Lawsuit Over Video Game Rights Might Kill The NCAA But Not The System

from the the-system-always-lives-on dept

Cross-posted from
I don't particularly like the NCAA and I enjoy their legal difficulties as much as the next guy. As a devout college sports fan, the usually arbitrary and always backward business side of the NCAA (including the affiliated schools and "non-profit" bowl associations) causes me great consternation.

Apparently, the incomparable Charles P. Pierce shares my disdain for the lumbering excuse for a fair and credible sanctioning body that currently governs collegiate athletics.

In a sharp Grantland piece, Pierce revisits the Ed O'Bannon-led class-action case against the NCAA and video game manufacturer EA over their combined efforts to profit in perpetuity from the likenesses of unpaid "student ath-o-letes." (Take it away Eric Cartman!) But I think Pierce is overselling the extent to which a possible O'Bannon victory would really change the college sports landscape....

By way of background, Ed O'Bannon is a former UCLA and pre-Brooklyn Nets basketball player who had retired from the game. It came to his attention that the NCAA had licensed his likeness to EA to make approximately a gajillion dollars selling video games featuring "classic" teams like O'Bannon's 1996 UCLA Bruins. O'Bannon felt -- and he was later joined by basketball legends like Bill Russell and Oscar Robertson, who were stunned to learn a) that they were in a video game and b) what a video game was -- that this seemed a little far afield of putting his likeness on a calendar in 1995, which is what he reasonably assumed he was authorizing the NCAA to do when he signed away his rights to profit from the marketing of his collegiate career when he was all of 18 years old.

O'Bannon filed suit in 2009, alleging that the NCAA violated the Sherman Antitrust Act when they forced him to sign a waiver giving up his rights to profit from representations of his collegiate career. As Robert Wheel of SBNation explains:

O'Bannon is alleging that if the NCAA didn't force him to sign this contract, then he could have gotten money from someone else (say, an EA competitor) to use his likeness. Thus, it essentially fixed the price of using his image at zero. Even if you consider players' scholarships adequate payment for their services, this still artificially depresses how much they're paid. If a judge agrees, the waiver would be considered an illegal restraint of trade under the act.

And now O'Bannon and his lawyers are seeking to certify a class of all former athletes used in this way for a trial next year (courts have held that maintaining the amateur status of current student athletes is a laudable enough goal to justify the NCAA robbing current athletes of the fruits of their potentially debilitating labor, so this case only deals with former athletes).

Which brings us to Charles Pierce's piece. You see, Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California just denied the defendants' motion to end the class certification process on the grounds that the plaintiffs have changed their legal strategy. Judge Wilken basically asked, "So?" and the defendants had no response. Pierce contends that this legal setback for the NCAA, along with recent NCAA retreats on the issue of stipends for players, portends an extinction-level event for college sports.

By and large, the people charged with running our various sports conglomerates have proven through history to be as incapable of taking the long view of their own survival as the average brachiosaurus was. They blunder around, eating whatever comes under their noses, trampling the scenery and hooting loudly into the wind. They never see the meteor coming. …

For the NCAA to survive in its current form, it has to win this lawsuit or get the lawsuit dismissed. There’s no third alternative. The NCAA can’t settle and then go back to the status quo ante. It can’t pay off O'Bannon and Russell and Robertson and all the rest of them, and then start business as usual again as regards Cody Zeller or Kenny Boynton. If it loses the lawsuit, the effect on the NCAA's financial structure would be profound. About which, at this point, the device has not yet been invented capable of measuring how little I care. Instead, I stand aside and listen to the stomping and the hooting from the thick Cretaceous rain forest, which is just loud enough to drown out the high whistling sound of something coming down from the sky.

I'm not sure comparing the NCAA to the dinosaurs makes much sense. The dinosaurs were wiped out entirely and a new world order replaced their presence. The elimination of the NCAA is more akin to the extinction of the Dodo bird: the weakest, most ineffectual player on the evolutionary stage will saunter off while the crazy dudes with guns and hunting dogs remain on top.

Or maybe Pierce is right about the extent of the mass extinction... but he forgets that the elite athletic departments and conferences aren't the dinosaurs, they’re the cockroaches. I just don't trust these folks to go quietly into the night. They'll let the NCAA take this hit regarding past licensing of "classic team" likenesses and then come up with some new regime where the individual schools capture all the revenue from licensing their own classic teams through bi-lateral agreements with manufacturers to create some semblance of a competitive market for these likenesses and go on exploiting the next generation of future former athletes.

Would that survive legal scrutiny? Maybe not, but the big power players in the sport will happily drag out the issue as long as possible to capture as much profit as possible, even at the expense of the weaker sports schools who would lose out without the NCAA dividing the licensing pot. But for a major athletic department, this is no time for communism! There's already a roadmap out there to ditch the NCAA and kill off the weaker sports schools leaching off the strong.

So the NCAA might die, but for the players themselves, the motto would be "meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

The O’Bannon Decision [Grantland]
Ed O’Bannon vs. the NCAA: The antitrust lawsuit explained [SBNation]
NCAA Student-Athlete Licensing Program — How Could It Happen and What Are the Elements? [Winthrop Intelligence]

More stories from Above The Law:



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Mason Wheeler (profile), Feb 8th, 2013 @ 2:28pm

    I hope they die off like dinosaurs

    The NCAA is a truly despicable group, not so much for the legal problems they create as for the ones they deliberately hide. If this "extinction-level event" does kill them off, good riddance to them.

    The NCAA, and the NBA after them, have fostered a truly disgusting culture of violence, rape and abuse by letting athletes do whatever they want without accountability. And when someone gets hurt, their high-powered lawyers do everything they can to sweep it under the rug.

    According to Jeff Benedict's exposť Out of Bounds, (http://www.amazon.com/Out-Bounds-Inside-Culture-Violence/dp/B000HWYLDS) at least 40% of NBA athletes have been charged with at least one violent felony of some sort, the vast majority of which never see the light of day in the court system because powerful athletic associations do everything in their power to ensure that the players that are making them money don't lose their ability to do so. Everything else--including the victims of these thugs' crimes--is regarded simply as an acceptable level of collateral damage. And then they hold them up before us and our children as role models!

    Well, the sooner they go the way of the Dodo Bird, the better. This here is a match I could truly cheer for.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 8th, 2013 @ 2:30pm

    In sports and the arts; those that can do, those that can't profit.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 8th, 2013 @ 2:43pm

    "In sports and the arts; those that can do, those that can't profit"

    I don't know about that. I can't color inside the lines and I'm broke as hell too.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 8th, 2013 @ 3:04pm

      Re:

      You either practice writing, music or acting; or lack the sociopathic ruthless streak needed to exploit others.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 8th, 2013 @ 8:29pm

    "They blunder around, eating whatever comes under their noses, trampling the scenery and hooting loudly into the wind. They never see the meteor coming."

    you now what else if like this?
    MPAA, NRA, etc. hell even the U.S government is pretty much doing this on the corporate level and trade agreements that i'm not gonna be surprised if there's gonna be a 2nd Civil war. they are too busy protecting from people from foreign threats that they could even see whats wrong with their own country

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 9th, 2013 @ 3:14pm

    Wait...video games have rights?!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This