RSS
University Reprimands Reporter For Livetweeting Basketball Game
from the because-who-would-ever-want-to-watch-the-game-when-you-have-140-character-update dept
I'm always amazed at what people who run sports teams think will draw away people's interests. For years, sports teams have tried to make it more difficult for people to get information about sports other than by attending games lives directly. They've tried instituting blackouts (especially if games aren't sold out) for local TV, sued services that (accurately) report scores in realtime and many other things all of which seem to be based on the ridiculous belief that if people can get some info about a game from another source, they won't actually want to go see the game. This, to put it simply, seems really stupid, and shows little understanding of how sports and fans work. Sports fans love the sport and would like to see it live when they can, but when they can't, those alternatives offer a way to keep them connected and keep them interested.
This "can't give away too much" attitude has gone past just broadcasts of the game directly to the way that sports teams and leagues seek to control reporters and what and how they report. While they can't legally tell them what they can and can't do, they do have control over who they provide press passes to -- and then threaten to pull those passes if they disobey "the rules." These rules often seem focused on the same kind of "restrictions" in hopes of getting people to show up live, even if that's impossible.
Thankfully, these rules rarely seem to be enforced, but the University of Washington recently instituted a "Live Coverage Policy" for credentialed reporters that says they can only provide a maximum of 20 "in-game updates." A reporter for the Tacoma News Tribune, who was live tweeting a recent game, was reprimanded for going over his allotted 20 tweets and daring to go all the way up to 53. Not surprisingly, the reporter, Todd Dybas, then Tweeted about the reprimand:
It's not even a case where the policy is just outdated. Apparently the policy is brand new.
I'm amazed that someone (or some group of people) in charge here actually think that someone providing a bunch of live tweets will somehow take away from other forms of coverage available. However, if I'm the Tacoma News Tribune (or any other publication) the first thing I do is suck it up and send a reporter to buy a season pass so that they're not at the whims of some ridiculous policy, and let them cover the games however they want via Twitter. Either that, or (better yet), ask for volunteers already attending the game to be the designated live tweeter for the game.
This "can't give away too much" attitude has gone past just broadcasts of the game directly to the way that sports teams and leagues seek to control reporters and what and how they report. While they can't legally tell them what they can and can't do, they do have control over who they provide press passes to -- and then threaten to pull those passes if they disobey "the rules." These rules often seem focused on the same kind of "restrictions" in hopes of getting people to show up live, even if that's impossible.
Thankfully, these rules rarely seem to be enforced, but the University of Washington recently instituted a "Live Coverage Policy" for credentialed reporters that says they can only provide a maximum of 20 "in-game updates." A reporter for the Tacoma News Tribune, who was live tweeting a recent game, was reprimanded for going over his allotted 20 tweets and daring to go all the way up to 53. Not surprisingly, the reporter, Todd Dybas, then Tweeted about the reprimand:
Also, tonight I was reprimanded by the University of Washington for tweeting too much during a live event.
— Todd Dybas (@Todd_Dybas) November 12, 2012
I’m looking for policy...
Developers On Patents: Ron Garret of Awun
Jon Potter: Software Patent Trolls Can Be Stopped By U.S. Patent Office And Congress
I have an app...
Top 5 Reasons Why Mobile Analytics Is Important
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
I have a business...
How To Successfully Get Your App Into China
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I used to follow a sports team fairly often. When it came down to those few rare games that weren't broadcast because it wasn't sold out so teed me off, I finally just gave up on keeping up with that team. Since I lived out of state, it wasn't like I was going to buy a ticket or a season pass.
All I can say, is great moves there. As a result I no longer care about that team or the game and no longer even keep up with it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Here, Blizzard. You may have my money.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's almost as bad as the "professional" video game reviewers...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, this season they sold all broadcast rights to the new PAC-12 Network. And, of course not every provider has contracts with them! So, thanks for nothing PAC, I now do not get ANY football or basketball games of the U of A. So, I guess, I'll be watching some east-coast basketball this season instead. Way to lose fans!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
All part of pretending it's "scarce", Mike.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Twitter
The sole exception is the local football team, which I get info on by hearing random cheering from nearby apartments on Sunday.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Might just help people
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment