Share/E-mail This Story

Email This



'Cocky' Defendant Gets A Web Redemption

from the video-solves-all dept

Cross-posted from


A few weeks ago, a young woman named Penelope Soto became an internet legend after she was caught on camera flipping a Florida judge the bird and telling him to go f**k himself during a court proceeding. Soto’s behavior earned her a 30-day stint in jail for contempt of court, but she apparently changed her ways at a later hearing and convinced the judge to vacate the month-long sentence.

But not all mouthy defendants are so lucky. Some of them do go to jail. Take, for example, the case of Brian Noval, a Florida man who in 2009 called a judge a c*ck — twice. Why do all of these things happen in Florida? Anyway, Noval’s antics were captured on film, and he earned himself 120 days in the pokey for his indiscretions. Noval only served four days of that sentence before the judge decided that this cocky defendant had learned his lesson.

As we all know, the internet is for porn, but it’s also for wonderful videos like these. And thanks to Daniel Tosh of Comedy Central’s Tosh.0, sometimes the stars of embarrassing viral videos are given the chance to redeem themselves on cable television. Ms. Soto hasn’t been given the opportunity to participate in one of these yet, but Noval was featured on the show last night.

For reasons that escape me, we never covered Noval’s incident in 2009, but now that he’s been brought back into the pop culture limelight, we’ve got some funny videos to entertain you with….

We’ll give you some info on the judge who heard Brian Noval’s case before you watch the video. Apparently Judge John Hurley of the Broward County Court presides over its first appearance division, and is known for his “spunk, one-liners and, on Fridays, bow ties.” To put it differently, this man is not to be f**ked with.

But Noval didn’t know that, so he called Judge Hurley a c*ck, like any man with common decency and respect for the judicial system would. And plus, it’s Florida — of course someone would think it’s acceptable to call a judge a c*ck in Florida. And without further ado, here’s the entertaining segment from Tosh.0:

Well, you don’t have to be wearing a seersucker suit to acknowledge that Daniel Tosh is correct when he says that “judges are basically parents for people who have sh*tty ones.” And we now know that Andrew Dice Clay could have a promising career ahead of himself as a criminal defense attorney. Because with a closing like, “Hickory dickory dock, my client has the right to call that judge a c*ck,” how can you possibly go wrong?

Broward judge sets high bar [Sun Sentinel]
Web Redemption – Courtroom C*ck Guy [Tosh.0]

More stories from Above The Law:



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:20pm

    Da Courts

    This is a fairly entertaining court appearance

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9j03q1_-YQ

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    anonymouse, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:20pm

    unavailable

    Seriously this is unavailable from my location, this is why people get pissed off what in any way could ever make this content restricted to the US alone, is it that the Americans don't like people laughing at them, i doubt it, is it because the copyright holder is claiming copyright on a public hearing, something i would be disagreeing with, or is it because now YouTube allows people to claim the advertising for content and this was posted by someone who just thought it was funny. What a sad sad world.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Gee, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:24pm

    --- Video unavailable ---

    ** fires up free US VPN **

    Internet: 0, Me: 1

    Take that you cocks

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    William Chambers, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:24pm

    Re: unavailable

    It's not YouTube, but nice try.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:54pm

    HA! Mike takes his "At the Bench" series to ridiculous levels!

    Honest, folks, thought I was KIDDING about his law fetish, but he's actually gone nuts if thinks this will draw an audience.

    Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
    http://techdirt.com/
    Mike Masnick, the economist with the soul of a lawyer. Watch for his "At The Bench" series.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 5:04pm

    Tosh?

    Hopefully there's something in the queue. I'd hate the week to end on Tosh.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    art guerrilla (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 5:41pm

    actually, the lesson should be...

    ...*not* that the odd (literally/figuratively) courtroom defendant *actually* cusses out a judge (or other 'officer of the court'); which i'm sure *at least* 50% of the nekkid apes who appear before a judge WANT to do...

    no, the lesson is, that judges are running unchecked fiefdoms where they can get away with 'contemptible' shit; whether a poor, ignorant, possibly screwed-over, unappealing defendant is slapped upside the head for having the temerity to treat the judge like a fellow human being who is no better than them; or imposing a personal or overtly political agenda to enforce THEIR views, regardless of the law...
    whether it is 10 commandment plaques on courthouse steps, or other patently un-constitutional bullshit; judges are NOT *OUR* arbiters of justice, they are owned by The System...
    (and we li'l peeps ain't invited...)

    there are few-to-no judges who are NOT part of The System, and they will defend that system to the detriment of the people...
    even though we have elections for some levels of judge, they are pretty much appointed to the position by the 'legal community'...
    the votes are almost 70-80-90% to retain judges; which is why i always vote 'no' on retaining *any* of them... i want my little vote to -eventually- tally with enough that we put some fear back in them, where they *must* respond to our viewpoints...
    (probably not in my lifetime...)

    art guerrilla
    aka ann archy
    eof

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 5:48pm

    argh

    wtf is this garbage doing on techdirt?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 6:31pm

    Re: argh

    Techdirt makes revenue off of advertisments, linking to more of them means making more money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 7:10pm

    Re: Re: argh

    alienating all your readers by linkspamming them tabloid trash will yield reduced pageviews.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:28pm

    Judges - The only profession where you can legally punish someone just because you don't like them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:53pm

    Re: HA! Mike takes his "At the Bench" series to ridiculous levels!

