Kim Jong Un's Mysterious Female Companion Hides The Real Issue: Piracy Of Disney Characters!

from the really? dept

There’s an almost entirely silly article over at CNN speculating — with absolutely no knowledge — about the identity of a woman seen frequently with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. I’m not quite sure how that makes a news story, but what caught Dark Helmet’s eye was that in this bizarre little story, there was a bit from Disney, in which it felt compelled to mention that a performance seen by Kim and the woman that included Disney characters was not authorized:

The mystery woman accompanied the young leader to a Pyongyang theater on Friday night to watch a performance of North Korea’s Moranbong band. The display included a cast of Disney characters, attracting the attention of The Walt Disney Company which issued a statement Tuesday saying it had not authorized their use.

As if (1) anyone cared about that or (2) anyone actually thought that Disney had licensed its characters to the North Korean government for a special performance.

This is what happens when, as a company, you seem to have infringement-on-the-brain, and think anything and everything must absolutely be framed within the context of whether or not something is infringing.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: disney

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Kim Jong Un's Mysterious Female Companion Hides The Real Issue: Piracy Of Disney Characters!”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
63 Comments
arcan (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

GREAT SCOTT, YOU MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING THERE. if we can get all the copyright and patent lawyers over to north korea and get them detained. such as hide a matyr in the group, we can solve a lot of problems. without all the lawyers there will be no where near as much of a legal mindset, and all the trolls will not be able to sue because there are no lawyers to run the “companies”

Josh in CharlotteNC (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Failtroll.

Absolutely unforgivable that you missed linking copyright infringement and communism in a story about both. Also, since North Korea wants nuclear weapons, and we all know that terrorists want nuclear weapons, there was that angle too. And even though both of your “sentences” were fragments, you capitalized one of them, and they were coherent.

Complete failing grade.

Killercool (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Ummm....

That’s only because the Brothers Grimm weren’t able to present their case to the Powers that Be that they deserved an extension.
Just because Disney has better lawyers, doesn’t mean it’s Disney’s fault that the Brothers Grimm allowed their copyrights to expire at the appointed time.

If they were any kind of businessmen, they would have been able to give their descendents a livelihood for generations.

Richard (profile) says:

Duhhh

The Walt Disney Company which issued a statement Tuesday saying it had not authorized their use.

Their use was undoubtedly authorised by Kim Jong Un or someone in his government – and in North Korea that is all that matters.

Has Disney not noticed that North Korea is a sovereign state that has not signed up for any international intellectual property obligations and that Disney therefore has no “rights” there to be infringed!

Constantinos (profile) says:

Overreacting on this news

Mike, I’m a huge fan of this site, and been a faithful reader since 2005, but I think this is an overreaction on your (our?) part.

All I can see from the article, is a company trying hard to distance itself from negative publicity. Authorizing a copyrighted work (whether that’s required or not) isn’t just about the copyright itself, it also gives implicit approval of the derivative work.

I don’t believe Disney was after a copyright claim here, and (as much as I despise the company itself), have to say that this statement is the minimum I’d expect from them, as well as the maximum – Implicit approval of the North Korean regime is not something any corporation would want on its resume.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Overreacting on this news

“All I can see from the article, is a company trying hard to distance itself from negative publicity.”

That’s actually the point. It should be blindingly obvious that NK doesn’t licence anything officially, let alone anything from major Western corporations. That Disney not only feel they have to announce this, but do so on the basis of a random gossip article about something else (i.e. nobody has accused them of having licensed the works) indicates how farcical this whole thing has become.

“Implicit approval of the North Korean regime is not something any corporation would want on its resume.”

I dare say Disney have worse on it already.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Overreacting on this news

“Overreacting on the news” is unfortunately one of the only things Pirate Mike knows how to do. I mean, how fucking stupid is this post? Whining about Disney, a company doing no more than distancing itself from a negative news story that involved the company. As a shareholder of their stock, I welcome the statement. Stories like this show just how desperate Pirate Mike is to say something–anything–negative about IP. Sorry, Mike, but you come across as just a whiny bitch–again. Congrats on being the internet’s biggest douchebag!

arcan (profile) says:

Re: Re: Overreacting on this news

lol irony you called mike a douchebag. i think his point is no one gives a damn that disney characters were used. it was entirely unnecessary for them to release a statement. and this is not even negative news. because guess what it is gossip. it has no real bearing on life. so get your head out of your anus and think things threw for once.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re: Overreacting on this news

“As a shareholder of their stock,”

Awesome! I knew I needed a reason not to buy from them! Watching idiots like you fail is reason enough. Time to ensure my money goes elsewhere, I wouldn’t want the likes of you getting richer when there’s so many more deserving recipients.

“Congrats on being the internet’s biggest douchebag!”

No, I think your trophy’s safe.

velox says:

Re: Overreacting on this news

“All I can see from the article, is a company trying hard to distance itself from negative publicity. Authorizing a copyrighted work (whether that’s required or not) isn’t just about the copyright itself, it also gives implicit approval of the derivative work.”

Absent the declaration by Disney, how many Americans would have jumped to the conclusion that Disney must have approved and collected a licensing fee for the play in a North Korean theater.
My guess — Zero.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Overreacting on this news

Of course Disney wants to dissociate itself from Kim Jong Un, but I think the point is that the way they’ve chosen to do so is very telling of their mindset.

They didn’t say “we disapprove of and do not support his regime,” would would have spoken to an ethical objection, they say “we did not authorize the use of our works,” which is a legal objection that says nothing about how Disney feels about the regime.

What it literally indicates is that Disney’s primary concern is the control over their “intellectual property”, not that they don’t want to be seen with the like of the Un.

Nash (profile) says:

Re: Overreacting on this news

I also think that if Disney HAD authorised this they would be in violation of US law, since their are economic sanctions against North Korea.

It is also newsworthy as the performance would be against North Korean law as well (and get the average citizen sent to a labour camp for a decade or more).

This has NOTHING to do with copyright.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Simple solution

Disney lawyers enter Kim Jung Un’s reception chamber…
“Let us look around, so we can ease Disney’s collective mind.
We’m sorry, but Disney must be firm with you.
Let us in, or else.”

“Or else…what?”

“Or else we will be very angry with you…and we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are.”

“OK, I’ll show you.
Stand to your reft.”

Lawyers move to their reft, I mean left.

“A rittle more.”

Lawyers move a little more.

“Good”

Kim Jong Un pulls switch, lawyers become shark food.

Everyone wins.

Anonymous Coward says:

This is why I rarely read CNN anymore.

About reading I just took a look at DSLreports and found this news:

Aereo win first round: injunction denied [paidcontent.org]
Study: slow and unreliable broadband affecting London?s economy [techworld.com] (And people say the interwebz is not valuable)
Government Officials Warn of Wireless Patent Wars [cio.com] (Warning is different from doing something about it)
Android rules U.S. and Europe smartphone sales [cnet.com]
How Amazon?s ambitious new push for same-day delivery will destroy local retail [slate.com]
UK Web snooping bill an ‘odious shopping list of new gov powers’ [theregister.co.uk]
Viacom Yanks Free TV Shows From Web Amid DirecTV Impasse [multichannel.com] (Oh this will be good)
Lawmakers Accuse FCC of Hypocrisy on Internet Regulation [cio.com]
The piracy pitfalls of offering public Wi-Fi [itpro.co.uk]
Who?s afraid of Google fiber? Time Warner for starters [gigaom.com] (See what happens when you poke a bear?)
Netflix’s lost year: The inside story of the price-hike train wreck [cnet.com] (The industry apparently will get what they want, the end of Netflix and with it the end of profits LoL)

On TorrentFreak:
Censoring The Pirate Bay is Futile, ISPs Reveal

So long for the wet dreams of the MAFIAA.

DannyB (profile) says:

This demonstrates why

This is a perfect example of why North Korea desperately needs large numbers of top of the line supercomputers in order to help not just its patent searches, but all kinds of intellectual property searches.

They also need a very fat pipe to the internet so that their computers can gobble down torrents of western content for comparative study.

Disney wants us to cheer WIPO recently giving North Korea computers in violation of sanctions.

sniperdoc (profile) says:

We Todd Did...

I believe that the Walt Disney company wanted to make that statement less about copyright infringement, more so about the fact that:

1. So it doesn’t get inundated by requests for the REAL Disney company to put on the same show that was put on in Korea.
2. So Disney is not recognized as supporting a Dictatorship that has its populace rotting in poverty and hunger.

Poor choice of words by Disney… yes.

Philip (profile) says:

Typical statement.

I’m sure this is a response from Disney being ask by a third party if this was authorized or if Disney is connected with the performance (in efforts to get info. about said woman).

I’m a little disappointed. You make it sound like Disney is threatening Kim John Un for the illegal use of Disney characters. Now, if I’m wrong, and this is a real legal threat; then yes, Disney is jumping the “MUCH PROTECT IP” gun before realizing China doesn’t care about US IP.

Anonymous Coward says:

It's time nuke North Korea!

A country can destroy any business they don’t like – the United States proved that!

A country can meddle in the affairs of any country they don’t like – the United States proved that!

A country can topple any government they don’t like – the United States proved that!

A country can freely murder whomever they bloody well feel like – the United States proved that!

A country can drop nuclear bombs on whomever they feel like and kill thousands and thousands of innocent people – the United States proved that!

A country can declare war on and destroy any country just minding their own business (especially if they threatened the us president’s daddy) and get away with it – the United States proved that!

A country can commit any war crimes it wants and get away with it – the United States proved that!

A country can ignore international law when they bloody well feel like it – the United States proved that!

But flaunt american national so-called “laws” designed to make filthy rich people filthy richer and bought and paid for by those that help finance the american presidential campaign in a us election year? Cleanly, North Korea is evil and must be destroyed!!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...