RSS
Father Of The Video Game Console Showed Off 'Set Top Box' Idea In 1973
from the no-new-ideas dept
While nothing in this presentation would seem all that new and innovative to modern audiences thanks to the proliferation of the internet, personal computers and smart phones, back in 1973, this was a massive leap for home electronics. For instance, the creative use of encoded audio signals when ordering a product from a commercial is very similar to such common place codes such as UPC and QR codes today. And while home education over the internet today seems old hat, using your cable television subscription to achieve the same end goal is actually quite remarkable.
Another interesting suggestion that was only touched on but not discussed to great length was the idea of ad supported gaming. Today we see this in many forms whether it is free games that include advertising to bring in revenue for the developer, or games sponsored by or acting as an advertisement for a brand. Once video games became a large part of the home, we saw Baer's prediction come true.
All in all, what this shows is that few ideas are completely new. Many times, someone else will have thought of it before you, or at least thought of something similar. A lesson that some companies should probably consider prior to using patent law as a way to kill competition.
I’m looking for policy...
Jon Potter: Software Patent Trolls Can Be Stopped By U.S. Patent Office And Congress
Policy Resources: Data Privacy & Security
I have a business...
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
Why and How Developers Use Mobile Payments: Infographic
I’m looking for research...
Who Are App Developers?
Apps, Platforms, Consumer Use
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
whoa
I will leave it with... " Prior art bitches"
Nigel
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
actually...
N.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: actually...
Here's a thought: A legally defined "saturation point" where a technology becomes so simply pervasive that for the good of society the patent is annulled and all people/companies can use it at whim for no cost.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What about his lawsuits?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Killing Competition
The costs to the public of commercial competition being lessened is one of the hidden but inevitable costs of the patent system. Many companies have been killed by patent litigation. Nobody knows what benefits might have been enjoyed by the public, had those companies been allowed to survive. Opportunity costs are economically important, even though they are very difficult to estimate.
The choice between keeping or abolishing the patent system ultimately comes down to economic analysis. Attempts at reform have consistently failed for over a century, so attempting reform is likely to fail yet again. It is as it is. Keep or abolish?
The analysis needs to work out the net cost minus benefits of both courses of action. The cost of the patent system appears to substantially exceed its benefits at present, with costs rising and benefits illusory. So "keep" is going to be even more expensive. However, "abolish" might be more expensive than "keep", if somebody can come up with a plausible reason why.
The patent system is a net loser, so abolition looks good. We need to discuss whether it is or not.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Did he show off something called a "set top box idea"?
Or did he show an "off set" "top box idea"?
Or maybe he showed off a "set" "top box idea"?
Or a "set top" "box" "idea"???
What is this title trying to say?
I'll have no idea until I've read the whole article.
Please correct it to something readable.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about his lawsuits?
Ralph Baer is a person.
Corporations are not people.
What is acceptable behavior in a person, is not acceptable in a golem created for the sole purpose of exploitation.
Claro?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about his lawsuits?
1) Ralph Baer is an actual inventor. He invents things and then patents them. He does not buy up patents for the sole purpose of suing over them.
2) Ralph Baer does not sue for the purpose killing competing products like Apple does. He invented some very important steps in making home video game consoles and then other companies stepped in and actually copied his ideas. They did not independently invent. They took products that used his patents, reverse engineered them and brought their own products to market without paying him a license.
I hope that helps.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Awesome!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment