CNET Reporter Resigns Over CBS Interference In Dish CES Award

from the editorial-independence dept

Last week, in writing about CBS's unquestionably stupid decision to interfere with subsidiary CNET when it covered Dish's new DVR device, all because CBS is involved in litigation against Dish over a similar device, I came very close to calling out reporter Greg Sandoval by name. Sandoval is an excellent reporter for CNET who has covered the Dish case in particular, along with numerous other copyright issues. I don't always agree with him, but I think he's a tough and fair reporter, and it seemed like CBS's decision would put his objective reporting in doubt. Minutes before posting the article, I pulled the sentence that included Sandoval's name, because I thought it was, perhaps, unfair to put him on the spot like that, and that each employee of CNET had to make a personal decision on how to handle the situation.

Now it appears that Sandoval has made his decision, announcing that he's resigned from CNET due to this situation:
As he notes, he no longer has confidence that CBS is committed to editorial independence. In later tweets, he notes that CBS never interfered with his own reporting, but that the situation was unacceptable and would lead others to call into question his own independence -- especially considering that Sandoval reported on the Dish case and other similar cases.
This all comes out after further information on the story reveals that CBS didn't just bar CNET staff from considering the new Dish device for the "Best of CES" award, but actually forced staffers to re-vote after the device had already won the award:
The Verge has now learned that the facts of the case are somewhat different than the story CNET and CBS had previously shared with the public. According to sources familiar with the matter, the Hopper was not simply an entrant in the Best of CES awards for the site: it was actually chosen as the winner of the "Best of Show" award (as voted by CNET's editorial staff).

Apparently, executives at CBS learned that the Hopper would win "Best of Show" prior to the announcement. Before the winner was unveiled, CBS Interactive News senior-vice president and General Manager Mark Larkin informed CNET's staff that the Hopper could not take the top award. The Hopper would have to be removed from consideration, and the editorial team had to re-vote and pick a new winner from the remaining choices. Sources say that Larkin was distraught while delivering the news — at one point in tears — as he told the team that he had fought CBS executives who had made the decision.

Apparently the move to strike the Hopper from the awards was passed down directly to Larkin from the office of CBS CEO, Leslie Moonves. Moonves has been one of the most outspoken opponents of the Hopper, telling investors at one point, "Hopper cannot exist... if Hopper exists, we will not be in business with (Dish)."
The Verge report also notes that CNET/CBS Interactive folks fought hard against the decision from the top folks at CBS, but in the end were told they had no choice. While it's not too surprising that folks from the old gatekeeper system, like Moonves, would be so clueless as to think that such a move would not massively backfire, it's still stunning to see that he never appeared to think through the consequences.

Kudos to Sandoval for standing up for his principles. As a top reporter in the space, I have no doubt he'll land on his feet -- hopefully at a publication with more credibility. Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 10:45am

    I look forward to reading his columns wherever he heads to next. Always found him to be an excellent and unbiased reporter. We can never have enough of those.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Jan 14th, 2013 @ 10:48am

    Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

    Ethics in journalism is like honesty in politics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 10:59am

      Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

      You mean quite common, but often overlooked by those with little interest in the details.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Milton Freewater, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 11:02am

      Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

      "Ethics in journalism is like honesty in politics."

      This story is about ethical journalists who voted to promote a device that might threaten their company's revenues in the short term. So yeah, journalists can be unethical but these ones aren't.

      Moonves can't get his head around what a CBS CEO's job responsibilities should be in 2012, i.e. maximum revenue generation in the CURRENT climate, not the climate you prefer. Once fund managers and stockholders start seeing his attitude as a red flag, he'll change his tune or they'll find someone who will.

      We talk about the next generation of lawmakers and judges being friendlier to communications innovations, and that's important, but arguably even more important is the next generation of investors.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        weneedhelp (profile), Jan 14th, 2013 @ 11:50am

        Re: Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

        Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.
        Ethics in journalism is like honesty in politics.

        Those two go together. My comment was directed at those who stay and keep their mouths shut and allow their names to be tarnished with further reviews where the reader will now always wonder if this is basically an infomercial. Because we now absolutely know, and should have always known, where there are corporate interests, honesty flies out the window for whATS PERCEIVED BY MANAGEMENT (sorry caps lock snafu) as best for the company. (While actually clueless as seen here. I will never trust a CNET review as 100% biased again.)

        Its a prime example of what has happened to journalism in the US. At least by my perception.

        "So yeah, journalists can be unethical but these ones aren't." - We will see.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          DCL, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 1:28pm

          Re: Re: Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

          Interesting... you didn't take the time to correct your CAPS issue but you took the time (probably the same about) to apologize for it.

          I think there may be a corollary in there about how ethics in journalism work for bulk of reporters.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 1:40pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

            If you're using a mobile device it is often easier to just apologize for mistakes and move on than to try to erase and re-write the mistake. Correlation does not mean causation.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              DCL, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 4:43pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

              You just expanded my point... in today's "get it out there as soon as possible" world we often take the easy way, like not always checking sources (add multiple TD article references here), which leads to outside groups perceiving an overall corruption of mainstream ethics(sometimes rightfully so).

              That also expands to the "Suits" piercing the journalistic veil of independence for the shortsightedness of blocking a competitors product, later they will apologize (hopefully) and try to smooth things over.

              Somebody with true integrity works to actively prevent corruption with every action the are responsible for. Hence Sandoval has come away with more integrity then the suits in this case.

              My initial response was meant to be a bit tongue in cheek but I purposely used the word corollary to soften the correlation vs causation argument.

              Personally when I type on a mobile device and I go back and fix my edits (the ones I notice) instead of just apologizing for them. I must be old skool.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 8:31pm

        Re: Re: Let's see if other CNET reporters follow suit.

        " but arguably even more important is the next generation of investors."

        Very insightful!!!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Jan 14th, 2013 @ 10:50am

    Well done

    *Rises to his feet and begins clapping slowly, but emphatically*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      dennis deems (profile), Jan 14th, 2013 @ 11:16am

      Re: Well done

      What's with this "slow clap" meme? Where and how did it start? In my experience a slow clap was an act of derision, always meant sarcastically.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 11:13am

    Wow A reporet with morals, how rare.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    PT (profile), Jan 14th, 2013 @ 11:36am

    Interesting!

    What is this "hopper" of which they speak? I'd never heard of it before, but now I'm thinking I need to buy one. Thanks for the tip, CBS!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 11:42am

    I know. How about if Techdirtbag hires him? Oh right, Mike doesn't believe in paying people.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 12:43pm

    What if they'd all refused to do what Larkin said they had to do? Like, as a bloc. Would they all have been canned?

    I guess they kinda did, since we're talking about it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 1:13pm

    They could have simply announced it quickly before the memo came.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Davey, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 3:44pm

    When will we have more real journalists running the news and be rid of assholes like Moonves? These corporate leeches are good for nothing except screwing their customers and ruining innovation.

    Hopefully 60 MInutes will be getting the story and helping drive Moonves to a home in a doorway where one of his intellect and integrity belong. Ooops, forgot: 60 Minutes is CBS, and so won't be allowed to comment. Hopefully Mike Wallace, Cronkite, and the other real journalists from back when CBS wasn't scum will find a way to wreak revenge.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Carl Alsing, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 9:03pm

    Greg Sandoval, journalist

    Good for you, Greg Sandoval. Wherever I see your work next, I'll read it with trust.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2013 @ 9:48pm

    good riddance.. sorry.. can't get past the spin (or extreme ignorance) he put on copyright pieces.. having cnet in his title made him dangerous.. hope he can't do as much damage wherever he ends up..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Gregg, Jan 15th, 2013 @ 5:59am

    What's sad about this

    What is sad about this, is really how little shocked people are about a big "media" corporation making it's own news through a News subsidiary. We are all so used to corporations being corrupt and manipulating the truth to get their desired response that we lump them in with politicians, taking the lessor of two evils. It's not that we ever really trusted big media or big corporations, but the "News" was always expected to be fair and clean. Over 20 years of Fox news and other BS, this just helps put the nail in the coffin.

    CBS should have it's executive board fired, fined and flogged.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Former CNet reader, Jan 15th, 2013 @ 2:32pm

    C|Net CES connection

    Kudos to Greg for doing what I think many would be too afraid or intimidated to do.

    But, on an additional note... the bigger problem which I think many people may be unaware of is that C|Net is *THE* OFFICIAL awards partner of CES itself and has been for the last 11 or so years.

    So in effect CBS has affirmed by this massive CF, that they now control CES's 'Best of' award process and can simply deny a company from even being considered for an award simply because the suits may not like whatever product is being showcased.

    Personally if I were Dish's CEO, I'd be demanding that the CEA terminate that relationship immediately as the official awards process is now obviously biased and tainted!!

    Seriously... who didn't see this coming when a content company acquired a tech news company. The two fundamentally do not mix since big content/media have always reviled new technology - because it's seen as a threat.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jamie Jacobson, Jan 17th, 2013 @ 8:36pm

    skipping commercials on live TV

    Hopper is nice for recorded shows, but what about live TV ?

    this iphone app lets you skip commercials on live TV! 



    https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/commercial-break/id589327264?mt=8

    

 ;It sends a message to your iphone when commercials are over.


    coooool!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Edward Eade, Jan 19th, 2013 @ 2:53pm

    His twitter accounts been deleted

    And now CBS deleted his twitter account rather than leave up such seditious comments by a now ex-employee

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This