Louis Vuitton Loses Bogus Trademark Lawsuit: Using Fake Handbag In Hangover II Isn't Infringement
from the get-over-it dept
Louis Vuitton is probably the biggest of the trademark bullies out there. We have a bunch of posts detailing some of Louis Vuitton's overreach. Unfortunately, just a couple months ago, it actually won in one of its more bizarre claims -- that a clearly fake basketball in a commercial damaged its trademark. LV used that win to support another ridiculous claim: that Warner Bros. using a counterfeit LV bag in its movie Hangover II itself represented trademark infringement.
Thankfully, as a number of folks have sent in, district court Judge Andrew Carter is not convinced and has dumped the case, noting (correctly) that "The likelihood of confusion is at best minimal." The judge pointed out that the bag was on-screen for less than 30 seconds and no one was likely to notice it was fake. The fact that the character in the movie (played by Zach Galifianakis) made a joke in which he pronounced Louis Vuitton as "Lewis Vuitton" is meaningless here, even though LV seemed particularly hurt by being the butt of a joke, saying it was "an oft-repeated and hallmark quote from the movie."
Now, if only we can get that ruling on the basketball overturned...
Thankfully, as a number of folks have sent in, district court Judge Andrew Carter is not convinced and has dumped the case, noting (correctly) that "The likelihood of confusion is at best minimal." The judge pointed out that the bag was on-screen for less than 30 seconds and no one was likely to notice it was fake. The fact that the character in the movie (played by Zach Galifianakis) made a joke in which he pronounced Louis Vuitton as "Lewis Vuitton" is meaningless here, even though LV seemed particularly hurt by being the butt of a joke, saying it was "an oft-repeated and hallmark quote from the movie."
Now, if only we can get that ruling on the basketball overturned...






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Have you not heard of a little company called Monster Cable™ who believes they can control all uses of the words "monster" and "cable"?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Monster Cable usage
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Mostly because I'd enjoy seeing The Hangover guys get boned in a court of law so they can never make another Hangover movie again. Bloody terrible film series.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Did what they had to do
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment