Microsoft's 'Threat Management Gateway' Blocks Free Software Foundation Donation Page As 'Gambling'
from the well,-for-microsoft-maybe dept
Via Slashdot, we learn that Microsoft's "Threat Management Gateway" (which some companies apparently use to protect against malicious websites) has classified the website for donations to the Free Software Foundation as "gambling," meaning that it's blocked for many users. This was first discovered by a user on Reddit who received the following notice:
What's amazing is the regular FSF page just shows "Technical Information" and "Shareware/Freeware." So it seems that the "Gambling" designation was just added to the donate page. Amazingly, the Reddit user noticed this nearly two weeks ago, and as I type this it's still showing up classified as gambling, though FSF has put in a request to change it.
The page you are trying to browse to is categorized as "Gambling"You can confirm this at Microsoft's site if you type donate.fsf.org in the box. Currently, it shows the following:
If you believe you are getting this message by mistake, try contacting your administrator or Helpdesk.
Technical Information (for support personnel)
Error Code: 403 Forbidden. Forefront TMG denied the specified Uniform Resource Locator (URL). (12233)
IP Address: [IP Redacted]
Date: 6/14/2012 6:31:39 PM [GMT]
Server: [server name redacted]
Source: proxy






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Give Them Credit
buying Windows 8 will be a gamble,
or driving to work in the morning,
or breathing air inside a bathroom,
or making a call on AT&T's network,
or sipping a coffee from McDonalds,
or ...
Seriously? Gambling? WTF?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Give Them Credit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
(BLACK JACK!!!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is why closed-sourced security isn't
Given that we are now presented with an obvious and egregious false positive error, there is no reason to think that equally obvious and egregious false negative errors also exist. Since the source code isn't available for public inspection, there's no way to know how many or how persistent they are.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's obvious Microshaft believes FSF's own definition, "The FSF advocates for free software ideals as outlined in the Free Software Definition, works for adoption of free software and free media formats, and organizes activist campaigns against threats to user freedom like Windows 7, Apple's iPhone and OS X, DRM on music, ebooks and movies, and software patents." is a gamble.
As we've seen in the past, activism can sometimes hurt as much as it helps, but it does do what it is supposed to do, get the message to the general public, so in this case, it is a "powerball lottery". Too bad Microshaft stopped at the word "power" and forgot the rest for themselves, while classifying everyone else as a lottery.
/end slightly sarcastic rant
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Of course Microsoft are completely biased in this regard, given that their flagship product, Windows, insn't freeware.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"which some companies apparently use to protect against malicious websites"
I realize some do not read the links, but to not read the summary?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/forefront/threat-management-gateway.aspx
As a windows users, you don't have to have this. However, since it is falsely flagging websites, it seems that it is practically useless for real use.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You haven't used a PC* (Personal Computer) since (at least) 1992? How did you survive this long?
* I swear, if you say that you have/had a Macintosh, I'll stab you**. Many times!
** Not really, but I'm just tired of he old "Mac isn't a PC" thing.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The party line
Microsoft has been claiming for years that using open source software, such as Linux, is a gamble - a gamble of being sued for patent infringement. And Microsoft should know - they're the ones that claim (although will never show evidence) that they have (ridiculously over-broad) patents (on obvious ideas).
So of course they're labeling FSF's website as falling into the gambling category.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Big gamble
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Big gamble
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Big gamble
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Big gamble
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Big gamble
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Give Them Credit
So what you're saying is Microsoft is gambling on people not realizing that the reason they are blocking donate.fsf.org is because they suck at CTF:RTB and hope that nobody will catch them?
I suspect you are right, given their previous actions in the anti-trust front.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Big gamble
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
We used to call these PC clones. Then again, most people seem to think PC = Windows, somehow.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Non-Story
So this is almost certainly an accident. As clumsy as MS is in some regards, even Ballmer isn't stupid enough to purposely block the FSF.
Of course, the FSF has a massive anti-Microsoft bent (not entirely unjustified after all) that is keeping them from seeing the obvious, and everyone else is raging about it for the sake of rage...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Give Them Credit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
But that's wrong, you retard
Hanlon's razor, anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Give Them Credit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Awww...It's Fixed
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment