Iran's Latest Aggressive Censorship Plan: Block All Audio & Video Files
from the seems-a-bit-excessive dept
It's no secret that the Iranian government has a bit of an uncomfortable relationship with the internet. First of all, it's trying to build its own internet, at which point it supposedly would like to block out that "other" internet completely. It's also pretty aggressive in censoring various sites it doesn't like. Over the past few days, it's apparently gone a step further. While there were plenty of reports about it blocking YouTube, someone who prefers to remain anonymous sent over this story, saying that Iran's Filtering Committee (IFC) has started blocking all kinds of audio-visual files, based on filetype:
Then, on October 4, 2012, the IFC began preventing files hosted on servers outside Iran from entering the country by blocking specific file extensions. At the time of writing, this policy applies to all MP3, MP4, AVI and SWF files. This kind of filtering was used after the controversial presidential elections of 2009, amidst harsh crackdowns on freedom of information, and coincides with Iran's current economic crisis and the ensuing protests.Apparently, those blocks do not apply to those files hosted within the country -- just those from foreign sites. Still, that's a pretty extreme move: blocking all of those files takes away a significant part of the audio-visual part of the web. The article highlights a number of Iranians complaining on Twitter about how these blocks are having a severe negative impact on what they do. Still, it's yet another warning for what happens when a government can aggressively filter the internet in extreme ways.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
1- Flash is being deprecated in favour of HTML5;
2- Instead of relying on proprietary mp3 and mp4, Iran is encouraging people to switch to ogg vorbis;
3- And finally, instead of relying on deprecated avi, they are trying to move people towards webm.
They are just a bit more aggressive at implementing the standards, that's all.
/sarcasm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
But still there's a problem with your comment. Regardless of if it will impact you or not, they are doing that to human beings, to their people. That should be a problem. We should be supporting Iranians fighting and denouncing this pile of crap.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
So why worry about it? Because WE care what happens to others no matter where they live.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
oob is a media executive?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
End the iranian suffering through your facebook account (refering to denouncing, as for the supporting part if there is no political will it simply won't happen)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No matter what Iran does, won't affect me as US gov't doing same.
first hey came for napster, but i didnt care as i listen to music that was given away for free legally
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Why interfere with the suicidal process?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Iran you should Rip all MAFIAA and make Free to the World.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The person receiving it just changes the file back to the correct extension.
For example - suppose I have an avi video to send to an Iranian friend. I change the file extension from ".avi" to ".abc" and send the file. Then after they receive and download it, they change the extension back to ".avi".
Now they can watch it.
However, that same video MUST have the correct file extension in order for it to be viewed in a website.
SO, changing the extension will work for sending email
but websites won't be able to show it without the correct file extension.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Work arounds will be found
I seems governments never tire of Whack-a-Mole.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Work arounds will be found
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Politicians and their quaint ideas of technology
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Somewhere in Iran...
Interrogator: "So you typed 9GB of commands in 2 hours?"
Suspect: "Of course!"
Interrogator "Um...well..."
Because sometimes, the alibi is as ridiculous as the charge.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Somewhere in Iran...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
-Sherlock Holmes, The Valley Of Fear
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Morons!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Would it be blasphemy if....?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment