Time Warner Cable Is Ready For A 'Conversation' About Rising Costs, But Not The One You Want To Have
from the choose-your-friends dept
It's no secret that lots of internet users hate the idea of metered broadband. It adds serious mental transaction costs in using the internet ("will watching this movie actually cost me lots of money in overage fees?") and generally limits innovation by limiting what you can do online. On top of that, there's little evidence that such metered bandwidth is necessary (contrary to the claims of marketing people, when you talk to the tech people, they don't see any real congestion problems). However, the broadband providers absolutely love the caps because they basically allow them to make more money without having to actually invest in expanding their infrastructure.
So it's interesting to see that Time Warner Cable has set up a site, called Time Warner Cable Conversations, which they claim is a conversation with consumers about how to "fight rising costs." Except... they really only want the conversation to be about rising costs caused by what the TV networks charge to carry the channels. If you want to talk about fighting rising costs by arguing against broadband metering, well, too bad. The whole site is moderated and limited and it appears that only conversations about TV networks and such are allowed. That's not much of a "conversation" now, is it?
So it's interesting to see that Time Warner Cable has set up a site, called Time Warner Cable Conversations, which they claim is a conversation with consumers about how to "fight rising costs." Except... they really only want the conversation to be about rising costs caused by what the TV networks charge to carry the channels. If you want to talk about fighting rising costs by arguing against broadband metering, well, too bad. The whole site is moderated and limited and it appears that only conversations about TV networks and such are allowed. That's not much of a "conversation" now, is it?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It sucks. In my-- a customer's-- opinion, it sucks.
That is all.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
https://www.education.gov.uk/aboutdfe/departmentalinformation/consultations/a00211052/paren tal-internet-controls
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Time Warner
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
discussion
It's exactly the kind of discussion they want everyone to have. Any other kind is simply not worth having! (meaning: can't bring them more easy money)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Metering costs
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Fiber
It is really good when competition shows how the existing networks have been ripping people off.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Poor TWC
We too are working hard to reach an agreement with Google. We think its wrong for Time Warner Cable to impose unnecessary bandwidth caps and hold our bandwidth hostage, putting their greed above our service. While you play hardball we will encourage Google to move into our service area.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cable company vs. FOX is kind of like Alien vs. Predator - on one hand, you enjoy watching because they're both terrible, and the more damage they do to each other the better; but on the other hand, you take whatever shots you can at them because, at the end of the day, they're fighting over who gets to eat you.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Overvalued content
End result - more cable cutting. Fans decide to pay less on their own terms.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Metering costs
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Or are they just assuming that the whole of the UK is against censorship unless they respond? (I think not)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If so, do they charge for its use?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Poor TWC
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
If at all possible ( probably no competition) I would have to drop their service.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hypermileing?
And replace streams with their overhead and buffering problems with free downloads of a known size. Download divx or mp4 formats and forget HD files. Turn off those auto-update pages that refresh endlessly as well as redirecting pages.
I think you will find that efforts to trim bandwidth will cause users to do a lot of things that the content providers do not want them to do. But faced with overcharges, I'll dump ads and clutter first. Will advertisers oppose caps or just devise new scripts to make advert deletion more difficult?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The problem is the *increase* in costs. If they were introducing metered usage in a manner that reduced costs, there would be a great deal fewer complaints.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Lines
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
data caps
I say file a complaint with the FCC and FTC for fraud.
Google Fiber should teach them all do not lie about bandwidth.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I am shocked, shocked.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Lines
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment