German Gov't Inadvertently Reveals Police Monitor Gmail, Skype, Facebook & Use Snooping Malware

from the did-we-really-tell-them-that? dept

Transparency is worth having for itself, since governments often tend to behave a little better when they know that someone is watching. But occasionally, requests for data turn up something big and totally unexpected because someone failed to notice quite what the information provided implies.

Here's a great example spotted by the annalist blog, which reports on a parliamentary enquiry about expenditures by the German Federal Ministry of the Interior, responsible for internal security. What was probably thought to be no more than a few dozen pages of boring and thus safe figures turned out to reveal something quite shocking:

The German ministry for home affairs and thus the German police clearly state that they are monitoring Skype, Google Mail, MSN Hotmail, Yahoo Mail and Facebook chat if deemed necessary. Money is spent on trojan viruses and we can be quite certain which company produces the IMSI catchers [used for "man-in-the-middle" attacks on mobile phones] used by German police.
It's been known for a year that the German police forces have been using malware to spy on citizens via their computers, but the latest revelations about surveillance activity go far beyond that. It confirms that even in countries where people are very sensitive about privacy, Internet snooping by the police is routine. It also emphasizes, once more, the importance of encrypting your communication channels where possible, and avoiding those where it isn't.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Mesonoxian Eve (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 3:33am

    I'm sure Germany will find a way to sue Google over this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 4:09am

    It's widespread. And yet they talk about freedom of speech and democracy. Hypocrites. All the lot of them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 4:27am

    Such a hot topic it took up two of the hot topic slots :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 4:53am

    and i thought that Germany, after what happened 70ish years ago, would have been a bit more careful concerning who is watching who and how to prevent anyone from finding out. mind you, given the way Merkel performs, it thinks it is the 'super country' all over again. it needs to remember that sooner or later, all things change. those dishing out harsh orders atm can easily be on the receiving end tomorrow. the way they treat others atm can determine how they are treated when roles are reversed!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Alex, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 5:29am

    is someone looking for attention?

    oh oh techdirt - I thought the summer slump was over already ;)

    This this post is a little exaggerated. The report just states to which private companies the "spying" is outsourced. The german gvt is forced by law to check wether it is cheaper to outsource certain services or to get the job done by an gvt-owned agency.

    In fact the title of this post is more than missleading. It's no secret that "the gvt" is spying on ppl. But only when a judge allowed it. And this is the same in most countries (maybe not neccessary in the U.S. ;) ). Every single service you mentioned in you post title has eventually clearly stated that they cooperate with law enforcement agencies. if a judge orders that the spying on the person X is ok, the law enforcement agencies ask the service which they think is used by the suspect to do "bad things" to monitor him / get his data. Or, if it is encrypted or to complicated to get the data (e. g. facebook, skype) the intercept the transmission. and this interception is mostly done by private comapnies (Digitask for example)

    the report is more or less about budgets and how much of the tax payers money was spend on what.

    nothing in this report is "new" - it all has been revealed years ago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ninja (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 5:42am

      Re: is someone looking for attention?

      Where it has been revealed? And while I do agree that there may be surveillance allowed by warrants how much of that was actually abiding by the law? I may not be that knowledgeable regarding German law but even if you accept that most of these initiatives are legal we still have the use of trojan/malware which I don't believe it's legal in any way.

      It's not just stating financial data, it's showing that Germany spies on Internet services. A lot.

      Seems enough for me to draw attention.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:01am

      Re: is someone looking for attention?

      Further, this line is amusing:

      'It also emphasizes, once more, the importance of encrypting your communication channels where possible, and avoiding those where it isn't.'

      My suggestion? Stop breaking the law. Then you have nothing to worry about. If you need encryption to feel secure from law enforcement, then you have a pretty guilty attitude.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:30am

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        That "got sumfin' to hide" very US-simpleton stance is so worn out. And almost exclusively used as a blanket statement to justify unauthorized abuse by government bodies. It's such a sound democracy 101 that mecanisms must ensure the government is kept in check as a preventive measure to their very nature of perpetual increased control.

        Your comment is without a doubt setting you on the side of the proponents of a total surveillance society. A totaliterian to the likes of the ex-communist countries...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:37am

          Re: Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

          It is proven democratic practice that governments increase their powoers wherever possible to get rid of the checks.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Alex, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:44am

          Re: Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

          I'm definitely not a proponent of total surveillance! But it is know that these services are monitored if "deemed necessary".

          You always have means that you can avoid being monitored. OTR, TOR, PGP S/MIME etc.

          So somehow its a good thing that you now that there is the chance that you beeing spyied on, so you don't rope in sand (? direct translation from the german saying) thinking "hey it's safe here, we can do what we want".

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Alex, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:46am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

            ignore this post, i got confused by the commenting system and just realized that you propably didn't meant me ;)

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Alex, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:47am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

            ignore this post, i got confused by the commenting system and just realized that you propably didn't meant me ;)

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:53am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

              Yeah no problem. Maybe check the threaded comments view, though not ideal either.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Ninja (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:34am

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        Are you from the Whales? Be sure to enroll your son in archery classes once he hits 16 or you will be breaking the law. Just saying.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Ninja (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 7:17am

          Re: Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

          derp.. Wales.


          Also, law! LAW!! Don't break the law! Law! /aj

          In any case, when even the Government seem not interested in following the law why should we?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 9:14am

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        If you need encryption to feel secure from law enforcement, then you have a pretty guilty attitude.


        If you aren't wary of law enforcement spying, then you are ignorant of even recent history.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 9:20am

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        Eh? Nothing to worry about today does not facilitate a worry free tomorrow. So..

        Fuck you, cunt. We don't bleed for you.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        UnKnown, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 12:36pm

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        No offence I think your missing the point. Yes the current leadership may be honest but who's to say things don't change further down the line for the worst. The data will already have been collected. What if Hitler had the intimate knowledge available now?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        T Raymond, Oct 11th, 2012 @ 11:52am

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        "Oh, well. I wasn't using my civil liberties, anyway."

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        hi, Oct 13th, 2012 @ 6:44pm

        Re: Re: is someone looking for attention?

        you sir are an idiot !

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Gregg, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 10:36am

      Re: is someone looking for attention?

      Hi Alex

      You're wrong. They are reading and accessing everything that everyone is doing without the courts authority and without warrants. That should not be legal and on the letter of the laws, it actually is not legal. So if you want to be a pawn go ahead. Frankly I don't want to be a pawn or a prawn. I don't want the Government snooping in my house. It's not a question of what I have to hide, it's call privacy! That's all that needs to be said!

      Did Americans forget their bill of rights?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Alex, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:34am

    It has been revelead through leaked documents (digitask); 3 or 4 years ago a letter from the the bavarian gvt. was leaked, in which they argued with some other agencies who has to pay what percentake from an invoice they received from digitask to monitor end decrypt skype conversations from a suspect.

    also the trojan horse / malware thing has been legal for some time, then skipped or limited by the federal constitutional court, than made legal again in a different law (for the "bka" = federal criminal agaency) under certain limitations. you always have to obey some kind of "inner circle or core area of private life" where they have to shut of the surveillance when you talk about this stuff (however it is no hard-coded what this core area is)

    as a german citizen which is familiar with the whole matter, believe me, nothing of this is new ... if it was it would have drawn a lot of attention when the report was released

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:38am

    OH NO! The police are using new technology to catch criminals. Oh, the humanity!

    If criminals use guns to commit crimes the police watch who buys guns. If criminals use electronic communications to commit crimes what exactly should they do????

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Joe Dirt, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 6:51am

      Re:

      Your analogy doesn't hold up... the government may be watching who buys guns, but they aren't breaking into your house and searching your closets for them.
      Using malware installed unknowingly on my system is the same as breaking and entering.
      Since when do the ends justify the means?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Oct 10th, 2012 @ 9:14am

      Re:

      What about the non-criminals?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Gregg, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 9:20am

    Don't think for a second

    Don't think for a second that this doesn't happen to everyone already! Everything that you write, read, download or upload, like, link or report is recorded by your government. 1984 already passed 28 years ago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 9:52am

    Eventually someone will find a way to blame the US for this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 10th, 2012 @ 3:13pm

    Germany? No way. It can't happen there!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Brain Fart- Silent but deadly, Oct 15th, 2012 @ 12:23pm

    We are all sleeping. Dazed in a world where we think the only thing we have available is to work for the company and still continue to worry about how to pay the mortgage. Don't even think about retirement, it's just too stressful.

    Wake up, there is no problem other than the new kingdom that we have completely missed being built around us. What are there, maybe 5 corporations that run just about every facet of goods and services? Why does food increase in prices exponentially? Wages are at a standstill, hiring is frozen, equipment has replaced low paid workers, gas has gone up under the guise of fear. Yeah, actually, none of that has anything to do with food increasing in prices. I still pay the worms the same amount to fertilize the soil. I pay the sun the same to give warmth.

    C'mon now, be a good dog and go to work, get locked into a single career path. Get more work loaded onto you, by far, compared to previous generation in your same line....but get paid unreasonably low based on inflation. Quit your bitching, and be a good dog. How else can the corporations attain record profits if they don't keep you in shackles of credit card debt, hangman's noose of taxes used to pay for the infirmed (who need it), the leeches who will never work a day and the upper level greed who will only be happy when they own everything.

    Oh, wait, they are attaining record profits. Just don't rock the boat, if people found how...it could be bad for business.

    So, yes, they'll be listening more and more. The worst thing that could happen is if we, the cows, realize that there's an opening in the fence..... we just may get out of this tainted field and get back to just being cows standing around eating grass and existing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This