    Oh, go suck a... ROOSTER! Ha, bet you thought I was going to say cock, but that would be pointless when talking to a dick that doesn't even realize this is a cross-post, and isn't even penned by anyone of the TD crew.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:00pm

    Re: unavailable

    Well it's available to me here (and was on Above the law when I originally read it) and I'm in Australia (and not using a proxy) so I have no clue what Jurisdiction you are in.. Maybe Germany? or North Korea?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    special-interesting (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 3:29am

    I would think that because of the video (new technology making an impact on the courtroom environment) would make it TechDirt material. Unspoken is the environment within the courtroom and the long standing traditions that are enforced.

    Much is made of the (fallacy?) that we don't have sharia law (of dress codes) on the books. However. Has anyone tried to ware a bandanna, headband or t-shirt with a peace sign on it into a courtroom? Ever see a congressman on the Senate floor in khakis? If you are dark skinned and wearing a hoodie what kind of untoward profiling does that get you?

    Minimum is the requirement that you wear your 'Sunday best' to the courtroom. There are whole charity programs that loan suits and ties to the unfortunate ones who cannot afford bail and thus show up in court in prison drags. Its a shame that appearances mean so much. A suit and tie is one of your best unspoken defenses. (along with your lawyer)

    On the other hand maintaining some level of decorum in the courtroom is important. Just imagine the prosecution and defendant attorneys professional level pranks if a judge did not thrash them thoroughly on a daily basis. (the motion is rescinded!) it is impossible to underestimate the (the effects of) outright acting and posturing capable by an experienced, in the courtroom, attorney.

    In some ways a judge is looking for your awareness of the severity of a 'legitimate' complaint brought against you and that you will take seriously the procedures of the court itself. (released on your own recognizance is a great example that the judge recognizes, that you recognize, this) Flipping off, and cussing out, the judge, however seemingly appropriate, does not breed respect.

    Even I have cussed in the courtroom (luckily not noticed) about some ridiculous prank of the prosecution (of a ticket) that the judge went along with. (3 continuations for an officer who did not show and when he did purgered himself so badly the judge threw it out less than 2 minuets into the case). Never was I more embarrassed of anything in my life. (had pictures and diagrams)

    Please note, that so far, I have spoken only of the procedures and perceptions of those procedures in the courtroom. Not irrelevant are the laws being enforced themselves. Are they just and proper? (Hint, hint: copyright law abuse)

    On incumbent judges and politicians its tempting to say just vote um out. However we really need a way to identify good ones from bad ones. How a judge differentiates between a rich and spoiled brat or fellow judge (or son or daughter of a judge) or police chief and a poor homeless person with only a public defender is of note. It would be healthy if your local newspaper reporter would measure this.

    It would be more healthy if we voted on this intelligently.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 7:02am

    I live in Florida and we have some awful blackwater, child raping, racist cops and courts that get off on knowing they have power over this fireball; just as the people bleed. Our sheriffs are trained to shoot first think about necessity later during the cover up, misconstruction facets of the statement.
    http://www.wtsp.com/video/1054896966001/0/Polk-deputies-break-up-prostitution-ring-using -teenage-girls

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 1:35pm

    Actually, it's the judges who are a bunch of cocky suckers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    special-interesting (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 8:54pm

    Re:

    Profiling has become the defacto method of enforcement. Arrest-Proof Yourself: An Ex-Cop Reveals How Easy It Is for Anyone to Get Arrested, How Even a Single Arrest Could Ruin Your Life, and What to Do If the Police Get in Your Face. http://www.amazon.com/PRIVOXY-FORCE/Arrest-Proof-Yourself-Ex-Cop-Reveals-Arrested/dp/1556526377 there are other (I remember a book, from Jacksonville?) books on how (bullies?) normal human tendency affects law enforcement.

    The damage of even a single arrest can get you fired from, not just a sensitive government or related job, but even a regular bonded cashier (at a convenience store) job. Read how arrest records are abused. What is life in the gutter anyway?

    Related is how we are aware of the individual habits of who we elect. How do we differeciate between a good candidate and a bad one? How a judge treats politically connected accused from a homeless person (familly?) is notable.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    btr1701 (profile), Mar 4th, 2013 @ 10:37am

    Re: Re:

    > http://www.amazon.com...

    If you're going to spam us with links, the least you could do is make sure they actually work.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This