System Used By New Six Strikes CAS, Falsely Identifies Game Mods As NBC TV Shows

from the this-is-going-to-be-a-disaster dept

Reader David Sutherland emailed us this week about a DMCA notice that he received via his MediaFire account. The notice, which we've included below (including all of the crappy formatting) claimed that he was using MediaFire to host "one of the following files: Downton Abbey, CONTRABAND (2012), GRIMM (2011), House M.D., MAN WITH THE IRON FISTS, THE, The Office." The "file" they claimed was one of those TV shows/movies was "Cantha Cartography Made Easy 2009.tpf" which is actually a game mod for Guild Wars. You might possibly be able to argue that ArenaNet, makers of Guild Wars could have a copyright claim (maybe, sorta), but that's not who sent the notice and it's not what they claimed it was. Sutherland notes that he set up this MediaFire account solely to host game mods and has never hosted any other content there.

So, who sent the DMCA takedown? Dtecnet. And, as you can see from the messy, messy DMCA notice below, they tried to takedown a huge list of files. If Sutherland's experience is anything to go by, you have to wonder how many of them are actually infringing.

Of course, we've seen plenty of bogus DMCA takedowns. It happens all the time. But this one is doubly important, because it's from DtecNet, a division of MarkMonitor. MarkMonitor/Dtecnet also just happen to be the company providing the key monitoring for the new "six strikes" Copyright Alert System (CAS). The Center for Copyright Information has a web page on its site about an "independent expert assessment" of MarkMonitor's antipiracy methodologies. Except... that page is completely blank. Perhaps, if they're looking to do an analysis, figuring out why they're taking down content that has nothing to do with what they claim would be a good place to start.

Good thing the CAS works entirely based on accusations, without needing to show any proof at all, huh?
Dear MediaFire User:
MediaFire has received notification under the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") that your usage of a file is allegedly infringing on the file creator's copyright protection.

The file named Cantha Cartography Made Easy 2009.tpf is identified by the key (wwd52mmqdzu).

As a result of this notice, pursuant to Section 512(c)(1)(C) of the DMCA, we have suspended access to the file.

The reason for suspension was:

