'Kony 2012' Filmmakers Can't Take Parody; Send Cease-And-Desist Claiming Copyright & Trademark Infringement

from the hello-copyfraud dept

It's really quite amazing how frequently those targeted by parody freak out and reach for intellectual property law in an attempt to silence the speech directed at them. The latest is the group "Invisible Children", which became quite famous (or infamous) earlier this year for the viral success of the "Kony 2012" video, which sought to build support for arresting Joseph Kony. Apparently a group of NYU grad students created a website called Kickstriker, which is a parody of Kickstarter, but to pretend that it's a crowdsourcing campaign to hire people to go get Kony.

However, as Wired's Danger Room blog discovered, Inivisible Children doesn't like being parodied. So they sent a cease-and-desist arguing that it violated both their copyrights and trademarks.
“It has come to our attention that you are causing public confusion through your use of Invisible Children’s copyrighted and trademarked property on www.kickstriker.com. This impermissible use is a blatant and egregious infringement of Invisible Children’s valuable copyright and trademark rights,” reads a letter Invisible Children sent last week and acquired by Danger Room. “[F]ailure to cease and desist your unlawful use of Invisible Children’s intellectual property will result in legal action.”

Among Invisible Children’s demands: “Confirm in writing that you have permanently deleted all electronic copies of the unauthorized and infringing materials from any computers, servers, or other distribution media”; take down any links to Invisible Children’s material; and declare “in a prominent location” that Kickstriker is “in no way associated with Invisible Children, Inc. or the Kony 2012 campaign.”
Thankfully, the students behind Kickstriker appear to know that these demands are ridiculous and have replied, with an explanation of fair use. You would think, in this day and age, that someone might have explained all that to the Invisible Children folks before they sent the takedown.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    blaktron (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 9:54am

    Wouldnt the next logical step be Joseph Kony sending Invisible Children a takedown request? Can they not see that?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    BentFranklin (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 10:25am

    Someone please send a DCMA takedown to Invisible Children signed by josephkony@aol.com!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Donnicton, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 10:30am

    I'm very surprised now that they haven't tried to do a C&D at this point for psychicpebbles' KONY2012 video.

    That one is bordering on 5 million views and is a hell of a lot more crass about it(not to mention hilarious).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    BentFranklin (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 10:32am

    Re:

    Er, sorry I did not read your comment carefully enough before posting mine. You were first.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    stompsfrogs (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 10:42am

    By describing their trademark as "valuable," are they not kind of admitting they're a for-profit disguised as a non-profit?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 11:07am

    when there is no punishment for falsely claiming copyright infringement, patent infringement or trademark infringement, why would anyone worry about trying this sort of thing? a lot of instances are won because those accused know no better so, if it can be gotten away with, there are those that will try it on

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 11:25am

    Re:

    Actually, many of the laws regarding the enforcement of IP come with penalty of perjury for takedowns done in bad faith. The DMCA has one such penalty applied to it for false takedown requests.

    Of course, none of those are actually enforced because feigning ignorance about the law seems to be a good enough defense for the offending party, but not a good enough defense for the defending party. So we never hear about the thousands of false DMCA takedowns ever being addressed in court.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    JustMe (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 11:50am

    Confused

    How, exactly, is Kickstriker supposed to be infringing on Kony 2012? It seems to me that any projects which help to raise awareness of dictators are a good thing, unless Kony is claiming to be the arbiter of such things now?

    Also, this is clearly protected speech so Kony can go pound sand.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Benjo (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 12:10pm

    Re: Confused

    The site is a work of satire. I think it's coming from the angle that the general online populous likes to pat themselves on the back for "supporting" a good cause. The KONY 2012 lacked direction and purpose. Kony was just the most marketable dictator in Africa, and removing him or killing him would do nothing to help the people living there.

    KONY 2012: stopping terrorism one Reddit upvote / Facebook like at a time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Sallo (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 12:15pm

    Raise money

    In the Kickstriker about page they say, "We hope to roll out a project submission process in the coming weeks, contingent on the success of the initial round of projects."

    Maybe they could raise money with a Kickstarter campaign!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:41pm

    * KONY 2012 *

    He's better than Obama or Romney.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:52pm

    Let me get this right, the campaign created to make Kony famous sent a cease and desist letter to someone mentioning the campaign to make Kony famous. Don't they understand what fame is?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:55pm

    Re:

    I'm waiting for someone to send a takedown notice to ICAAN. If they'd just shut down the internet, all of this infringement would stop!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Benjo (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 6:25pm

    Re: * KONY 2012 *

    KONY 2012: Why settle for the lesser evil?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 8:24pm

    Re: Re: * KONY 2012 *

    I represent Cthulhu Dagon and I must insist you stop using our trademarked phrase "Why settle for the lesser evil?" as it is likely to cause confusion with the public.

    Please clear this matter up before my Lord strikes you down with madness.

    Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

    Bob Bul Head Esq.
    Intellectual Property Law LLC.
    R'lyeh

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    samoanbiscuit (profile), Jun 21st, 2012 @ 12:35am

    Re:

    Well, to be fair, the term is "not-for-profit" not non-profit. It's not that they're not allowed to make money, just that it's not supposed to be their primary goal. I still think they're a bunch of attention hogging idiots who haven't actually done any good.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    blaktron (profile), Jun 21st, 2012 @ 8:08am

    Re:

    Fame is masturbating in public in San Diego.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    PT, Jun 21st, 2012 @ 9:41am

    I think the objection is probably less to the mention of the Koni 2012 video and more to the implied criticism on the 'about' page -

    "While "Kony 2012" succeeded at raising awareness and connecting potential activists with an issue, it ultimately failed due to suspicions regarding the role that Invisible Children played as a middleman."

    In other news, expect them soon to receive a takedown from Academi, for reminding the public that this friendly-sounding company used to be called Blackwater.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anon #41, Jun 21st, 2012 @ 10:34am

    Re: Re: Re: * KONY 2012 *

    Shouldn't that be "likely to cause panic"?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This