For All The Talk From Hollywood About Making Sure People Get Paid, Why Doesn't It Pay Interns?

from the because-it's-never-been-about-getting-anyone-paid-by-studio-bosses dept

We hear the refrain from the entertainment industry all the time, about how they are fighting against modern technology because without it, people don’t get paid, and how unfair is that? The RIAA’s Cary Sherman keeps talking about all those lost jobs (even though his math doesn’t add up), and talking about all the people the movie industry “employs” (exaggerated by an order of magnitude) has become a key part of the MPAA boss Chris Dodd’s stump speech.

So, isn’t it interesting that the entertainment industry may be facing a potentially big class action problem… for not paying interns? Apparently, it’s quite common for entertainment industry heavyweights to take on unpaid interns, usually eager kids hoping to “break into” the business. But, federal law (and the key state laws) are pretty explicit in noting that “free” internships are almost always illegal for for-profit companies.

Now, to be clear, I actually don’t think free internships — entered into willingly — should be illegal (just as I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people volunteering to do stuff for free). But if Hollywood is running around whining about getting more people paid… it seems pretty hypocritical to then not pay people working for you.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “For All The Talk From Hollywood About Making Sure People Get Paid, Why Doesn't It Pay Interns?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
84 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

So I guess RIAA/MPAA really are worse than Chinese factories.

That presupposes that a company that pays its interns is “better” than one that doesn’t. What rubbish. If an intern agrees to work for free, then there’s nothing wrong with Mike. Mike even concedes this very point. How fucking desperate is he that he faults them for not living up to a standard that he admits is no big deal not to live up to?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Because they’re interns, you fucking buffoon.

Are you paying people to write for this silly blog?

Agreed. It’s whiny, hate-fueled, straw man posts like this that, unfortunately, keep Techdirt at the fringe. Why does Mike feel the need to publish such substanceless nonsense? Just because they don’t pay interns, a common practice that Mike himself (for obvious, self-related reasons) approves of doesn’t diminish from their belief that professionals, who don’t agree to give it away for free, should get paid. This article is so dumb and desperate, that I honestly can’t understand why Mike wrote it. How desperate is he? How stupid and silly is his hatred of the MPAA. I’m sorry, but the fact that he publishes shit like this is just pathetic.

Rikuo (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Let me spell it out for you.

Hollywood whines all the time about people disrespecting copyright because, as they say, people will lose jobs. To keep on saying this, while not paying a certain group of employees, at the very least looks hypocritical, if it actually isn’t.
Surely if they actually were that worried about the income of those at the bottom of the food chain, those people would actually have an income, no?

Greevar (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The laws are, that unpaid interns are there for one purpose: to learn their vocation. They are not there to do work for the company and help them earn a profit. If an unpaid intern is doing work that generates a profit for the company, they must be paid a comparable wage to what an entry level employee would receive. Otherwise, they are illegally exploiting people for profit. Furthermore, it would unfairly displace professionals that merit higher compensation, even paid interns cannot be allowed to displace them.

What an unpaid intern is supposed to be doing is receiving mentoring from the experienced professionals of the company as to learn to be more proficient at their particular vocation. All their work is to be educational and is not for the company’s benefit, except to be a potential future employee of equal merit after graduation. To use unpaid interns in for-profit work is to place them into servitude through deception or coercion.

Interns are not free labor you can use or abuse at your whim you “fucking buffoon.” It is a valuable step in the educational process.

Anonymous Coward says:

Isn't the next question...

Why are unpaid internships valuable for getting exposure and knowledge, but free contributions by artists, authors, etc. are somehow parasitic?

You’re pointing out the hypocrisy, I’m wondering if we can ever get them to acknowledge that there is at least one form of “free” that actually is valuable to the “free” contributor. Then it’s just a slippery slope away from boo-yah…

Not an Electronic Rodent says:

Re: Isn't the next question can you not read at all or did you just get bored after the first sentance?

Now, to be clear, I actually don’t think free internships — entered into willingly — should be illegal (just as I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people volunteering to do stuff for free). But if Hollywood is running around whining about getting more people paid… it seems pretty hypocritical to then not pay people working for you.

MRK says:

If you don’t think unpaid internships should be illegal, then you have to ask yourself:

Should there be a minimum wage?

Should there be a maximum number of hours an unpaid intern should work in a week?

Should the internship be unpaid even if the person was coerced into entering it? Example: Many schools require an internship as as a graduation requirement.

If an intern is from a foreign country, do they need a work visa if they are unpaid?

Can interns work unpaid as a means of working off a debt?

Should any agreement between two people enter into willingly be legal?

Niall (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I’d go with:

Yes, yes, no, yes, that would be a form of payment but should still be limited, within the bounds of reason and the law.

You don’t have to carpet all the world, but it saves a lot of hassle if you don’t have to deal with people bleeding and falling over everywhere. Unless you are advocating an extreme ‘social darwinian’ position?

zoidberg says:

Because Piracy

Of course Hollywood would love to pay everyone. That’s never been in question. But, at the current levels of piracy there’s no way they can afford to do so.

You can’t on one claw say, “Everything should be free” and then on the other claw complain “More people should be paid.”

Shirley, you must see the dilemma in this!

Ed C. says:

Re: Because Piracy

AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!
AAAHAHAHAHA!

Oh wait, you’re serious? I guess that if you ignore facts like Hollywood is still making record profits, or even productions from the world’s most successful movie franchises that existed long before the dawn of the modern Internet made billions beyond all real cost but have yet to “turn a profit”, then you might make the argument that piracy has anything what so ever to do with it. But then, of course, you run the risk of people laughing hysterically every time you speak.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Because Piracy

Remember the anti-piracy ad in which people in the movie industry would ask things like, “How am I supposed to…pay for my glasses?”, etc. Of course, what those ads never mention is the fact that by the time the movie is released those people have long since been paid.
I don’t think they’ve been waiting around a year or so to receive a paycheck.

bob (profile) says:

Why don't you pay comment authors?

I’m personally responsible for many page views, all by injecting some new and interesting opinions.

The argument is all about people having control over their work. If anyone feels like giving away their work, that’s their business.

The complaint from the artists is that folks like Big Search come along and just start making money with other people’s work. They don’t bother to negotiate at all or even ask permission.

It’s all about being polite. At least the studios are polite and they ask whether people want to give away their work for free.

Lowestofthekeys (profile) says:

Re: Why don't you pay comment authors?

“I’m personally responsible for many page views, all by injecting some new and interesting opinions. “

Mmhahahahahahahaha..err..mmm…ugh I just laughed so hard I knocked the wind out of myself.

The rest of your post is sort of off-topic, which is not really conducive to new or interesting opinions, bob.

Rikuo (profile) says:

Re: Why don't you pay comment authors?

Bob, methinks you haven’t got the slightest idea what being polite means. Your comment history here proves it.

Now I want you to use what most other people have (a brain) and do a hypothetical scenario. Let’s pretend you are a mega-star author. You’re more famous than Stephen King, Tolkien and CS Lewis put together. You’ve written a dozen books and they’ve made you a fortune.
Now, let’s pretend that we live in a world where permission is needed for every single instance of someone wanting to use your work. Here’s my question: Would you want to be chained to your computer, answering 5 million emails every day from people asking for permission to quote your works in, say, an essay for school?

Greevar (profile) says:

Re: Why don't you pay comment authors?

And do you apply the same criminality to the local phone directory if they list a residence that is a known crack house? Companies like Google or your local phone company provide a service. That service is taking publicly available information and collating it into easy to comprehend formats. It is the job of any such service to make it harder to access information because another special interest doesn’t like it being found. They are in the business of making it accessible, not hiding it.

Ed C. says:

Re: Why don't you pay comment authors?

Since you have YET to figure it out, Google doesn’t make a cent off other people’s content. They give their listings away for FREE by selling ADVERTISING. You know, just like phonebook publishers have been doing since before the Internet even existed. They’ve been making money off your personal information for decades without your permission, so why are you not railing against BIG BOOK?

Ed C. says:

Re: Why don't you pay comment authors?

It’s all about being polite. At least the studios are polite and they ask whether people want to give away their work for free.

Sure, taking people’s work while almost never the royalties they contractually agreed to might be considered “polite”–about as polite as a pit bull kindly growls before biting you.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Why don't you pay comment authors?

bob just made the jump from stupid to stupid AND egoistic.

Do you think people will only click on pages to view them if you respond to them? How do you propose this occurs? “Oh, I don’t think bob is going to leave his wisdom behind on this story; it’s clearly not worth my time”?

Oh, and to the chumps who like to claim “reporting = censorship”, as of writing I am responding to a flagged post. Portraying reported posts as irretrievable and unreadable is disingenuous lying, and you know it.

Niall (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

If Floor64 is being ‘paid’ by Google to ‘lobby against IP’ then Google must be wasting their money, as I fail to see anything actually lobbying against IP. If you want frothing-at-the-mouth rants with no substance but only the corporate overlord mistaken talking points, go look at the RIAA sites for examples. Or any of bob’s rants…

Kelly (profile) says:

I’ve never understood how anyone could want to work for free “just for the experience” or how any company in its right mind would want unpaid interns running about. After all, if you’re too broke to pay interns, then you’re a bad investment. If you’re just too big a jerk to pay interns, then you’re probably cooking the books in other ways and aren’t trustworthy.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Actually that’s not made up. Or should we point out that Eminem had to sue to get royalties owed him? Royalties that were changed from “license” to “sale” as it suited the label to pay him less. Kenny Rogers owed $80,000 in royalties?Return of the Jedi STILL not profitable. And so on and so forth.

Yes, it’s only made up if you ignore reality. As you appear to do. But the stories and evidence proves it’s very much a reality that routinely takes place, and one where you and yours are happy wagging your fingers at pirates and crying to the high heavens over non-provable losses but at the same time go out of the way to genuinely cheat artists out of money they are owed.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

No.

No, not “so and so forth”.

If they never paid those that work for them they wouldn’t be allowed to stay in business.

You’re trying to incorrectly paint an entire industry with a tinyl brush because you think it might allow you to rationalize ripping off creative people.

It doesn’t.

You’re

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

>If they never paid those that work for them they wouldn’t be allowed to stay in business.

So you’re saying that as long as some people get paid (you might not even need most people to be paid), it’s perfectly alright for a few payments to be missed?

And please – the RIAA is the champion of whining to courts that whatever happens, they deserve to stay in business and all competing technology must be shut down, or otherwise impeded. It’s funny how judges can be convinced to look the other way when you lobby hard enough.

cosmicrat says:

Done that as long as I can remember

The movie / indie film / whatever has always used volunteer labor. Since long before the 15 years I’ve been in it. The smaller budget projects have to just to get done, and the big players do it because hey can. On union shows the roles interns can play are tightly controlled but on non-union it’s anything goes. People are willing to work without pay because so many people want to get into the film business.

Theoretical question: how is someone working for free on a big studio show different from someone working for free/spec (same thing in my experience) on a low budg indie/kickstarter/whatever project?

jeansonbelly (user link) says:

making mone online

John Chow best known for showing the income power of blogging by taking my blog from zero to over $40,000 per month in two years. His Review is what are you looking for? Visit JohnChowBlogging.com for more information. or Peng Joon credibility, SCAM not Even The Real Deal. Let me state clearly the..Making Mone Online Best Blogging Tips

jeansonbelly (user link) says:

making mone online

John Chow best known for showing the income power of blogging by taking my blog from zero to over $40,000 per month in two years. His Review is what are you looking for? Visit JohnChowBlogging.com for more information. or Peng Joon credibility, SCAM not Even The Real Deal. Let me state clearly the..Making Mone Online Best Blogging Tips

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...