Prenda Law Issues Subpoena For IP Addresses Of Every Visitor To Critic Blogs For The Past Two Years
from the what-are-they-smoking? dept
This is rather incredible. We already wrote about Prenda Law's series of defamation lawsuits against commenters on two key blogs that have been instrumental in exposing their shenanigans: FightCopyrightTrolls and DieTrollDie. While John Steele has dismissed his claim, the other two suits are still moving forward as far as I know. And now it's come out that Prenda Law's Paul Duffy sent a ridiculously broad subpoena to Wordpress demanding every IP address of every visitor who has visited either site since the beginning of 2011. Basically, they're looking for everyone who has ever visited either site:
It's not difficult to look at this and see a likely attempt at creating chilling effects to try to scare people off from visiting those sites. Considering that Prenda has been collecting all sorts of IP addresses in its various copyright trolling lawsuits, can you imagine what they might do if they can cross reference IP addresses of visitors to those sites with the IP addresses they've already sued over?
Our client is requesting all Internet Protocol addresses (including the date and time of that access in Universal Coordinated Time) that accessed the blogs located at dietrolldie.com and fightcopyrighttrolls.com between January 1, 2011 through the present. Please provide this information in an Excel spreadsheet.The subpoena is from Paul Duffy, so it's a bit ridiculous to claim "our client" since he is the client. This seems like a pretty clear abuse of the subpoena process, though, coming from Prenda Law, whose specialty is doing anything it possibly can to get IP addresses, perhaps it's no surprise. The subpoena was issued in association with the original claim that was filed in state court. The cases have all been removed to federal court, and hopefully the lawyers at Wordpress know better than to just cough up this info like that. Even more ridiculously, Duffy tries to claim that this is an "emergency" so they shouldn't waste any time in handing over the info:
Due to the emergency nature of the requested information, it is imperative that your organization responds to the subpoena immediately. The requested information is perishable and vital to the claims asserted in a complaint alleging widespread and systematic defamation.What hogwash. They're looking for data going back to January of 2011. If Wordpress has logs going back that far, it's not like they're suddenly going to disappear. And, of course, the "widespread and systematic defamation" claims are already pretty questionable.
It's not difficult to look at this and see a likely attempt at creating chilling effects to try to scare people off from visiting those sites. Considering that Prenda has been collecting all sorts of IP addresses in its various copyright trolling lawsuits, can you imagine what they might do if they can cross reference IP addresses of visitors to those sites with the IP addresses they've already sued over?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Um, guys... really...
And ... it demands production 10 days from the date the subpoena issued, seven after service, although by statute,they need to give 20 days ...
"It shall command compliance . . . on a date that is no earlier than 20 days after the issuance, or 15 days after the service, of the deposition subpoena, whichever date is later." CA CCP §2020.410(c)
And why is the Complaint attached? Just to make a point? And what is the sudden urgency that the rules don't matter? Urg! Makes you wanna tear your hair out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Aliens
The lawsuits are all a red herring.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What utter bell-ends.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
;-)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Nice
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nice
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I kind of hope so
Is is commenters or commentors? Spell-check is having a dickens of a time with both. LOL
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's not a good way to identify people they want to sue, but it would be an excellent way to figure out what IPs to try to intimidate.
As far as intimidating random people based only on the flimsiest of IP address information, they are quite experienced.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Aliens
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Aliens
Why didn't I realize it sooner. The judge is really the Doctor. That's why he wants everyone in his court on Monday!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Please Lord
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Prenda Law! A staple in the "At The Bench" series. Mike sez (short version): "Wow. Wow. Wow. ... The story is gripping."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation .shtml
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"Due to the emergency nature of the requested information, it is imperative that your organization responds to the subpoena immediately. The requested information is perishable and vital to the claims asserted in a complaint alleging widespread and systematic defamation."
Translation : Our ship is sinking we need more money.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
The more Mike writes about Prenda, the more you troll here.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nice
WordPress does not simply hands out information. While a motion to quash is pending (or after the case is SLAPPed down), they won't cough out anything.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
Should be interesting to see what troll, gnome, or Morlock the basement-dweller looks like...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
Well, good for you!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Excel spreadsheet?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
AC is really Alan Cooper.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Now, go fuck off back to fox news.
Nigel
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Monday, Monday...
Seems fitting.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
From mom's basement I stab at thee!
(hissssssss....)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Dear Sir(s):
The below list includes all IP's that have visited us within the past 2 years:
1.1.1.1
1.1.1.2
1.1.1.3
...
255.255.255.255
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Oops... I did not know and instead just went there to read those two sites.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Excel spreadsheet?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
Oh wait. Maybe I should sue you for stealing my thought. Now - who do I hire for this? Prenda et al? Carreon? Ken at the zoo? so many choices...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Excel spreadsheet?!
But the subpoena itself seems overbroad at first glace. The IP of everyone accessing the site for several years? They can't even limit it to the dates and times of the posts in question?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
We've got it backwards.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Monday, Monday...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Please Lord
"I will come to you! My airplane is only 10k an hour – have more cash & Gold in the bank than you can imagine..."
;-}
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Aliens
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Aliens
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Pudenda Sleazebag Attorney 1: "Nice little internet you've got 'ere mate. be a shame if somefin' 'APPENED to it."
(knocks pen holder off desk)
Goon 1: (cracks knuckles
Pudenda Sleazebag Attorney 2: Or, like, if it was to catch on fire...
(flick lighter ominously)
um so weider....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
St. Clair County, Illinois
These guys look more and more shady with every move.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
But come on.
There is something wrong with the mechanics of our judicial system when an outfit like Prenda has been able to carry on in civil court as they have for as long as they have.
This seems completely dysfunctional, and broken. We need tort reform, badly.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Maybe they should subpeona Al Gore to demand getting access to the interwebs office address!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So it you could repeat each IP with each second of the day next to it.
All in an Excel spreadsheet.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
fprintf(file, "Here is the list you requested:\n\n");
for (int a = 0; a <= 255; a++)
for (int b = 0; b <= 255; b++)
for (int c = 0; c <= 255; c++)
for (int d = 0; d <= 255; d++)
fprintf(file, "%d.%d.%d.%d\n", a, b, c, d);
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
Isn't it telling when the people propping up your copyright and corporations all happen to be complete scumbags?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ahhhh, drat
Paul Duffy's action make him sound like an asshat.
That oughta do it. I really want to see what he plans to do with the list, given that he does not appear to have requested the text of the comments. Asshat.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I demand my nickel.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
http://dietrolldie.com/2013/03/07/battle-stations-prenda-law-sends-wordpress-an-overly-broa d-subpoena-for-information-on-who-accessed-dtd-fct/comment-page-1/#comment-9729
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Prenda Law?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Logic Flaw
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
OooB is a "special" boy with "special" needs.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Um, guys... really...
Wordpress (Automattic) might NOT control the domains of either of the two url's.
Though it does look like Automattic was used to register DietrollDie, and therefore that domain MIGHT reside on a host server controlled by Automattic.
FightCopyrightTrolls on the other hand looks like it is totally separated from Wordpress servers on a completely separate host server (ie: WP was just installed - it's a software program when it boils down to it) and if that is the case then Automattic has no ability to provide any IP logs whatsoever.
The other problematic (though more a logistic problem) thing I can see is the requested format of supplied information. Excel (unless they classify CSV files as excel) can not be used here since any log files of IP address's specific to the requested information would far exceed the limitations that Excel has. They could place it all in a huge CSV file but Excel would only read part - though since the format of Excel is specified in request then any information they receive is already suspect to reliability.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
I like it
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Go F*** YOURSELF!
:-)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Aliens
I once believed that calculus was a concept sent to Earth of destroy the minds of the young. (Register now while the lines are short.)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
If these clowns actually had a defamation, or whatever complaint, case they would have to provide specific details for every instance. Is there any precedent for the type of generality described?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What an orifice.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 4,294,967,296 (IPv4)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
If you look at a DieTrollDie URL request it starts with *.DieTrollDie.com, *.wp.com, (and others) of which any discernig web crusader would of course notice and add them to the block list. The site looks funky without the formatting but who cares anyway? You can miss a lot of content but for general locked down web browsing its cool. (for most)
For sensitive sites vulnerable to an outright information, by hostile legal groups, grab I wold recommend using another forum program of which there are many. Why make yourself vulnerable to such nonsense when you can at least reduce the liability risk. WordPress is slick but it obviously creates extra risk. It is kind of like EA's always online policy but in a much smaller way. I wonder if there is a setting on the WP server site settings that would prevent this type of URL leak. (getting out of my experience so will shut up)
I understand the bandwidth considerations and they are severe so there is no easy solution. It's another privacy issue related to the immaturity of the information age.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Please. Many are assigned dynamically and change regularly.
Without the corresponding ISP logs this information is pretty worthless.
We need tort reform. This is a clown show.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Um, guys... really...
Re the Excel issue: The subpoenaing party can specify the desired format for the production, but the producing party does not necessarily have to create documents in that format. They just have to produce in the format as kept in the ordinary course of business. (I hope that's tractor-feed printouts, but that's wishful thinking.)
My reaction to that was (again), um, guys... really?... Excel?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
IP addresses are only marginally useful.
The entire multinational corporation that I work for shows up under the same European IP address, for example, even though many of us are located in other parts of the world. It drives geolocation attempts based on IP address crazy. :-)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Prenda Law?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Um, guys... really...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Excel spreadsheet?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Excel spreadsheet?!
Maybe one of them or their cronies are reading this comment thread and now they know. So if it gets that far, I'll have to send them an invoice for this consulting service.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The more I jibe at Mike, the more obsessed with Prenda he gets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Oh wait...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I kind of hope so
You can see the evil comments I've made that made the big bad legal entity cry.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
There are many AC's but only 1 "That Anonymous Coward".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Logic Flaw
2 - They want to cause more fear in their targets.
3 - They want to scare those of us who speak out.
4 - They hope that they can show the court this long list and make it appear that kajillions of people saw all of the defamatory remarks so they can demand more.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Um, guys... really...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment