waste of bandwidth. Get on to something that's relevant beyond this one case.



      I for one, am extremely amused by all of this and find it very relevant and interesting.

      You are free to find some other blog community to annoy, Blue. Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out, k?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:06pm

        Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

        Congrats. You're one of maybe 17 people.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Mike Masnick (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:22pm

          Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

          Congrats. You're one of maybe 17 people.


          Judging by the traffic here on this story and other Prenda stories, your prognostication and math skills are just about as bad as your business skills in the music biz...

          You should try living in reality, rather than the world where you make stuff up all the time to make you feel better.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:41pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

            Then again math was never their strong suit. This is a given.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
             
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:56pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

            Judging by the traffic here on this story and other Prenda stories . . . .

            I'm sure the flock are hanging on your every word as you report the misdeeds of these copyright maximalists. Best thing to happen to you since Swartz.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:03pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              ಠ_ಠ

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
                 
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 1:30am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                Best thing to happen to you since Swartz.

                Actually, Masnick has been desperate for even one single instance of malfeasance in regard to Six Strikes, but hasn't hit his piracy-apologist lotto yet. He'll keep at it tho. He literally can't wait to say that one mistake means enforcement should be done away with. That's why he supports rape laws being wiped from the books; because, y'know, enforcement doesn't work and the "collateral damage" from a false accusation is just too much. Because he's consistent across the board with his opinions on law.

                Aren't you, Mike?

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  Rikuo (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 2:44am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                  As someone who knows four women who confessed to being raped ...I'm actually amazed at this but...you should be raped. You should experience it, and then come back and say to someone's face that he said "Do away with rape laws".
                  No. Shut up. You're wrong. You're sick.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  •  
                    icon
                    Ninja (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 3:14am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                    Actually it's amusing. They are projecting their own desperation into Techdirt. I find trolls in general highly amusing. When they get called on with facts and evidence they freak out ;)

                     

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  Niall (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 8:48am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                  You really a a sick puppy, and the best argument you can make are underhanded comments about rape and a suicide? Typical control industry morals!

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:23pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              I'm sure the flock are hanging on your every word


              Are you sure you didn't mean 'envy word'?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:25pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              You're just mad that this is the best your copyright buddies can come up with. How's it feel to finally have the book thrown at you? Have fun campaigning for their amnesty, just like Evan Stone and Andrew Crossley. Glorious heroes and enforcers of copyright, all of them.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 7:51am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                You're just mad that this is the best your copyright buddies can come up with.

                LOL! I haven't really followed this story, and these guys certainly aren't my buddies. I think all scumbag lawbreakers should pay. That includes these guys, if they're guilty, and all of the piratical douches that flock to Chicken Mike. My opinion doesn't change because of which side of the debate they're on. Watching you basement dwellers drool at the site of a dishonest "porn troll" is very entertaining. If only you idiots cared about other lawbreakers with the same vigor. But, alas, when it's one of "your kind," you all become myopic.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  Niall (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 8:50am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                  No, we just love seeing the massively hypocritical and law-buying/bending content-stealing-and-controlling-not-creating industry getting its just desserts.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 5:00pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

                  Keep squawking, Chicken Joe.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Rikuo (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 2:46am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              So let's see here.

              We've got a very interesting story happening in the courts. One that most Techdirtians are interested in. As a business owner and blog writer...wouldn't it be in everyone's best interests for Mike et al to keep writing about it? He gets the traffic, we get the stories. He is thus doing what any other blogger would do.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Ninja (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:07pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

            your prognostication and math skills are just about as bad as your business skills in the music biz

            According to his math and accounting skills he wasted 6 Petabytes of data and caused the collapse of the entirety of North American network by merely loading this post. Hollywood accounting can be scary. o.O

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 1:19am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

            Oh Masnick, you ESP reader you. Was one line enough for you to deduce a "unique writing style"?

            You have one also, and you threatened death. You'll have to pay for that some time, won't you, Mr. "I value people's privacy... Until I look at their IPs"?

            Keep falling into the same traps, Mike.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 1:37am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              He knows your IP cause you post on his site. He doesn't know your name or address or anything else unless you give it to him.

              And this site doesn't ask for that stuff either.

              I don't even know why I respond, it's just a waste of time, the only thing I find is strawmanning, ad hominem, faulty logic and plain old lies.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 3:58am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              Yes, and now we know exactly where you live.

