RSS
Statistical Stupidity: 95% Of All Lazy Journalists Believe That 88% Of All Homemade Porn Ends Up Online
from the that-cannot-possibly-be-true dept
We are often told that we need mega-media news organizations because they, unlike their smaller internet bretheren, are more trustworthy because they fact-check. This is a repeated premise (despite example after example after example showing that it just isn't true), which is why some folks may still be surprised when an organization like CBS can botch their reporting so horrifically. Witness their reporting of a new study put out by the Internet Watch Foundation concerning explicit images that end up on so-called parasite websites.
And, of course, it isn't true. Nor is it even what the report concluded. What it actually concluded was that 88% of explicit images uploaded to the internet end up on parasitic websites. Now, that claim may still be inflated, but it isn't as outlandishly inflated as CBS made it sound. This isn't to say that major media should be 100% accurate all the time, but to claim that journalism will die if this kind of reporting goes away is the kind of over-exaggerated false claim that you would expect...well...I guess CBS to make.
So keep this story in your back pocket for the next time someone tells you how much we need mega-media news because they fact-check. Also make sure you throw some random made up statistics at that person. Hell, if they love major news media so much, there's a 43% chance that they'll believe them one-half of the time. Every time.
Eighty-eight percent of homemade pornography, including videos and still images, finds its way onto porn sites, often without the owners’ knowledge, a new study from Britain’s Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has found.
The study analyzed more than 12,000 sexually explicit images uploaded by young people and found that the great majority of images had been stolen and published to what the organization calls, “parasite” websites.If you read that first sentence, the one that says that 88% of all homemade pornography ends up online, and didn't immediately begin laughing at the sheer silliness of that number, you're a stronger person than I am. Now, granted, being both a horribly ugly pasty white and being, at best, mildly attractive, I'm not someone prone to taking pictures of my man-junk, nor mid-coitus. But what the hell? Eighty-eight percent? There's no way that could possibly be true.
And, of course, it isn't true. Nor is it even what the report concluded. What it actually concluded was that 88% of explicit images uploaded to the internet end up on parasitic websites. Now, that claim may still be inflated, but it isn't as outlandishly inflated as CBS made it sound. This isn't to say that major media should be 100% accurate all the time, but to claim that journalism will die if this kind of reporting goes away is the kind of over-exaggerated false claim that you would expect...well...I guess CBS to make.
So keep this story in your back pocket for the next time someone tells you how much we need mega-media news because they fact-check. Also make sure you throw some random made up statistics at that person. Hell, if they love major news media so much, there's a 43% chance that they'll believe them one-half of the time. Every time.
I have an app...
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
App Developer Conversations: What Does The iPad Mini Mean For The App Economy?
I have a business...
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
I have an idea...
Securing Venture Capital for that Next App Development
75 Questions To Help You Write An RFP For Website Design
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Which isn't really that surprising. If the IWF can find it quite quickly, one imagines the parawebsites shouldn't find it too hard either...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm unclear on the point
It seems that the article is upset about infringement. Damn you porn pirates. I want to make sure the actors are getting paid!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
78% of all stats are made up on the spot
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Solve this problem
That is a travesty. 100% of the idiots that upload explicit images of themselves deserve to have them published for everyone to see.
I, however, and far more interested in an examination of the other 12%. Why weren't these caught by the porn crawlers? I would assume that since they are actually the industry that seems to advance technology, their ability to find explicit images is WAY better than an organization that seems to think they need to tax the population to preserve the integrity of their news print.
My guess is that the crawlers rejected that 12% because it was so bad or the people were so ugly that they did not think they could monetize it. That, or they included celebrities and they are waiting for their payoff.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
They know how approximately how many people have been making explicit images of themselves, because they've been had enough people under constant video surveillance to extrapolate that.
That or they only found 88% of what they recorded was worth putting on the internet.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
FTFY.
Though it might be kinky for Bob, AJ, and OOB to see you with the mask, sans the Blackhawk's uniform. You might even have them stalking you as much as they do Mike.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
88% + your 100% averages 94% of all porn...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm not implying that his consent was obtained though.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://imgur.com/Zehuf
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Analysis
Where does one sign up for these studies?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Analysis
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
People claim this?
Wait, intelligent people actually claim this? Now, that's obscene.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics"
echo [rand 100]% of all statistics are made up on the spot!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
not quite right.
Actually there is no way to know. How could they know how much home made porno there is? No survey could be reliable. Sex and pornography are something that most Americans lie about.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
There are FOUR kinds of liars
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment