Rep. Lofgren Looks To Reddit To Help Crowdsource Anti-SOPA

from the not-sure-that-will-work dept

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, who has been one of the few leaders in Congress when it comes to pushing for real copyright reform and pushing back against the bad proposals of Hollywood, is apparently looking to use Reddit to crowdsource a new bill concerning internet freedom. Earlier this year, we noted that Lofgren had introduced two good bills -- one on ECPA reform (pushing for more privacy for your communications) and one called the Global Internet Freedom Act to create a task force designed to ensure internet freedom. It will be interesting to see how well this works.

Of course, post-SOPA, some on Reddit sought to crowdsource a bill on internet freedom themselves, and the process went a bit off the rails. I don't know that crowdsourcing is the best way to create a bill. I could see how it would be very handy in critiquing and improving an existing bill -- or maybe just generating ideas for a bill -- but if it's just starting from scratch, quality control could be an issue. Either way, this seems like an interesting experiment that will be worth watching.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Christopher Best (profile), Nov 19th, 2012 @ 10:08am

    Luckily someone has already done the work for him!

    Just paste the suggestions from the RSC Copyright Policy Brief info a bill.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Jay (profile), Nov 19th, 2012 @ 10:30am

      Re: Luckily someone has already done the work for him!

      I think the issues call for more attention than just that brief. Judicial education, public education, DMCA exemptions... There's a gamut of things this bill can address to ensure that the people have a voice in copyright that they have barely had in the past 30 years.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Mason Wheeler, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 1:39pm

        Re: Re: Luckily someone has already done the work for him!

        We don't need DMCA exemptions; we need to repeal the DMCA. Specifically, we need to do away completely with two things:

        1) The "Safe Harbor" provision--an Orwellian abuse of the language if there ever was one--needs to die, and in its place we should put Internet services under Common Carrier doctrine. (This would fix our problems with bogus takedowns and Net Neutrality as well. Two birds with one stone!)

        2) The legitimization of DRM and the legal protection for it need to go. In any other context, what DRM does to your computer--forcibly overriding your control of your property--would be considered hacking, so let's call a spade a spade and make the use of DRM technology illegal. We need to enshrine in law the principle that piracy is the content owner's problem; it is not the user's problem and the content owner has zero right to make it any user's problem unless and until they can prove in court that that user is part of the problem.

        Fix those two issues, and well over 90% of the copyright abuse we see running rampant today would go away.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 9:29pm

          Re: Re: Re: Luckily someone has already done the work for him!

          the republican bill adressed #1 tho, introducing penalties for false takedown claims.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      gorehound (profile), Nov 19th, 2012 @ 11:56am

      Re: Luckily someone has already done the work for him!

      And like that RSC Policy it will never get done or make an impact.
      Those A-Holes will do whatever MAFIAA tells them to do.
      And we have already seen this happen before..............like just the other day with that RSC Copyright Policy that sounded good and then was quickly Retracted.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Designerfx (profile), Nov 19th, 2012 @ 11:04am

    reddit is the wrong place

    The better place to do it would be a public google docs document, so that trolling/bad things can be reverted and as it allows hundreds if not thousands of edits to happen simultaneously.

    reddit is just not a good place for that, and neither was that site used for crowdsourcing some other internet bill by Wyden.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 11:14am

      Re: reddit is the wrong place

      Oh, will the Jailbait Forum be the host?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        rhonda, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 8:35pm

        Re: Re: reddit is the wrong place

        Agree all the way ...while this forum is read by many it is not the place to get a serious response .Try posting.a humours video with a.link to the original sight you wish to source from ..the people will bring.others if it is ligitimate enough.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Jay (profile), Nov 19th, 2012 @ 11:21am

      Re: reddit is the wrong place

      No, Google dogs is a bad idea. I saw what happened with the FIA document and the trolls really hit that document hard.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    PT (profile), Nov 19th, 2012 @ 11:21am

    On the other hand...

    While on the face of it this sounds like a good thing, why is the solution always more laws? A law for "internet freedom" will end up as a reservation, with everything not specifically included being excluded by default. We need the opposite, repeal of the laws that threaten internet freedom. We could start with the DMCA.

    Maybe if people would stop calling the fuckers "lawmakers" and start calling them "representatives", they might get their priorities right.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 11:42am

      Re: On the other hand...

      Hear Hear, what is required is the repeal of bad laws, and a prohibition on regulating the Internet. However illegal actions are illegal actions and the responsibility of the police of the country where they occur.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 12:01pm

    Redditor Here...

    Where the fuzzy hell is this again? Not a single link yet.....Repost plz....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 12:15pm

    but if it's just starting from scratch, quality control could be an issue

    Like SOPA?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    bob, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 1:01pm

    Hah

    Crowdsource? The 435 members of the House can barely agree on anything. What makes anyone think that the Internet will be able to converge on something?

    The only way they'll be able to converge on it is by limiting access to just a few like-minded friends. That's how the Wikipedia debated whether to take the Google money for their SOPA protest.

    In practice, I think it will be filled with lots of looney ideas like the copyright holders should give out free massages to the people who pirate their work. Why? Some sort of reparations for all of the terrible wrongs that copyright brings to the world.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 2:12pm

      Re: Hah

      Do you enjoy painting fans as some sort of rabid wolverine, or are you just projecting, bob? It's a good thing there isn't a wiki for such initiatives, because it'd allow you to vandalise it with your Big Search rightsholder massage ranting.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Nov 20th, 2012 @ 1:00am

      Re: Hah

      Sorry bob, but I don't recall Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation ever taking any money for anything related to the events of January 18th. The decision to black out Wikipedia was a bottom-up, community decision.

      If you have solid, direct proof otherwise, let us know. Until then, however, your claims are meaningless.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 1:28pm

    you could crowdsource an army to march on government offices....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2012 @ 5:47pm

    Iceland crowdsourced their new constitution and it's working fine so far. That's because crowdsourcing is what representative democracy should be: the people say what they want, and the representatives put it into legal jargon. This is the ultimate form of representative democracy and should be encouraged. Reddit specifically? Maybe not, but it's a good place to start. The most important aspect is that Lofgren is acting as the filter to get rid of bogus ideas. Again, that's how representative democracy should be working. I'd be fine with this process using 4chan to crowdsource a bill, because once you slap on the bullshit filter (again, Lofgren and his peers), you can come up with some pretty great stuff.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This