              Keep on crying for the likes of Evan Stone and campaigning for titles like "Daddy My Ass is On Fire".

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 5:23am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              the irony is never lost.

              One day you'll finally understand what i mean.

              Im not holding my breath, though.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Niall (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 8:52am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

              Only because, like Prenda, you believe an IP address is like Mike being handed your passport and driver's licence.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:29pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      Great use of bandwidth. Prenda, Righthaven, MPAA, RIAA and other copyright trolls are extremely relevant.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:33pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      I doubt that anybody cares about you and your split personalities...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:35pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      Yeah, reality is a bitch ain't it?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      alanbleiweiss (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:48pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      "WE'RE"? Who the eff is "we"? Seriously. The volume of discussion across this site, the PopeHat site, Ars Technica, Fight Copyright Trolls is pretty much validation of the interest in this topic.

      Jump to Twitter and read the activity all day today on the #Prenda thread and it's confirmed.

      This is the most interesting, entertaining and quite relevant cases to ever come along regarding copyright & copyright trolls, and how they go to the lengths they go to.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Ninja (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:59pm

        Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

        Which amusingly explains the likes of outo_of_the_bob. He claims it's a waste of bandwidth but he keeps reading EVERY-SINGLE-ARTICLE. I take it trolls are masochists judging from Prenda and our usual trolls.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Trails (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:51pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      Who's this "we" you speak of? You and your other personalities? You and the neighbor's dog that's telling you to kill people? You and your imaginary friend, Col. Schlotz?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:53pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      Mike turned you down for a date, didn't he?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:56pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      Keep squirming, out_of_the_lube. Squirmy squirmy squirm.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      fogbugzd (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:35pm

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      >>A waste of bandwidth. Get on to something that's relevant beyond this one case.

      Give us a break. This case is our version of porn.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 9:25pm

        Re: Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

        Best of all this doesn't even need useless copyright protection. Why are you here not paying for entertainment, out_of_the_lube? That's totally immoral and, like, not cool mmmkay?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2013 @ 1:20am

      Re: WE'RE not amused, either, Mike.

      "A waste of bandwidth."

      This frome someone who's life is a waste.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:16pm

    One can only hope

    One can only hope that the judge issues bench warrants for the arrest of these asshats and throws their sorry butts into a deep, dark hole! This isn't just (IMO) a matter of contempt of court - it is more a matter of felony obstruction of justice!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:18pm

    Ace Attorney

    For some reason, I cannot stop visualizing all of this as something out of a Phoenix Wright game.

    I keep expecting to hear someone shout "OBJECTION!".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    S. T. Stone, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:26pm

    I kinda wish Vince McMahon knew about this. Id pay to see Judge Wright take down all these morons inside a steel cage at WrestleMania.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:35pm

    I am soooooo surprised that they did not show up in court today. /deadpan

    When they didn't get called, I wonder if they popped open some champagne to celebrate. Or were they following the twitter feed as they quickly crammed some clean underwear into their go bag to make a run for it...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That One Guy (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:45pm

      Re:

      Yeah, totally not surprised in the least they pulled a no-show here, and I have to wonder if they went with the 'you can contact us via phone' routine because they are scrambling like mad to get out of the country before the bench warrants are written up, which would make showing up physically rather difficult.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:03pm

        Re: Re:

        I think it's more likely that they knew they were going to get reamed, and none of them could bear to face it in person. That's what I was thinking about when I woke up this morning; I wouldn't be able to force myself to show up, if I was on Team Prenda.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:18pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Well, they kinda telegraphed that outcome, didn't they, by their last minute mailing in of their excuse note on Friday.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:24pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Yes, but I would argue that anyone with half a brain could describe the exact arc of this fiasco since day 1. Prenda seem to be the only ones stupid or delusional enough to be surprised.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        anonymouse, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:20pm

        Re: Re:

        As has been pointed out this is a civil case and not a criminal case although i would be surprised if there were not some charges laid against the two or three main culprits in this.
        I hope the judge calls for criminal charges and pushes this up to a higher court.

        If anything there seems to be a lot of he said she said and a lot of trying to hide any income with everyone saying they have not been paid anything so far.
        One interesting thing would be how many people paid up from those that were accused and sent demanding letters after the court said they must not, also how much has Prenda or any organization that Steel and Hammershite(sp) have been involved with taken from settlements. Where has Steel been making money as he was barred from practicing law previously from what i can remember.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          That Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:23pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          He was barred from attempting to practice law in FL. Which made him filing his defamation suit there hysterical as he promised the FL bar he wouldn't even think of player lawyer there.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:49pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I think he may have taken the word " practice" in the term " practice law" a little too literally. How people like this get a license in the first place is beyond me.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              alanbleiweiss (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:07pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "I think he may have taken the word " practice" in the term " practice law" a little too literally"

              hahaha almost spit up my coffee on that one

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            tqk (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 8:18pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            He was barred from attempting to practice law in FL. Which made him filing his defamation suit there hysterical as he promised the FL bar he wouldn't even think of player lawyer there.

            Is that practicing law (he was his own client, I take it) or just availing himself of using the law to defend himself? Even douchebag lawyers have the right to defend themselves.

            BTW, I'm not defending them, exactly. I think this whole charde is just stunningly ridiculous. These bums made it through law school and were accredited by the Bar?!? What's wrong with law schools and the Bar that allows this crap to happen? No accountability on their part, whatsoever? This seems to happen over and over again.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      DOlz, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 5:53pm

      Re:

      If Judge Wright had called they would have been in the bathroom ... every time.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Wally (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:24pm

    I'm just wondering...isn't all this enough to actually get all these people at Prenda Law kicked out of the California Bar Association? I mean seriously, why haven't these clowns lost their licenses to practice law?!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:32pm

      Re:

      Disbarment isn't a fast process. In many states (including California IIRC), it permanently removes your ability to work and earn money in your chosen field, with no ability to be reinstated after you've rehabbed yourself. It takes all of those years of schooling and work and flushes them away, leaving you to try and find some other way to pay your bills.

      It has to be a deliberate process, to make sure that only lawyers who truly deserve to be disbarred are disbarred. They have to rule out the possibility that a long suspension or other disciplinary actions are inadequate.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 6:43pm

    I'm Casey Kasem and this is a very special Long Distance Dedication.
    From John in IL to Brett in CA...
    This is Taylor Swift's 'We Are Never Getting Back Together'

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    jd2112 (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:05pm

    I thought the First lesson, Day 1 in Law School

    ...was:

    Do Not Piss Off The Judge.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ken, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:14pm

    SOON

    Sent my draft to Mike. Up tonight, perhaps late.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:51pm

    THREE HOURS SINCE PROMISED UPDATE!

    Fanboys are holding their breath, Mike! Needz more NON-NEWS!



    Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
    http://techdirt.com/
    Why aren't you fanboys helping out Mike with links back to here as I do? What a bunch of innovation-less freeloaders!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 7:56pm

      Re: THREE HOURS SINCE PROMISED UPDATE!

      And once again the jackass proves that he can't do simple math. Keep on squirming, out_of_the_lube.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That One Guy (profile), Mar 11th, 2013 @ 8:17pm

      Re: THREE HOURS SINCE PROMISED UPDATE!

      You know, as entertaining as it has been, and continues to be to watch all the scum at Prenda dance and squirm to avoid having to answer for their actions, almost as entertaining has been the actions of you and a few others, desperately, futility trying to act like nothing at all is happening, all the while trying to convince others of that 'fact'.

      Well, sorry to say Mr. Wizard, but the curtain has been pulled back, and everyone is getting a good look at the people, and actions behind it, no matter how much you might wish otherwise.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 2:53am

      Re: THREE HOURS SINCE PROMISED UPDATE!

      So for someone who's repeatedly said that this story is boring and a waste of bandwidth...you sure are on tenter-hooks waiting for the latest news, aren't you?

      This is why no-body believes or even likes you. You constantly scream bloody murder at Mike and Techdirt, (often quite literally) but in reality, you keep coming back, you keep reading, because, deep down, you're one of us. You're a copyright hating person too...
      Actually scratch that. I sincerely hope not, because if you are one of us, you are capable of singlehandedly causing copyright abolition to fail simply through sheer incompetence and stupidity.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 11th, 2013 @ 9:47pm

    Awesome! We need more jailhouse lawyers because we're in short supply.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    crashsuit (profile), Mar 12th, 2013 @ 9:32am

    I can't keep track of all the twists and turns. Can someone just let me know when the story comes out on DVD?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This