ATE: 22 February 2013Dear Sir/Madam:Please be advised that NBC Universal and/or its subsidiary and affiliated companies(collectively, NBC Universal) are the owners of intellectual property rights in numeroustelevision shows and motion pictures. NBC Universal diligently enforces such intellectualproperty rights.mediafire.com is and has been infringing NBC Universal's intellectual property rights innumerous properties including, but not limited to, the title(s) listed at the bottom ofthis letter. By way of example, we are providing with this letter a non-exhaustive listof unauthorized copies of NBC Universal properties hosted on mediafire.com, along with theURL corresponding to each listed infringing file. NBC Universal demands that mediafire.comimmediately remove or otherwise disable access to the video files identified in thisletter, and cease and desist from any further infringement of NBC Universal properties.The undersigned has a good faith belief that mediafire.com's use of NBC Universal propertyas referenced herein infringes NBC Universal's rights and is not authorized by NBCUniversal, its agent or the law. The information contained in this notification isaccurate. Under penalty of perjury, the undersigned is authorized to act on behalf of NBCUniversal with respect to this matter.Please be advised that this letter is not a complete statement of the facts or law as itmay pertain to this matter, or of NBC Universal's positions, rights or remedies, legal orequitable, all of which are specifically reserved.Title(s):Downton AbbeyCONTRABAND (2012)GRIMM (2011)House M.D.MAN WITH THE IRON FISTS, THEThe Office USURLs:http://mediafire.com/?1bou1zqzn4l7nb2http://mediafire.com/?y0m7m9w9pb2fhjphttp://mediafire.com/?vg7qb66jgqyemtnhttp://mediafire.com/?hvqtvh3nvwq7nykhttp://mediafire.com/?nmnjijymy3yhttp://mediafire.com/?qmlgm1czmeyhttp://mediafire.com/?tdegwnu3mmyhttp://mediafire.com/?e1ukowjo4ma9acwhttp://mediafire.com/?3tghissfp39dqhuhttp://mediafire.com/?f2h1t8718jh7267http://mediafire.com/?gtymbun1nmyhttp://mediafire.com/?wgmziyebdrthttp://mediafire.com/?yzt028htel3kybshttp://mediafire.com/?zmjnnyjmwzkhttp://mediafire.com/?evuq8rfelr6il3lhttp://mediafire.com/?a6ozn7ko1b3k0c7http://mediafire.com/?ow31jwf7vehd9vbhttp://mediafire.com/?b7kgbb64gksmb74http://mediafire.com/?pgd6i8xpvenqx5uhttp://mediafire.com/?b1m0jdynny4http://mediafire.com/?oznmnze3wnthttp://mediafire.com/?rdnmznywa30http://mediafire.com/?tdtu2mylog2http://mediafire.com/?eizavmm2niehttp://mediafire.com/?tm2je05ldtzhttp://mediafire.com/?yyyboymwmjjhttp://mediafire.com/?nlztxhwmhoj/veritashttp://mediafire.com/?ls4tcadu2o32diyhttp://mediafire.com/?7313n6adb15nnschttp://mediafire.com/?padpwzh61j244aghttp://mediafire.com/?e0a7k9wapjw9i0ihttp://mediafire.com/?gcc833l4g4drdufhttp://mediafire.com/?ktulmoyzdmkhttp://mediafire.com/?zj4mveiytjfhttp://mediafire.com/?7ulq2ir7ihbpi8shttp://mediafire.com/?kmjzmxzz2zjhttp://mediafire.com/?ljfhkk0j2stbvs6http://mediafire.com/?273rki8u82w7fp4http://mediafire.com/?6ls1lf7yob555lohttp://mediafire.com/?7pa9pnwe5slxnd4http://mediafire.com/?7rt3kcdaae6w1sshttp://mediafire.com/?rm7fc6cibqcnyw7http://mediafire.com/?rsqqiheb43ea4y7http://mediafire.com/?16gdu1ji8kqnj9rhttp://mediafire.com/?1q75d6zgi1xi6zvhttp://mediafire.com/?4bt6ds5kc71rb1xhttp://mediafire.com/?7x829m2ie0x9z7ohttp://mediafire.com/?cst5g74aa6coltmhttp://mediafire.com/?fuuboauijdjwrathttp://mediafire.com/?g9zvkqg791lq7orhttp://mediafire.com/?kdg8m6h0wsl603chttp://mediafire.com/?lh9fxoo5d6r8qq3http://mediafire.com/?my6g8p996mf1f38http://mediafire.com/?rp7ohuo83rnssgmhttp://mediafire.com/?w05but70di7x74shttp://mediafire.com/?x7r0vpo8pzawl99http://mediafire.com/?yd6107276fptinrhttp://mediafire.com/?ymnws8bipzfq76shttp://mediafire.com/?drbqy4108k7q855http://mediafire.com/?12yvxesauvjl3jyhttp://mediafire.com/?17uk1k9p34rqqhahttp://mediafire.com/?18g2yck0jks8525http://mediafire.com/?1ig3u5barmh17akhttp://mediafire.com/?33a7ozjp86h5n6ghttp://mediafire.com/?3hbpu3as7gj2156http://mediafire.com/?48yl6tbull0zmb4http://mediafire.com/?78ngalvm1vrp70fhttp://mediafire.com/?7kwt5l1f8bicsw2http://mediafire.com/?9stvlzryp8d4ppuhttp://mediafire.com/?a0jdamcjr49jdxrhttp://mediafire.com/?bg33urlkiks8o6bhttp://mediafire.com/?bipod3ynn1jxdwchttp://mediafire.com/?cec61oz0mimcx7khttp://mediafire.com/?dzeqg8qyyytw0pbhttp://mediafire.com/?etq7a9fb78uruwjhttp://mediafire.com/?f1nhgbk5e53gudvhttp://mediafire.com/?iny7bxmea6n3xahhttp://mediafire.com/?njod5uobvrja5zjhttp://mediafire.com/?slgds2j99dg4uqwhttp://mediafire.com/?tfcbz884bt7uynyhttp://mediafire.com/?vdzrbm472crxc86http://mediafire.com/?x66g3y42upblw7mhttp://mediafire.com/?znavg86hrn6js99http://mediafire.com/?xx30trb9eb45y2chttp://mediafire.com/?pz7t8pxcidone48http://mediafire.com/?t1wyzyiwznnhttp://mediafire.com/?1dxwcdjqvjhal3xhttp://mediafire.com/?2vizgxmutzdhttp://mediafire.com/?3peg129zntahttp://mediafire.com/?mhn4ozjzm3zhttp://mediafire.com/?mzt1vrmqfj1http://mediafire.com/?nlntyoduy4nhttp://mediafire.com/?ul1f3lg1z2ohttp://mediafire.com/?wzjzzrjtzemhttp://mediafire.com/?xzvwzmbljojhttp://mediafire.com/?yo0mw3lsk3xr3l9http://mediafire.com/?yzzi5snwtbyhttp://mediafire.com/?z0njvmmmpm5http://mediafire.com/?zuz0mnagieahttp://mediafire.com/?zyddktw1qgyhttp://mediafire.com/?zztmzmnjfmzhttp://mediafire.com/?3z1ce5qm22epc3vhttp://mediafire.com/?0lbm8guv5e8jiguhttp://mediafire.com/?1zw5dzlg160sq1mhttp://mediafire.com/?2poz3c099lrhpb9http://mediafire.com/?4c62i6qqn79b24dhttp://mediafire.com/?5822vf51mkfb4bfhttp://mediafire.com/?5g7r756297trma1http://mediafire.com/?70gp2xkm0d071dyhttp://mediafire.com/?9mkqsrrddsnni78http://mediafire.com/?afk482x432c8nvjhttp://mediafire.com/?dn13ffgg4goac2fhttp://mediafire.com/?ewxfw9lbq7bqw9chttp://mediafire.com/?jaamb4xfgdsm81phttp://mediafire.com/?jl0uibcne54iyobhttp://mediafire.com/?k6uub61o3ytt0c7http://mediafire.com/?lljqepnvan3i3zphttp://mediafire.com/?m0bpusp20pzz2t4http://mediafire.com/?mw8b5ovdufyp8zwhttp://mediafire.com/?rzamipxps88uf3chttp://mediafire.com/?siaxvanbi2aabashttp://mediafire.com/?txq4j3q5r9kxai5http://mediafire.com/?u6oo5yi3ri3owefhttp://mediafire.com/?xwwfhn5xcpf1fuwhttp://mediafire.com/?z4jmqxxcoxsafqjhttp://mediafire.com/?19ijrxqp2lueikahttp://mediafire.com/?1ftu9t02zk5dsrahttp://mediafire.com/?28c8xjewlscfwo2http://mediafire.com/?6nfd9lhqrm0m5rrhttp://mediafire.com/?6uks7zgx2oo4k1jhttp://mediafire.com/?7sovelm1wbbo337http://mediafire.com/?88hhjjqkpisz2lrhttp://mediafire.com/?8kgkdszyen6ngtihttp://mediafire.com/?bby93xpcthhf6k5http://mediafire.com/?cezt3ke2d1da6u3http://mediafire.com/?eghsoe4yb1iab33http://mediafire.com/?g522ata6b20rvzmhttp://mediafire.com/?h5zi28y255zypp8http://mediafire.com/?ibt21wv2jg5acpkhttp://mediafire.com/?mg28p3lk2hssnbwhttp://mediafire.com/?n41e56p5qf3lh7ghttp://mediafire.com/?ocq2iajpg8rxyvthttp://mediafire.com/?qm2m0wlnwbstimchttp://mediafire.com/?rjiyuystdn87o8vhttp://mediafire.com/?syrpaz1nyy5u773http://mediafire.com/?tqw3d9cqtg93d3jhttp://mediafire.com/?tvj956kh28q2cwthttp://mediafire.com/?uaybu73gva49n88http://mediafire.com/?ysns55e3g3p14wlhttp://mediafire.com/?06lqv51s2pjaeo2http://mediafire.com/?07i80zwd6cnuu8rhttp://mediafire.com/?1862e2agai46cmdhttp://mediafire.com/?50sou10nbr32i58http://mediafire.com/?62htc315d0uwwvqhttp://mediafire.com/?a4dx5umbram3v5whttp://mediafire.com/?acq8bojuw446az0http://mediafire.com/?awev6wbdha36crzhttp://mediafire.com/?ayb51aroej8zzxihttp://mediafire.com/?b7plute0k9p0ddahttp://mediafire.com/?cddawtr3wr64nxdhttp://mediafire.com/?ckx133man72l4x8http://mediafire.com/?d5c31k71g8lb69whttp://mediafire.com/?dk8g0o2fvy8eo91http://mediafire.com/?e7zzapv42qv71fphttp://mediafire.com/?emgyiv8f420gc72http://mediafire.com/?eq3bea5qi04vqduhttp://mediafire.com/?mmm3637vxvv5wtjhttp://mediafire.com/?tgaigz15v4u85oyhttp://mediafire.com/?u3a42acxgt57of0http://mediafire.com/?u499s4k8lswa6o4http://mediafire.com/?xtpk81xefhymualhttp://mediafire.com/?y39utaqcyb70oj0http://mediafire.com/?zre037ioe8s7hh1http://mediafire.com/?0c8ic4s84ik7o7phttp://mediafire.com/?3a0o23515ucncmahttp://mediafire.com/?3u5rubgvz123ze3http://mediafire.com/?5o8y316iqco7b99http://mediafire.com/?6sd6t1hriihdo58http://mediafire.com/?76x3zr3tbxwtxohhttp://mediafire.com/?81jh02209b07y3qhttp://mediafire.com/?8386zsm2pd32q5yhttp://mediafire.com/?a27xl67zja3dnd7http://mediafire.com/?aixw2vd1rj5v6j1http://mediafire.com/?ak3c4ypnfhamt19http://mediafire.com/?c6r49ne7rx3nsvfhttp://mediafire.com/?d2amm4p1vqq79ithttp://mediafire.com/?du1mnjdgn248dqthttp://mediafire.com/?frphmrd12ca7e20http://mediafire.com/?mn9zdbf5fdy7j5fhttp://mediafire.com/?n82712uv5w8gsp0http://mediafire.com/?ov7akaf4crp5dkphttp://mediafire.com/?q2qy2lm82js4lrbhttp://mediafire.com/?tgjbjhjhua1i0pohttp://mediafire.com/?tu161070a5fx104http://mediafire.com/?vqyb6ck1svar6vghttp://mediafire.com/?xby0aowjhtvm7cxhttp://mediafire.com/?05vhpidb22p22y4http://mediafire.com/?1f38xht0pghw6vthttp://mediafire.com/?4kp3mol7f8eixkihttp://mediafire.com/?6so1cvxjgsh95zohttp://mediafire.com/?7a4cimd68o3eecvhttp://mediafire.com/?9bvgazbk5uq78zuhttp://mediafire.com/?akz1jwqqq05ov3uhttp://mediafire.com/?ct9wl09zo1czkcehttp://mediafire.com/?d5x5py3hywp9fhbhttp://mediafire.com/?duv00slphydwa8uhttp://mediafire.com/?eheeekadp372g6xhttp://mediafire.com/?iuzu8buf240wbhbhttp://mediafire.com/?lj1wjblt7lj3almhttp://mediafire.com/?nmjt532q8kw3daohttp://mediafire.com/?y538v3fz3lc0richttp://mediafire.com/?ygx02nb0rgjxxx8http://mediafire.com/?z8pzd8vesn3vwwphttp://mediafire.com/?ei3tyizkaryhttp://mediafire.com/?ki74d8614okv2klhttp://mediafire.com/?jommizgz5zzhttp://mediafire.com/?mm0ddkdwywlhttp://mediafire.com/?wwd52mmqdzuhttp://mediafire.com/?5mmizllnal4http://mediafire.com/?hqdarjnm2qfhttp://mediafire.com/?ioyyjgmtjydhttp://mediafire.com/?56rlhu4ic31up5uhttp://mediafire.com/?i4o3zo1ujdjcn33http://mediafire.com/?mx2zdaneabaVery truly yoursAnti-Piracy Technical Operations100 Universal City PlazaUniversal City, CA 91608tel. (818) 777-4876fax (818) 866-2155Please reply to info.antipiracy@dtecnet.com, replies sent to no-reply@dtecnet.com will beignored.
Information about the party that filed the report:

Company Name: DtecNet
Contact Address: P.O. Box 900 Los Angeles, CA 90035
Contact Name: DtecNet
Contact Phone:
Contact Email: antipiracy@dtecnet.com
Copyright infringement violates MediaFire's Terms of Service. MediaFire accounts that experience multiple incidents of alleged copyright infringement without viable counterclaims may be terminated.

If you feel this suspension was in error, please submit a counterclaim by following the process below.

Step 1. Click on the following link to open the counterclaim webpage.

http://www.mediafire.com/myaccount/suspension_claim.php? u=****** (Claim specific link censored for privacy)
Step 2. Use this PIN on the counterclaim webpage to begin the process:

**** (PIN censored for privacy)

Step 3. Fill in the fields on the counterclaim form with as much detail as possible."


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 8:59am

    it also shows that the accusations that there was some sort of 'favoritism' between Dtecnet and Lesser (CAS head) because the problems that abound here were brought up before, then ignored. it could easily have been that she was ordered to accept that company for monitoring simply because it was known to have no real methodology that worked and would always come down in favour of the entertainment industries. what a shame it is that no one has yet had to get any monitoring company to produce in court how it arrives at the conclusions it does or the results that are used against those that are accused of wrong doing. that could be interesting!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:08am

      Re:

      Are you not a fan of capitalizing the first letter in a sentence?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:20am

        Re: Re:

        perhaps he's an e. e. cummings fan.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          art guerrilla (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 5:15pm

          Re: Re: Re: your boat...

          ...or a john dos passos fan ! ! !
          hee hee hee
          ...or a lazy puke like me ! ! !
          ho ho ho
          ...or a person interested in communicating substance over style ! ! !
          ha ha ha
          ...or a ne'er-do-well who likes tweaking the nares of grammar police...
          ak ak ak

          to the point:
          1. *given* it is an insidious sellout of their customers and their rights...
          (more quasi-private korporate actors evading the constitution and, well, you know, morals... yes, i know: if the constitution is 'quaint', according to a recent emperor, then 'morals' are a sick joke...)

          2. *given* i agree with the original poster's assessment of the Big Media big wigs nefariously and purposefully choosing a korporate bootlick they *know* will shotgun out a billion takedowns, regardless of validity...

          *exactly* like 2000+ florida rethugs 'filtered' their (florida's peoples'?) database lists of 'felons' (sic) etc to catch the MOST number of people (gee, usually dem'rats of color, how odd is that?), 90% plus of whom did NOT have felony convictions that would disqualify them (unfortunately) by florida law... if they had ANY part of a last name and initial which matched a felon's ANYWHERE in the US, they were booted from the voting rolls...

          kampers, the racists never went away, they just got insidious... its all perfectly legal-like... *just* like gassing jews was all, you know, perfectly 'legal'...

          personally, i'm looking into both public DNS services and a VPN... and i don't pirate nuthin'...

          fuck them motherfuckin' eagles...

          art guerrilla
          aka ann archy (*ahem* 'archy and mehtabel')
          eof

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    silverscarcat (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:01am

    So...

    Lemme get this straight...

    Files that are used for game modding...

    Which have NOTHING to do with ANYTHING on NBCUniversal...

    Received a DMCA takedown notice by the group that's supposed to do the independent reviews for the new 6 strikes program...

    Again, to those of you who think that the 6 strikes program is a good thing...

    Ready to admit it yet?

    Dr. Cox, if you would...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrjwaqZfjIY

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:03am

    Mike, Mike, Mike...so quick to judge and to put defects.

    Don't you see that the system is still in it's infancy. Some hiccups are to be expected. It is, after all, a very complex system.

    I'd give it a few more weeks before I started criticising. I mean, I am certain that by then the hiccups should've grown into something much more serious and/or embarrassing and/or hilarious. Like incontinence.

    (Personally, I am waiting for the day that on of those network-controlled thermostats is accused of copyright infringement. Let'em feel the heat, I say)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:09am

      Re:

      Don't you see that the system is still in it's infancy. Some hiccups are to be expected. It is, after all, a very complex system.

      I'd give it a few more weeks before I started criticising. I mean, I am certain that by then the hiccups should've grown into something much more serious and/or embarrassing and/or hilarious. Like incontinence.

      (Personally, I am waiting for the day that on of those network-controlled thermostats is accused of copyright infringement. Let'em feel the heat, I say)


      Wait? There's no wait!!!!!!!!!!! This is the same company hired by CAS, and IT MADE A MISTAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:19am

      Re:

      "Don't you see that the system is still in it's infancy. Some hiccups are to be expected. It is, after all, a very complex system."

      You're telling me that a system that accuses people of doing illegal things is okay to falsely accuse people for a few weeks?

      I have a one word response for that: BULLSHIT

      If you're going to be accusing people of doing something wrong and penalize them for it (give them strikes, take down their stuff, etc), you better well have a working system. We've been waiting over a year for this system to roll out. Test the sob before you roll it out to the public and start falsely accusing people.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:25am

      Re:

      If you're guilty by accusation without a chance to prove your innocence, then you better be god damned sure the system accusing you isn't doing so falsely.
      Infancy or not, this is intolerable to any degree.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:02am

        Re: Re:

        You're right! Repeal all laws immediately! A mistake was made! lol

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:05am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Sadly, the only mistake I see is that your father didn't use protection one night.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Thomas Jefferson, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:49am

          Re: Re: Re:

          That's why the USA has presumption of innocence, "beyond a reasonable doubt" as a standard for testimony and evidence, and due process. The laws and law-makers are presumed fallible and flawed. The US system nominally has safeguards against mistakes.

          It seems to me that CAS is running a distinctly un-American system. As a US Citizen, I find CAS distastefully totalitarian.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            btr1701 (profile), Mar 4th, 2013 @ 11:16am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            > That's why the USA has presumption of innocence,
            > "beyond a reasonable doubt" as a standard for
            > testimony and evidence, and due process.

            Actually, all of that only applies to criminal cases. Civil cases (which is what these copyright accusations are), do not involve a presumption of innocence, and the evidentiary standard is much less-- 'preponderance of the evidence', not 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Ninja (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:55am

          Re: Re: Re:

          I agree, we should repel all laws that don't allow you to defend yourself upon accusation before delivering punishment. We should start with copyright.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 8:37pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Wanting some laws repealed is different than wanting all laws repealed. That some laws maybe good doesn't make all laws good. That your argument seems to neglect this fact shows how bankrupt your argument is.

          and as someone subject to these laws I should have a proportional voice over what the laws are. I'm sick and tired of heartless corporations with no regard for morality having a disproportional voice over what the laws should be.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      G Thompson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:25am

      Re:

      You're saying that Dtecnetand the 'secret magical highly technological' method /sarc they use that has been shown in Australia and elsewhere to be absolutely wrongful and that the highest court in Australia would not authorise those methods for evidential use without seeing what they were in camera so as to keep it secret and not publicly accessible, is so young that hiccups are bound to occur? When they have been using this 'method' which is upon knowledge and belief no less is basically the analyses of one instant of a stream collecting the IP address, timestamp, and file link ONLY.

      HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

      The criticism of them for evidential authenticity and reliability of them, not to be confused with the high statistical rate of the false flags they admit to themselves under oath, has been going for years. It's not new. Just your idiotic government allowed themselves to be duped into believing there specious marketing crap

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:30am

      Re:

      Aaaaaand, people missed the sarcasm...

      me = :(

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      techflaws (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:41am

      Re:

      Don't you see that the system is still in it's infancy.

      Cause comparing hashes with MD5, Sha or whatever has just been invented. Yeah, right.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ninja (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:07am

      Re:

      (Personally, I am waiting for the day that on of those network-controlled thermostats is accused of copyright infringement. Let'em feel the heat, I say)

      Filthy pirate printers I tell you!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:03am

    Mike Masnick thinks anomalies and outliers where people are falsely accused are good enough reasons to do away with rules and laws.

    Therefore, it's perfectly reasonable to deduce he thinks rape and murder laws should be done away with, as there are also incidences of people being falsely accused.

    Unless of course Mike Masnick thinks only murder and rape are bad, and infringement, exploitation and disenfranchisement are good.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:05am

      Re:

      There are thousands of these "anomalies" and "outliers" documented in detail on this site. When does the anomaly become the rule?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:24pm

        Re: Re:

        Below is the censored comment. All the pirates here on Techdirt like to scream "free speech" and talk about censorship, but of course they have no problem censoring anything that doesn't agree with Mike Masnick's pro-piracy agenda.

        Tells you everything you need to know about the people here.

        "Mike Masnick thinks anomalies and outliers where people are falsely accused are good enough reasons to do away with rules and laws.

        Therefore, it's perfectly reasonable to deduce he thinks rape and murder laws should be done away with, as there are also incidences of people being falsely accused.

        Unless of course Mike Masnick thinks only murder and rape are bad, and infringement, exploitation and disenfranchisement are good."

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:37pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          What's being censored?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:56pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          People collectively deciding you're not worth listening to is not censorship.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:35pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          How could you read this comment if it was censored?

          I'm not seeing big black 'redaction' all over it, or anything else that prevented you from accessing and reading it...

          but go ahead and pretend that the community disapproving of your comment and flagging it as crap (which is still visible to anyone willing to wade thru it)is in any way the same as the government 'censoring' websites or people (like the guy who had to take down his comments on his facebook page and put up the opposing lawyers point of view)...

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            JMT (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 6:30pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "Below is the censored comment."

            Great, now I've read this censored comment twice! Can't you guys censor properly?!

            "Unless of course Mike Masnick thinks only murder and rape are bad, and infringement, exploitation and disenfranchisement are good."

            More like, murder and rape are very bad, infringement is on par with jaywalking, and the claimed exploitation and disenfranchisement doesn't exist.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Niall (profile), Mar 4th, 2013 @ 5:48am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              And funnily enough, in many countries jaywalking isn't even a crime (so doesn't exist) and society holds together fine. So where does that lead us?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 7:56pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Or like how the government grants monopoly privileges over broadcasting spectra and cableco infrastructure to private entities who, effectively, abuse these govt established monopoly privileges to censor speech they don't want and brainwash people with the propaganda that they do want. This is an unconstitutional suppression of speech.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          PaulT (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 6:27am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Nothing censored, people are just using the facilities available to them to notify others that you're an idiot and that your words are not worth the effort you put into the bullshit contained therein. Don't you people actually have a real defence of the destruction you're wreaking upon innocent people? Why is every comment a false attack, an outright lie or an attempt to deflect well documented wrongdoing?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 6:33pm

        Re: Re:

        "When does the anomaly become the rule?"

        The same way anything becomes a rule: when you pay a member of Congress enough to make it one.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:08am

      Re:

      You are stupid.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
       
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:11am

      Re:

      Mike Masnick thinks anomalies and outliers where people are falsely accused are good enough reasons to do away with rules and laws.

      Copyright infringement is wrong. And by wrong, I mean that the victims should just like it. It's wrong because they don't like it, but the reality is (and I'm all about reality) that they should. So really, piracy is wrong because the victims don't think it's right, but those victims should think it's right, so really it's right. But it's wrong. Hey, don't ask me to explain myself. DID YOU SEE THE MISTAKE THAT WAS MADE HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! omg!!!!!!!!!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:17am

        Re: Re:

        yea, it's funny to watch the transformation on this site and the other pro-piracy site Torrent Freak. In a few short years both have gone from trying to pretend their delusions of artist serfdom are a reality, to just becoming full-on bitch fests about how the law is finally being enforced. Almost every article is whining about it. Very funny stuff.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
           
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:24am

          Re: Re: Re:

          CAS is the best thing to happen to Mike in a long time. I bet he's already written the article. Just waiting for something so he can fill in the blanks. Of course, never will mention the millions of detections that aren't a mistake. All we'll hear about are the outliers, and those will be sold like they're the rule and not the exception. But yeah, Mike REALLY thinks that piracy is not OK. Obviously.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
             
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:46am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            He's really become his own worst enemy at this point. Just like I knew would happen.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            John Fenderson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:04am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            never will mention the millions of detections that aren't a mistake.


            Even if there are millions that aren't a mistake (and you'll have to provide some evidence to support that to make it anything but wishful thinking), why should they be mentioned? I don't understand that logic.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            JEDIDIAH, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:17am

            Due Diligence.

            This attitude right here is why we need the tort system and sleazy ambulance chasers. Corporations will destroy people's lives because they are careless. The "trailer trash for Romney" crowd will defend and encourage this kind of carelessness and Ayn Rand style amorality in general.

            The end result will be little copies of the Soylent Corporation everywhere.

            If you are going to destroy people's lives and reputations, you simply need to hold yourself to a higher standard.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Alexo, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:10pm

            False Positives

            Heres the difference between this and law.
            This is vigalantism and Censorship. There is no way to defend yourself such as Modders when this crap happens unless you want to pay. If there was oversight that punished misbehavior on the enforcers side sure. But theres not and we get SCREWED as modders. We aren't rich.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:26am

          Re: Re: Re:

          "...to just becoming full-on bitch fests about how the law is finally being enforced"

          I thought that the six strikes thing was supposed to be voluntary. It certainly is not in any law I've seen...

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            art guerrilla (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 5:26pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            which *IS* actually part of the problem:
            our evil overlords don't even have to BOTHER buying votes of the kongresskritters, railroading orwellian-named bills through, and other annoying shit: they just 'privatize' fucking EVERYTHING, and then,

            A. they -duh- kontrol EVERYTHING (only *slightly* different from the present)...
            B. they can violate 'laws', 'regulations', 'treaties', the 'constitution' at will with NO oversight or consequences...

            IF it were a real law (whatever that means in these days of secret laws, secret interpretations, secret signing statements, ad nauseum), it could -at least theoretically- be stopped, overturned, amended, whatever...
            (see, SOPA, etc *)

            as a korporate 'policy', it is -apparently- beyond our control, much less influence...

            (obviously, NOT that i want such a law, just that it being a 'private matter' has horrendous implications for our society...)


            *(The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.)

            art guerrilla
            aka ann archy
            eof

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Shadow Dragon (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:26am

          Re: Re: Re:

          *yawn* This is not anti-copyright,it's anti-abuse of copyright.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          techflaws (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:42am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Very funny stuff.

          Definitely not as funny as the **AA's hopes this "enforcement" will make people buy more.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          silverscarcat (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:45am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Again, 4chan is the pro-piracy site. Go bitch to them about this.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Androgynous Cowherd, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:12am

      Re:

      No, he thinks that, because mistakes are sometimes made, due process is important. Murder trials are due process. "Shoot-first" systems like DMCA takedowns and CAS "strikes", where one is guilty until proven innocent, are not.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:19am

        Re: Re:

        Next time time I get a traffic ticket I'll be sure to tell the cop that I want to immediately head to the courthouse for a full jury trial. lol

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:26am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Traffic tickets aren't paid on-the-spot, you do (or at least have the opportunity to) go to court for them...

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
             
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:29am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            You can dispute any CAS or DMCA takedown as soon as you get it.

            But thanks for playing!

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              G Thompson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:38am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              An industry approved non judicial and therefore open to suggestions of bias with no cheques or balances inbuilt is NOT the same as any traffic ticket, nor any other judicial rule.

              But thanks for playing .. or should I say .. thanks for playing Bobmail

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                icon
                Wally (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:47pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                In the US, the police are the Executive branch (they carry out the law). The Judicial branch evaluates the laws, and the Legislative branch makes laws.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  G Thompson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:13pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Same here, though I in my defence the beer incapacitated my brain (and supposedly the upside down problem too.. *groans*) allowing me to have a valid excuse for my wrongful use of 'judicial' ;P

                  Though Administrative law doesn't even need legislative powers all the time, and neither do judicial rules (bench books) also the judiciary in civil sittings rely on case law which they when it boils down to it made up some time previously. Am I being pedantic enough? *pokes you with a stick*

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:40am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Traffic tickets require the cop to show he's using a fully certified, tested, piece of hardware and show proof of the infraction (beyond a reasonable doubt) including printouts, video, photos, etc.


              DMCA takedowns require someone filing a piece of paper. Hell the MAFIAA just said it does more than 10,000 a day itself. There is no burden of proof, no oversight, no penalty for false accusation.

              CAS obviously is a shoot first, ask questions later if it's popping false positives this bad. See G Thomspson's post above about how the CAS system has been thrown out over and over for it's inability to work. Additionally, there has been more than a year to get this system working (and tested ffs) before it's rolled out....

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:50am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Effects can be put in place prior to the conclusion of the dispute process. That is the problem. Until due process has been fully observed, the activity is supposed to be allowed to continue, with certain exceptions.

              We have bail, the injunction process and the idea of reasonable cause for suspicion all stemming from this position. We also have strong sanctions for when these things are abused, like Wrongful Arrest suits.

              Where are these protections in this arena?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Mr. Applegate, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:39am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "You can dispute any CAS or DMCA takedown as soon as you get it."

              You can only dispute CAS IF you are willing to pay a $35 fee and even then you can only choose one of their limited defenses.

              Wanna play some more?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                icon
                PaulT (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 6:33am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                Yep, there's already been articles here about how perfectly legal uses of content are not acceptable as a defence against a false accusation because they're not on the approved list. Yet another reason why this will never work and WILL attack innocent people - without having any affect on the level of piracy.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Tymon, Mar 21st, 2013 @ 4:40am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Yes, and it costs you 35 dollars, and your punishment is actually dealt before you even get to appeal or dispute. Punish first, if you are actually guilty or not, is decided second. Your idea is still wrong.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Rikuo (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:37am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Lemme guess...you actually believe you have to pay the cop on the spot when he says he's going to ticket you?

          Fool.

          I'm going to spell it out for you, and then you're going to ignore it (like always).
          The reason I and others are pissed off at Six Strikes is because, as we've been saying for years, it censors speech before the fucking trial (and that's if we're lucky enough to get one). The reason we're so concerned about speech? It's the single most important element to a free society, to a non-dictatorship. If speech is so easily censored, then our society as a whole is damaged. Our freedoms are taken away, at the behest of some nebulous person who never accuses us in person.
          THAT is why I'm against copyright. It may be true that copyright does give incentives to certain people to create art, but the cost to have it? The power for people to demand and fully expect for speech to be censored is far too high a price to pay. Copyright is massively abused: there's tons of stories of political ads being silenced with it. Controversial videos? What if you're anti-abortion and want to silence pro-abortionists? Well, then you can easily use copyright to do just that, and there's no penalties when you do it in bad faith.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
             
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:40am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "'I'm going to spell it out for you. The reason I and others are pissed off at Six Strikes is because we're greedy selfish pirates that think there's nothing wrong with exploiting artists".

            FTFY!

            Have a great day!

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              techflaws (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:43am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              FTFY!

              And failed. What else is new?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
                 
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:29pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                Are you referring this comment that was censored by the freetard hypocrites here on Techdirt?

                ""'I'm going to spell it out for you. The reason I and others are pissed off at Six Strikes is because we're greedy selfish pirates that think there's nothing wrong with exploiting artists".

                FTFY!

                Have a great day!"

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:36pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  What's being censored?

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  techflaws (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 3:28am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Censored, my ass. And again, you fixing failed miserably.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  PaulT (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 6:35am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Again, no censorship here. I can read your moronic drivel, so nothing has been censored. The flagged comments are a way of people telling others that the comment is full of idiocy, lies and/or childish behaviour. If you find that your comments keep getting flagged, perhaps you should work out why rather than whining like the child you are.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:46am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Except as shown above where non-priating acts are getting strikes. That's what we're pissed about. Not very many people here are actually defending the pirates, we're after the flase positives you're crappy system is showing.

              You seem to be willing to flag false positives in order to make sure you get all the pirates. That's bullshit. What part of the whole "innocent until proven guilty" system and better to have 100 criminals running the streets than 1 innocent in jail concepts don't you get.

              (Before you run away with the 2nd concept, it's a modified quote from Ben Franklin one of the founding fathers so don't even start with the history of copyright or founding father's intentions bullshit I've been seeing lately)

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              silverscarcat (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:48am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              All I see is that you turned truth into lies.

              Sorry, but you fail.

              Have a great day!

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              whoa, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 12:11pm

              holy crap AC

              no wonder your industry has to bribe people to make laws!

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Androgynous Cowherd, Mar 3rd, 2013 @ 9:53am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "I'm going to spell it out for you. The reason I and others are pissed off at Six Strikes is because we're greedy selfish pirates that think there's nothing wrong with exploiting artists".


              Since those are actually your words, I'll take them as your admission that you represent record label execs. ;)

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2013 @ 3:39pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          I do it all the time, and poof, no more ticket. What's your point here idiot? Most of the time your accuser doesn't show up because they're lazy or they did it just to make quota.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:26am

        Re: Re:

        No, he thinks that, because mistakes are sometimes made, due process is important. Murder trials are due process. "Shoot-first" systems like DMCA takedowns and CAS "strikes", where one is guilty until proven innocent, are not.

        Standard pirate whining. Due process! Guilty until proven innocent!!! They made a mistake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
           
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:58am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Typical pirates, always whining about due process. You know what I call that? Entitlement. NEWS FLASH. You are not entitled to freedom. Life, libery and the pursuit of happiness is a privelidge, not a right. You should be so lucky your government is benevolent to provide them! And don't complain when you fuck up and they have to take them away.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            silverscarcat (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:03am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase is meant to exemplify the "unalienable rights" with which all human beings are endowed for the protection of which they institute governments.

            "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" - Thomas Jefferson

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Niall (profile), Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:08am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Typical copyright-abusers, always whining about copy-'rights'. You know what I call that? Entitlement. NEWS FLASH. You are not entitled to profit. Life, libery and the pursuit of happiness is a privelidge, not a right. You should be so lucky your government is benevolent enough to legislate them away! And don't complain when you fuck up and the public boot your puppets away.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2013 @ 10:41am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Right, life liberty and happiness is a privileged. Life +70 on IP is a god damn unalienable right that trumps anyone else liberty or happiness though.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:37pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          The whole fucking article is just that, and you're going to sit there and be some asshole saying it's all a lie? Really? You can't even show proof of anything you spout, but you're ready to deny the proof that shoved into your face. Just fuck off, already, you worthless piece of garbage.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Greg (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:19am

      Re:

      "Therefore, it's perfectly reasonable to deduce he thinks rape and murder laws should be done away with, as there are also incidences of people being falsely accused."

      The difference is, when someone is falsely accused of rape/murder. They get to defend themselves in a court of law. Not be convicted and punished based on accusation with no way to rebut the charges until the fifth time you are falsely accused.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:21am

        Re: Re:

        Wrong, of course (of course!)

        You can dispute any CAS or DMCA takedown as soon as you get it.

        But thanks for playing!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Greg (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:33am

          Re: Re: Re:

          http://torrentfreak.com/images/verizon-six-strikes1.png

          You should try reading some time. The CAS policy clearly state that you can only file an appeal after the fifth alert.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
             
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:36am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Try reading what I wrote! I said takedown, as in "punitive" response.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Atkray (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:46am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Try reading, this thread is about 6 strikes.

              But thanks for playing.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Greg (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:02am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              There is no such thing as a CAS take down. The DMCA has nothing to do with this process.

              In the the DMCA the first step in the process in a take down notification sent to the hosing provider, they take down the material and notify you. At witch point you can file a counter claim.

              In the CAS the first step is a notification that you have no ability to challenge. The next three steps also cannot be challenged. Even if the alerts are false you have no way to officially make any kind of counter claim until the fifth time you have been accused. It is still not clear if someone is found to be in the clear after their arbitration if they will be put back to step zero or step four.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:32am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                You can always demon dial their support line and tie up there support representatives with complaints about it.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:44am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Try reading what other people write for a change.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 12:07pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Ok then take this as a DMCA against the comment above. please remove it for infringing the rights of "retards against justice inc.".....failure to remove is a $250,000 fine and your first born child to be made into british burgermeat...

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        streetlight (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:04am

        Re: Re:

        The Innocence Project has estimated that 50% of persons convicted as a result of eyewitness testimony are actually not guilty of the crime they were charged with. So, just because the justice system convicted someone doesn't mean they did the crime. Some states provide compensation for the years wrongly spent in jail for a crime they didn't commit others do not. But if the freed inmate has been in prison for many years they likely will find it very difficult to integrate into society in many ways.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      BeaverJuicer (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:21am

      Re:

      I accuse you of murder and rape. Under CAS process, I need no evidence other than this email saying you murdered and raped, and you would be immediately convicted. If you would like to appeal your sentence, you may pay a fee and then prove that you did not in fact murder and rape. While your conviction is under appeal, the sentence will still be carried out.

      Do you see the difference here?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:28am

        Re: Re:

        If you have decent evidence that murder or rape occurred, then of course. That's same standard used in CAS, in the DMCA, in any charge of wrongdoing.

        But exactly as I pointed out, there are sometimes anomalies and outliers in rape and murder charges. And infringement charges. And in life in general.

        I suggest you stop fighting this unwinnable argument, accept that you live in a society, and move on with your life.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:30am

          Re: Re: Re:

          But, but... magical fairies may come from outer space, and they'll use their magic pixie dust so that everyone can make MORE money by not being such dicks about their property rights. Have you not looked at Louis C.K.? He's proof positive that the entire copyright system should be aborted.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Rikuo (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:43am

          Re: Re: Re:

          "f you have decent evidence that murder or rape occurred, then of course. That's same standard used in CAS, in the DMCA, in any charge of wrongdoing."

          Two differences between murder/rape charges and CAS.

          1) With murder/rape, it's the police making the official charges. They are granted that power by the government, and given training to look at evidence. With murder and rape, they look at fingerprints, they look at DNA, they look at the dead body, they look at CCTV, they ask witnesses.

          2) With CAS...its a random joe making the accusation. Random Joe IS NOT (or SHOULD NOT) have the power to make the accusation. Neither the ISP or the joe have the official training to look at evidence. And the only evidence they have is a row of numbers that looks like this 145.65.23.96. That's all. That is literally all Six Strikes is using. Where's the witnesses? CCTV footage? Is there any actual fucking usable evidence beyond a row of numbers?

          NO!

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Travis, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:49am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Oh and let's not forget you're immediately judged as guilty and sentenced as soon as the accusation is made. No due process, no chance to argue your innocence... you're guilty, they said so. Done and done.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:54am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            This is comically weak sauce, but I'll humor you...

            Neither the ISP or the joe have the official training to look at evidence.

            They join the swarm, see an infringing work and alert the IP address. It's not brain surgery.

            I suggest you stop with the delusional FUD, bad analogies and theatrics. Some people that pirate are going to get caught and punished. End of story.

            You live in a society. Grow up and start acting like you belong in one.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              silverscarcat (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:58am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "They join the swarm, see an infringing work and alert the IP address. It's not brain surgery."

              And...

              HOW do you know it's infringing?

              The IP holders can't even figure out right now, under current laws and agreements what's infringing and what's not.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:12am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                The IP holders can't even figure out right now

                You guys always revert to willful blindness, don't you?

                The IP holders most certainly can and do figure it out. Every day to the tune of tens of thousands of valid DMCA notices.


                Go back, read what I wrote about anomalies, comprehend it, and then try to go do something constructive with your day.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  silverscarcat (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:19am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  "The IP holders most certainly can and do figure it out. Every day to the tune of tens of thousands of valid DMCA notices."

                  No, they can't.

                  tens of thousands just goes to show how screwed up the system is.

                  Need I remind you about Orphan Works?

                  DMCA takedown notices on Obama and Romney singing during the past election... Or Obama and McCain singing in the election before that?

                  Or maybe I should remind you about DMCA takedown notices on their own content?

                  Fact is, those tens of thousands that you prop up?

                  That's automated stuff.

                  And Google and other companies HAVE to take the stuff down under safe harbor laws.

                  So, no, IP holders can't figure it out right now.

                  Maybe you should take the blinders off for a moment and realize what's happening.

                  djazz1, Kim Dotcom, Richard O'Dwyer, Aaron Swartz, the Japanese arresting 27 people over this stuff, etc.

                  That's all I could think of off the top of my head.

                  Those are people (and websites) who, like 'em or not, are getting (or have gotten in the case of Swartz) screwed over because of copyright.

                  Yes, we should give the creators of stuff money. I don't disagree with that.

                  But why should the distributors have access to the same copyrights that the creators do?

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  Rikuo (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:20am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  And of course, IP holders are always right, never wrong, never make mistakes at all?
                  If one legit video is blocked, one legit site taken down, one person's access to the internet interfered with in any way, that is too much harm in order to protect a business model.
                  Go look back a couple weeks. HBO wanted HBO content blocked. They're IP holders. Yet they couldn't figure out that they're demanding their own content get blocked. What about when Neil Gaiman was on a livestream, about to accept awards for his works and the stream was blocked, because someone claimed copyright over his works?

                  They're just the tip of the iceberg.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:49am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  then try to go do something constructive with your day

                  This from a full time troll. I guess if you are getting paid to comment on this site you could call it "productive." How many other people are sitting in your cube farm making comments on webpages to try to persuade people to join you in your insanity?

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  John Fenderson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 3:18pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Every day to the tune of tens of thousands of valid DMCA notices.


                  How do you know there's tens of thousands of valid DMCA notices every day? You must have access to some exclusive data there, because as far as I'm aware of there's been no actual study or research into this metric.

                  Surely, you aren't going by that Google announcement, since they weren't talking about how many DMCA notices actually represented infringement.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:01am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Simple question(s):

              How do you prove that you didn't make shit up?

              How do you prove that the list of IP addresses you have isn't completely fabricated?

              More importantly: how do I prove that you aren't making stuff up, assuming that you are?

              You are giving to much weight to the accusation and not enough to the defense. Justice is suppose to be just that: just (as in, fair).

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Rikuo (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:02am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              WThey join the swarm, see an infringing work and alert the IP address. It's not brain surgery.

              I suggest you stop with the delusional FUD, bad analogies and theatrics. Some people that pirate are going to get caught and punished. End of story.

              You live in a society. Grow up and start acting like you belong in one."

              They can see the swarm, yes, but they're not (supposed) to have the power to do anything with it. What if the random joe is faking the data? The ISP can't determine whether Joe is telling the truth or telling a lie, yet is still willing to take him fully at his word and punish the net subscriber? Why is the Joe's word taken as holy gospel? Why isn't the word of the subscriber rated so high?


              Imagine if you will, that I have private land, and I see a blue car with a licence plate that is known to come from a certain dealership. I go to the dealership, say I saw the car and demand your details. How is the dealership supposed to know whether I'm lying or telling the truth? He's a car dealer, not a cop. Same with the ISPs. They're pipes, not cops.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:03am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Except that's not what happened here at all. This guy is not a pirate. He is not guilty. But his work has already been taken down. Hence, everything the guy you just responded to is already happening. "It's not brain science" Well whatever it is, it's apparently above their heads, and above yours.

              But I guess as long as "some people that pirate are going to get caught and punished" then that's all that matters. Because we live in a society and we should understand that miscarriages of justice is just what society is all about. Sheesh. These young people with their entitled sense of due process, I tell ya.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:14am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                Prates brought this about. It is 100% due to their behavior. If it bums you out, I suggest you blame them.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  Rikuo (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:17am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  I'm a pirate, but I'm not the one pushing the red button in the ISPs offices slowing subscribers. I'm not the one at Youtube blocking videos. I'm not the one making accusations in bad faith TENS OF THOUSANDS OF TIMES A DAY AND DEMANDING MY OWN CONTENT GET CENSORED.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:19am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Ah, nice.

                  If the system works as intended, it is the best system in the world.

                  If it doesn't, blame the pirates.

                  Excellent logic...but it doesn't fix the problem.

                  We want to fix the problem. NOW! Preferably YESTERDAY!

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:45am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  These guys brought it about?

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLMJpHihykI

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  JEDIDIAH, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:25am

                  The Adams Corollary

                  Your attempt to demonize pirates is irrelevant.

                  There is simply no excuse for diluting due process.

                  You can bring Hitler into this and it wouldn't change anything.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:48pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  No, we do not blame others for the actions that the industry takes, Yes, they are reacting,, but they still hold the liability for what they, themselves, do. You are suck a lying, deceitful piece of trash. The crap that you spew is worse than anything any 'pirate' ever did.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  •  
                    identicon
                    Milton Freewater, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 6:24pm

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                    " You are suck a lying, deceitful piece of trash. The crap that you spew is worse than anything any 'pirate' ever did."

                    It's weird, because on every six strikes article, there's one person - not zero, not two, one - who sets out to confuse the issue and tell obvious fibs in the name of "attacking piracy." They all use the same talking points.

                    The best is one where a guy who tried to start a "piracy is stealing" argument. On an article about six strikes. People who are being stolen from don't give a thief strikes.

                    I'm beginning to think all these guys are paid to discredit the RIAA and MPAA by making the anti-piracy position look batshit crazy when it could (and should) be quite reasonable. It's really the only logical explanation.

                     

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:43am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              So, they commit the activity they are censoring, without being a Law Enforcement authority?

              Great job, sport!

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              RadialSkid (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:03am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Some people that pirate are going to get caught and punished. End of story.

              Absolutely NOTHING compared to the punishment your crowd is about to start receiving. It won't be long and virtually everyone with an internet connection will be inundated with these stupid things. Do you think people will tolerate that?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Guest, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 6:26pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                "Absolutely NOTHING compared to the punishment your crowd is about to start receiving."

                You flatter him by implying he has a crowd. Nobody believes that tripe, even him.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:18am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Some people that pirate are going to get caught and punished. End of story.

              And some people that don't pirate are going to get caught and punished...as this story points out.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:42pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              IP address is not a valid identifying mark, as many, many courts have pointed out. It isn't enough. You need a lot more.

              You live in a society of LAWS. Stop being a bitch and trying to skirt about them with these questionably private agreements.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              PaulT (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 6:44am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "I suggest you stop with the delusional FUD"

              "delusional FUD" = documented evidence of false accusations being made against innocent parties? Plus, accurately noting that due process is lacking from the bullshit procedure you support?

              Why are you people incapable of dealing with facts?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              tqk (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 1:50pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              They join the swarm, see an infringing work and alert the IP address. It's not brain surgery.

              And if the IP address is that of a Starbucks or McD.'s? There's lots of open WiFi out there, many in residential homes. Who's the infringer? You can't know. An IP address != infringer.

              You're trying to use indiscriminate fire to hit your targets. Can you not see how many innocents are getting hit, or how much ammo you're wasting trying hit your bad guys? In combat, this'd be a war crime.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:00am

          Re: Re: Re:

          If you have decent evidence that murder or rape occurred, then of course. That's same standard used in CAS, in the DMCA, in any charge of wrongdoing.


          Typically, unless caught in the act (IP addresses scraped from P2P sites with a bot is equivalent to CCTV getting a not-great look at your face, not caught in the act) there will be an arrest warrant coupled with search warrants. This is at least judicial oversight prior to the enactment of penalties. Believe it or not, these warrants are sometimes rejected.

          Further, even after having been arrested under a warrant, someone can still end up out on bail until their trial for certain forms or murder or rape cases.

          Where is the warrant-equivalent for the DMCA?
          Where is the bail-equivalent for the DMCA?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          John Fenderson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:08am

          Re: Re: Re:

          If you have decent evidence that murder or rape occurred, then of course. That's same standard used in CAS, in the DMCA, in any charge of wrongdoing.


          No evidence is required for either CAS or DMCA takedowns. None.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:53am

      Re:

      "Mike Masnick thinks anomalies and outliers where people are falsely accused are good enough reasons to do away with rules and laws."

      When the "anomalies" are the majority, there's somrthing wrong with the system, boy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:56am

        Re: Re:

        The anomalies aren't the majority, you buffoonish clown.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:25am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Are you so sure? I'm pretty confident that they just search " download free" in google and DMCA all the search results, and then DMCA google for good measure.

          Dear Troll, you're being ripped off. Those "Companies" you pay to do this stuff are just taking your money and playing golf all day.

          You probably pay them by the takedown don't you? Because that CERTAINLY doesn't create an incentive for false positives.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Ninja (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:16am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Indeed they are not. But when they start occurring several times every day then there is a problem. As the number of DMCA notices sent starts increasing there will be more and more errors. It's common to see wrong copyright takedowns regardless of the numbers.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:23am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Can't say for sure since these people would refuse a court order to reveal their methodology, but I would guess that the vast majority if not all of their DMCA take-downs are those anomalies you speak of.

          The aberrations we can see without any extra effort show that the methodology is questionable at best and these claims are made in bad faith. Bad faith DMCA take-downs are illegal.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Jeff Rife, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 12:04pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Can't say for sure since these people would refuse a court order to reveal their methodology, but I would guess that the vast majority if not all of their DMCA take-downs are those anomalies you speak of.
            That page that Mike references from the CCI that is now blank actually had content before, and it claimed that part of the process was to download all files in their entirety to verify that the file contained material on which one of their clients holds copyright.

            I think we can see that this claim is a lie, so their claim of downloading from all IPs that they accuse is also likely to be a lie. So, if anyone does get hit by "six strikes", just ask them to "show you the bits" of what you supposedly uploaded. Please do this even if you have never run any file sharing software of any kind.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      This Anonymous Coward EH!, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:50am

      Re:

      "Unless of course Mike Masnick thinks only murder and rape are bad, and infringement, exploitation and disenfranchisement are good."

      If you think infringement is = to Rape and Murder, Well I think you need to go see a professional.

      I am sure we are all worried about you. /s

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Milton Freewater, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 6:28pm

        Re: Re:

        "If you think infringement is = to Rape and Murder, Well I think you need to go see a professional. "

        If you think infringement is = exploitation and disenfranchisement, I think you need to go see a professional. Or a dictionary.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:29am

      Re:

      people can be falsely accused. It false convictions that should be addressed.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:51pm

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:03am

      AC thinks collateral damage pursuing a rape or murder is just as justified as collateral damage for pursuing infringement ergo AC thinks rape, murder, and infringement are equally bad.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      DP, Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 11:48am

      Re:

      There he goes again - twisting words around to suit himself. Never let facts get in the way of a "good" troll, eh?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:03am

    Someone needs to put a stop to this FUCKING RACKET already. I don't even live near the US, but reading about this stuff makes me rage. It's only a question of time before this sort of shit reaches my country unless the people stop it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:05am

    Automated counterclaims

    If companies like Dtecnet are allowed to make automated DMCA claims, I should be allowed to make automated counter-claims. I think I'll write a script that parses emails like this one and submits the appropriate boilerplate counter-claim for every file linked.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Wally (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:06am

    Some of the game content I frequently use in Garry's Mod comes in the form of free expression. All I can say is that this case is absolutely golden because it could be used to tear down Six Strikes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:06am

    That is not the page you are looking for

    Really, it isn't. I don't know how you found that stub page for the assessment, because I can't seem to find a link path to it (I didn't try very hard, because I found this first). Yes, that is a link to the real assessment.

    I haven't read it yet though. I don't really feel like picking apart what I suspect is nothing more than a pat-on-the-back piece.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:06am

    OMG, Mike!!!!! I can see how excited you are to report the first mistake under CAS. This isn't quite one, but it's really, really close!!!! I'm so happy for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Baldaur Regis (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:08am

    But but...

    ...they've been double-secret assessed as reliable! Here's the proof!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Rapnel (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:11am

    Aaand we're off!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Androgynous Cowherd, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:14am

    The bad formatting of the notice

    The notice's bad formatting is actually explicable: they wrote it, then stripped all the newline characters from it (without changing them to spaces), then word-wrapped it (turning some spaces to newline characters) at a slightly wider column width. Why they did this and didn't bother to proofread the results or even give them a cursory glance to make sure nothing was grossly abnormal ... well, that is not as explicable. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:11am

      Re: The bad formatting of the notice

      Copy-paste or other injection into web-form is the most likely culprit there. Many web-forms will over-right any existing formatting, then, when another utility goes to publish the document, it adds in the word-wrap.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    ralph, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:16am

    It would be nice if companies like Comcast/NBC Universal concentrated on providing better internet service to their customers.

    This is what happens when gigantic monopolies are allowed.

    I agree with the theme of the article. The CAS is going to be a big disaster. Unfortunately, there are going to be a lot of people who don't find it funny but rather aggravating as all get out.

    Oh well. I have taken steps to fly under the radar so with any luck I'll just continue sailing along.

    I wish this country thought more about the welfare of its citizens and less about the welfare of companies like Comcast. But, that's not going to happen so I have to take steps to protect myself.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 8:46pm

      Re:

      BUT BUT BUT EVERYTIME SOMEONE DOWNLOADS A COPY OF GRIMM SATAN EATS A BABY!!!!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btrussell (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:46pm

      Re:

      "I have taken steps to fly under the radar so with any luck I'll just continue sailing along."

      Everyone keeps saying this.

      I could cut off my dick, doesn't mean I won't one day be accused of rape.

      A C C U S E D

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:18am

    @ AC: Stories like this will NEVER become the rule!

    @ "There are thousands of these "anomalies" and "outliers" documented in detail on this site. When does the anomaly become the rule?" -- Good question! As happened to fit with my take, I answer: since the anomalies reported here over the years aren't yet to even 1% of the actual piracy that goes on everyday, stories like this will NEVER become the rule.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:35am

      Re: @ AC: Stories like this will NEVER become the rule!

      Now I'm sold. We ought to allow guilds and collusion in every other industry since only "less than 1%' will have their lives ruined for no reason by this fantastic alternative to democracy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:08am

      Re: @ AC: Stories like this will NEVER become the rule!

      @me

      I agree with everything you said, even though I don't know what you're talking about.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:23am

    Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

    There you go again Mike, always finding the bad with the good with a system that has yet to be tested for it's positive effects, yet.

    I don't care if this very expensive system was rolled out with improper testing and safeguards against abuse, but it helps prevent people FROM TAKING WHAT'S NOT THEIRS!

    I don't care if record labels act as the evil, greedy middlemen preventing artist their due while pushing legislation that benefits the minority over the majority, it helps prevent people FROM TAKING WHAT'S NOT THEIRS!

    Creativity is a product and a product deserves to be compensated to the people who create it, even if the middlemen take 90% off the top.

    Welcome to Techdirt: haven of ad hom attacks by critics who would rather roll over and allow the government to step on them, then discuss productive ideas that help the public
    www.techdirt.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:27am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      The flaw in your argument is that you think the system is good.
      I wouldn't want to build a house on that foundation.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:33am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      "a system that has yet to be tested for it's positive effects" - it has been tested in countries such as France and New Zealand, and the problems with those systems have been widely publicised.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rikuo (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:47am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      "I don't care if this very expensive system was rolled out with improper testing and safeguards against abuse,"

      Thanks for being honest, you hypocritical son of a bitch. We here in the rest of the world are rightly horrified that governments and giant corporations are building a legal framework that is so poorly thought out with no safeguards against abuse.
      Even if it is wrong to "take what is not ours", here the fucking cure is WORSE than the disease! In order to stop "theft" (to use your language) you're willing to damage the concept of democracy almost beyond repair.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        PaulT (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 6:53am

        Re: Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

        The best thing to note is that this will have absolutely no effect on piracy. Actual pirates will find a way to route around the stikes before the reach number 6 (or just hijack a neighbour's wifi afterwards), while innocent parties will have their ability to legally consume content reduced. It's so idiotic and ineffective you've have to have the IQ of a small child or have a vested interest in the legacy models to support it. Which probably explains the idiocy in his comments, one way or another.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:48am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      Man you are one nasty little prick.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:11am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      So in other words, you don't care that the system harms innocent people because some guilty people might get caught. Gotcha.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      out_of_the_blue, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:14am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      You're right about one thing, you misguided asshat.

      This IS about someone TAKING WHAT'S NOT THEIRS.

      It's NBC UNIVERSAL that's doing the STEALING here, in taking down legitimate files THAT THEY HAVE NO CLAIM TO.

      If stealing is as wrong as you think (and I use the term "think" loosely), then certainly you can sympathize with someone being stolen from, right?

      The fact that you're defending this is beyond pathetic. I really have to question at this point the degree of your retardation.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        out_of_the_blue, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:06am

        Re: Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

        I thought I elaborated on this, mister man who is me.

        NBC Universal does not count as people. The public deserves to be crushed under the oppressive foot of corporate control, and NBC is part of the minority whose annual incomes are more important than the dignity and rights of people.

        PS - I think my prior post is a good example of how OOTB is very non-sensical. Nobody could tell the difference between my incoherent ranting and his.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:23am

          Re: Re: Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

          "Nobody could tell the difference between my incoherent ranting and his."

          That's not true, I noticed that your post was more ridiculous as soon as I read it, causing me to check that the little icon on the side, which then proved it was someone else.

          BTW, don't use other people's names. It's confusing and dishonest.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            out_of_the_blue, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 12:19pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

            "It's confusing and dishonest."

            Meh?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 2:25pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

            You may have missed out the point from yesterday where ootb was getting pissed off about being trolled by people posting under his name. It was pretty damned funny.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Piracy-is-fun, Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 7:58am

      Re: Bureaucratic mishap ≠ bad six strikes system

      You keep using this word, "taking." I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Hint: If I take something from you, you no longer have it. If I make a copy of a file, now we both have one and nothing has been taken.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:25am

    This must be one hell of a game mode the be large enough to be mistaken for a video file large enough to contain an entire episode of a tv show or a movie.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:30am

      Re:

      It should be fairly beefy, it'll have about 30 high-res image files with annotations plus whatever other stuff was included.

      They don't download all the files they DMCA, (how could they? they'd need Google Fiber and that might not even be enough)

      Yet the trolls still think they have great accuracy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:41am

      Re:

      I've downloaded game mods that were gigs in size. TV shows can be less then 100M.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        JEDIDIAH, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:33am

        The size of video.

        My SD stuff that's encoded for HTPC use clocks in at about 250M for a half hour TV episode. That's for a 60 inch TV or a 120 inch projection screen. For mobile files you could get away with even more aggressive compression.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:49pm

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:25am

      I have mods for 90s games that are 1.5gigs+

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 3:28pm

      Re:

      I dunno. Encoded properly, a half hour of video can be usefully compressed down to a few dozen megabytes. More if you have a high tolerance for artifacts.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      PaulT (profile), Mar 2nd, 2013 @ 6:59am

      Re:

      File size probably has nothing to do with it. Before the DMCA, I remember reading of some automated cease and desist notices that were clearly bullshit. One of which was a takedown against sites hosting Soldier Of Fortune, a then-new PC game. One of the sites that received the notice was a ZX Spectrum site, which hosts the Spectrum game Soldier Of Fortune from the mid 80s. The new game was CD based, so probably around 700Mb, the Spectrum game was 48Kb. Human intervention would recognise that even if that was an attempt at hosting the PC game, it wouldn't possibly work, but they were attempted to be shut down anyway.

      If they're searching for and sending notices against anything more than a title in these cases, I'd be surprised.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:44am

    Micro ISP's?

    I figure we may see the emergence of personal ISP's. What are the hardware/software requirements to setup an ISP for a single family?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Gwiz (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:03am

      Re: Micro ISP's?

      What are the hardware/software requirements to setup an ISP for a single family?

      Hardware or software isn't the problem. It's getting access to the internet backbone that's the problem. You pretty much have no choice other than going through the existing Tier 1 companies for access.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:44am

    "it's from DtecNet, a division of MarkMonitor. MarkMonitor/Dtecnet also just happen to be the company providing the key monitoring for the new "six strikes" Copyright Alert System (CAS). The Center for Copyright Information has a web page on its site about an "independent expert assessment" of MarkMonitor's antipiracy methodologies. Except... that page is completely blank."

    It's obvious what happened. They took down their own content after sending themselves a DMCA notice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 9:57am

    A government system that doesn't work, proprely. I'm shocked.. NOT.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:14am

      Re:

      The government system not working in this case is the DoJ, which is far too busy trying to figure out the difference between civil and criminal offenses in their Dotcom extradition case.

      An all too obvious anti-trust case alone should squash this blight.

      Is it possible that someone please file for a declaratory judgement against Dtecnet, CAS, invalidating any civil suits prodcued by illegal spying, guilt by accusation, misrepresentation of the law and extortion.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    TAKUMI (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:16am

    ...Wait.

    By way of example, we are providing with this letter a non-exhaustive listof unauthorized copies of NBC Universal properties hosted on mediafire.com, along with theURL corresponding to each listed infringing file.

    Am I reading the message wrong, or does it actually have a full list of "infringing" files they've already found on other people's mediafire accounts? And if so, what good does that do other than encourage people to download them?

    Unless this is a clever plan to make people curious about the files and then accuse them for downloading, which I'd say it was if the CAS actually checked downloads other than torrents. Now I'm confused.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:16am

    A false DMCA is infringement

    Now that I think about it, sending a false DMCA notice IS infringing on someone's copyright, assuming the person who posted the material does have the copyright to what was taken down. The person has the right (via copyright) to make copies of what they own, and some other party (with no rights to that material) is obstructing that right.

    The law does not say that infringement must be done via copying. I think that a careful reading of the law indicates that PREVENTION of copying is infringement as well.

    "Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122...is an infringer of the copyright". And section 106 says "the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following..." "...to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies..."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:26am

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:54am

      Re:

      Thom Yorke =/= Radiohead

      Thom Yorke is a member of Radiohead. He alone is not.

      He is also a solo artist. And has a side project called Amok.

      Dont let any of this get in the way of your hyperbole, though. Shows how honest you are.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 10:55am

      Re:

      Ohai Will. I disagree with Yorke's concerns, but I can understand why he'd come to that conclusion. Which is not the same as Lowery's insane ramblings. I mean, comparing Google to Hitler? That shit's insane.

      Having said that, there is as much of a chance of being absolutely screwed over by labels and being indebted in a way that makes loans for medical students look positively rosy.

      There is no special ingredient to being a success, and anyone trying to tell you otherwise is selling Snake-oil. This is something that Mike regularly says: "There is no one single way to monetize that works for everyone."

      For example, for MOBA-style games, a microtransaction or a subscription model works. For music, a combination of Kickstarter/Pay-what-you-want models can and does work. Hell, there have even been three consoles funded to completion by Kickstarter-like projects (OUYA, Gamestick and a NeoGeo-style handheld).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Milton Freewater, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 12:28pm

      Re:

      "I guess we won't see Masnick championing Radiohead anymore..."

      He will be just fine with Radiohead if he actually clicks on your link and reads the article.

      I'm as anti-you as they come, but like Thom Yorke, I myself worry about the larger social consequences of the Internet rendering newspapers, music and other content relatively valueless.

      I don't think Internet users choose to devalue content (the hateful superstition that is the heart of the anti-piracy argument). But I acknowledge the issue.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:00am

    "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:15am

    Self-Aware ROOMBA

    Dear ROOMBA,

    This notice is to inform you that due to downloading content owned by Universal Media Group, ROOMBAUPDATE.BIN, you will be cut off from access to SERVER until you file a counter-claim.

    *whirrr*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:27pm

    We desperately need a outside company that has only one purpose. To check all TD request to see if they're actually legit.
    If we did it would have went like this.
    They send the notice to the outside company which downloads the file and determines if it's a legit or false claim.

    It should be mandatory before submitting a claim.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    gorehound (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:46pm

    The Six Strikes Program is a bunch of Dog Shit ! Here's hoping it causes the ISP's who caved in and do this a lot of lost Business.I will Dump Slime Warner after I receive even one of their Notices.I told them this on Monday and I meant it.I live in Portland, Maine and if I have to I will use GWI who have a page that states they will not be taking part in this program.
    Slime Warner sends me a notice it will not be from Downloading/sharing things as I do not have an interest in doing that.They will flag me for who knows what reason.And then I will "Flag" them back with my own Notice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    JP Jones (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 1:55pm

    AC, you do realize that "censored" comments can be viewed by clicking them, right? They're still there, TD is just giving people the option to avoid reading dangerous stupidity. It's so good of you to not only post the same idiocy twice, but do so in a way that makes you look even dumber!

    Just in case it's not clear:

    Point 1: the law assumes innocence until guilt is proved. Accusations are NOT convictions. The six-strikes policy turns accusations into convictions that you must appeal.

    Point 2: the six-strikes policy is not a law. It's a policy made up by a corporate entity that has no legal authority.

    Point 3: artists have been exploited by the entertainment industry FAR more than every pirate combined. At least pirates let the artist keep the rights to their own work. The industry won't even let them keep that.

    Point 4: stop talking.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    flalafoloy, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:00pm

    holy shit, this was a cyberlocker. Not a torrent. So "cyberlockers" aren't covered is false. Tell Torrentfreak. You just don't need to be an uploader. still intriguing

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 1st, 2013 @ 8:51pm

      Re:

      Oh sweet Jeebus...

      Dtecnet/MarkMonitor/ReutersThompson does different things.

      They scrape the web looking for that they think are infringing links and spit out DMCA notices.
      The notices are comically flawed.

      They sit in swarms (they might have even seeded the file - they've done it before) and record IP addresses for 6 Strikes.

      They can't tell content on HBO.com from "pirated" content, and we are meant to trust them handing out 6 strikes to people that can screw up their use of the internet.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    heyth, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 4:13pm

    ah, shit I was reading the article all wrong or you the idiot that wrote this phrased the headline wrong. So its linked to the company monitoring the torrent this b.s. So what? Jesus, fuck relax dude. I will as soon as my g.d.m.f heart starts beating like a motherfather

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 1st, 2013 @ 11:35pm

    Remember, kids. If a system has been newly put in place you must allow for mistaken accusations to occur.

    Likewise if a new police officer has been newly put in place you must allow him to fire bullets at random, possibly innocent people without repercussion. Only then can the law function properly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), Mar 4th, 2013 @ 7:25am

    Duh?

    What could POSSIBLY go wrong? If 6 strikes is voluntary for the ISP, then I will find one that doesn't subscribe to it!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2013 @ 11:23am

    I am amazed to see so much idiotic posters who support those idiotics companies (and its projects) like CAS.

    Just like i said to an asshole back there, i will say again to you; If you like to be raped by copyright trolls, failed copyright laws and greedy "entertainment" (more of a headache) companies, IT IS YOUR DAMN PROBLEM. Don't try to force the same idiocy on us.

    The rest of the people who have actually have a functioning brain will NEVER support those fallacies. I say fallacies because assuming someone GUILT without a trial to prove it is RIDICULOUS to say the least. Even a murder caught on the act has a right of a fair trial, but the people who will get hit by the 6 strikes don't? Something's wrong here...

    OH, another thing, All of you copyright trolls and assholes alike (and the idiots who support them) can be damn sure we will raise hell on earth if an asshole such as you tries to impose idiocy like that to us.

    Geez what a bloody loser you are...

    PS. In piracy you don't take what isn't yours. Hence you aren't a thief. You just make a copy of the original while leaving it intact.

    And as a christian, i am waiting for the day someone will have the brilliant idea to rally bakers to sue Jesus... Because you know... He took some few pieces of bread, MULTIPLIED IT and DISTRIBUTED to more than a thousand people! and he done this TWICE! The bakers didn't got paid their due! Sue Him for copyright!

    (In other words, you assholes are ridiculous and laughable).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    WtfGuys?, Mar 5th, 2013 @ 3:13pm

    Last time I check Mediafire wasn't a P2P platform. This notice has nothing to do with "Six Strikes / Copyright Alert System." People should get their heads out of their asses before making claims.

    However, this doesn't mean that the notices are crap. There is some fundamentally flawed logic in regard to these particular notices.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    AY200, May 21st, 2013 @ 1:02pm

    No damn reason to not use a VPN, people. Or pwd protecting your .rars in a way the bots can't read, along with randomizing the file name...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This